FY 2010 and FY 2011 Budget and Fee Collection Update March 3, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Economic implications of global patent backlogs Presentation by London Economics 10 March
Advertisements

“city of people, ON THE MOVE” ONE TEAM, ONE VISION.
Legal Aid Ontario Bob Ward, President and CEO January 25,
Federal Budget Process Steve Kidd and Allison Boehm Budget and Program Analysis Staff April 2009.
UCLA Budget Outlook FY Presentation by Steven A. Olsen Vice Chancellor, Finance and Budget November 18, 2003.
Preparing Designated/Auxiliary FY11 Operating Plans.
1 Frank J. Murphy Assistant Chief Financial Officer for Financial Management June 15, 2009 HUD’s Results on Eliminating Improper Payments.
Medicare Shared Savings Program Presented by John Donnelly For Kemal Erkan HCM-401 Course.
Wireline Competition Bureau 2004 Promoting Real Consumer Choice and Investment in Broadband Facilities.
1 Clearing the Oldest Patent Applications (COPA) John Barlow Subject Matter Expert Technology Center 2800.
Evaluating the Alternative Financing Program Geoff Smith Vice President Woodstock Institute March 18, 2008 WOODSTOCK INSTITUTE.
THE USPTO 21 ST CENTURY STRATEGIC PLAN – A BRIEF REVIEW AND UPDATE RICK D. NYDEGGER PRESIDENT-ELECT AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION NICE,
US Fiscal Policy Challenges to a Sustainable Fiscal Future March 2010.
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
GEF and Environmental & Conservation Funds Presentation for the Workshop on “Management of Environmental Funds for the Financial Sustainability of Biodiversity.
PLS 121: American Politics and Government The Constitution The Budget Making Process.
1 FNGATSWG-Initial Observations Financing the Next Generation Air Transportation System Working Group (FNGATSWG) July 27, 2005.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
11 IP Section Colorado Bar Association Robert Stoll Commissioner for Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office.
1 Patent Quality Initiatives Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Tuesday, April 7, 2015 Valencia Martin-Wallace Deputy Commissioner.
1 5 Year Financial Plan : 2008 – 2012 Presentation to Senate by Hollie Clarkson Acting Chief Finance Officer Wednesday 9 April 2008.
Quality Counts!! GOAL “Provide our customers with the highest levels of quality and service in all aspects of PTO operations”
State Legislative Update Faculty Senate April 3, 2013.
Senior Legislative Policy Analyst
Powering Alberta AESO Annual General Meeting May 14, 2009 Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People.
1 Reduction to our parliamentary appropriations Our challenge doesn’t end there.
September 23, 2011 Maury M. Tepper, III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC © Tepper & Eyster 2011.
TECHNOLOGY PLANNING FOR Mary Mehsikomer Division of School Improvement November 2006.
Shaping Our Future Together What we Heard Alternatives and Opportunities Moving Forward February 23, 2015.
Educator Effectiveness Update January Agenda 1.Overview of CDE’s Educator Effectiveness Work 2.Focusing Funding Streams to Support Educator Effectiveness.
Concern Universal Vacancy Director of Income Generation and Communications.
A Strategic Plan for The United States Probation & Pretrial Services System John J. Fitzgerald & Matthew G. Rowland Probation and Pretrial Services Office.
USPTO Updated Strategic Plan in Brief March 3 rd, 2010.
City-County- State-Federal Cooperative Committee March 18, 2009 Walter C. Waidelich Jr. California Division Federal Highway Administration Future Directions.
Christian Chace Patent Process Reengineering Team September 8, 2010 Patent Process Reengineering Team as part of the Patent End-To-End Processing Team.
March 2, 2011 Status of the Patent Budget. 2 Steps in the Budget Process Strategic Planning – long term Budget Formulation and Performance Planning -
Department of Labour Unemployment Insurance Fund Budget 2006/07 UIF Presentation to Portfolio Committee 13 March 2006.
America’s 21st Century Transportation Fuel Ethanol From Biomass.
AAHAM Spring Meeting MHA UPDATE March 15, 2013 Anne Hubbard, Assistant Vice President, Financial Policy & Advocacy 1.
OCFO - Financial Status of USPTO May 7, FY 2010 Status Authorized level of $1,887.0 million Mid-year Budget Execution Review currently underway.
September Board Meeting FY08 and FY09 Spending Plan.
January Cal Poly Budget Presentation UPBAC January 2009.
Patent Fee Proposal Patent Public Advisory Committee Hearing November 19, 2015.
Pasadena Water and Power Public Hearing Date Water Capital Improvement Charge Pasadena City Council Meeting November 16, 2015 Agenda Item #13.
Copyright © 2015 Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP Inside the USPTO Peggy Focarino Senior Patent Advisor.
Inland Navigation - A National Perspective Jim Walker USACE, Headquarters November 8, 2007.
Meeting of AcademyHealth Members Joseph Antos, Ph.D., Chair Coalition for Health Services Research June 8, 2008.
FY 2010 and FY 2011 USPTO Financial Report Trademark Public Advisory Committee Meeting February 25, 2010.
Seattle Colleges Budget Proposal Fiscal Year
Government – A Key External Factor
What Small Businesses Need to Know About Intellectual Property (IP)
U.S. Global Health Funding: Global Malaria, FY FY 2013*
Budget Overview Kelly Ratliff
Chapter 7 Sect 3 Mr. Plude.
Grace Connolly Director, Administration & Finance January 17, 2018
U.S. Global Health Funding for the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), FY 2001-FY 2014 (Actual) In Millions NOTES: FY 2014 is President’s Budget Request.
First Quarter Financial Status Report
Speeding up Improvement in Chronic Care: What should be the Federal Role? Sandra M. Foote Senior Vice President, Capitol Health January 29, 2009.
U.S. Global Health Funding: The Global Fund, FY FY 2013*
Unidata Policy Committee
2010 Objectives and Activities Network Council Meeting
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association
Revolutionize USACE Civil Works
Priorities for the new century
Budget and Planning Update
RIM OF THE WORLD UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT
Ministry of National Economy of The Republic of Kazakhstan
The National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP)
South Carolina Health Care Association
Presentation transcript:

