UC E NTERPRISE A RCHITECTURE F RAMEWORK (EAF): T HE B USINESS V ALUE UC-ITAG.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2004 Flashline Inc. The Seven Faces of Reuse Enterprise Architect Summit June 8, 2004 Charles Stack Founder and CEO Flashline, Inc. © 2004 Flashline.
Advertisements

Connected Health Framework
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
The Changing Face of Higher Ed and the Role of IT as a Strategic Enabler Dave Wallace Chief Information Officer University of Waterloo December 4, 2012.
Overview of Priorities and Activities: Shared Services Canada Presentation to the Information Technology Infrastructure Roundtable June 17, 2013 Liseanne.
Primary Benefit Types Value Discipline Benefits – Operating Excellence Reduce Cost Reduce Risk – Product Leadership Increase Revenue – Customer Intimacy.
Enterprise Architecture 2013 ITLC & ITAG Leadership Meeting Discussion Points April 9, 2013.
Building an Operational Enterprise Architecture and Service Oriented Architecture Best Practices Presented by: Ajay Budhraja Copyright 2006 Ajay Budhraja,
Facilities Management 2013 Manager Enrichment Program U.Va.’s Strategic Planning Initiatives Colette Sheehy Vice President for Management and Budget December.
EIM Framework EIM Vision & Strategy EIM Governance EIM Core Processes
Brief History of Architecture Frameworks
Enterprise Integration Architecture IPMA Professional Development Seminar June 29, 2006 Scott Came Director, Enterprise Architecture Program Washington.
The Information Technology Architecture Group (ITAG) David Walker, UCD Arlene Allen, UCSB.
UC San Diego EH&S Staff Meeting Project 2010 Jan00 meeting notes.doc May 5, 2004 Update on the New Business Architecture EH&S Staff Meeting.
A Roadmap to Service Excellence – The UW-Madison IT Strategic Plan October 15, 2008.
The topics addressed in this briefing include:
Enterprise Architecture 2013 University of California Enterprise Architecture: A Case Study ITANA Face2Face - October, 2013 Mojgan Amini, UC San Diego.
LEVERAGING THE ENTERPRISE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT Louise Edmonds Senior Manager Information Management ACT Health.
Enterprise Architecture 2013 ITAG – Managing Enterprise Architecture Assets April 5 th 2013.
ITAG and EA Update ITLC – Oct. 23
Enterprise Architecture
EA and Governance CSG, San Diego, Jan 2014 Jim Phelps Director EA & Strategy. University of Washington.
Information Technology Architecture Group ITAG, Version 2.0 Or, how our role supports the evolution of interoperable systems February ITLC.
UC-ITAG ANNUAL UPDATE Oct. 22, 2014 ITLC Meeting, UC Irvine.
Pennsylvania GTO 3-Year Strategic Plan NSGIC Annual Conference 2005 Rochester, NY Jim Knudson Stacey White
Engineering, Operations & Technology | Information TechnologyAPEX | 1 Copyright © 2009 Boeing. All rights reserved. Architecture Concept UG D- DOC UG D-
THE REGIONAL MUNICIPALITY OF YORK Information Technology Strategy & 5 Year Plan.
Advising Strategic Plan University of Cincinnati August 10,2015.
Information Technology Architecture Group ITAG, version 2.0 We need resource commitments! February ITLC.
1 DoD-VA Partnership Status 22 February DoD/VA Partnership DoD/VA Mission, Vision, Authority DoD/VA Council Structure Joint Strategic Plan Current.
The Challenge of IT-Business Alignment
Enterprise Architecture 2013 ITAG and EA Update ITLC – Oct. 23.
UC E NTERPRISE A RCHITECTURE F RAMEWORK (EAF): T HE B USINESS V ALUE UC-ITAG.
Save time. Reduce costs. Find and reuse interoperability solutions on Joinup for developing European public services Nikolaos Loutas
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) at NIH Bill Jones
UC Enterprise Architecture Framework (EAF): The Business Value UC-ITAG.
The ESS.VIP Programme: a response to the challenges facing the ESS Mariana Kotzeva, ESS VIP Programme Coordinator Advisor Hors Classe ESTAT.
Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Data Management, and Data Standardization Efforts at the U.S. Department of Education May 2006 Joe Rose, Chief Architect.
Planning for Success 7 th - 8 th Meeting Course Name: Business Intelligence Year: 2009.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
The DoD Information Enterprise Strategic Plan and Roadmap (SP&R)
11 ITLC – Middleware Report May 27, 2010 The work of a subgroup of ITAG.
Health Information Exchange Roadmap: The Landscape and a Path Forward Primary and Behavioral Health Care Integration Program Grantee.
Student Technology Services June Student Technology Services Team Dedicated to creating a holistic strategy to improve the technological services.
Mobile, social media, and web Roadmap Presentations for Committee on Technology and Architecture November - December, 2011 Jeff R. Jorgenson Deputy Director,
18/13/2009 Enterprise Architecture & Standards Setting MnGeo Council - Nonmember 2010.
Business and Finance Strategic Planning Agenda Introduction Overview: B&F Strategic Plan Discussion: B&F as one B&F Values with Behaviors.
National Geospatial Enterprise Architecture N S D I National Spatial Data Infrastructure An Architectural Process Overview Presented by Eliot Christian.
Enterprise Architecture Reference Framework Generalities
Library Efforts and IT Infrastructure Services Paul Conway & Mike Pickett Duke University
Basic Concepts Key Learning Points : The objectives of this chapter are as follows:  To provide an introduction to the basic Concepts of enterprise architectures,
Environmental Public Health Tracking Network (EPHTN): Enterprise Architecture (EA) Ray Buckner Environmental Health Tracking Branch Division of Environmental.
© 2010 IBM Corporation STRATEGIC ADVISORY COUNCIL MARCH 2011 Enterprise Architecture - Advisory Discussion – Greg Dietzel Vice President, Client Unit Director,
Executive Summary – Real Time Integration OpportunitiesRecommended Actions Leverage Centralized Integration Hub architecture (ESB) o remove the dependencies.
Data Management Program Introduction
Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA)
Electronic Government and IT Policy Unit
IT Governance at the SCO
Enterprise Architecture Guide Project at MIT CSG Presentation 9/23/04 Jerry Grochow MIT’s ITAG team sponsored a six week initiative to document the.
Interoperability of Data Systems Administration for Children & Families Office of Planning, Research & Evaluation Robert (Bob) Garcia Regional Administrator,
A Campus-Based Shared IT Services Framework for the UC
Towards an ESS architecture ITDG Item 3.4
A Campus-Based Shared IT Services Framework for the UC
Achieving an Operational Office of Water Enterprise Architecture: FY Roadmap November 23, 2005 Achieving an Operational Office of Water Enterprise.
Enterprise Architecture at Penn State
UC IT Architecture Committee (ITAC)
DATA USE PARTNERSHIP Event Title: The 7th EAHSC Development of Tanzania Health Sector Enterprise Architecture Presenter: Oswald Luoga Organization: PATH.
IEEE Architecture Council Overview
Community Benefit Activities
Presentation transcript:

