Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) 2010 1 9/22/2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preparing for 2005 Mid-Cycle IV Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Determinations Massachusetts Department of Education August, 2005.
Advertisements

Massachusetts School and District Accountability System 2003 Mid-Cycle AYP Determinations State Report December 4, 2003.
Preparing for Cycle III School and District Accountability Ratings and AYP Determinations Information Sessions August 26 & 27, 2004 Juliane Dow, Associate.
School Accountability Ratings What Are Our District’s Accountability Ratings? What do they mean?
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Instructions for Use This presentation slideshow is intended for school and district leaders to use to explain Adequate Yearly Progress to faculty, school.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2008.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Data for Student Success Comprehensive Needs Assessment Report “It is about focusing on building a culture of quality data through professional development.
Delaware’s Accountability Plan for Schools, Districts and the State Delaware Department of Education 6/23/04.
HULL HIGH SCHOOL 10 th Grade MCAS Results and Comparisons Spring of 2008 Testing.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education September 17 &
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress Fresno Unified School District 2005 Data Review.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
2009 MCAS Analysis & Adequate Yearly Progress Report Mendon – Upton Regional School District.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) and Accountability Status Determinations.
Seaford School District Annual Parent Meeting 1. Title I Funding and Programs Parent Meeting Agenda Title I Program Presentation Document Review Parent.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Pittsfield Public Schools September 23, 2009.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
1 Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) Steve Martin, CMT Program Manager Bureau of Research, Evaluation, and Student Assessment Connecticut State Department.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
AYP and Report Card. AYP/RC –Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. –Understand the purpose and role of the Report Card in Oregon.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
August 1, 2007 DELAWARE’S GROWTH MODEL FOR AYP DETERMINATIONS.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Melrose High School 2014 MCAS Presentation October 6, 2014.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
Parkway District Improvement…. 10/16/ Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating. 
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
School and District Accountability Reports Implementing No Child Left Behind (NCLB) The New York State Education Department March 2004.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
- 0 - OUSD Results MSDF Impact Assessment State Accountability Academic Performance Index (API) The API is a single number, ranging from a low.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
MCAS Progress and Performance Index Report 2013 Cohasset Public Schools.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Braintree Public Schools Spring 2007 MCAS Tests Braintree High School.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
2012 Accountability Determinations
Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Burlington Public Schools
Michigan School Report Card Update
AYP and Report Card.
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010

Test all public school students in grades 3 to 10. Performance is based on the Massachusetts Curriculum Framework learning standards; Students must pass the grade 10 tests in English Language Arts (ELA), Mathematics and Science as one condition of eligibility for a high school diploma. Tests are administered over several weeks in the Spring each year. MCAS measures both individual student proficiency and district proficiency. In addition, MCAS will monitor progress on the No Child Left Behind federal law. 2 9/22/2010

 The MCAS is used to hold schools and districts accountable, on a yearly basis, for the progress they have made toward all students being proficient in Reading and Mathematics by 2014 as required by NCLB.  The measure used in determining (growth) is called Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). 3 9/22/2010

A ParticipationDid at least 95% of students participate in MCAS in 2010? B PerformanceDid the student group perform at or above the 2010 state performance target? C ImprovementDid the student group meet its own 2010 improvement target? D Additional Indicator Did the student group meet the target for the Additional Indicator (Attendance, Graduation)? A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination *AYP is measured by the Composite Performance Index (CPI) 4 9/22/2010

A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination PARTICIPATION: Did at least 95% of students participate in MCAS in 2010? A 5 Dartmouth Public Schools 9/22/2010

Composite Performance Index (CPI) CPI: Multiply the number of points by the number of students at each performance level, then divide the total number of points by the total number of students (example below) 6 9/22/2010 B

District MCAS Results Scores reported as % of students in each category. 7 9/22/2010

A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination PERFORMANCE: Did the student group perform at or above the 2010 performance target? B Composite Performance Index (CPI) ELA Math /22/2010

A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination PERFORMANCE: Did the student group perform at or above the 2010 performance target? B Composite Performance Index (CPI) ELA Math /22/2010

