A Local Relaxation Approach for the Siting of Electrical Substations Walter Murray and Uday Shanbhag Systems Optimization Laboratory Department of Management Science and Engineering Stanford University, CA 94305
SSO - Review Service area Washington State
SSO - Review Colour: Black – substation Other – Kw Load Service area: each grid block is 1/2 mile by 1/2 mile
SSO - Review “Model distribution lines and substation locations and – Determine the optimal substation capacity additions To serve a known load at a minimum cost” Service area: each grid block is 1/2 mile by 1/2 mile
SSO - Review More substations: Higher capital cost Lower transmission cost Characteristics: Capital costs: $4,000,000 for a 28 MW substation Cost of losses: $3,000 per kw of losses Service area: each grid block is 1/2 mile by 1/2 mile
Variables
Problem of Interest
Admittance Matrix
A Multiscale Problem
SSO Algorithm DETERMINE INITIAL DISCRETE FEASIBLE SOLUTION INITIAL NUMBER OF SS DETERMINE SEARCH DIRECTION DETERMINE SEARCH STEP TO GET IMPROVED SOLN FINAL NUMBER AND POSITIONS OF SUBSTATIONS WHILE # OF SS NOT CONVERGED ADJUST # OF SS WHILE IMPROVED SOLUTION CAN BE FOUND UPDATE POSITIONS OF SS
Finding an Initial Feasible Solution Global Relaxation Continuous relaxation Modified Objective
Finding an Initial Feasible Solution Global Relaxation
Search Direction Substation Positions Candidate Positions Good Neighbor
Search Direction Local Relaxation QP Subproblem
Center of Gravity Search Step Center of Gravity
Optimal Number of Substations
Sample Load Distributions Gaussian Distribution Snohomish PUD Distribution
Comparison with MINLP Solvers Note: n and z* represent the number of substations and the optimal cost. In the SBB column, z represents the cost for early termination (1000 b&b) nodes.
Time (scaled) vs. Number of Integers (scaled) Scaled Time
Large-Scale Solutions Note: n 0 and z 0 represent the initial number of substations and the initial cost.
Uniform Load Distribution
Different Starting Points
Quality of Solution Initial Voltage Load Distribution Initial Voltage Most Load Nodes Have Lower Voltages
Final Voltage Most Load Nodes Have High Voltages Load Distribution Quality of Solution Final Voltage
Conclusions and Comments A very fast algorithm has been developed to find the optimal location in a large electrical network. The algorithm is embedded in a GUI developed by Bergen Software Services International (BSSI). Fast algorithm enables further embellishment of model to include Contingency constraints Varying impedance across network Varying substation sizes
Acknowledgements Robert H. Fletcher, Snohomish PUD, Washington Patrick Gaffney, BSSI, Bergen, Norway.
Appendix
Lower Bounds Based on MIPs and Convex Relaxations Note: We obtain two sets of bounds. The first is based on a solution of mixed-integer linear programs and the second is based on solving a continuous relaxation (convex QP).
Comparison with MINLP Solvers Note: n and z* represent the number of substations and the optimal cost. In the SBB column, z represents the cost for early termination (1000 b&b) nodes.
SSO - Review – Varying sizes of substations – Transmission voltages – Contingency constraints: Is the solution feasible if one substation fails? Complexities: Constraints: Load-flow equations (Kirchoff’s laws) Voltage bounds Voltages at substations specified Current at loads is specified Service area: each grid block is 1/2 mile by 1/2 mile
Cost function: SSO - Review New equipment Losses in the network Maintenance costs Constraints: Load and voltage constraints Reliability and substation capacity constraints Decision variables: Installation / upgrading of substations Characteristics:
Variables
Admittance Matrix : Y
Admittance Matrix
A Local Relaxation Approach for the Siting of Electrical Substations Multiscale Optimization Methods and Applications University of Florida at Gainesville February 26 th – 28 th, 2004 Walter Murray and Uday Shanbhag Systems Optimization Laboratory Department of Management Science and Engineering Stanford University, CA 94305