Landfill Closure SWANA November 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Municipal Solid Waste Defined in 40 CFR Part 258.2
Advertisements

The Committee and Research – Where are we and where might we be going?
WATER QUALITY ANALYSIS for ANTIDEGRADATION
Presentation by: LT Environmental, Inc.. Why Stormwater Matters Water is a precious resource that must be protected. Flood-defensive measures will protect.
Certification of Compliance By Evita Lagard
Role of Activity & Use Limitations in Clean Energy Development at Disposal Sites Elizabeth Callahan Acting Division Director, Policy and Program Planning,
Chapter F.A.C. Updates F. Thomas Lubozynski, P.E. Waste Program Administrator.
1 Results Based Regulation Implications for Municipal Solid Waste Management Presented By: Blake E. Nesbitt Saskatchewan Ministry of Environment SUMA Convention.
 ideally the disposal methods should meet the following condition:  environment friendly  cause no health hazard  economically less demanding  maximum.
Natural Gas Drilling Activities - A State Perspective Ryan Benefield, P.E. Deputy Director, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality
Promoting Renewable Energy Development on Closed MA Landfills Sarah Weinstein, Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection, AEHS Foundation, UMass.
Environment Engineering I
CE 326 Principles of Environmental Engineering Prof. Tim Ellis February 4, 2008 Municipal Solid Wastes
The Process of Siting and Approving a New Landfill in Ontario
EXAMINATION OF MODERN SANITARY LANDFILLS W. Gregory Vogt Chair, Sanitary Landfill Working Group, ISWA Vice President, SCS Engineers.
Utah Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (UPDES) Utah Sewer Management Program (USMP)
SWPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Creating/Implementing a Plan for Compliance.
NPDES Phase II Storm Water Regulations: WHAT MUNICIPAL GOVERNMENTS NEED TO KNOW.
PUBLIC INFORMATION SESSION: Old Fall River Road Landfill Dartmouth, MA Massachusetts Unlined Landfill Closure Policy March 28, 2013 Mark Dakers, Acting.
Wes Marshall, P.E. University of Connecticut March 2007 CE 276 Site Design Chapter 10 – Soil Erosion & Sediment Control.
Env 247 Overview of Stormwater Management March 1, 2011.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
G3 – Environmental Geomechanics (Dr Sam Yuen)
Storm Water Discharges from Oil and Gas Related Construction Activities EPA Public Meeting Dallas, Texas May 10, 2005.
Bob Evans, Director Lexington Field Office Office of Surface Mining Reclamation & Enforcement.
1 ELEMENTS OF AN EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN PLANNING APPROACH Issued May 2009 Level II: Introduction to Design Education and Certification for Persons.
E&P STORM WATER OVERVIEW Domestic Onshore Energy E&P STORM WATER OVERVIEW Domestic Onshore Energy May 10, 2005.
EnE 301: ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING
Landfill. ESSENTIAL COMPONENTS 7 essential components are: (a) A liner system at the base and sides of the landfill which prevents migration.
20 – Operation and Maintenance 1/45 “There is no sensible reason to design and prepare for a better engineered landfill if it is not operated in a better.
Creating a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan For Construction Activities.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
New Stormwater Regulations “C.3” Provisions in effect Feb. 15, 2005.
Matthew Udenenwu Waste Permits Division 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
