The Basics of Peer Review Sandy Fogel MD FACS Assoc Prof Surgery Medical Director of OR Services Surgical Quality Officer NSQIP Surgeon Champion.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

No-Charge Policy for Serious Adverse Events

Advertisements

Shannon Kilkelly, D.O. Assistant Professor Department of Anesthesiology Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

IRB Application Process Deb Schneider IRB Administrator Office of Research & Sponsored Programs 1055 AB (313)

Katrina Strowbridge, BSN, RN, CWS

Conducting Patient Safety Rounds with Staff. First Steps Set the stage –Unit and Hospital Leadership Support –Identify a “champion(s)” for each unit where.

1 THE IMPAIRED INDIVIDUAL Recognition of the Signs and Symptoms of the Impaired Individual.

CREDENTIALING Where does the Board fit in? Robert P. Redwine President, Board of Directors Blount Memorial Hospital Maryville, Tennessee.

Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.

Reporting Unanticipated Problems Involving Risk to Subjects or Others and Adverse Events WFUHS Policy/Procedure Effective Date 6/1/07 Wendy Murray Monitoring.

Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.

Peer Review - Overview DEB KAZMERZAK, IOWA PCA ACKNOWLEDGEMENT: LINDA RUBLE, PA/NP, PCA CLINICAL CONSULTANT.

“Informal Complaint Resolution”

1 Protecting Peer Review Gordon H. Smith, Esq. Maine Medical Association.

1 Behaviors that Undermine a Culture of Safety. 2 Presence Health’s Commitment Consistent with its Mission, Vision, Values and Ethical and Religious Directives.

Stacy A. Rudnicki, M.D. Brendan C. Stack, Jr., M.D., FACS, FACE.

Membership and Personnel Requirements for VCA Programs (Resolution 27) Vascularized Composite Allograft (VCA)Transplantation Committee Sue V. McDiarmid,

The Nature of Errors Richard M. Satava, MD FACS Professor of Surgery University of Washington School of Medicine and Program Manager, Advanced Biomedical.

Focused Professional Practice Evaluation (FPPE) and Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (OPPE) Why FPPE and OPPE? FPPE – to ensure that physicians.

Credentialing and Privileging Procedures at UWHC

Ron Wyatt MD, MHA, Merck IHI Fellow

School Uniforms: An Investigation Status Report Harford County Public Schools December 17, 2007.

Kendall L. Stewart, MD, MBA, DFAPA August 17, 2009

Ethics and Legal Issues. Advance Directives Living Wills –Document that states patients wishes for medical care Medical Power of Attorney –Document giving.

What do patients and families need to know when errors occur? Susan Moffatt-Bruce MD, PhD, FACS, FRCS(C) Chief Quality and Patient Safety Officer Associate.

SCHEN SCC-CSI MUSC Walter Limehouse MD MA MUSC Emergency Medicine.

© Copyright, The Joint Commission Joint Commission Update National Credentialing Forum San Diego, California February 6, 2014 Ron Wyatt MD, MHA Medical.

HABERSHAM MEDICAL CENTER Quality Leadership to Improve ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE 2012.

PROPRIETARY NAME EVALUATION AT FDA Jerry Phillips, RPh Associate Director for Medication Error Prevention Office of Drug Safety December 4, 2003.

Nursing Research Project Idea? CALL Center for Nursing Research & Practice Is it research or quality improvement? Once your submission is.

Q UALITY IN HEALTH C ARE What is it? How do we measure it? How do we know if we are providing quality?

H I P A A T R A I N I N G Self Directed Module 7 Research Disclosures For Data Custodians START Click to begin…

Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.

The Disruptive Physician Federation of State Physician Health Programs 2010 Annual Meeting Doris C. Gundersen, MD Medical Director Colorado Physician Health.

© 2008 The Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois Learning From the Patient’s Experience: Opportunities to Improve Patient Safety AHRQ 2009 Annual.

 Part IV of the ECU Faculty Manual  To get to the Faculty Manual 1. Go to ECU Home and click on “Faculty & Staff.” 2. Scroll down to the “Policies”

The Elimination of Non-medically Indicated (Elective) Deliveries Before 39 Weeks Gestational Age: Overcoming Barriers-- Ideas for Leaders John S. Wachtel,

Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.

Occurrence Reports. An occurrence report is a document used to record an event when it occurs Occurrences are reported each time an occurrence occurs.

4/25/2017 Your Facility Name Focused and Ongoing Professional Practice Evaluation (F/OPPE) for Medical Staff & Allied Health Professionals Facility Name.

