Acceleration Overview J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory January 8, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMMA Upgrade: Slow Acceleration with Low-Frequency Cavity J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory 12 March 2010.
Advertisements

MCDW 2008, JLAB, Dec 8-12, Multi-pass Droplet Arc Design Guimei WANG (Muons Inc./ODU) Dejan Trbojevic (BNL) Alex Bogacz (JLAB)
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation- Variation and 0ptimization David Neuffer, A. Poklonskiy Fermilab.
Task Force on Project X for Muon Collider Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermilab.
Μ-Capture, Energy Rotation, Cooling and High-pressure Cavities David Neuffer Fermilab.
FFAG Ring of magnets, like synchrotron, not solid like cyclotron Fixed field magnets, like cyclotron, not variable like synchrotron Can work at relativistic.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Optimization David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
FFAG Concepts and Studies David Neuffer Fermilab.
ABSTRACT The International Design Study for the Neutrino Factory (IDS- NF) baseline design 1 involves a complex chain of accelerators including a single-pass.
Large Dynamic Acceptance and Rapid Acceleration in a Nonscaling FFAG C. Johnstone Fermilab Shane Koscielniak Triumf WG1 NuFact02 July 4 Imperial College,
, WP1 Meeting, RAL J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs for the NF J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC.
S.J. Brooks RAL, Chilton, OX11 0QX, UK Options for a Multi-GeV Ring Ramping field synchrotron provides fixed tunes and small.
3 GeV,1.2 MW, Booster for Proton Driver G H Rees, RAL.
Source Group Bethan Dorman Paul Morris Laura Carroll Anthony Green Miriam Dowle Christopher Beach Sazlin Abdul Ghani Nicholas Torr.
2002/7/04 College, London Beam Dynamics Studies of FFAG Akira SATO Osaka University.
The ISIS strong focusing synchrotron also at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory. Note that ISIS occupies the same hall as NIMROD used to and re- uses some.
FFAG for next Light Source Alessandro G. Ruggiero Light Source Workshop January 24-26, 2007.
1 Status of EMMA Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 23 April, ffag/machida_ ppt & pdf.
The Overview of the ILC RTML Bunch Compressor Design Sergei Seletskiy LCWS 13 November, 2012.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation and FFAG -Factory Injection David Neuffer Fermilab.
, EUROnu Meeting, Strasbourg J. Pasternak Status and recent progress on muon IDS-FFAG J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL STFC Work.
Front-End Design Overview Diktys Stratakis Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014 D. Stratakis | DOE Review of MAP (FNAL, February 19-20, 2014)1.
Design of an Isochronous FFAG Ring for Acceleration of Muons G.H. Rees RAL, UK.
Dejan Trbojevic Dejan Trbojevic An Update on the FFAG Minimum Emittance Lattice with Distributed RF D. Trbojevic, J. S. Berg, M. Blaskiewicz, E. D. Courant,
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
1 Muon acceleration - amplitude effects in non-scaling FFAG - Shinji Machida CCLRC/RAL/ASTeC 26 April, ffag/machida_ ppt.
Operated by the Jefferson Science Associates for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz, Dogbone RLA – Design.
-Factory Front End Phase Rotation Gas-filled rf David Neuffer Fermilab Muons, Inc.
Recent Progress Toward a Muon Recirculating Linear Accelerator S.A.Bogacz, V.S.Morozov, Y.R.Roblin 1, K.B.Beard 2, A. Kurup, M. Aslaninejad, C. Bonţoiu,
First Thoughts on IDS G H Rees, RAL. Topics 1.Two-way, μ ± injection chicane for the dog-bone RLA. 2.Injection energy & efficiency for a first dog-bone.
 Stephen Brooks / RAL / April 2004 Muon Front Ends Providing High-Intensity, Low-Emittance Muon Beams for the Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider.
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
IDS-NF Accelerator Baseline The Neutrino Factory [1, 2] based on the muon storage ring will be a precision tool to study the neutrino oscillations.It may.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Muon Collider Design Workshop, BNL, December 1-3, 2009.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
HYBRID WARM-COLD SYNCHROTRON FOR THE MUON COLLIDER Al Garren July 28, 2011.
FFAG Acceleration David Neuffer Fermilab FFAG Workshop ‘03.
 1 of 13 Stephen Brooks / RAL / March 2005 Muon Front Ends Providing High-Intensity, Low-Emittance Muon Beams for the Neutrino Factory and Muon Collider.
Future Circular Collider Study Kickoff Meeting CERN ERL TEST FACILITY STAGES AND OPTICS 12–15 February 2014, University of Geneva Alessandra Valloni.
Nufact02, London, July 1-6, 2002K.Hanke Muon Phase Rotation and Cooling: Simulation Work at CERN new 88 MHz front-end update on cooling experiment simulations.
WP3: The Neutrino Factory Costing Status Ajit Kurup CERN Costing Workshop 8 th December 2011.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
P OSSIBILITIES FOR MAINTAINING AA AND PP CAPABILITIES IN PARALLEL WITH E RHIC V. Ptitsyn Collider-Accelerator Department BNL RHIC and AGS Users Meeting,
Bunched-Beam Phase Rotation - Ring Coolers? - FFAGs? David Neuffer Fermilab.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
Operated by the Southeastern Universities Research Association for the U.S. Depart. Of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz Status and Plans for Linac and RLAs.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz 1 Status of Baseline Linac and RLAs Design.
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
MCS meeting 20/11/2015 S. Guiducci. Introduction Yesterday meeting has shown an interest in a large physics community to incremental development of muon.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz 1 Muon Acceleration – RLA, FFAG and Fast Ramping.
Ionization Cooling for Muon Accelerators Prepared by Robert Ryne Presented by Jean-Pierre Delahaye MICE Optics Review Jan, 2016 RAL.
, UKNF Meetin, Imperial College J. Pasternak Status and Recent Progress in the Muon FFAG Designs J. Pasternak, Imperial College, London / RAL.
, IDS Meeting, Fermilab J. Pasternak Challenges of muon FFAG: injection/extraction, beam dynamics and injection/extraction hardware design studies.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz IDS- NF Acceleration Meeting, Jefferson Lab,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Acceleration.
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz 1 Recirculating Linac Acceleration  End-to-end.
Research and development toward a future Muon Collider Katsuya Yonehara Accelerator Physics Center, Fermilab On behalf of Muon Accelerator Program Draft.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Introduction Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab,
Operated by JSA for the U.S. Department of Energy Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Alex Bogacz NuFact’08, Valencia, Spain, July 4, 2008 Alex.
UK Neutrino Factory Conceptual Design
+-- Collider Front end- Balbekov version
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Isochronous, FFAG Rings with Insertions for Rapid Muon or Electron Acceleration G H Rees, RAL.
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
K. Tilley, ISIS, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory, UK Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Acceleration Overview J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory January 8, 2014

