Chapter 23 Deciding how to collect data. UIDE Chapter 23 Introduction: Preparing to Collect Evaluation Data Timing and Logging Actions –Automatic Logging.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation of User Interface Design
Advertisements

Fact Finding Techniques
Human Computer Interaction
Human Computer Interaction
CS305: HCI in SW Development Evaluation (Return to…)
Web E’s goal is for you to understand how to create an initial interaction design and how to evaluate that design by studying a sample. Web F’s goal is.
Cognitive Walkthrough More evaluation without users.
Each individual person is working on a GUI subset. The goal is for you to create screens for three specific tasks your user will do from your GUI Project.
ACTIVELY ENGAGING THE STAKEHOLDER IN DEFINING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE BUSINESS, THE STAKEHOLDER, SOLUTION OR TRANSITION Requirements Elicitation.
Observing Users Paul Bogen, LaShon Johnson, Jehoon Park.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. Usability Testing Emphasizes the property of being usable Key Components –User Pre-Test –User Test –User.
Collecting Quantitative Data
©N. Hari Narayanan Computer Science & Software Engineering Auburn University 1 COMP 7620 Evaluation Chapter 9.
© De Montfort University, 2001 Questionnaires contain closed questions (attitude scales) and open questions pre- and post questionnaires obtain ratings.
Empirical Methods in Human- Computer Interaction.
Think-aloud usability experiments or concurrent verbal accounts Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research group School of Information.
Evaluation of usability tests. Why evaluate? 1. choose the most suitable data- collection techniques 2. identify methodological strength and weaknesses.
Part 4: Evaluation Chapter 20: Why evaluate? Chapter 21: Deciding on what to evaluate: the strategy Chapter 22: Planning who, what, where, and when Chapter.
Observing users.
Observing users. The aims Discuss the benefits & challenges of different types of observation. Describe how to observe as an on-looker, a participant,
Chapter 10 Collecting Quantitative Data. SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES Establishing Procedures to Collect Survey Data Recording Survey Data Establishing the Reliability.
Data-collection techniques. Contents Types of data Observations Event logs Questionnaires Interview.
An evaluation framework
From Controlled to Natural Settings
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
Usability Testing. Testing Methods Same as Formative Surveys/questionnaires Interviews Observation Documentation Automatic data recording/tracking Artificial/controlled.
User Interface Evaluation Usability Inquiry Methods
Predictive Evaluation
Evaluation Framework Prevention vs. Intervention CHONG POH WAN 21 JUNE 2011.
Chapter 11: An Evaluation Framework Group 4: Tony Masi, Sam Esswein, Brian Rood, & Chris Troisi.
Chapter 23 How to collect data. This chapter is about the tools/techniques used to collect data Hang on, let’s review: what are we collecting? What’s.
Evaluation Techniques Material from Authors of Human Computer Interaction Alan Dix, et al.
Human Computer Interaction
Usability testing. Goals & questions focus on how well users perform tasks with the product. – typical users – doing typical tasks. Comparison of products.
Evaluation approaches Text p Text p
COMP5047 Pervasive Computing: 2012 Think-aloud usability experiments or concurrent verbal accounts Judy Kay CHAI: Computer human adapted interaction research.
Usability Assessment Methods beyond Testing Chapter 7 Evaluating without users.
Virtual University - Human Computer Interaction 1 © Imran Hussain | UMT Imran Hussain University of Management and Technology (UMT) Lecture 40 Observing.
Ways of Collecting Information Interviews Questionnaires Ethnography Books and leaflets in the organization Joint Application Design Prototyping.
Welcome to the Usability Center Tour Since 1995, the Usability Center has been a learning environment that supports and educates in the process of usability.
Writing Software Documentation A Task-Oriented Approach Thomas T. Barker Chapter 5: Analyzing Your Users Summary Cornelius Farrell Emily Werschay February.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2006.
Creating User Interfaces Review midterm. Work on User Observation studies Homework: Spring break! Use opportunity to work on user observation study!
Observing users. The aims Discuss the benefits & challenges of different types of observation. Describe how to observe as an on-looker, a participant,
Usability Evaluation, part 2. REVIEW: A Test Plan Checklist, 1 Goal of the test? Specific questions you want to answer? Who will be the experimenter?
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS
Julia Eka Rini Petra Christian University, Surabaya LTBI Atma Jaya, Jakarta.
Chapter 27 Variations and more complex evaluations.
Data gathering (Chapter 7 Interaction Design Text)
Observation & Think-Aloud Protocol Qualitative Research.
Steps in Planning a Usability Test Determine Who We Want To Test Determine What We Want to Test Determine Our Test Metrics Write or Choose our Scenario.
Usability Engineering Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2007.
Chapter 24 Final preparations for the evaluation.
Observational Methods Think Aloud Cooperative evaluation Protocol analysis Automated analysis Post-task walkthroughs.
School of Engineering and Information and Communication Technology KIT305/607 Mobile Application Development Week 7: Usability (think-alouds) Dr. Rainer.
Day 8 Usability testing.
Research in Sociology  Like all scientists, sociologists gain knowledge by doing research. They ask “how” and “why” and then they form a hypothesis 
Human Computer Interaction
Usability Evaluation, part 2
Usability Evaluation.
SY DE 542 User Testing March 7, 2005 R. Chow
Chapter 23 Deciding how to collect data
Chapter 19 Case study on requirements, design, and evaluation: NATS
Chapter 22 Planning who, what, when, and where
From Controlled to Natural Settings
Evaluation.
HCI Evaluation Techniques
Evaluation tools training
Experimental Evaluation
Cognitive Walkthrough
Presentation transcript:

Chapter 23 Deciding how to collect data

UIDE Chapter 23 Introduction: Preparing to Collect Evaluation Data Timing and Logging Actions –Automatic Logging of Keystrokes and Mouse Clicks –Specialist Logging Software for Usability EvaluationsSpecialist Logging Software for Usability Evaluations –Choosing a Logging Product

UIDE Chapter 23 Think-Aloud and Offering Help –Using Cognitive Walkthrough Questions “Is there anything there that tells you what to do next?” “Is there a choice on the screen that lines up with what you want to do? If so, which one?” “Now that you’ve tried it, has it done what you wanted it to do?”

UIDE Chapter 23 Taking Notes When Observing Users

UIDE Chapter 23 Conducting Post-Session Discussions –Retrospective protocol –Post-session interview / debrief

UIDE Chapter 23 Think-Aloud (Concurrent) Protocol vs. Retrospective protocol –Recording time? Concurrent may get in the way –Retrospective allows examination of what the user was thinking or trying to do. –Concurrent is immediate, less loss of events –Concurrent may unduly interfere with the users ability to concentrate

UIDE Chapter 23 Questionnaires –Advantages Can’t forget to ask a question All participants see the same questions Ability to collect quantitative data –Disadvantages Difficult to design Must predict topics the users will need Closed questions don’t give reasons why the users answered the way that they have.

UIDE Chapter 23 Questionnaires –SUMI, the Software Usability Measurement Inventory Learnability – knowledge of the world Helpfulness – visibility Control – affordance Efficiency Affect (emotional response)

UIDE Chapter 23 Using Technologies to Help with Recording –Video and Audio Recording –Eye-Tracking Equipment

UIDE Chapter 23 Using Technologies to Help with Recording –Practitioner’s Choice of Technology What to Do If a Participant Does Not Agree to Be Recorded

UIDE Chapter 23 Using Technologies to Help with Recording – the benefits of human interaction –Shows participants that you are paying close attention –Gives the observer more opportunity to directly interact and control progress of the test