Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Analysis of CMAQ Performance and Grid-to- grid Variability Over 12-km and 4-km Spacing Domains within the Houston airshed Daiwen Kang Computer Science.
Advertisements

Photochemical Model Performance for PM2.5 Sulfate, Nitrate, Ammonium, and pre-cursor species SO2, HNO3, and NH3 at Background Monitor Locations in the.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1 Modeling of 1,3-Butadiene for Urban and Industrial Areas B. Rappenglück and B. Czader.
An Assessment of CMAQ with TEOM Measurements over the Eastern US Michael Ku, Chris Hogrefe, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla PM Model Performance Workshop,
Sensitivity to changes in HONO emissions from mobile sources simulated for Houston area Beata Czader, Yunsoo Choi, Lijun Diao University of Houston Department.
Incorporation of the Model of Aerosol Dynamics, Reaction, Ionization and Dissolution (MADRID) into CMAQ Yang Zhang, Betty K. Pun, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Improving the Representation of Atmospheric Chemistry in WRF William R. Stockwell Department of Chemistry Howard University.
4-km AIRPACT vs 12-km AIRPACT Both with dynamic boundary conditions from MOZART-4 Figures created on 5/29/2011 (corrected corrupted JPROC input file)
Integrating satellite observations for assessing air quality over North America with GEOS-Chem Mark Parrington, Dylan Jones University of Toronto
Ozone Production Efficiency in the Baltimore/Washington Urban Plume Presentation by Linda Hembeck Co-Authors: Christopher Loughner, Timothy Vinziguerra,
Integration of CMAQ into the Western Macedonia environmental management system A. Sfetsos 1,2, J. Bartzis 2 1 Environmental Research Laboratory, NCSR Demokritos.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
A Modeling Investigation of the Climate Effects of Air Pollutants Aijun Xiu 1, Rohit Mathur 2, Adel Hanna 1, Uma Shankar 1, Frank Binkowski 1, Carlie Coats.
Examination of the impact of recent laboratory evidence of photoexcited NO 2 chemistry on simulated summer-time regional air quality Golam Sarwar, Robert.
Comparison of three photochemical mechanisms (CB4, CB05, SAPRC99) for the Eta-CMAQ air quality forecast model for O 3 during the 2004 ICARTT study Shaocai.
Impact of Emissions on Intercontinental Long-Range Transport Joshua Fu, Yun-Fat Lam and Yang Gao, University of Tennessee, USA Rokjin Park, Seoul National.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory | Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division| A Tale of Two Models: A Comparison.
Importance of Lightning NO for Regional Air Quality Modeling Thomas E. Pierce/NOAA Atmospheric Modeling Division National Exposure Research Laboratory.
1 Recent Advances in the Modeling of Airborne Substances George Pouliot Shan He Tom Pierce.
1 Using Hemispheric-CMAQ to Provide Initial and Boundary Conditions for Regional Modeling Joshua S. Fu 1, Xinyi Dong 1, Kan Huang 1, and Carey Jang 2 1.
Annual Simulations of Models-3/CMAQ: Issues and Lessons Learned Pat Dolwick, Carey Jang, Norm Possiel, Brian Timin, Joe Tikvart Air Quality Modeling Group.
On the Model’s Ability to Capture Key Measures Relevant to Air Quality Policies through Analysis of Multi-Year O 3 Observations and CMAQ Simulations Daiwen.
A comparison of PM 2.5 simulations over the Eastern United States using CB-IV and RADM2 chemical mechanisms Michael Ku, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla.
Modeling of Ammonia and PM 2.5 Concentrations Associated with Emissions from Agriculture Megan Gore, D.Q. Tong, V.P. Aneja, and M. Houyoux Department of.
Rick Saylor 1, Barry Baker 1, Pius Lee 2, Daniel Tong 2,3, Li Pan 2 and Youhua Tang 2 1 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory.
A detailed evaluation of the WRF-CMAQ forecast model performance for O 3, and PM 2.5 during the 2006 TexAQS/GoMACCS study Shaocai Yu $, Rohit Mathur +,
Presented at the AQAST 9 th Semiannual Meeting Wednesday June 3 rd, 2015 Presentation by: Dan Goldberg, Ph.D. Candidate Co-authors: Tim Canty, Tim Vinciguerra,
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division C. Nolte, R. Pinder, W. Benjey, D.