UC E NTERPRISE A RCHITECTURE F RAMEWORK (EAF): T HE B USINESS V ALUE UC-ITAG

ITLC Vision  To invest and deploy technology-based solutions that support the University's missions of teaching, research, public service, and patient care, and to address common Information Technology (IT) opportunities that advance the collective priorities of Locations and the system as a whole.

Foundation for Collaboration UC-ITAG and EAF Mission  Pillar I — Formalize partnerships with UC Leadership groups to jointly establish principles for common or shared solutions and to develop and regularly maintain shared roadmaps of future direction.  Pillar II — Establish the enterprise architecture and technology infrastructure necessary to promote and support interoperability and sharing of IT solutions among and between campuses.

EA Framework Purpose UC CIOs ITAG and UCOP EA Team Shared Services Align Campus and System-wide Strategy and Plans Current State  Start from scratch  Redundancy in Data Infrastructure Applications Costs  Variances with no standards  One-off implementations New State  Reuse of approaches and assets  Increased interoperability  Deliberate variances  Easier UC collaboration

How EAF Addresses Business Needs  Standardized Data Models  Metadata Repository  Architecture Artifacts  “In a Box” Services, i.e. SSO In a Box, ESB In a Box  “Shareable Upon Delivery” initiative, i.e. Cross- Campus Enrollment System will leverage the Web Services guidelines.

How Do We Know We Are Successful?  Improved Interoperability, Less Build, Less Buy  Faster delivery of systems using shared services  Cost, resource, or time savings

How Will We Measure Success?  Number of artifacts used and how often, per campus  How fast services can get rolled out, start to finish  Efficiency of system integration efforts  Reduction of “one-off” point-to-point links  Total cost of rollout  (see slide notes for more)

Tracking Metrics  (insert table here – see slide notes)

UC IT Architecture Group (ITAG) UCTrust Working Group (UCTrust)