Acceleration Goals Accelerate rapidly to avoid decays –High average RF gradient: ≈5 MV/m for 70% transmission Control costs and power use –Make many passes through RF –To simultaneously maintain high average RF gradient: high average dipole field Handle large emittance beams January 8,

Energies and Emittances Neutrino Factory Higgs Factory Top Factory 1.5 TeV Collider 3 TeV Collider ≈6 TeV Collider Energy (GeV) ≈3000 Transverse Emittance (µm) –40050–20025 Longitudinal Emittance (mm) 241–1.51.5–1070 January 8,

Beam Properties Wide variety of emittances to accelerate Biggest challenge is the large longitudinal emittance for the higher energy colliders Higgs factory beam is more reasonable size –But still need to accelerate large longitudinal emittance through that energy range Neutrino factory beam has very large transverse emittance –Specific solution for neutrino factory discussed earlier January 8,

Acceleration Scenario Low Energy Induction linac Low-frequency RF Cooling RF Acceleration to 63 GeV Dogbone RLAs Acceleration to ≈375 GeV Fast-Ramping synchrotron Dogbone RLAs Hybrid synchrotrons Acceleration to 750, 1500, 3000 GeV Hybrid synchrotrons January 8,

Accelerator Types: Linac Best for low energies, large beams Large longitudinal emittance –325 MHz SCRF not possible for low energies (until about 700 MeV) Use technologies from final cooling for acceleration (expensive) –Induction linacs: low gradient –Low frequency RF: low gradient –Cooling RF: high gradient, longitudinal acceptance No re-use of RF January 8,

