Assessment: Results & Implications for Instruction Parent meeting – October 13, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Discovery Education ThinkLink Assessment. Founded by Vanderbilt University Acquired in March 2006 by Discovery Education Specializes in Predictive Assessment.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
Everything You Wanted to Know About NJ ASK 2009 But Were Afraid to Ask!!!!
Welcome to Menlo Park School Overview of NJASK3-5 Presented by Dalia Mirrione Curriculum Resource Teacher.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Common Core Standards and the Edmonds School District November 4, 2013.
Tewksbury Township Schools “ Measuring Our 2012 Results ” District Testing Report NJ PASS Grades 1 and 2 NJ ASK Grades 3-8 Prepared for the Tewksbury.
Warren Hills Regional School District State Assessment Results October 2013 Presenters Jaclyn Russo Director of Guidance Kimberly Unangst Director of Special.
TWSSP Summer Academy June 24-28, Celebrations.
CCSS-M IN MICHIGAN. Michigan K-12 Standards CCSS-M with Michigan “Welcome”
Building an Accurate SBPR RECORD KEEPING ASSESSMENT AND INSTRUCTION GRADE LEVEL STANDARDS SBPR 1.
Do we need to Assess for Learning? Concordia University Michael Pellegrin, MEESR March 2015.
Integration and Differentiation of Curriculum
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Dayton’s Bluff Achievement Plus Elementary School Saint Paul, MN Presenter: Andrew Collins, Principal.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
Overview of NJASK 8. WHY? ~ NCLB- “No Child Left Behind” –2002 ~ Every state must have an annual assessment for language arts and math grades (3-8) Students.
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
Eagle Ridge Elementary Data Presentation. Eagle Ridge: CRCT Data Review (3-5) Subject Gains/Losses Reading86%87%+1 Language Arts86%82%-4 Math81%69%-12.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
1 State Testing March 2006 Grades 3-8 (NJASK and GEPA)
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
SEISMIC Whole School and PLC Planning Day Tuesday, August 13th, 2013.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
WELCOME TO PARK VIEW MIDDLE SCHOOL NECAP REPORT NIGHT.
Maywood School District Assessment Overview October 19, 2011.
Language and Content-Area Assessment Chapter 7 Kelly Mitchell PPS 6010 February 3, 2011.
Company LOGO Embedding Mathematics into Advanced Careers 1 New Jersey Entrepreneurship Summer Teacher Training Institute July 31, 2013 Facilitator: Kenna.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
District Assessment Report Rory McCourt – District Testing Coordinator Westwood Regional School District December 16, 2010.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Smarter Balanced Assessment System March 11, 2013.
Campus Improvement Plans Northwest ISD Presentation to the Board of Trustees October 14, 2013.
After lunch - Mix it up! Arrange your tables so that everyone else seated at your table represents another district. 1.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
NJ ASSESSMENTS CYCLE II REPORT GRADES 3-8 and 11 October 30, 2008 Haddonfield Public Schools.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
EngageNY.org Overview of the 3-8 ELA Curriculum Modules Session 1A, February 2014 NTI.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS
Goal: Use multiple sources of data to make instructional decisions based on students’ learning gap.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
© Crown copyright 2008 Subject Leaders’ Development Meeting Spring 2009.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
21 st Century Skills Jason McLaughlin Kean University EMSE
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
Formative assessment: what it is and what it’s not Dylan Wiliam
AEMP Grade Level Collaborative Module 8 Office of Curriculum, Instruction, and School Support Language Acquisition Branch Academic English Mastery Program.
APR 2014 Report: Data, Analysis and Action Plan for Full Accreditation.
NJASK 3-5 Report Sean Siet Director of Curriculum and Instruction October 20, 2011.
Loretta L. Radulic, Assistant Superintendent Roxbury Township Public Schools October State Assessment Results and Analysis.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Year 2. 1.Name 2.What you teach 3.Hope or Fear Who makes up this Curriculum Team?
EHT Grades K to 2, Thanks and Congratulations! You Accomplished! Pacing guides based on NJCCS! Quarterly tests! Ton of work for NJ PASS! Professionalism!
3rd Grade NJ ASK Parent Workshop Weston Elementary School 2013.
Big Ideas of the 2014 ELA/ELD Framework
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Assessment of Student Performance for 2011 – 2012
M-Step Overview, Practice and Instructional Implications
Standards Aligned System Integration Trainer Professional Development
District Assessment Report
Presentation transcript:

Assessment: Results & Implications for Instruction Parent meeting – October 13, 2011

WHY?  NCLB- “No Child Left Behind” –2002 Every state must have an assessment for annual tests in reading/language arts and math in grades 3-8 in place by the school year. Assess every student in science at least once in each of these grade spans: 3-5, 6-9, Align state assessments with standards Have all students attain a level of proficiency by the school year.

NJ ASK (Assessment of Skills & Knowledge) Summative assessment. Once a year in spring.

WHO? All students enrolled in New Jersey public schools must be tested. English Language Learner students and special education students are included.

WHAT?  LANGUAGE ARTS ASSESSMENT Writing- Explanatory-30 minutes Speculative-30 minutes Persuasive – 30 minutes 3 Reading Texts  Narrative Texts 30 minutes each  Informational Texts with open-ended questions and multiple choice questions Each multiple choice question is worth 1 point and each open-ended question is worth up to 4 points.