Model & Chemistry Intercomparison CMAQ with CB4, CB4-2002, SAPRC99 Ralph Morris, Steven Lau, Bongyoung Koo ENVIRON International Corporation Gail Tonnesen,
TEMIS user workshop, Frascati, 8-9 October 2007 TEMIS – VITO activities Felix Deutsch Koen De Ridder Jean Vankerkom VITO – Flemish Institute for Technological.
Prakash V. Bhave, Ph.D. Physical Scientist PM Model Performance Workshop February 10, 2004 Postprocessing Model Output for Comparison to Ambient Data.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
U.S. EPA and WIST Rob Gilliam *NOAA/**U.S. EPA
William G. Benjey* Physical Scientist NOAA Air Resources Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling Division Research Triangle Park, NC Fifth Annual CMAS.
Effects of Emission Adjustments on Peak Ground-Level Ozone Concentration in Southeast Texas Jerry Lin, Thomas Ho, Hsing-wei Chu, Heng Yang, Santosh Chandru,
Evaluation of Models-3 CMAQ I. Results from the 2003 Release II. Plans for the 2004 Release Model Evaluation Team Members Prakash Bhave, Robin Dennis,
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
THE MODELS-3 COMMUNITY MULTI- SCALE AIR QUALITY (CMAQ) MODEL: 2002 RELEASE – NEW FEATURES Jonathan Pleim, Francis Binkowski, Robin Dennis, Brian Eder,
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Extending Size-Dependent Composition to the Modal Approach: A Case Study with Sea Salt Aerosol Uma Shankar and Rohit Mathur The University of North Carolina.
Robert W. Pinder, Alice B. Gilliland, Robert C. Gilliam, K. Wyat Appel Atmospheric Modeling Division, NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, in partnership with.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division October 21, 2009 Evaluation of CMAQ.
Impact of dimethylsulfide chemistry on sulfate Golam Sarwar, Kathleen Fahey, Kristen Foley, Brett Gantt, Deborah Luecken, Rohit Mathur October 7, 2015.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
Office of Research and Development | National Exposure Research Laboratory Atmospheric Sciences Modeling and Analysis Division |Research Triangle Park,
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
W. T. Hutzell 1, G. Pouliot 2, and D. J. Luecken 1 1 Atmospheric Modeling Division, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 2 Atmospheric Sciences Modeling.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Implementation of an Online Photolysis Module in CMAQ 4.7 Christopher G. Nolte.
Sensitivity of PM 2.5 Species to Emissions in the Southeast Sun-Kyoung Park and Armistead G. Russell Georgia Institute of Technology Sensitivity of PM.
ORIGIN OF BACKGROUND OZONE IN SURFACE AIR OVER THE UNITED STATES: CONTRIBUTION TO POLLUTION EPISODES Daniel J. Jacob and Arlene M. Fiore Atmospheric Chemistry.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Examining the impact of aerosol direct.
Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Examination of sulfate production by CB05TU, RACM2, and RACM2 with SCI initiated.
Preliminary Evaluation of the June 2002 Version of CMAQ Brian Eder Shaocai Yu Robin Dennis Jonathan Pleim Ken Schere Atmospheric Modeling Division* National.
SAPRC07T Implementation within the CMAQ model.
Development of a Multipollutant Version of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System Shawn Roselle, Deborah Luecken, William Hutzell,
CRC NARSTO-Northeast Modeling Study
A Performance Evaluation of Lightning-NO Algorithms in CMAQ
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Characteristics of Urban Ozone Formation During CAREBEIJING-2007 Experiment Zhen Liu 04/21/09.
Quantification of Lightning NOX and its Impact on Air Quality over the Contiguous United States Daiwen Kang, Rohit Mathur, Limei Ran, Gorge Pouliot, David.
Changes to the Multi-Pollutant version in the CMAQ 4.7
The Double Dividend of Methane Control
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
Deborah Luecken and Golam Sarwar U.S. EPA, ORD/NERL
Intercontinental Transport, Hemispheric Pollution,
Linking Ozone Pollution and Climate Change:
Simulation of Ozone and PM in Southern Taiwan
Presentation transcript:

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Golam Sarwar, Wyat Appel, Annamrie Carlton, Rohit Mathur, Keneth Schere, Mohammed Majeed October 11, 2010 Impact of an updated toluene mechanism on air quality in the western US

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Background Chemical mechanisms are a critical component of air quality models Toluene is an imporant chemical compound that can affect O 3 and SOA; however its chemistry is poorly understood Different chemical mechanisms use different approximations for toluene chemistry Models using different chemical mechanisms produce different results – Faraji et al. (2008) noted CB-IV & SAPRC99 lead up to 40 ppbv O 3 difference in Houston A large part of the difference was attributed to differences in aromatic chemistry – Whitten et al. (2010) updated the toluene chemistry in CB05 (Whitten et al., A new condensed toluene mechanism for Carbon Bond: CB05-TU, AE)

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Background Chemical mechanisms are evaluated using chamber experimental results – updated toluene chemistry performed better than base chemistry Earlier, we evaluated impact of the updated toluene chemistry on air quality in the eastern US (Sarwar et al., 2010) – Monthly mean 8-hr O 3 increased by up to 2.0 ppbv Here, we examine impact of the updated toluene chemistry on O 3 and PM in the western US

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory TOL CRESTO2 NTR OH CRO OPEN OH HO2 (benzaldehyde) 36%56% 8% NO 10%90% OH NTR NO2 HO2 C2O3 PAN NO2 Ref: Yarwood et al., 2005 Existing toluene chemistry in CB05 mechanism CB05-Base (simplified)

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory TOL CRES TO2 NTR OH CRO OPEN OH HO2 (benzaldehyde) 18% 65% 10% NO 14%86% OH CRON NO2 HO2 OPO3 OPAN NO2 OH 7% CRNO 2 NTR CRN2 O3 NO OH NO2 CRPX OH Ref: Whitten et al., 2010 Updated toluene chemistry in CB05 mechanism CB05-TU (simplified)

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Modeling details CMAQ model CMAQ model version 4.7 was used Horizontal grid resolution = 12-km Number of horizontal grids = 213 X 192 Number of vertical layers = 14 Surface layer thickness = 36 meter Simulation period: July 1 – 31, 2002 Two different model simulations were performed – with CB05-Base – with CB05-TU Used generalized Rosenbrock solver for gas-phase chemistry – Model with CB05-TU required 6% additional computational time

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Modeling details Meteorology and emissions Meteorological fields – PSU/NCAR MM5 system Anthropogenic emissions – 2002 National Emissions Inventory (NEI) Biogenic emissions – Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS) Model-ready emissions – Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emission (SMOKE)

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory CMAQ: impact on daily maximum 8-hr O 3 Changes in mean 8-hr O 3 (CB05-TU - CB05-Base) Mean TOL/VOC (CB05-Base) Monthly mean 8-hr O 3 (CB05-Base) O 3 increases where toluene/VOC ratio is high ppbv

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory CMAQ: variation of daily maximum 8-hr O 3 (CB05-TU – CB05-Base) While CB05-TU increases daily maximum 8-hr O 3 by up to 5-6 ppbv, impact on many other days are low to moderate Los AngelesPortlandSeattle

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory CMAQ: NO z with CB05-Base and increases in NO z with CB05-TU Monthly mean NO z with CB05-Base Changes in mean NO z (CB05-TU - CB05-Base) CB05-TU increases NO z compared to CB05-Base

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory CMAQ: ozone production efficiency (OPE) CB05-Base at Los Angeles CB05-TU at Los Angeles CB05-TU increases O 3 but not OPE

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Comparison with observed data Daily maximum 8-hr O 3 at Seattle MB with CB05-TU decreases slightly at higher observed O 3 and increased slightly at lower observed O 3

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Comparison with observed data Daily maximum 8-hr O 3 at Los Angeles MB decreases slightly with CB05-TU at all observed O 3

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Impact on SOA from toluene Monthly mean SOA with CB05-Base CB05-TU / CB05-Base Predicted SOA increased slightly with CB05-TU (maximum 7%) However, impact on PM 2.5 was also small

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory Summary Updated toluene chemistry enhances monthly mean 8-hr O 3 by up to 2.8 ppbv Updated toluene chemistry produces more NO z than CB05-Base Updated toluene chemistry increase O 3 but not OPE Updated toluene chemistry slightly decreases MB at higher observed O 3 Updated toluene chemistry slightly increases SOA; impact on PM 2.5 is smaller Results are consistent with those reported by Sarwar et al. (2010) for eastern US – CB05-TU increased monthly mean 8-hr O 3 by up to 2.0 ppbv in eastern US