ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Advertisements

AYP to AMO – 2012 ESEA Update January 20, 2013 Thank you to Nancy Katims- Edmonds School District for much of the content of this presentation Ben Gauyan.
Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Essential Questions: What are the components of the (SPP)? How is PVAAS used as part of the calculation for the School Performance Profile (SPP)?
Changes To Florida’s School Grades Calculations Adopted By The State Board Of Education On February 28, 2012 Prepared by Research, Evaluation & Accountability.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) Reading and Mathematics 2012 Carolyn Wood, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) & CAHSEE Results Update Prepared for the September 21, 2010 Board of Education.
Alaska’s New Accountability System for Schools 1.
Understanding Massachusetts’ new accountability measures November 2012.
ESEA Flexibility: College & Career Readiness Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 7 of 8.
Overview of the Idaho Five Star Rating System Dr. TJ Bliss Director of Assessment and Accountability
Maryland Career and Technology Education Status Report Presentation to the Maryland State Board of Education March 23, 2010 Katharine M. Oliver Assistant.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
Carolyn M. Wood - Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems October 31,
School Performance Measure Calculations SY Office of Achievement and Accountability.
1 Prepared by: Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly Progress.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
1 School Grades & AMO Overview Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2010 Results Leslie Wilson, Assistant State Superintendent Division of Accountability and Assessment July 20, 2010 State.
1 School Grades Paul Houchens Director Student Assessment & Research.
State Teacher Evaluation Model Professional PracticeStudent Growth Planning and Preparation 12.5% Instruction 12.5% Classroom Environment 12.5% Professional.
What’s going on in Richmond? Items of Interest to VESIS March 21, 2012 Bethann H. Canada Director of Educational Information Management Virginia Department.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement Florida Department of Education Accountability Research and Measurement Florida’s School Grading System Rule.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
ESEA Flexibility: Gap Reduction Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 5 of 8.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 2 of 8 1.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
1 Requirements for Focus Schools Contractors’ Meeting March 4, 2013 Presenter: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
Lodi Unified School District Accountability Progress Report (APR) Results Update Prepared by the LUSD Assessment, Research & Evaluation Department.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
ESEA Flexibility: Student Growth Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 6 of 8.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Updates from the Office of Human Resources/Accountability September 13, 2011.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
PRINCE GEORGE’S COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS James Madison Middle School MSA Data Presentation 2012 Marcie L. Gray, Testing Coordinator Courtney.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
South Carolina Succeeds
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
© 2014, Florida Department of Education. All Rights Reserved. Accountability Update School Grades Technical Assistance Meeting.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
ESSA and School Accountability in Alaska Brian Laurent, Data Management Supervisor.
February 2012 State Board Ruling: School Grade Calculations
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17
2012 Accountability Determinations
FY 11 School Grade Calculation
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
State Teacher Evaluation Model
School Performance Measure Calculations SY
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Media Briefing School Progress 2012 Results Mary L. Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy July 10, 2012 Meeting the requirements.
Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?
Presentation transcript:

ESEA Flexibility: Achievement Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 4 of 8

Lillian M. Lowery, Ed.D. State Superintendent of Schools Dr. Charlene M. Dukes President, Maryland State Board of Education Martin O'Malley Governor Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems Maryland State Department of Education Division of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems 200 West Baltimore Street Baltimore, Maryland MarylandPublicSchools.org MarylandPublicSchools.org 2

Maryland Accountability Program 3  School Progress  Reduce by half the percentage of students in the “all students” group and in each subgroup who are not proficient within six years  School Progress Index  Achievement  Growth  Gap Reduction  College & Career Readiness  Differentiated Recognition  Reward  Priority  Focus

