1 Interagency Review Team Coordination and Roles State Water Resources Control Board.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
Advertisements

THE EXPANDING ROLE of RECYCLED WATER The Need, Benefits and Cost Effectiveness Make Recycled Water an Increasingly Valued Resource Harry Ehrlich, SDA Principal.
PENNSYLVANIA CODE Title 25.Environmental Protection Chapter 102 Erosion and Sediment Control Clean Streams Law-Act 394 of To preserve and improve.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Water Quality Control Boards Regulatory Authority Review and Concepts for a Statewide Order for Composting.
June 19, 2014 CONTROL OF TRASH ENTERING WATERWAYS IN CALIFORNIA DRAFT WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD POLICY.
Bill Orme, Senior Environmental Scientist, State Water Board Liz Haven, Asst. Deputy Director, Surface Water Regulatory Branch, State Water Board Dyan.
Deborah M. Smith United States Magistrate Judge District of Alaska LAWS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT RELATED TO FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS Second Asian Judges Symposium.
UC Davis Viticulture & Enology Water Rights in California Impacts of New Regulations 1 February 13, 2015 Paula J. Whealen, Principal.
What is an In Lieu Fee Program ? Clean Water Act - Section 404 : “no overall net loss” of wetland acreage and functions. One mechanism for providing Compensatory.
State of Water: Minnesota’s Lakes, Rivers and Wetlands John Jaschke Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Nov 13, 2014.
Clean Water Act Section 404 Basics Clean Water Act Section 404  Regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the U.S., including.
Water School June 20, 2013 Loretta M. Bates, Ph.D. University of California Cooperative Extension San Diego County.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
California Wetlands: Update on new state definition and policy development California Native Plant Society Fall Conservation Symposium September 10, 2011.
Protecting Water Resources: The U.S. Legal Framework Babette J. Neuberger, JD, MPH Associate Dean for Academic Affairs University of Illinois at Chicago.
GENERAL AWARENESS TRAINING BCTS SFM Commitments BC Timber Sales is committed to managing and administering forest management activities on our operations.
Economic Analysis of Water Supply and Water Quality Benefits IRWM Round 2 Roger Mann Lorraine Marsh Steve Hatchett Jerry Horner.
Lassen Lodge Hydroelectric Project Public Scoping Meetings November 5, 2014 (Sacramento and Red Bluff) State Water Resources Control Board Division of.
New Ag Waiver for the San Diego Region (including Temecula Valley) Water Quality Workshop Rancho California Water District November 6, 2008 Presented by.
Rogue Basin Water Quality Implementation Plans Greg Stabach, Natural Resources Project Manager Rogue Valley Council of Governments.
Method to Develop Flow Criteria for Priority Tributaries to the Bay-Delta Workshop Erin Ragazzi March 19, 2014.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
 Why are we here?  Without regulations, rivers used to catch fire. Rules and Regulation.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Steve Harrison, Environmental Manager Bureau of Entomology and Pest Control -Mosquito Control Section.
Building Strong! 1 US Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program Kimberly McLaughlin Program Manager Headquarters Operations and Regulatory Community of.
Module 1: Stormwater Permit Program Robert Pitt Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of Alabama Tuscaloosa, AL.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Changing Focus on Watershed Issues < 1960’s: Water supply and flooding > 1960’s: Land use effects on water quality > 1980’s: Riparian and aquatic ecology.
Chumstick Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land development, road construction, and other human activities have affected channel migration and sediment.
Icicle Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Land Development has affected stream channel movement, off channel habitat, and LWD recruitment. Barriers to migration.
RUTHERFORD SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CLEAN WATER MANAGEMENT TRUST FUND GRANT Travis Ringo, Rutherford SWCD.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Mission, Brender, and Yaksum Creeks Habitat Conditions Low flows and associated high temperatures affect distribution and abundance of native species.
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
1 Floodplain Management SESSION 21 Policy History: Rivers as a Legal Battleground Public Policy in the American Federal System – An Overview Prepared by.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
Importance of the Lower Wenatchee River in Salmon Recovery* The Lower Wenatchee is a critical migration corridor for all ESA listed species Of the total.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Inter-Agency Coordination BLM PILOT VERNAL & GLENWOOD SPRINGS U.S. Army Corps of Engineers & U.S. Bureau of Land.
CACHE CREEK WATERSHED Watershed Overview –Physical Description –Land Uses Present –Flow Characteristics –Beneficial Uses Point and Non-Point Source Pollutants.
Enforcement What to Expect From the Water Boards, and What to Look for Locally ENTS Workshop August Mark Bradley Office of Enforcement CA State.
Overview of Proposed Alaska National Wildlife Refuges Regulatory Changes U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Nason Creek Salmon Habitat Conditions* Development, and road building have affected riparian (streamside) habitat, large woody debris and gravel recruitment.
ANTIDEGRADATION and THE BENEFITS OF PUMP LOGS FOR BATCH DISCHARGES Given by: Dan Murray, Terrell Hendren and Josh Frazier.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
SONOMA CREEK AND SEDIMENT: KNOWING WHAT WE DON’T KNOW MAY 2011.
The Clean Water Act (1977, 1981, 1987) By: Jonas Szajowitz.
TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed TMDL for Diazinon in Chollas Creek Watershed Linda Pardy (858) Jimmy.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
The Fish and Game Commission has designated the states portion of the South Bay Salt Ponds an Ecological Reserve. Planning for the management of Ecological.
The Jordan Cove Pacific Connector Gas Pipeline and Terminal.
What is Stormwater? Direct result of rainfall Recharges groundwater by infiltration Produces “runoff” (excess rainfall after infiltration) May be concentrated.
1 Water Quality Standards - CWA and Porter-Cologne An Overview.
Slide 1 California Implementation Water Board Policies.
1 How the Water Board Protects California’s Water Quality Kate Hart, Board Member Chair Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board.
1 Staff Public Workshops Fall 2011 Policy for Siting, Design, Operation and Management of Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems San Luis Obispo: October.
Sustainable Vineyard Practices Replanting Strategies & Economics December 13, 2012 Conditional Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements Vineyards in Napa.
1 Roles of the State and Regional Boards in the basin Plan Amendment Process.
Cannabis Cultivation: A Growing Threat to California’s Water Quality
Hudson Wetlands Protection Bylaw
Human Activity and Ground Water
The Clean Water Acts of 1977, 1981, & 1987
Human Activity and Ground Water
Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Zoning
Overview of US EPA & State Manure Management Regulations
San Joaquin River At Crows Landing 30 June 2010.
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Agricultural Order 4.0 Discussion
Presentation transcript:

1 Interagency Review Team Coordination and Roles State Water Resources Control Board

Water Boards I.State and Regional Water Boards Mission History Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act Basin Plans Permits Nonpoint Source Policy Enforcement II.Water Quality and Timber Harvest Regional Water Board permitting III.Water Rights and Timber Harvesting 2

Mission State Water Resource Control Board “The State Water Board’s mission is to preserve, enhance and restore the quality of California’s water resources, and ensure their proper allocation and efficient use for the benefit of present and future generations.” 3

4 Programs & Responsibilities Discharges to surface waters Discharges to groundwater (via land) Storm Water: construction, industrial, municipal Sewage Treatment Facilities Leaking Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Nonpoint Source: forestry, grazing, agriculture, dairies, septic systems, erosion Filling of wetlands Total Maximum Daily Loads Planning Monitoring Grants

Water Boards’ History  Dickey Water Pollution Act in 1949 Created the State Water Pollution Control Board Established the 9 Regional Water Boards 5

Regional Water Boards 6

Water Boards’ History  1967 “State Water Quality Control Board” and “State Water Rights Board” merged to “State Water Resources Control Board”  Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act Cornerstone of todays water quality protection in California Sections of Porter-Cologne used as the basis for amendments to the Federal Clean Water Act in

Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act Established broad regulatory authority  Basin Plans  Permits Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs) Waivers of WDR  Enforcement 8

Water Quality Control Plans  Basin Plans are the Regional Water Board’s master water quality control planning document  Description of the Region and its water quality and quantity problems  Designates water quality standards: beneficial uses of water water quality objectives implementation plans 9

Basin Plans 10  Can be updated by Basin Plan amendment  Regulatory tool for Regional Water Board staff and other resource management agencies

Basin Plans  Beneficial Use Designations Examples: Municipal and Domestic Supply (MUN) Water Contact Recreation (REC-1) Agricultural Supply (AGR) Industrial Process Supply (IND) Cold Freshwater Habitat (COLD) Migration of Aquatic Organisms (MIGR) Spawning, Reproduction, and/or Early Development (SPWN) Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Species (RARE) Wetland Habitat (WET) Wildlife habitat (WILD) 11

Basin Plans  Water quality objectives Established for the reasonable protection of beneficial uses Narrative or Numeric Often referenced or written into permits 12

Basin Plans  Water Quality Objectives Sediment: The suspended sediment load and suspended sediment discharge rate of surface waters shall not be altered in such a manner as to cause nuisance or adversely affect beneficial uses Turbidity: Turbidity shall not be increased more than 20 percent above naturally occurring background levels. 13

Basin Plans  Water Quality Objectives (con’t) Temperature: The natural receiving water temperature shall not be altered unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Regional Water Board that such alteration in temperature does not adversely affect beneficial uses. At no time or place shall the temperature of any COLD water be increased by more than 5°F above natural receiving water temperature. 14

Basin Plans  Implementation Plans A description of the nature of actions which are necessary to achieve the objectives Geographic area (e.g. Humboldt Bay) Pollutant (e.g. mining waste) Implementation (e.g. TMDL - Garcia River Sediment) Activity (e.g. logging and construction) 15

