Motivation To characterize the shallow subsurface at Wadi Qudaid for its water storage and reuse potential.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Advertisements

Multichannel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW)
Reflection Seismic Processing
Seismic Reflection Ground Roll Filtering Ted Bertrand SAGE 2004.
Subsurface Fault and Colluvial Wedge Detection Using Resistivity, Refraction Tomography and Seismic Reflection Sherif Hanafy King Abdullah University of.
Using 3D Seismic Imaging for Mine and Mineral Exploration G. Schuster University of Utah.
Processing: zero-offset gathers
Seismic Refraction Analysis of California Wash and Astor Pass
Seismic refraction and reflection projects and the traditional field camp Bob Bauer and Eric Sandvol University of Missouri Branson Field Lab.
Petrotech 2007 AOA Geophysics Inc Integrity Oil Services Specialists in Applied Geophysics.
Seismic Reflection Processing/Velocity Analysis of SAGE 2007 Data Andrew Steen Team Members; Stan, Tim, Josh, Andrew.
First Arrival Traveltime and Waveform Inversion of Refraction Data Jianming Sheng and Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah October, 2002.
Closure Phase Statics Correction Closure Phase Statics Correction University of Utah Jianhua Yu.
Reflection GPH492 By: Jonathan Payne Peter Bernhard Eve Marie Hirt.
Wave-Equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Data Ruiqing He Dept. of Geology & Geophysics University of Utah.
Occurs when wave encounters sharp discontinuities in the medium important in defining faults generally considered as noise in seismic sections seismic.
Advanced Seismic Imaging GG 6770 Variance Analysis of Seismic Refraction Tomography Data By Travis Crosby.
Primary-Only Imaging Condition Yue Wang. Outline Objective Objective POIC Methodology POIC Methodology Synthetic Data Tests Synthetic Data Tests 5-layer.
Reflection Field Methods
Joint Migration of Primary and Multiple Reflections in RVSP Data Jianhua Yu, Gerard T. Schuster University of Utah.
Bedrock Delineation by a Seismic Reflection/Refraction Survey at TEAD Utah David Sheley and Jianhua Yu.
Interferometric Extraction of SSP from Passive Seismic Data Yanwei Xue Feb. 7, 2008.
Acquisiton of Passive Seismic Data at Tooele Army Depot, Utah David Sheley, Travis Crosby, Jianming Sheng.
Reflection Survey Todd Hansen Diana Hooper Michelle Heimgartner.
Youli Quan & Jerry M. Harris
Reflection Processing and Analysis Bryce Grimm Mayo Thompson Shallow Subsurface Investigation across many areas of the V-line and Truckee Canal Fallon,
Applications of Time-Domain Multiscale Waveform Tomography to Marine and Land Data C. Boonyasiriwat 1, J. Sheng 3, P. Valasek 2, P. Routh 2, B. Macy 2,
Filters  Temporal Fourier (t f) transformation  Spatial Fourier (x k x ) transformation applications  f-k x transformation  Radon (-p x ) transformation.
Seismic reflection Ali K. Abdel-Fattah Geology Dept.,
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics This Week: No new lab assignment… But we’ll go over the previous labs 06 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 07 Feb:
3D Wave-equation Interferometric Migration of VSP Free-surface Multiples Ruiqing He University of Utah Feb., 2006.
Searching for blind faults: the Haiti subsurface imaging project ERAY KOCEL ERAY KOCEL with with Robert R. Stewart, Paul Mann, Robert R. Stewart, Paul.
A Massive 3D VSP in Milne Point, Alaska
Last week’s problems a) Mass excess = 1/2πG × Area under curve 1/2πG = × in kgs 2 m -3 Area under curve = -1.8 ×10-6 x 100 m 2 s -2 So Mass.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Imaging Normal Faults in Alluvial fans using Geophysical Techniques: Field Example from the Coast of Aqaba, Saudi Arabia Sherif M. Hanafy 28 October 2014.
CS Math Applications Enabling technologies inspire Many applications drive U. Schwingenschloegl A. Fratalocchi G. Schuster F. BisettiR. Samtaney G. Stenchikov.
Subwavelength Imaging using Seismic Scanning Tunneling Macroscope Field Data Example G. Dutta, A. AlTheyab, S. Hanafy, G. Schuster King Abdullah University.
1 OBS->OBS Extrapolation Interferometry Shuqian Dong and Sherif Hanafy Coarse OBS Virtual SWP.
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey
Beach Energy Ltd Lake Tanganyika 2D Marine Seismic Survey Data Processing, 2014 Squelch Tests for Streamer Noise Attenuation Lines BST14B24 and BST14B67.
The main instrument used is called the sonde. A basic sonde consists of a source and two receivers one-foot apart. The sonde is lowered down the borehole.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
The Geophysical Laboratory at KAUST
AUTOMATON A Fuzzy Logic Automatic Picker Paul Gettings 1 UTAM 2003 Annual Meeting 1 Thermal Geophysics Research Group, University of Utah.
Super-virtual Interferometric Diffractions as Guide Stars Wei Dai 1, Tong Fei 2, Yi Luo 2 and Gerard T. Schuster 1 1 KAUST 2 Saudi Aramco Feb 9, 2012.
G. Schuster, S. Hanafy, and Y. Huang, Extracting 200 Hz Information from 50 Hz Data KAUST Rayleigh Resolution ProfileSuperresolution Profile Sinc function.
FIELD GEOMETRY FOR MULTICHANNEL SEISMIC (MCS) PROFILES Introduction to Seismic Reflection Imaging: Pt 2.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Migration Velocity Analysis of Multi-source Data Xin Wang January 7,
Controlled Noise Seismology Sherif M. Hanafy 2015 SEG Annual Meeting New Orleans, October 2015.
Lee M. Liberty Research Professor Boise State University.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 23 Feb 2016 Lab 3 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Seismic Reflections Next assignment due one week from now Due noon Mar 1.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 12 Feb 2016
Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity
Seismic Methods Geoph 465/565 ERB 5104 Lecture 7 – Sept 16, 2015
Seismic Refraction Interpretation
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
Processing of KAUST Golf Data
Inverting Resistivity and Seismic Data to Find Subsurface Faults
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
Detection of Qademah Fault using Geophysical Methods
Wavelet estimation from towed-streamer pressure measurement and its application to free surface multiple attenuation Zhiqiang Guo (UH, PGS) Arthur Weglein.
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
Overview of Multisource and Multiscale Seismic Inversion
—Based on 2018 Field School Seismic Data
Seismic Radar Sherif M. Hanafy.
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