WHAT?  MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT- Approximately 130 minutes Multiple Choice - MC Short Constructed Response - SCR Extended Constructed Response - ECR

WHAT?  SCIENCE- NJ ASK 4 and 8 4 Parts- each part includes 43 multiple-choice items and 3 open-ended items Life Science- 40% of the test Physical Science- 30% of the test Earth Science- 30% of the test

How is the test data utilized?  By the federal government and state: AYP-Adequate Yearly Progress NJ School Report Cards By each individual school

Adequate Yearly Progress Each state must develop a timeline that effectively ensures that 100% of students are proficient in the state’s academic standards (reading and math) by years Academic Year (100%) 9

How is the test data utilized by the school? To compare data from similar schools/district schools To analyze and compare data over the years to identify areas of strengths and weaknesses To examine test scores to identify areas of strengths and weaknesses on a grade level and for individual students. To analyze data to direct instruction To plan instruction based on student needs To intervene for student improvement To integrate test taking strategies across the curriculum

How to Interpret Test Scores ISR- Individual Student Reports Identifies areas of proficiency in LA, Math and Science (grade 4 & 8 only) Advanced Proficient = Proficient = Partially Proficient =

New Jersey State Benchmarks for AYP Content Area Grade Span Starting Point Language Arts Literacy 3 rd -5th th -8th Mathematics 3 rd -5th th -8th NJ Applying to Federal Govt for NCLB Waiver. State would Have to put their own assessment standards in place.

NJ-ASK – 2011 LCCS mean vs. State mean

NJ-ASK – 2011 LCCS mean vs. State mean

NJ ASK Math & LAL Proficiency

NJ ASK Math & LAL Proficiency

LCCS is in Early Warning Status this year for AYP. Year 2 – would be considered a school in need of improvement unless the state of NJ gets a waiver.

Formative Assessment

Building a Coherent Assessment System Summative Summative/Formative Formative High Stakes (Long Cycle) Classroom (Short Cycle) Benchmark/ Early Warning Summative (Long Cycle) Weekly/ Monthly (Medium Cycle)

Assessment of Learning – Assessment for Learning Summative Summative / Formative Formative High Benchmark / Weekly/ Stakes Early Warning Monthly Classroom Summative No!

Assessment for Learning – Assessment of Learning Summative Summative / Formative Formative High Benchmark/ Weekly/ Stakes Early Warning Monthly Classroom Summative Yes!

Assessments in Practice Student Performance Minute-by-Minute (Formative) Day-by-Day (Formative) Week-by-Week/ Month-by-Month (Formative) Twice-a-Year (Early Warning Summative) Annual (Summative)

Formative Assessment Evidence-Base Global & All Subjects K – 16 & All Socio- Economic Contexts

Effect Size! “ ….. formative assessment has a more profound effect on learning than do other typical educational interventions, producing effect sizes of between.4 and.7” Lorrie Shepard, Past President American Educational Research Association

Formative Assessment “ ….. formative assessment is a process used by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning.” Formative Assessment and Next- Generation Assessment Systems: Are We Losing an Opportunity? September, 2010

“Hijacked” “The research-based concept of formative assessment, closely grounded in classroom instructional processes, has been taken over—hijacked—by commercial test publishers and is used instead to refer to formal testing systems called ‘benchmark’ or ‘interim’ assessment systems.” Lorrie Shepard, Past President American Educational Research Association

Formative Assessment Involves: using evidence of learning to adapt lessons in real time to meet students’ learning needs; it includes:  sharing learning expectations, learning strategies, & evidence of success  engineering discussion and questioning  providing & receiving feedback  activating students as learners

Formative Assessment: A Framework for Teaching & Learning Where the learner is going Where the learner is right now How to get there Teacher Clarifying and sharing learning intentions and criteria for success (Sharing Learning Expectations, Learning Strategies, and Evidence of Success) Engineering effective classroom discussion, questions, & learning tasks that elicit learning evidence (Engineering Discussion & Questioning) Providing feedback that moves learners forward (Providing & Receiving Feedback) Peers Understanding and sharing learning intentions and criteria for success (Sharing Learning Expectations, Learning Strategies, and Evidence of Success) Activating students as instructional resources for one another (Activating Students as Learners) Learner Understanding learning intentions and criteria for success (Sharing Learning Expectations, Learning Strategies, and Evidence of Success) Activating students as the owners of their own learning (Activating Students as Learners)

Formative Assessment: The Elements

Sharing Learning Expectations, Learning Strategies, & Evidence of Success Learning Expectations: WALT – We Are Learning To Be Focused – Separate Expectations from Context (SMART but not DUMB) Learning Strategies: Thinking Strategies Strategies for Getting Unstuck Evidence of Success: WILF – What I Am Looking For (High Quality End Product) Stages on the Journey

Tuning into Students’ Minds Discussion – A Culture of Discussion (Discussion Strategies & Tools) Questions & Questioning – Differentiation in Questions (Factual Questions; Opinion Questions + Divergent Questions; Focus Questions; Hypothetical Questions; Inquiry Questions; Inventive Questions; Probing Questions; Rhetorical Questions; Verification Questions + Teaching Questioning; Learning Questioning; Growth in Questioning)

Stepping Forward with Feedback Teacher-to-Student (Focus on the Task, not the Person; Highlight & Prompt Grading) Student-to-Teacher (Traffic lights; Exit Cards) Student-to-Student (Student Judgment; Comparison Feedback)

Activating Students as Learners Collaborative Learning (Not Learning in Groups, but Group Learning) Reciprocal Teaching (Student as Teacher) Meta-Cognition (How Students Learn) Motivation (Success Mindset) Peer and Self Assessment (Scaffolded Practice)

Towards Student Success

A Strategy for Success Clarify & Explore Design & Deliver Verify & Enhance