Basin Plans  Action Plan for Logging, Construction, and Associated Activities contains the following prohibitions: 1.The discharge of soil, silt, bark, slash, sawdust, or other organic and earthen material from any logging, construction, or associated activity of whatever nature into any stream or watercourse in the basin in quantities deleterious to fish, wildlife, or other beneficial uses is prohibited. 2.The placing or disposal of soil, silt, bark, slash, sawdust, or other organic and earthen material from any logging, construction, or associated activity of whatever nature at locations where such material could pass into any stream or watercourse in the basin in quantities which could be deleterious to fish, wildlife, or other beneficial uses is prohibited. 16

Permits – Waste Discharge Requirements  Section 13260: Regional boards prescribe waste discharge requirements (WDRs) WDRs are permits to discharge WDRs implement Basin Plan requirements Discharge is a privilege, not a right 17

Permits – Waivers  Section 13269: WDRs may be waived for specific type discharge that is consistent with applicable Basin Plan and is in the public interest Discharges involving similar types of waste and requiring similar treatment standards may be regulated under general WDRs or Categorical Waivers 18

Water Quality and Timber Harvest  Regional Water Board Timber Permits Timber operations constitute a discharge, or potential discharge of waste Generally rely on existing programs or regulations, such as the FPRs, Aquatic Habitat Conservation Plans, Northwest Forest Plan Add additional conditions as necessary to meet water quality requirements 19

Regional Water Board Permits  Waiver of Waste Discharge Requirements  General Waste Discharge Requirements (WDRs)  Ownership Permits Green Diamond Forest Management WDR Green Diamond Roads WDR U.S. Forest Service Nonpoint Source Waiver  Watershed Permits Elk River, Freshwater Creek, Bear and Jordan Creeks  Individual WDR or Waiver 20

Nonpoint Source Policy State Water Board 2004 Policy for the Implementation and Enforcement of the Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program (NPS Policy) requires nonpoint source discharges of waste to be regulated by: 1.waste discharge requirements (WDR), 2.waiver of WDRs, or 3.prohibitions to ensure compliance with Basin Plans. 21

Enforcement Water Quality Enforcement Policy – February 2002  Framework for: identifying and investigating noncompliance taking the appropriate level of enforcement prioritizing enforcement for the maximum environmental benefits  Goal of being fair, firm and consistent  Progressive enforcement 22

23  Participate in CAL FIRE THP review process  Independent permitting of THPs  Permit USFS forestry and related projects  Provide input to BOF in rule making  Participate in interagency timber review (1492)  Participate in monitoring and restoration projects  Enforcement when necessary Regional Board Forestry Program

Water Quality and Timber Harvest  Road and crossing construction, maintenance, and decommissioning  Harvest locations (unstable areas, streams)  Harvest timing (winter operations)  Harvest methods (i.e. tractor, cable, shovel, etc.)  Harvest rates and cumulative impacts  Streamside buffer zone protections for sediment, shade, recruitment of large wood 24

Forest Practice Rules and Water Quality  896 – purpose of the act,  – conditions requiring THP disapproval  916 – Watercourse and lake protection  923 – Road rules 25

BOF, CAL FIRE and Water Quality  Management Agency Agreement - State Board certify FPRs as BMPs -BOF and CDF joint management agencies for implementation of water quality management plans -US. EPA withheld certification  2003 – Memorandum of Understanding Reaffirms MAA CDF recognizes obligation to assure timber operations comply with applicable water quality requirements 26

Water Quality Protection -The Basics  Control sediment Identify and correct existing sources Avoid creating new sources Regular inspections  Preserve and restore shade on streams  Preserve and restore large wood 27

Mission Statement Division of Water Rights “To establish and maintain a stable system of water rights in California to best develop, conserve and utilize in the public interest the water resources of the state while protecting vested rights, water quality and the environment.”

General Principles  All water belongs to the people of the state  Water rights are a right to the use of water  Water use must be reasonable and beneficial

Water Quality and Water Rights  Quantity affects quality  Allocation and efficient use of water can be influenced by water quality standards

Water Rights

Riparian Rights  Apply to the natural flow only  The parcel of land must at some point be contiguous to the source stream or overlie the subterranean stream  For use only on the portion of the riparian parcel within the watershed of the source stream

Riparian Rights  Limited to smallest legal tract in the chain of title  Unless preserved, a parcel severed from contiguity by conveyance loses the riparian right, and it cannot be re-established  The right does not extend to seasonal storage of water

Appropriative Rights  For diversion of water on parcels that do not abut a stream  For storage of water on any parcel  Pre- and post-1914 rights differ

Post-1914 Appropriative Rights  APPLICATION: Request for a permit to divert and use water.  PERMIT: Authorization for the diversion and use of water.  LICENSE: Confirms the diversion and use of water authorized by the permit.

Appropriative Rights  “First in Time -- First in Right.”  Cannot be increased  Can be lost by nonuse

Statement of Water Use CWC §5101 Requires:  File statement of water use and diversion by July 1  Supplemental statements  Water diversion measurements  Penalties for failure to file