Accelerator Types: RLA Recirculating linear accelerator Multiple passes through RF Large longitudinal acceptances possible Can’t put too many beamlines in switchyard –Large emittance beam –Limits number of passes Dogbone geometry –Maximizes separation for given number of passes –Gives very high average accelerating gradient Start these right after cooling RF January 8,

Accelerator Types: FFAG Fixed field alternating gradient accelerator Single beamline with wide energy range –No switchyard limiting number of passes Trade single beamline with large magnets for many beamlines with smaller magnets in RLA Passes limited by tolerable longitudinal emittance distortion –Worse with large longitudinal emittance –Do not appear to be cost-effective with 70 mm longitudinal emittance January 8,

Accelerator Types: Synchrotron Synchrotron with very fast ramping time –1.5 T maximum fields Low average bend field: low RF efficiency –Pulse times: 63–375 GeV, 200 µs for 5 MV/m –Beam moves in aperture to correct time of flight –Pulse times too short at low energies Hybrid synchrotron –Alternate fixed-field high-field dipoles and low-field bipolar pulsed dipoles to get large average dipole field –More passes through RF, but faster ramp times –Ideal solution at high energies January 8,

Acceleration Scenario Low Energy Induction linac Low-frequency RF Cooling RF Acceleration to 63 GeV Dogbone RLAs Acceleration to ≈375 GeV Fast-Ramping synchrotron Dogbone RLAs Hybrid synchrotrons Acceleration to 750, 1500, 3000 GeV Hybrid synchrotrons January 8,

Acceleration Scenario Linac with cooling technologies to ≈700 MeV RLA to 63 GeV –Compatible with 70 mm longitudinal emittance Acceleration to ≈375 GeV –RLA or non-hybrid synchrotron Appear to have comparable costs Synchrotron could share tunnel with next stage Relatively safe technologies –Hybrid synchrotron (two stages) Appears better for cost/efficiency Short pulse times a challenge (70 µs for 5 MV/m) January 8,

Acceleration Scenario Hybrid synchrotron above ≈375 GeV –Gets easier as energies increase –10 T SC dipoles, 1.5 T ramped dipoles, looks like could accelerate to 3 TeV on Fermilab site January 8,

Design Challenges RLA switchyard layout Injection/extraction Time of flight correction Collective effects Showstoppers unlikely, but cost escalation an issue January 8,

Status NuMAX concept in place Concept for 63 GeV acceleration in place –May need modifications for 70 mm longitudinal emittance Hybrid synchrotron design exists –Needs modification for current magnet parameters –Needs time of flight correction –Should look at chromaticity correction –Needs to be scaled to other energies January 8,

Key Technologies RF –High-gradient SCRF: higher helps efficiency & decays –High gradients for cooling RF systems used for early acceleration Superconducting magnets: higher fields help efficiency and decays Kickers for injection/extraction January 8,

Key Technologies: Pulsed Magnets Workable designs for 1.5 T –1.8 T with grain oriented steel, but Field line pinning makes this sensitive to construction tolerances Not possible to model accurately with existing codes –FeCo could achieve 2.2 T But need shielding solution for Co activation, unlikely Quadrupole design Better understand steel behavior with short pulse times, high fields, thin laminates –Pushing limits on existing measurements –Consequences of short pulse times Power supplies: controlled ramp January 8,

Schedule FY14FY15FY16 NuMAX to ≈1 GeV NuMAX to 5 GeV To 63 GeV MC Initial To 750 GeV To 1500 GeV To ≈3000 GeV Higher Energy Interface to Ring January 8, ConceptLatticeSign-OffInterfaceTechnology Sign-offReview OKInitial ReviewReviewSpecification

Effort & Key Personnel NuMAX Lattice DesignA. BogaczJLab0.2 RLA Lattice DesignA. BogaczJLab0.4 Switchyard Magnet Design0.2 Switchyard Layout0.2 Synchrotron DesignJ. S. BergBNL1.0 Pulsed Quadrupole DesignH. WitteBNL0.2 Pulsed Power Supply0.2 Kicker System0.3 Initial AccelerationR. B. Palmer, H. Sayed, J. S. BergBNL0.4 Tracking/Verification0.7 Collective Effects0.5 Report/Review PreparationJ. S. BergBNL0.3 Report/Review PreparationA. BogaczJLab January 8,