George I. Sanchez Charter School 713-926-112 [Houston] John De La Cruz Principal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

CIP Part IV: Culture Strategies to Address School Safety/Classroom Management/Discipline/RTI Framework/Building Supportive Learning Environments.
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
TOSS-BFK Administrators’ Evaluation Crosswalk to School-wide Changes
Elementary School Counselor
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Network for College Success The School of Social Service Administration at The University of Chicago A community of Chicago public high school leaders.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
STRATEGIES AND SUGGESTIONS FOR BEGINNING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS BY MACARTHUR JONES ROSANNA LOYA MICHAEL SAENZ FALL 2011 A Leader’s First 100 Days.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
By Laura Nicole Bramlett Watkins
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
NAUGATUCK HIGH SCHOOL STRATEGIC PLAN Presentation to Board of Education November 13, 2014 A collaborative effort between teachers, students, and administrators.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Planning for Secondary Growth DIPBLE nvironments CCRCTEL earning 2014RISDF lexible September 22, 2014.
Frameworks Overall Facts and Presentations Hubbard High School Model Lakeview Career Readiness Certificates Grand Rapids Model.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
Making a Difference in Heidi A. Ramírez, PhD Chief Academic Officer Milwaukee Public Schools.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
District Improvement Plan September 21, 2015.
OPEN HOUSE, SEPTEMBER 19, 2013 Newfane Elementary School.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
TRHS Action Plan Goal 1 O Goal #1: In the School Year TRHS will further develop our Response to Instruction (RTI) model to ensure.
R.B. STEWART MIDDLE SCHOOL REFINING OUR FOCUS BULLDOG 20/20 Professional Learning Communities (PLCs)
April 29, 2011 Developing Effective Leaders: Principal Evaluation Systems CCSSO – National Summit on Educator Effectiveness.
A Mission of Restoration
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
The vision of Davidson County Schools is to graduate ALL students future-ready and globally competitive.
The School Counseling Program
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
School Improvement Plan & Accreditation
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Vision, Mission, and Wildly Important Goals
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
MAPLE VALLEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS DISTRICT PD January 18, 2016.
Welcome Back to Day Two Q and A Professional Learning Communities SMART Goals Mission Statement for improving parent-school relations Book Study “ The.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
U SING D ATA TO ASSESS AND INFORM SCHOOL CHANGE Data for change Presenter: Judith Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
 Gain an understanding of transformational leadership  Gain an understanding of leadership journeys  Participate in discussions related to scenarios.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Peakview School MANAGEMENT PATHWAYS PROPOSAL
Clarke County School District Accountability Report
Paul L. Dunbar Elementary Strategic Plan (Jackson Cluster)
Comprehensive Planning
Texas Title 1 Priority Schools Grant
Staples Motley School District
District Mission & Vision Cluster Mission & Vision
Presentation transcript:

George I. Sanchez Charter School [Houston] John De La Cruz Principal

George I. Sanchez charter School Demographics Enrollment650 GradesPK, 7 th – 12 th TypeAlternative LocationHouston - Urban

George I. Sanchez charter School CategoryGISState At Risk84.6%47.2% LEP24%16.9% Low Income81.1%59%

Challenges

Vision No clear mission No long term vision No alignment to community needs

Teacher/Staff Capacity Number of teachers/staff certified Number of teachers highly qualified Discipline over pedagogy Ownership of responsibility Professional growth

Professional Development Instructional delivery Planning Assessment Alignment

Instructional Practices Vertical alignment Horizontal alignment Data driven Research based

Campus Culture Punitive Non-collaborative Low expectations Limited buy in

Community Involvement Lack of community involvement Low parent engagement Negative community perceptions Limited partnerships

Students Significant gaps Low self-motivation and low expectations Limited parent involvement Lack of ownership in the education process

Transformation

Vision Analyze campus data to assess the success in serving the learning community Bring community and campus members together to create a common vision Align programs to meet the future needs of the community Bring in the personnel to implement the components of the new vision

Teacher /Staff Capacity Provide opportunities for teachers/staff to be certified and highly trained Match HQ teachers with HQ needs Create incentive programs that focus on academic achievement Implement systems that focus on instructional pedagogy Develop PLC’s and campus based leadership opportunities

Professional Development Analyze data to determine appropriate PD for staff Create PD calendar that optimizes opportunities Bring in systems that track data and train staff how to use those systems Expect to see evidence of PD implemented in the classroom Create trainer of trainer model

Instructional Practices Allow for common planning time Develop a common campus dialogue Common template for lesson plans Use data to drive instruction Research based PD implemented campus wide

Campus Culture Change the alternative campus mindset Bring collaborative practices Raise expectations Build leadership across the campus

Community Involvement Create meet and greets Seek input and maintain communication Share the Vision Seek out and develop partnerships Create systems to maximize community involvement

Students Implement instructional programs that help students close the gaps Implement Positive Behavior Systems Emphasize the positives and use the support systems More choices and more focus on future opportunities

Results

Vision Education as the core of the non-profit organization Aligns with NCLB and college career readiness Allows for a comprehensive education that meets the needs and wants of the community SMARTer than before

Teacher/Staff Capacity Number of certified staff: 2010 vs. Present Systems in place: 2010 vs. Present Incentive and leadership opportunities:2010 vs. Present Staff and teachers: 2010 vs. Present PLC’s: 2010 vs. Present

Professional Development Data software systems now in place Trained staff that now uses data to drive instruction PD plan that builds on and extends previous PD “Inspect what you expect” attitude campus wide Tap into the best/most motivated staff to create trainer of trainer model

Instructional Practices Collaboration at all levels Consistent practices and expectations Data sharing Best practices: innovation, relevancy, rigor, and reflection

Campus Culture Comprehensive opportunities making GIS a a school of choice PLC’s and a larger community presence High expectations for staff, students, and parents diverse Numerous leadership opportunities for the entire campus community

Community Involvement Parent and community involvement increasing rapidly Greater parent input and more resources Positive impressions – Positive results 2010 vs. Present New systems, new programs, new staff

Students Systems: 2010 vs. Present Merits and recognitions Data and surveys: Parent and student satisfaction levels New classes and new opportunities in 2011

Turning the Corner PBMAS TTIPS CCR & CTE NDPN

Questions? About the challenges? About the process? About the results? About our campus? About us?

Thank You! “Our Students Are Transforming Today For A Better Tomorrow” John De La Cruz Principal Giselle Easton Dean of Instruction Terri Kouba Teacher Facilitator Bianca Arriazola Teacher Facilitator Roger Ramirez Teacher Math Rosas Lead counselor