Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group New Technologies Committee Noise Abatement Measures and Criteria  Committee priorities and screening assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
3rd Module: Information Systems Strategy and Planning:
Advertisements

Airport Planning and Design
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Sensitive Facilities Committee AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Louisville and Jefferson County MITIGATION ISSUES.
The Value of a Project Management Office Copyright: Kathy J. Lang, 2004.
The pilot and airline operator’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 1.
What is Multimedia Includes: Sound Animation Video and Graphics.
1 Information Systems Development (ISD) Systems Development Life Cycle Overview of Analysis Phase Overview of Design Phase CP2236: Information Systems.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
GEMS3 works with private and public stakeholders at national, State and LGA levels to build and deliver a systematic framework that helps make it easier.
1 Moderated by Gordon Gillerman National Institute of Standards & Technology November 10, 2010 Ninth Annual ANSI-HSSP Plenary: U.S. European Collaboration.
1 The critical challenge facing banks and regulators under Basel II: improving risk management through implementation of Pillar 2 Simon Topping Hong Kong.
1 Comprehensive Management Plan for East Hampton Airport  Safety, Noise and Operations Peter J. Kirsch December 1, 2011.
PROJECT INFORMATION PUBLIC OUTREACH WHO IS INVOLVED?
1 Referrals, Evaluations and Eligibility Determinations Office of Vocational and Educational Services for Individuals with Disabilities Special Education.
Fifth Public Meeting Review of the Draft Noise Compatibility Program September 18, 2002 Reid-Hillview Airport FAR Part 150 Noise and Land Use Compatibility.
Environmental Management Systems An Overview With Practical Applications.
Computer Security: Principles and Practice
The air traffic controller’s perspective on runway excursion hazards and mitigation options Session 2 Presentation 3.
FPSC Safety, LLC ISO AUDIT.
1 Risk Assessment Develop Objectives And Goals Develop and Screen Cleanup Alternatives Select Final Cleanup Alternative Communicate Decisions to the Public.
An Accountant’s Look at the Changing Horizons within SOX 404 Presented to Colorado Bar Association’s Securities Law Group Presented by Bill Evert Hein.
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group NOISE ABATEMENT STRATEGIES Alternatives and Results New Zion Baptist Church Neighborhood Orientation and Discussion.
Experiences and lessons learned from the TNA of China WANG Can Tsinghua University, China UNFCCC workshop on Technology Needs Assessments Bonn, Germany.
JJDPA Reauthorization 2009: An Update DMC Action Network Annual Meeting May 15, 2009.
Objectives To identify the key parts of the clients brief. To identify possible success criteria To complete the specification sheet.
CVFPB Executive Committee Meeting – Agenda Item No. 8A Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
Lecture 4 1 Introduction to Systems Planning Lecture 4 2 Objectives n Describe the strategic planning process n Explain the purpose of a mission statement.
Capability Maturity Model. History Effort started by SEI and MITRE Corporation  assess capability of DoD contractors First version published in.
TEN-T Experts Briefing, March Annual Call Award Criteria.
1 Asset Management Steering Committee Briefing on Senate Bill 408 (Access Management) August 2013 Harold Lasley, P.E. Access Management Program.
Project Management Models
Georgia Institute of Technology CS 4320 Fall 2003.
East Hampton Airport Safety, Noise and Operational Management Plan Peter J. Kirsch December 1, 2011.
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
Draft GEO Framework, Chapter 6 “Architecture” Architecture Subgroup / Group on Earth Observations Presented by Ivan DeLoatch (US) Subgroup Co-Chair Earth.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee AIRPORT NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Louisville and Jefferson County FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Decision Support Aids for Patient/Providers Cathy Melvin Maria Fernandez Jennifer Allen.
1  The objective of operational risk management is the same as for credit, market and liquidity risks that is to find out the extent of the financial.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
Principles of I-4 Risk Management. 2 Prevention of Serious Incidents is The Highest Priority.
Development of the Egyptian Code of Practice for Student Assessment Lamis Ragab, MD, MHPE Hala Salah, MD.
F E D E R A L A V I A T I O N A D M I N I S T R A T I O N A I R T R A F F I C O R G A N I Z A T I O N 1 Wide Area Augmentation System (WAAS) Dan Hanlon.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
System Planning (Overview of Feasibility) System Planning (Overview of Feasibility) - Mr. Ahmad Al-Ghoul System Analysis and Design.
Sustainable Community EMS Design Including Pollution Prevention Michelle M. Wyman Reed Smith Shaw & McClay LLP EMS Models and Strategies: ISO & Beyond.
Doing Applied Science. Why the Poor Link to the Applied Environment? When you understand what is real, how to apply it is a relatively minor matter In.
11 Regional Renewable Energy Study Review of Findings and Forecasts Presented to: Climate, Energy and Environment and Policy Committee Metropolitan Washington.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
Superior Infrastructure – Phase One Lenora Chapman & Michelle Stevenson Presenting.
AIRCRAFT ENGINE EMISSIONS The results of CAEP/5 by Gerard Bekebrede.
Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group Navigation Committee Noise Abatement Strategies: The Critical Questions  Which runway use provides the most noise.
Information Systems Development
NOISE COMPATIBILITY PROGRAM Completing the Package
Research methodology.
An assessment framework for Intrusion Prevention System (IPS)
(Additional materials)
Requirement Change Control Procedure
Mitigation Strategy “The long-term blueprint for reducing the potential losses identified in the risk assessment. The mitigation strategy includes the.
Identify stakeholders. Design a strategy. Set up a program.
(System Development Life Cycle)
WG C – Groundwater Activity WGC-3 Risk Assessment (RA) and
Information Systems Development (ISD) Systems Development Life Cycle
AIRCRAFT NOISE The results of CAEP/5
Agricultural Land & Avian Foraging Habitat Mitigation Fee
Requirements engineering in Cloud Computing
Presentation transcript:

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group New Technologies Committee Noise Abatement Measures and Criteria  Committee priorities and screening assessment compared  acknowledge disconnects discussed in other committees  sound assessment of technology requires hard data and analysis  focus on measures of specific interest to the committee  Advanced technology  need means to evaluate effects of hardware, not just procedures  if hardware not developed enough for evaluation, document ‘state of the art’ for further study

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group New Technologies Committee Noise Abatement Measures  Navigation aids  variety of alternatives, hard to dictate specifics to users  consider common standard instead, e.g. “RNP” (required navigational performance)  bottom line: tighten flight tracks to within ±X, with X as small a standard as can be adopted  Airport facilities  most measures deferred to mitigation assessment  runway extension/overrun: evaluate as preexisting

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group New Technologies Committee Noise Abatement Strategies  “Further analysis” of advanced technology hard to discern  screening assessment lacks specifics  strategies combine multiple measures  discrimination of individual effects not pre-designed  Knowledge base resulting from study of technology- based measures may be at least as important as model results

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group New Technologies Committee Noise Mitigation Screening Criteria  Suggested criteria adequate  consistent with study goals  reduce/prevent non-compatible land use  provide noticeable noise reduction  consistent with local policies  feasible  Refinements  distinguish between 2d, 3d  noise reduction is quantitative - support evaluation with hard data  “feasible” must specify  technically  economically

Airport Noise Compatibility Study Group New Technologies Committee Noise Mitigation Measures Measures adequate; focus on knowledge base, implementation  Document available knowledge on measures assessed, whether adopted or not  remedial measures  compensatory measures  preventive measures  Impose systematic process on any on-site mitigation project  measure existing noise reduction  design/specify mitigation standards  re-examine facility; adjust as required  certify attainment of standards  qualified management and oversight