Review of the Nipissar Lake Replenishment Project, Rankin Inlet, Nunavut September 25, 2014 NWB Hearing Presentation Type A Water License Amendment Application.
Idaho Solid Waste Facility Record Keeping June 20, 2006 Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines January 19, 2010 Daniel Hall, Solid Waste Section Chief.
CCR Rule: Consultant’s Perspective 2015 Air & Waste Management Association Meeting Callaway Gardens, GA Presented by: Randy Sullivan, Principal & Senior.
David Dippel, P.G. Frank Zeng, P.E. Waste Permits Division Municipal Solid Waste Permits Section 2015 TCEQ Environmental Trade Fair.
October Mary Louise Hendrickson Solid Waste Section – Technical Lead
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Permitting Guidelines June 17, 2009 Mark Dakers, Environmental Analyst Massachusetts.
Landfill Closure Issues. Stormwater Retention  Florida Regulations - –must collect and detain runoff from first 1” of rainfall (for > 100 acres, 0.5”
APPLICATIONS OF WATER QUALITY REGULATIONS Module 22, part c – Applications.
Soil Quality Measurement Unit: Soil Science Lesson 7.
Environmental Toolbox. Technical Module Introduction.
Lynne Welsh Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
New Development and Significant Development 12/21/20151 New Development & Significant Redevelopment.
SWANA - Saskatchewan Landfill Capital and Operational Costs By Steve Johnson M.Eng., P.Eng. November 2015.
Proper Waste Management Today For A Better Tomorrow SWANA Waste Management Workshops Saskatchewan November 2015.
Bureau of Watershed Management Preliminary Regulatory Proposal Chapter 102 Erosion, Sediment and Stormwater Management December 19, 2007.
Jim Lapp City of Edmonton SWANA Northern Lights Chapter 2/19/2016Lesson 11 1.
Regulations and Best Practices January 2016
December 6, 2004CIWMB P&E Committee Workshop1 Postclosure Maintenance Postclosure Maintenance Beyond the Initial 30 Years and Financial Assurance Demonstrations.
Renewable Energy at Closed Landfills Workshop: Landfill Post Closure Use Critical Components July 26, 2012 John Carrigan MassDEP Northeast Regional Office.
Lithuanian Water Suppliers Association LEGAL REGULATION OF WASTEWATER DISPOSAL AND TREATMENT IN LITHUANIA.
SWPPP: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Creating/Implementing a Plan for Compliance.
Let’s Begin! Writing Manure Management Plans!. Manure Management Manual DEP Manure Management Manual can be divided into 3 Parts: Part I Requirements/Guidelines.
1. Wolfeboro’s Tool Kit Implemented tools for water quality protection Municipal Watershed District Ground Water Protection Overlay District Steep Slope.
Mandatory Requirements of Ecological Solid Waste Management Act (RA 9003) on CLOSURE AND REHABILITATION OF DUMPSITES.
Results of the Review of MSW Landfill Regulations from Selected States and Countries Landfill Facility Compliance Study presented to California Integrated.
ENGINEERING CHALLENGES OF SITING RENEWABLE ENERGY AT LANDFILLS Ronald Johnson, PE, GE Brownfields Conference 2011 Philadelphia, PA April 5,
Upland Landfill Waste Discharge Application 7295 Gold River Highway
Numfon Eaktasang ,Ph.D Thammasat University
PENNSYLVANIA STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES MANUAL
Land Use and Zoning Committee Special Workshop
Scientific or Engineered Landfilling of Waste
WASTE DISPOSAL No matter what processing is done, there will be some residue that needs to be disposed of safely Options for disposal Modern, engineered.
Closure and Post-Closure
the path less traveled Termination of Post Closure Care
Presentation transcript:

Landfill Closure SWANA November 2015

Closure Discussions What is Final Closure? Regulations Steps to Implement Final Closure Design Considerations Cover Systems Contaminating Lifespan Financial Considerations

What Does Closure Mean? Final cover and environmental systems to be placed on and over the landfill once it stops accepting waste. Final cover provides long-term protection against vectors, while reducing infiltration and soil erosion. Long-term protection of ground and surface water resources.

Closure Objectives Minimize post-closure leachate generation (protect environment). Minimize post-closure maintenance. Allow site to return to some beneficial use as quickly as possible. Make site aesthetically acceptable. Accommodate settlement. Prevent wind blown litter. Suppress fire dangers. Monitor performance of engineered controls.

Regulations Municipal Refuse Management Regulation (1986) Draft Guideline for the Closure and Reclamation of Municipal Waste Disposal Grounds (1998) Saskatchewan Environmental Code, Landfill Chapter Stormwater Guidelines (2014)

Municipal Refuse Management Regulation Submission of proposal and approvals required to closure landfill. Ministry of Environment sets terms and conditions to carry out landfill closure, dependant upon site sensitivity.

Draft Guideline for the Closure and Reclamation of Municipal Waste Disposal Grounds Closure / Decommissioning Plan Assess level of risk to determine minimum closure and reclamation requirements. Includes: Notification – public notification of intent to close. Sign placement at entrance. Site Clean-Up. Day of Closure – Public access prohibited. Rodent control. Grading and Capping. Site Plan. Complete “Decommissioning Information on Municipal Waste Disposal Grounds” Survey. Register. End-Use.

Saskatchewan Environmental Code Landfill Chapter Closure required if landfill no longer accepts waste or has not accepted waste for at least two consecutive years. Closure by following either the Acceptable Solutions or proposing Alternative Solution. Closure requirements dependant upon site sensitivity.

Stormwater Guidelines (2014) Guidance with respect to stormwater management and water quality. Closure systems to address long-term post-closure storm water. Off site discharge of storm water. Use of sediment fore bays and pond structures.

Post-Closure Monitoring Steps to Final Closure Landfill owner submits a Pre-Closure Proposal to Environment, outlining the steps which will be taken in closing the landfill to protect the environment. Environmental Protection Plan. Closure Plan Obtain approval for closure prior to undertaking activities. Approvals Design and construction. Closure Report. Detailed Design Typically developed after closure design. Post-Closure Plan Environmental control systems performance. Post-Closure Monitoring

Closure Plan Notification of closure. Report years site in operation and quantity of waste in place. Schedule for completion of closure works. Identify site sensitivity / receptors. Site cleanup. Address storm water, leachate, landfill gas, and erosion control measures. Final contours and cover system design concept. Buffer zones and compliance boundaries. Water balance / long term-leachate generation. Decommissioning of facilities. Estimation of contaminating lifespan.

Estimation of Percolation Leachate Generation Erosion and Slope Stability Cost Surface Water Runoff onto Adjacent Lands Selection of Landfill Cover Components Risk Assessment Receptors Long-Term Performance & Durability Material Availability Spatial Constraints

Components of Closure Systems Final Grading Cover System Storm water management Leachate management Landfill Gas Management Environmental Monitoring Systems

Grading Grading a key component in landfill closure often not given its due. Slopes typically between 5 and 33 percent. Settlement of 10 percent (or more) of total waste height should be expected. Differential settlement common. Crest slope critical. Drainage from slopes.

Types of Cover Systems Numerous types of landfill cover systems have been developed. Suitable cover system options are site specific based upon numerous factors.

Roles of Cover System Components Vegetative Cover – reduces infiltration, wind erosion, and improves slope stability. Filter Layer – Prevents sifting of cover soil into drainage layer. Drainage Layer – provides conduit for water to exist cover system. Barrier Layer – minimizes infiltration through cover, barrier for vectors, and odour control.

Clay Cover Systems Readily constructible. Low capital cost (if suitable material available) Approvals well defined. Susceptible to shrinkage cracking and/or freeze/thaw cycles. May have higher permeability than base liner. May be susceptible to differential settlement.

Evopotranspiration Covers Climatic specific. Suitable for semi-arid environments only. Not significantly impacted by drying or freeze/thaw cycles. May be more effective than compacted clay covers. Design and regulatory approvals more intensive. Suitable soils required.

Composite Cover Systems Excellent performance with very low infiltration rates possible. Suitable for high sensitivity. Not affected by freeze/thaw or drying. Decreased profile depth. May have higher capital costs relative to clay. Design and regulatory approvals may be more intensive. Require specialized installation and QA/QC.

Stormwater Management Manage, at a minimum the 1:25 year event. May be required to manage the 1:100 year event depending on site conditions and receptors. Balancing Act: Preserve hydrologic cycle and getting storm water off limit of waste area ASAP. Ongoing maintenance and inspection.

Leachate Management Leachate Management ranges from natural attenuation to active treatment. Active treatment range from on-site treatment, wetlands, to pumping via force main to off-site treatment facility.

Landfill Gas Management

Environmental Monitoring Monitoring performance of environmental controls, and closure systems. Groundwater Surface water Soil gas

Post-Closure Plan Address long-term site inspection, monitoring and maintenance. Address post-closure reporting and record keeping requirements. Ongoing post-closure care through “Contaminating Lifespan” of site.