Sexual Misconduct Information Presented by Office of Equity & Inclusion Sue Groff, Ed. D. September 8, 2015.

SRH Peer Review. 2 Project Overview Project goal and Aim : Project goal and Aim : The establishment of a centralized committee for improving physician.

HOW A BILL BECOMES A LAW In this lesson you will learn how a bill becomes a law.

Surgeon Champion Who’s that? What’s the role? June 2012.

 Secure resident safety  Assess the resident, provide medical and/or psychosocial treatment as necessary  Examine the resident’s injury and/or psychosocial.

Intro to Clinical Scholarship: Lessons From Walmart Daniel Eiferman, MD, FACS FAME Workshop November 10, 2015.

The TJU Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Part II, Conflict of Interest and IRB Noncompliance J. Bruce Smith, MD, CIP.

Hospital policy requires that an ORTS report must be completed for any Adverse Occurrence involving a patient(s), visitor(s), or other person(s) who are.

WA Patient Blood Management Role Maps. Using Role Maps  Role Maps are designed to provide a snapshot of key stakeholders at each facility and key contact.

United Behavioral Health, operating under the brand Optum U. S. Behavioral Health Plan, California, doing business as OptumHealth Behavioral Solutions.

Re-edited by the Collection Management Group  It is the job of the Librarian to make information accessible to the public.  Librarians accomplish this.

ASK MBSAQIP Agenda ASK MBSAQIP December 8, 2016 Time (CST) Agenda Item

2017 January – July Proposed Bylaws Revisions

REFLECT: Recovery Following Intensive Care Treatment

Crouse Health Hospital

Peer Review in Anesthesia at BIDMC

2016 Medical Staff Bylaws Proposed Revisions

Image/Figure Surgical Performance Improvement in a Health System -

PROFESSIONALISM & SUPERVISION

Disclaimer This presentation is intended only for use by Tulane University faculty, staff, and students. No copy or use of this presentation should occur.

Credentialing and Privileging Procedures at UWHC

Understanding the Section 504 Process

Mark A. Smith, MD, MBA, FACS Clinical Assistant Professor of Surgery

ALLEGATIONS OF ABUSE Internal Occurrence Reporting and Investigation.

Algorithm for Processing Applicant Privilege Requests

OSAA District Athletic Committee GUIDELINES

GHS Medical Staff Appointments and Reappointments

Changes to Hospital-Based OPO (HOPO) Voting Privileges

Membership & Professional Standards Committee Spring 2014

Professional Performance Evaluation FPPE & OPPE

Office Or Outpatient Centers Are The Best Place To Perform Most Arterial And Venous Interventional Treatments: Precautions And Current Status Of Their.

Presentation transcript:

The Basics of Peer Review Sandy Fogel MD FACS Assoc Prof Surgery Medical Director of OR Services Surgical Quality Officer NSQIP Surgeon Champion

Purpose

To improve care

Law Federal – OPPE State Medical Staff

Structure Board MEC MSPROC Departmental peer review committee Section peer review committee

MSPROC Voting member from each department and 3 at large members Numerous non-voting members from quality management Chaired by Chief of Staff elect (non-voting) Any non-physician related issues, process issues, sent to the QM staff.

MSPROC Indicators Sentinel events Unexpected death Harm to a patient Behavior incidents

How does a case become known? Verbally 7 – SAFE Soft med online event reports Regular chart reviews RCA, IA Other

Why does a case get reviewed? Must meet the indicators – MSPROC vs department/section review If you think a case should be reviewed that does not meet indicators, change the indicators. Must follow your process

Once a case identified for review Goes to 2 reviewers Must be rated – Ours Exemplary Appropriate Questionable or controversial Inappropriate

Ratings If both reviewers agree that medical care was exemplary or appropriate, no further discussion If reviewers disagree, or if any lower rating, must be discussed at full committee Some judgment needs to be made

Case Being Reviewed Physician notified of review If anything less than appropriate, physician gets letter with opportunity to answer questions from the committee and/or give any additional information not readily obtained from the chart Physician get letter of outcome

Reports All levels of committee report up MSPROC keeps track and files reports to the MEC, who then reports to the board

Actions If there is an egregious breech, MSPROC can ask section chief or department chief to come up with plan of remediation If not satisfactory, MSPROC can ask the MEC to intervene If still not satisfactory MSPROC can go to the board

Actions For a series of events that are not egregious, MSPROC may ask MEC for FPPE

Peer Review Hard work Process really does work Most physicians take it as intended

Questions?