FY 2010 and FY 2011 Budget and Fee Collection Update March 3, 2010

2 FY 2010 Fee Collections FY 2010 CJS language appropriates the use of $1,887M of fee collections to USPTO FY 2010 collections are significantly above this level Patent maintenance and issue fee increases are the main drivers Fee Collections are estimated to be at least $2,003M for FY 2010 At this level, $116M in patent fee collections will be unavailable USPTO is in discussions with OMB and DOC regarding full access to fee collections in FY 2010

3 Average Workday Patent Fee Collections FY 2010 President’s Budget FY 2010 Collections Projection $1,930.4 September Congressional Update FY 2010 Collections Projection $1,887.0 January Congressional Update FY 2010 Collections Projection $2,003.0 FY 2009 Congressional Update FY 2010 Collections Projection $2,369.3

4 Average Workday Patent Fee Collections, by Type Increased Allowances Bulk Payments

5 FY 2011 President’s Budget President Obama released his Budget on Feb 1 st USPTO Congressional Justifications were distributed to the Congress as a part of the DOC package on Feb 2 nd President’s Budget Highlights: Introduces a new set of Strategic Priorities Requests $435M increase in appropriation level over FY 2010 Multi-year plan to achieve goal of an average first action pendency of 10 months, with an average total pendency of 20 months Requests a 15 percent interim fee adjustment on most Patent Fees Requests authority to set fees by regulation to recover the estimated cost of operations Establishes an operating reserve to help deliver on patent pendency goals

6 Strategic Priorities The USPTO has identified strategic priorities that are in support of the Administration/Department performance goal. These include: Reduce Patent Pendency and Backlogs Improve Quality of Examination Improve/Enhance Patent Appeal and Post-Grant Processes Demonstrate Global Leadership in all Aspects of IP Policy Development Improve Information Technology Infrastructure and Tools Secure a Sustainable Funding Model, and Improve Relations with Stakeholders

7 Patent Pendency and Backlog Reduction 10 months to first action and 20 months total pendency for patent applications An inventory reduction of 326,000 cases Achieving a targeted inventory level per examiner of 10 months This will be accomplished by: Hiring 1,000 patent examiners in each of FY 2011 and 2012 Initiating a new hiring model that emphasizes: Recruiting candidates with significant IP experience (IP professionals, such as agents and attorneys, and technologists with invention experience) Hiring outside the Washington, D.C. area Achieving efficiency improvements of 3 percent a year by reengineering management and operations systems and processes; for example: Compact prosecution and training First Action interviews A reengineered count system Patent Prosecution Highway/Work-Sharing Addressing historic ex parte appeal workload growth

8 Information Technology Investment Funds are requested to begin working towards a new IT Vision which includes: Conducting a ground up redesign of the USPTO’s infrastructure and applications on 21st Century platforms Stabilizing current systems to “keep the trains running” This will be done by investing $122M for: Patent end-to-end electronic processing Trademark’s Next Generation Stabilize current systems

9 USPTO Requests a Sustainable Funding Model: Addressing Short Term and Long Term Needs Short Term / Interim Funding Authority - Begins putting USPTO on stable ground to set USPTO priorities in motion Full access to USPTO fee collections Interim Fee Adjustment on Patent fees Fee Setting Authority Operating reserve Long Term / Sustainable – Reform USPTO Fee Structure and manage multi- year plans Establish fees that reflect costs of services Structure fees to provide appropriate incentives for innovation Structure fees to facilitate the effective administration of patent and trademark processes Maintain Operating Reserve

10 USPTO Requirements vs. Funding FY 2011FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Requirements2,3312,4762,533 Fee Collections/ Other Income 2,1162,2292,258 Interim Funding Adjustment Total Collections2,3402,4612,486 Reserve-Activity9(15)(47) Reserve-Balance Dollars in Millions

11 Requirements vs. Funding by Business Line FY 2011FY 2012FY 2013 Total Requirements 2,0812,2222,275 Fee Collections/ Other Income 1,9031,9922,001 Surcharge Total Collections 2,1272,2242,229 Reserve-Activity 462(46) Reserve-Balance PATENTS Dollars in Millions FY 2011FY 2012FY 2013 Total Requirements Fee Collections/ Other Income Reserve-Activity(37)(17)(1) Reserve-Balance TRADEMARKS Dollars in Millions

12 Patent Workloads and Performance Measures