English Assessment Validity February 2012 Michael Orkin, Jo Ann Phillips, Hui Zhang, Sheryl Queen Office of Institutional Research Peralta Community College.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Placement Validity Study for Freshman Composition and College Algebra Gary Greer University of Houston Downtown Annual Conference on.
Advertisements

Early Assessment Program: A Valid Solution for CCC Math and English Placement? KC Greaney, Director Jeanne Fadelli, Research Analyst Santa Rosa Junior.
Compass Math Test Validity April 2011 Mike Orkin, Jo Ann Phillips, Hui Zhang Office of Institutional Research Peralta Community College District 1.
Comparing Growth in Student Performance David Stern, UC Berkeley Career Academy Support Network Presentation to Educating for Careers/ California Partnership.
MATH ASSESSMENT TEST OCMA May, HISTORY OF MAT Test originally developed in late 60’s.
Pass Rates in Paired and Unpaired Courses Fall 1998 Office of Institutional Research LaGuardia Community College.
Multnomah County Student Achievement Presented to the Leaders Roundtable November 25, 2008 Source: Oregon Department of Education, Dr. Patrick.
Psyc 235: Introduction to Statistics
Chapter 9 Correlational Research Designs
BASIC SKILLS & Budget Cuts Mike Orkin Educational Services October, 2011.
1 Predicting Success in Math: The relationship between high school courses and remedial math in college Brandon Lagerquist Northshore School District Paul.
Presenter: Wes Anthony, M.S.. COMBINING FOUR COURSES INTO TWO From RED 080 and RED 090 and ENG 080 and ENG 090 to….. ENG 085/085A and ENG 095/095A The.
1 Foothill College Basic Skills College Hour Rob Johnstone, Ph.D. 10/8/03.
ARCC /08 Reporting Period Prepared by: Office of Institutional Research & Planning February 2010.
Using Data to Make Decisions Regarding Professional and Personalized Learning: WV General Summative Assessment – Part 1 County Chief Instructional Leadership.
Academic Success First-time/Full-time Students Fall 2008, 2009 and 2010 Concurrently Enrolled in English and Select Courses.
ABLE + COLLEGE EQUALS SUCCESS OAACE April
Understanding The PLAN. What Do My Scores Mean?  Your scores range between 1 and 32.  The PLAN takes the number of correct responses on each test and.
Online Course Evaluations Is there a perfect time? Presenters: Cassandra Jones, Ph.D., Director of Assessment Michael Anuszkiewicz, Research Associate.
Implications of Mediated Instruction to Remote Learning in Mathematics Joy L. Matthews-López Educational Testing Service Sergio R. López-Permouth David.
Education 795 Class Notes Data Analyst Pitfalls Difference Scores Effects Sizes Note set 12.
METHODS Setting Wichita State University Physician Assistant Program Study population WSU PA graduating class of 2003 and 2004 (n=84) Study design Retrospective.
+ General Education Assessment Spring 2014 Quantitative Literacy.
Pre-Transfer Courses & Budget Cuts Mike Orkin Educational Services October, 2011 English, ESL, Math.
Perceptions of the Appropriateness of Student Placement in English, Math, Reading, and ESL Courses at Cañada College CAÑADA COLLEGE PLANNING, RESEARCH,
The University of Hawai ʻ i at Mānoa ACCESS TO SUCCESS: LEADING INDICATORS WORKGROUP.
March 23, 2015 WELCOME. General Overview of AP Program Advanced Placement Is: A Rigorous Program-college level curriculum National curriculum culminating.
Educational Research Chapter 13 Inferential Statistics Gay, Mills, and Airasian 10 th Edition.
Increasing Gateway Course Completion by Scaling Successful Statewide Initiatives Saundra King Assistant Vice President of Remediation and Innovation April.
MEAP / MME New Cut Scores Gill Elementary February 2012.
Earning College Credit While in High School David W. Carter and H. Grady Spruce High School Counselors Saturday, October 31, 2015.
1 Making Better Decisions on Placement in Mathematics Courses W. Robert Stephenson Iowa State University.
Introducing Communication Research 2e © 2014 SAGE Publications Chapter Seven Generalizing From Research Results: Inferential Statistics.
Multiple Measures Project  California Community Colleges are required to use multiple measures Title 5 § 55502(i) clearly mandates that California community.
Multiple Measures Assessment Project (MMAP) Cañada Pilot Study December /09/2015CAÑADA COLLEGE 1.
Examining the Enrollment and Persistence of Students with Discrepant High School Grades and Standardized Test Scores Anne Edmunds, Ed.D. Higher Education.
 California community colleges serve over 2.9 million students each year  70 to 80% of students enrolled in California community colleges need developmental.
What is the Advanced Placement Program? The Advanced Placement Program are courses taught at local high schools, which allow students to participate in.
MULTIPLE MEASURES, ASSESSMENT, AND THE RE-IMAGINATION OF STUDENT CAPACITY February 16, 2016 Craig Hayward Director of Research, Planning and Accreditation.
BASIC SKILLS & Budget Cuts Mike Orkin Educational Services October, 2011.
The fast track to your future! Spring Branch Early College Program.
LESSON 5 - STATISTICS & RESEARCH STATISTICS – USE OF MATH TO ORGANIZE, SUMMARIZE, AND INTERPRET DATA.
The fast track to your future! Spring Branch Early College Program.
Lesson 3 Measurement and Scaling. Case: “What is performance?” brandesign.co.za.
College Credit Plus Welcome Students and Parents to: Information Session.
The Process The Results The Repository of Assessment Documents (ROAD) Project Sample Characteristics (“All” refers to all students enrolled in ENGL 1551)
Pre-Transfer Courses & Budget Cuts Mike Orkin Educational Services October, 2011 English, ESL, Math.
Cheryl aschenbach, north representative
Data Mining in Higher Education
College Credit Plus September 2017
Michelle Kershner (and Dan Kernler) Elgin Community College Elgin, IL
Assessment of Student Course Competency Readiness: Ensuring proper placement of students Andrew LaManque, Associate Vice President of Instruction, Foothill.
Multiple measures and accurate student placement
Tim Johnston, Dean of Enrollment Services
Alternate Math Pathways
Multiple Measures Assessment Project (MMAP) Cañada Pilot Study
Ginni May, ASCCC Area A Representative
Becoming AB 705 Compliant Tammi Marshall, Cuyamaca College
Implementation requirements for ab 705
AB 705 and You: Your Program and Your Students – Noncredit, ESL, and Basic Skills Ginni May, Area A Representative, Math and Quantitative Reasoning Task.
What we know about ab 705 Cheryl Aschenbach, North Representative
Applied Statistical Analysis
Teacher SLTs
Running Start Information Session
AB 705 Implementation requirements
PARCC RESULTS: PRESENTATION FAIRVIEW SCHOOL DISTRICT OCTOBER 2, 2018
What we know about ab 705 Cheryl Aschenbach, North Representative
Houston Baptist university
T-tests using Excel Comparing group means under 2 conditions
Presentation transcript:

English Assessment Validity February 2012 Michael Orkin, Jo Ann Phillips, Hui Zhang, Sheryl Queen Office of Institutional Research Peralta Community College District 1

English Assessment Test New Peralta students take assessment tests for placement in English classes. Course placement from test scores is recommended but not mandatory. A student can take courses without placement tests if prerequisites are met. 2

ACT Compass Test Peralta currently uses the ACT Compass test, CENG, for English placement. CENG tests English proficiency with separate writing and reading tests. This will soon change... 3

Statewide Online Assessment From Student Success Task Force, January, 2012: “… all students will have access to common online assessment tools for English, mathematics and ESL and to pre-testing programs that help improve assessment outcomes. They also will be able to take the results of their tests to any community college in the state.” 4

For now: ACT Compass Test Placement in English Courses A decision rule based on the two test scores selects an English course: transfer level (English 1A) degree applicable (English 201A) Pre-collegiate (Basic Skills). 5

Placement in English Course If the writing score is less than 22, the student is not assessed into a course and must see a counselor. 699 students in the sample data had low writing scores and were excluded. 6

Data Students taking CENG-recommended English courses in Fall 2008, Spring 2009, Fall 2009, Spring Took test immediately preceding semester when they took English course. Never took test prior to semester when they took English course. 7