Elements of Post Closure Care Final Cover System Erosion control Mowing and Overseeding Invasive Species Storm water management Ditch maintenance Pond dredging Damage from large storm events Leachate Management Leachate treatment and disposal Landfill Gas Management LFG collection system operations, maintenance. Equipment replacement. Environmental Monitoring Groundwater Surface water Soil gas

Financial Considerations

Financial Considerations Contaminating Lifespan Post Closure Liabilities Closure Costs Maintenance, Monitoring and Reporting Costs Contributions to Reserves. Financial Analysis

Contaminating Lifespan How long before I can walk away from a landfill site? The “minimum 25 year” catch. Termination of post-closure care when: Contaminants of concern do not exceed background concentrations. Waste stabilization. Actual landfill contaminating lifespan may be significantly longer than 25 years.

Post-Closure Liabilities Ongoing maintenance of landfill environmental controls (cover system, surface water controls, etc.). Leachate treatment and disposal for sites with leachate collection systems. Ongoing environmental monitoring and annual reporting. Contingency reserve to address the unforeseeable.

Closure Costs Final cover and stormwater management system / closure costs are highly variable and dependant upon numerous factors including: Site sensitivity (environmental receptors); Site geology and topography; Meteorological conditions; Material availability; and Spatial constraints.

Closure Costs – Part 2 So how much ??? $15-35 per square meter for compacted clay cover systems when materials readily available, low sensitivity. $40-50 per square meter for compacted clay covers systems when material scarce or high sensitivity. $50-80 per square meter for geosynthetic composite covers for high sensitivity areas where “entombment” is required.

Financial Assurance Currently only required for non-municipal landfills. Under proposed Environmental Code, Landfill Chapter, financial assurances would be required for all privately owned landfills as part of permit by end of the five-year phase-in period.

Closure / Post-Closure Reserves Planning for landfill closure is a lot like planning for your retirement!! Start early. Be conservative with length of contaminating lifespan. Account for closure, post-closure activities, and a contingency fund to replace the house roof. How much to stash away per year into a reserve fund? Life cycle cost analysis.

“Rule of Thumb” Stuff If all else fails…. $4 to $6 per tonne is a good place to start, depending upon size of site and time until closure. Post-closure monitoring - $25,000 to $50,000. Post-closure maintenance - $25,000 Leachate management and disposal – current unit costs.

Life Cycle Cost Analysis Cradle to Crypt approach to financial analysis of a landfill typically employs a LCA methodology. Used to evaluate tipping fees. Takes into account the following: Remaining Airspace/Site Life; Operating, expansion and closure costs; and Post-closure liabilities. Answers the question, “does the present tipping fee structure financially support ongoing operation, development, closure and post-closure liabilities for the landfill site”.

Closure Example Rural attenuation landfill. Low sensitivity. Existing GW monitoring wells (3). No storm water infrastructure. Attenuation (unlined) site. Closure area of 1.2 hectares. Topsoil stockpiled on site. Readily available clay barrier soil. Some regrading required to achieve 3H:1V (33 percent) slopes.

Closure Costs Item Description Unit Approx. Quantity Unit Price Total Price Administration and Execution Requirements Bonds, Insurance, Mobilization, Demobilization, Temporary Controls and Closeout (15%)   $53,025 Closure / Reclamation Grading C.M. 1,500 $15 $22,500 Final Cover / Reclamation - supply, place, compact, grade, and seed S.M. 12,000 $25 $300,000 Stormwater Ditching L.M. 400 $40 $16,000 Pond with emergency spillway L.S. $15,000 Subtotal $375,525 Engineering and Approvals (10%) $37,553 Total (Excluding GST) $413,078

Post Closure Liabilities Description Annual Costs Environmental Monitoring (3 wells, bi-annual) $14,000 Final Cover Maintenance $5,000 Stormwater Management Maintenance General Maintenance Reserve Total $29,000 Total for 25 Year Time Period $725,000

Thank You!!