33.3%- Mathematics Proficiency (Algebra/ Data Analysis HSA) 33.3%- English Proficiency (English HSA) 33.3%- Science Proficiency (Biology HSA) Achievement* 40% Gap* College-and Career-Readiness** 40% 20% 60%- Cohort Graduation Rate 40%- College and Career Preparation (CCP) Advanced Placement Career and Technology Education (CTE) Concentrators College Enrollment Gap between lowest subgroup and highest subgroup within a school: 20%- Mathematics Proficiency (Algebra/ Data Analysis HSA) 20%- English Proficiency (English HSA) 20%- Science Proficiency (Biology HSA) 20%- Cohort Graduation Rate 20%- Cohort Dropout Rate Gap* 40% 33.3%- Mathematics Proficiency (MSA) 33.3%- Reading Proficiency (MSA) 33.3%- Science Proficiency (MSA) 50%- Mathematics Proficiency (MSA) 50%- Reading Proficiency (MSA) Gap between lowest subgroup and highest subgroup within a school: Achievement* 30% Growth* 30% 33.3%- Mathematics Proficiency (MSA) 33.3%- Reading Proficiency (MSA) 33.3%- Science Proficiency (MSA) Percent of students making one year’s growth: *ALT-MSA is included in the index component **Revised 9/17/2012: To be submitted to USDE for Approval Maryland School Progress Index** Grades 9-12 Grades PreK-8 Meeting Performance Targets (AMO) Meeting Performance Targets (AMO) 4

SPI Indicator: Achievement PreK-8 Grades 9-12  MSA Math Proficiency  MSA Reading Proficiency  MSA Science Proficiency  HSA Algebra Proficiency  HSA English Proficiency  HSA Biology Proficiency  Percentage of “all students” group scoring proficient or advanced on Maryland standardized assessments progressing toward targets 5

Achievement Targets – Reading, Mathematics and Science Proficiency  AMOs  Proficiency rates based on 2010–2011 assessments used as the baseline for setting AMOs  50% reduction of “all students” who are not proficient by 2017  Target increases in equal increments for 6 years  For “all students” at the school level with a 90% or higher baseline the corresponding LEA level AMO will be used  Unless the LEA is higher than the school level 6

PreK-8 Proficiency Population  Content areas include Reading, Mathematics, and Science  Former AYP population rules apply  Test Takers meeting the following conditions:  Full Academic Year  LEP Exempt  1% and 2% Rule for Alt and Mod assessment contributions  With the exception…  Non-participants are included WITHIN the aggregated population as Basic 7

PreK-8 Proficiency Calculation NumeratorDenominator MSA/ModMSA Advanced, Proficient MSA, ModMSA Advanced, Proficient, and Basic ++ AltMSA Advanced, Proficient AltMSA Advanced, Proficient, and Basic + MSA, ModMSA, AltMSA Nonparticipants == Proficient Count÷Member Count=Percent Proficient  Member Count – Full Academic Year participating students plus the Full Academic Year non-participant students 8

Grades 9-12 Proficiency Population  Content areas include English, Algebra, and Biology  Former AYP population rules apply (See HSSC Manual for details)  12 Grade Population  Current 10 th Grade AltMSA population  HSA and ModHSA Scale Scores  12 th Grade Certificate students the year they earn a certificate  1% and 2% Rule for Alt and Mod assessment contributions  With the exception…  Non-participants are included WITHIN the aggregated population as Basic  Former AYP Exclusions apply (See HSSC Manual for details)  Modified HSA +Plus student scores  Student who received course credit (Status 05)  Second Semester Transfer Students (Status 08)  AltMSA Identified students in the HSSC file with Y or T indicator (AltMSA data retrieved from AltMSA vendor file)  Linking Study student scores from the May 2008 administration  Foreign Exchange students 9

Grades 9-12 Proficiency Calculation NumeratorDenominator HSA/ModHSA Passed HSA/ModHSA Passed and Failed ++ Substitute Test ++ AltMSA Advanced, Proficient AltMSA Advanced, Proficient, and Basic + HSA/ModHSA/AltMSA Nonparticipants = = Proficient Count ÷ Member Count = Percent Proficient 10

SPI Calculation Example: Elementary School VariableAchievementGapGrowth AssessmentMathReadSciMathReadSciMathRead % Proficient CY Target % Prof of Target Content Weight Weighted % Prof of Target Indicator Weight Indicator Contribution School Index % Prof of Target = % Proficient CY ÷ Target Weighted % Prof of Target= % Prof of Target x Content Weight Indicator Contribution= (Math + Read + Sci) x Indicator Weight School Index= (Achievement + Growth + Gap)

Maryland Accountability Program 12  School Progress  Reduce by half the percentage of students in the “all students” group and in each subgroup who are not proficient within six years  School Progress Index  Achievement  Growth  Gap Reduction  College & Career Readiness  Differentiated Recognition  Reward  Priority  Focus

Questions?  Please forward questions and comments to: Doug Strader, Ed.D