Validity Validity measured in three ways: Relationship between assessment scores and grades. Comparison of assessed and non-assessed. Comparison of students who took the “right” course (recommended by CENG) and “wrong” course (not recommended by CENG). 8

Assessed and Took Right Course 9 CoursesCount% Eng 1A % Eng 201A 59321% Basic Skills* 59822% TOTAL % * English 252AB, 267AB, 268AB, 269AB

Assessed - Grade % 10 A B C D FW Eng 1A 28%23%12%5%8%25% Eng 201A 21%19%15%9% 27% Basic Skills 23%22%16%4%10%24% ALL 25%22%13%6%9%25%

Placement and Grades 57% were placed in English 1A. 47% overall got A’s or B’s. 25% overall withdrew from class. 11

Grades vs. Test Scores Are assessment test scores positively correlated with grades? We use ANOVA (Analysis of Variance). 12

Reading Test Scores by Grade 13 Courses A - Test ave B - Test ave C - Test ave D - Test ave F/W- Test ave ANOVA Sig. Eng 1A Eng 201A Basic Skills

All Test Scores by Grade 14 Courses ANOVA Sig. Reading ANOVA Sig. Writing ANOVA Sig. Combined Eng 1A Eng 201A Basic Skills

Grades vs. Test Scores Analysis Reading test scores most sensitive to grades. Students who get A’s have higher average test scores than those who have lower grades. Writing test and Combined Tests only significant for English 1A. 15

Predicted Chance of Success As test scores get higher, does predicted chance of success increase? We use logistic regression. 16

Reading Test Predicted Chance of Success 17

Reading Test Predicted Chance of Success 18

Reading Test Predicted Chance of Success 19

Predicted Chance of Success As test scores get higher, predicted chance of success increases but … Only for reading test scores. Different courses are selected across range of scores so much is filled in by software. Results aren’t statistically significant. 20

Assessment vs. No Assessment Do assessed students do better in their assigned courses than students who don’t take the assessment test? We use ANOVA and Chi Square tests. 21

Counts 22 CoursesAssessedNot Assessed Eng 1A Eng 201A Basic Skills* TOTAL * English 252AB, 267AB, 268AB, 269AB

Not Assessed - Grade % (Similar to Assessed) 23 A B C D FW Eng 1A 25% 15%5%6%24% Eng 201A 18% 19%9%11%25% Basic Skills 21%18%13%6%10%31% ALL 23%22%16%6%8%25%

Assessed vs. Not Assessed GPA 24 Courses Assessed Course GPA Not Assessed Course GPA ANOVA Sig. Eng 1A Eng 201A Basic Skills TOTAL

Assessed vs. Not Assessed GPA No significant results: Students who are assessed have similar class GPA as those who are not assessed. 25

Assessed vs. Not Assessed Success 26 Courses Assessed % Success Not Assessed % Success Chi-Square Sig. Eng 1A 62%65%0.112 Eng 201A 55%56%0.795 Basic Skills 61%53%0.004 TOTAL 60% 0.984

Success - Assessed vs. Not Assessed Significant only at basic skills level: Students who are assessed have greater success than those who are not assessed. 27

Assessed – “Right” vs. “Wrong” Course Do assessed students who take the right course do better than assessed students who take the wrong course? We use Chi Square and ANOVA. 28

Counts - Right vs. Wrong Course 29 Courses Right Course Count Wrong Course Count % Right Course Eng 1A % Eng 201A % Basic Skills % TOTAL %

Success - Right vs. Wrong 30 Courses Right Course Success % Wrong Course Success % Chi Square Sig. Eng 1A 62%53%0.001 Eng 201A 55%52%0.364 Basic Skills 61% 0.932

Success - Right vs. Wrong Significant only for English 1A: Assessed students who take right course have greater success than those who take wrong course. 31

GPA - Right vs. Wrong 32 Courses Right Course GPA Wrong Course GPA ANOVA Sig. Eng 1A Eng 201A Basic Skills

GPA - Right vs. Wrong Significant only for English 1A: Assessed students who take right course have higher GPA than those who take wrong course. 33

Conclusions English assessment test validity confirmed. Generally assessed results aren’t much different from non-assessed. Most students take English 1A. Students assessed into English 1A do significantly better than “wrong” English 1A students. Reading test most sensitive. 34