A ParticipationDid at least 95% of students participate in MCAS in 2010? B PerformanceDid the student group perform at or above the 2010 state performance target? C ImprovementDid the student group meet its own 2010 improvement target? D Additional Indicator Did the student group meet the target for the Additional Indicator (Attendance, Graduation)? A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination *AYP is measured by the Composite Performance Index (CPI) 10 9/22/2010

A + (B or C) + D = Affirmative AYP Determination ADDITIONAL INDICATOR: Did the student group meet the target for the Additional Indicator (Attendance, Graduation)? D 11 9/22/2010

Adequate Yearly Progress HistoryNCLB Accountability Status English Language Arts AggregateYes No Status All Subgroups Yes No Math AggregateYes Improvement Year 1 Subgroups All Subgroups Yes No Yes 12 9/22/2010

13

9/22/

 Share information with community: post on website, parent reports sent home, web link to district data  Analysis – District Data Team: Results within the context of multiple measures (DIBELs, benchmarks, SAT)  District and School goals 15 9/22/2010

Appendix Additional information and data. 16 9/22/2010

Table of Contents  Definition of terms17  District Data18-19  NCLB Accountability Status20  Performance Rating21  Improvement Rating22  Joseph DeMello School Data23-25  George H. Potter School Data26-28  James M. Quinn School Data29-31  Dartmouth Middle School Data32-34  Dartmouth High School Data /22/

 Aggregate – total number of students  Subgroups – Male Female Limited English Proficiency Special Education Low Income Black or African American Asian Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native White Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander Multi-race, Non-Hispanic *Only subgroups which contain more than 40 students are considered official subgroups with values assigned. 18 9/22/2010

Dartmouth District 19 9/22/2010

Dartmouth District 20 9/22/2010

Dartmouth District 21 NCLB Accountability Status - The category to which a school is assigned based on its AYP determinations over multiple years, to define the required course of school, district and/or state action that must be taken to improve student performance. Accountability status categories include No Status, Improvement, Corrective Action Restructuring. A district or school is placed in an accountability status on the basis of the performance and improvement profile of students in the aggregate or of one or more student groups over two or more years in ELA and/or mathematics. Schools that make AYP in a subject for all student groups for two or more consecutive years are assigned to the positive No Status category. 9/22/2010

Dartmouth District 22 Performance Rating - Issued annually, a descriptive representation of aggregate student performance on MCAS tests. Schools and districts are assigned one of six performance rating categories based on their 2010 CPI: Very High ( ); High ( ); Moderate ( ); Low ( ); Very Low ( ); and Critically Low ( /22/2010

Dartmouth District 23 Improvement Rating - Descriptive term corresponding to the amount of aggregate CPI gain a district achieved in 2008 as compared to The improvement that a district is expected to make from one year to the next is expressed not as a single numeric target, but as a target range. A district's improvement rating corresponds to its aggregate improvement gain: Above Target (improved above error band), On Target (improved within error band), Improved Below Target (improved above the baseline but below the error band), No Change (gain was equivalent to baseline plus or minus the error band), and Declined (gain was below baseline and below the error band). 9/22/2010

Joseph DeMello School 24 9/22/2010

Joseph DeMello School 25 9/22/2010

Joseph DeMello School 26 9/22/2010

George H. Potter School 27 9/22/2010

George H. Potter School 28 9/22/2010

Grade and Subject Advanced/ Above Proficient Proficient Needs Improvement Warning/ Failing Students Included CPI SCHOOLSTATESCHOOLSTATESCHOOLSTATESCHOOLSTATE GRADE 03 - READING GRADE 03 - MATHEMATICS GRADE 04 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS GRADE 04 - MATHEMATICS GRADE 05 - ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS GRADE 05 - MATHEMATICS GRADE 05 - SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY George H. Potter School 29 9/22/2010

James M. Quinn School 30 9/22/2010

James M. Quinn School 31 9/22/2010

James M. Quinn School 32 9/22/2010

Dartmouth Middle School 33 9/22/2010

Dartmouth Middle School 34 9/22/2010

Dartmouth Middle School 35 9/22/2010

Dartmouth High School 36 9/22/2010

Dartmouth High School 37 9/22/2010

Dartmouth High School 38 9/22/2010