Estimating Reservoir Potential of Wadis by Waveform Inversion and Land Streamers

Motivation To characterize the shallow subsurface at Wadi Qudaid for its water storage and reuse potential.

Area of Interest KAUST

Collected Geophysical Data (Seismic Data)

Seismic Data CSG Samples 0.0 0.3 232 X (m) Time (s) 0.0 0.3 232 X (m) Time (s) 0.0 0.3 232 X (m) Time (s) 0.0 0.3 232 X (m) Time (s)

Data Processing Apply a bandpass filter of 15 ~ 70 Hz. Correct for the geometric spreading: 3D → 2D. Correct for attenuation by an estimated Q. Mute the near-offset traces within 14 m. Extract a natural source wavelet by averaging the near-offset first arrivals.

Seismic Result

Collected Geophysical Data (Resistivity Data)

Resistivity Result P2 P1 P2 P1

Land Streamer Test Test # 1 Saudi Arabia

Land Streamer Geophysical Field Laboratory at KAUST has 5 land streamers P-wave geophones 24-channel at each streamer Up to 2 m geophone interval

Test # 1 Data are collected at Saudi Arabia Two parallel lines are collected The first is a conventional seismic profile, where geophones are planted in the ground The second is a land streamer survey

1.5 m Land Streamer Shot Location Conventional Seismic

a) CSG # 74, Convention Seismic Data Trace Comparison a) CSG # 74, Convention Seismic Data Time (s) 0.2 93 153 X (m)

b) CSG # 74, Land Streamer Seismic Data Trace Comparison b) CSG # 74, Land Streamer Seismic Data Time (s) 0.2 93 153 X (m)

Test # 2 Robotec Survey Utah, USA Land Streamer Test Test # 2 Robotec Survey Utah, USA

Test # 2 Robotic Land Streamer Data are collected at Utah, USA One profile is collected with 10 CSGs In each shot gather the land streamer moved 10 times to give a total number of traces/shot gather of 231 Shot Loc. ………… Position 1 Position 2 Position 3 Position 10

Test # 2 CSG Sample Sample interval = 2 ms 0.0 Sample 550 0.0 17.56 X (m) Sample interval = 2 ms