Deliverables  Forcing for AR5 (1) -atmospheric composition (CH4, N2O….), including aerosols, O3 on a regional basis -nitrogen deposition -prescribed or.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Emissions in GEMS Data on emissions are needed for the 4 sub-systems GHG, GRG, AER and RAQ GEMS Project has dedicated tasks for emissions and surface fluxes.
Advertisements

Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
CMIP5: Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5
The other Harvard 3-D model: CACTUS Chemistry, Aerosols, Climate: Tropospheric Unified Simulation Objective: to improve understanding of the interaction.
Michael Gauss, UiODe Bilt, 8-9 November 2005Quantify A3 workshop WP Future chemical composition changes from different modes of transport Set-up.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009 Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory Review June 30 - July 2, 2009.
Secondary Organic Aerosols: What we know and current CAM treatment Chemistry-Climate Working Group Meeting, CCSM March 22, 2006 Colette L. Heald
Predicted change in global SOA in response to future climate, emissions, and land-use change Colette L. Heald NOAA Climate and Global Change Postdoctoral.
Eric M. Leibensperger, Loretta J. Mickley, Daniel J. Jacob School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University Climate response to changing.
Urban Air Pollution, Tropospheric Chemistry, and Climate Change: An Integrated Modeling Study Chien Wang MIT.
CLARIS WP4.3 : Continental-scale air Pollution in South America.
Colette Heald Fangqun Yu Aerosol Processes Working Group.
Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Intercontinental Transport and Climatic Effects of Air Pollutants Workshop USEPA/OAQPS.
SETTING THE STAGE FOR: BIOSPHERE, CHEMISTRY, CLIMATE INTERACTIONS.
SOCOL activities at IAC and PMOD/WRC 1 J. Anet, F. Arfeuille, S. Brönnimann, M. Calisto, T. Egorova, N. Hochmuth, C. Hoyle, T. Peter, E. Rozanov, W. Schmutz,
Image: NASA ECHAM5/6 projects by Quentin Bourgeois, Junbo Cui, Gabriela Sousa Santos, Tanja Stanelle C2SM’s research group - Isabelle Bey.
Impact of Mexico City on Regional Air Quality Louisa Emmons Jean-François Lamarque NCAR/ACD.
Henry Fuelberg Nick Heath Sean Freeman FSU WRF-Chem During SEAC 4 RS.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
Aerosol Working Group The 7 th International GEOS-Chem User’s Meeting May 4, 2015 Aerosol WG Co-Chairs Colette Heald: Jeff Pierce (outgoing):
Aerosol Microphysics: Plans for GEOS-CHEM
Modelling the Canadian Arctic and Northern Air Quality using GEM-MACH Wanmin Gong and Stephen Beagley Science and Technology Branch Environment Canada.
Prediction of Future North American Air Quality Gabriele Pfister, Stacy Walters, Mary Barth, Jean-Francois Lamarque, John Wong Atmospheric Chemistry Division,
Contribution from Natural Sources of Aerosol Particles to PM in Canada Sunling Gong Scientific Team: Tianliang Zhao, David Lavoue, Richard Leaitch,
Evaluation of Wildfire Impacts in CAM5 Yufei Zou
2/27/06CAB Meeting Scientific and Technical Plans for IPCC AR5 Bill Collins With input from Lawrence Buja and Jerry Meehl National Center for Atmospheric.
Welcome! Chemistry-Climate WG Peter Hess Jean-Francois Lamarque Michael Prather.
Progress on Application of Modal Aerosol Dynamics to CAM Xiaohong Liu, Steve Ghan, Richard Easter, Rahul Zaveri, Yun Qian (Pacific Northwest National.
Report available from Workshop held in Washington, DC, April 27-29, 2005 Daniel J. Jacob (chair),
Climate Change Working Group (CCWG) July, 2004 Co-chairs: Gerald A. Meehl, Ben Santer, and Warren Washington.
Research Needs for Decadal to Centennial Climate Prediction: From observations to modelling Julia Slingo, Met Office, Exeter, UK & V. Ramaswamy. GFDL,
Coupling between the aerosols and hydrologic cycles Xiaoyan Jiang Climatology course, 387H Dec 5, 2006.
Linking Anthropogenic Aerosols, Urban Air Pollution and Tropospheric Chemistry to Climate ( actually, to CAM/CCSM ) Chien Wang Massachusetts Institute.
MAP MODELING EFFORTS MAP: Building Integrated Earth System Analysis (Modeling): IESA CTM work funded by MAP will be seen as part of the overall Earth System.
Chemistry-Climate Working Group Meeting (March 22-24, 2006) Background –SSC expectations and the next IPCC (Bill Collins) Summarize where we are now Discuss.
AT737 Aerosols.
Status of MOZART-2 Larry W. Horowitz GFDL/NOAA MOZART Workshop November 29, 2001.
An Interactive Aerosol-Climate Model based on CAM/CCSM: Progress and challenging issues Chien Wang and Dongchul Kim (MIT) Annica Ekman (U. Stockholm) Mary.
Estimating background ozone in surface air over the United States with global 3-D models of tropospheric chemistry Description, Evaluation, and Results.
The G4-Specified Stratospheric Aerosol Experiment Alan Robock 1, Lili Xia 1 and Simone Tilmes.
HYMN Hydrogen, Methane and Nitrous oxide: Trend variability, budgets and interactions with the biosphere GOCE-CT Status of TM model Michiel.
Observational Constraints on Aerosol Deposition and Optical Depth Mark Flanner 1 Phil Rasch 1 Jim Randerson 2 Joe McConnell 3 Tami Bond 4 1 NCAR 2 University.
Implementation Plan for CCSM 4 CCSM 4 needs to be ready by the end of 2008 for AR5 in early 2013.
REGIONAL/GLOBAL INTERACTIONS IN ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY Greenhouse gases Halocarbons Ozone Aerosols Acids Nutrients Toxics SOURCE CONTINENT REGIONAL ISSUES:
Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division,
CHARGE QUESTIONS: ENDPOINTS  anthropogenic emissions   air pollution   climate OK, but can we be more specific?  Intercontinental transport of.
Presented by LCF Climate Science Computational End Station James B. White III (Trey) Scientific Computing National Center for Computational Sciences Oak.
Update on the 2-moment stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in CAM Hugh Morrison and Andrew Gettelman National Center for Atmospheric Research CCSM Atmospheric.
Global Aerosol Forecasting System Applications to Houston/Costa Rica Aura Validation Experiments Arlindo da Silva Global Modeling and Assimilation Office,
March 31, 2004BGC Working Group Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison and S. Walters Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
Radiative Forcing of Climate Change: Expanding the Concept and Addressing Uncertainties Report from the NRC Committee on Radiative Forcing of Climate commissioned.
What Were We Supposed to Have Done in CAM4 with Chemistry? Who will do what?
March BGC Working group The SANTA FE project Jean-François Lamarque.
Troposphere Strastosphere D. H. Gas phase chemistry Scavenging processes Fossil fuel Emissions Biomass burning emissions Biogenic emissions Boundary layer.
Aerosol Indirect Effects in CAM A. Gettelman (NCAR), F. Vitt (NCAR), P. Hess (Cornell) H. Morrison (NCAR), P. R. Field (Met Office), S.J. Ghan (PNNL)
Modal Aerosol Treatment in CAM: Evaluation and Indirect Effect X. Liu, S. J. Ghan, R. Easter (PNNL) J.-F. Lamarque, P. Hess, N. Mahowald, F. Vitt, H. Morrison,
March 9, 2004CCSM AMWG Interactive chemistry in CAM Jean-François Lamarque, D. Kinnison S. Walters and the WACCM group Atmospheric Chemistry Division NCAR.
White paper: Atmospheric Chemistry impacts on the land biosphere Phillip Cameron-Smith and Natalie Mahowald Processes: 1.[AC-direct] Ozone Damage (a strong.
Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service
Chemistry-climate interactions in CCSM
A proposal for multi-model decadal hindcast simulations
Lupu, Semeniuk, Kaminski, Mamun, McConnell
Chemistry-Climate Working Group Update
Latest Development on Modal Aerosol Formulation and Indirect Effects
CCSM3’s IPCC Simulations and Lessons Learned
Update on CAM and the AMWG. Recent activities and near-term priorities. by the AMWG.
Global atmospheric changes and future impacts on regional air quality
Some thoughts on future air quality models from a WRF-Chem modeler
Benchmarking of chemical mechanisms
Presentation transcript:

Deliverables  Forcing for AR5 (1) -atmospheric composition (CH4, N2O….), including aerosols, O3 on a regional basis -nitrogen deposition -prescribed or modeled within CCSM4  Fully coupled chemistry-climate biogeochemistry simulations (2) -what must be coupled?  Air quality projections -21 st century -HTAP  Quantification of model errors - hindcasts, forecasts, assimilation  Emission scenario evaluation and correction (1+)

Meeting Goals Recommendations for CAM4 (CCSM w/ CHEM for AR5): –Holes (?) –Action Items/Priorities (?) Next Steps (Chemistry within the CCSM) -- Possible use in high resolution/chemical AR5 runs –Action Items/Priorities (?) –Where do we go next (?) Plan for new gaus allocation Increase Use of Model (Recruitment?) Release of Code (CAM3.5)/Interim release of CAM-MZ4+ Workshop after release (focus? Include biogeochemistry…)

Priorities for Development -1) Aerosol-Cloud microphysics [Ghan, Liu, Gettleman, Morrison] (with Atmospheric working group) Aerosol package(s) ( NH4NO3? w/ prescribed oxidants: hole) [Colette – SOA], [Ghan, Liu] - 4) Fast-j with/without cloud overlap [Jessica, Philip] -Wet-deposition with/without cloud overlap - 5) Dry Deposition coupling CLM [J.F./Beth – low priority] 3) Interactions with biosphere [Philip/Beth: Biogeochemistry Group] - Biosphere emissions (methane etc) [Colette - biogenics] - Ozone interaction with the biosphere - 6) New lightning…. [Louisa, Barthe] - 2) Fast chemistry x 3 [J.F., Philip] - Interactive middle atmosphere (and how much) -Data assimilation / inverse modeling -Coupling to WRF-chem

Priorities for Gaus CAM-CHEM runs Demonstrate necessity of chemistry – climate interactions [Beth, Michael – white paper by Breckenridge meeting?/fall workshop?].

1 st Spinup To Test CCSM Coupling present day Forcing Agents: Solar: time series and spectral changes from J. Lean LLGHG: as IPCC #4 reconstruction Landuse: Feddema (see Land/BGC meeting) Ozone: Lamarque et al, IPCC #4 reconstruction (prescribed) Prognostic dust/seasalt? Nitrogen deposition from Lamarque et al. Other Aerosols To Prescribed from Offline Run –No chemistry –Oxidants from Lamarque et al. –BC, OC anthropogenic: fossil fuel and biofuel 1850-present (T. Bond) –Steve Smith, SO2 –BC/OC from biomass burning Randerson et al. Ramped up from 1/3 present day in tropics - current emissions extra-tropics

Fall-Back1 st 2 nd 3 rd ChemistryNoneInput Oxidants SimpleFull Biogeochem.Input N Input O3 Prognostic N and O3 StratosphereNOYES AerosolsPrescribeProg. SS Prog Dust SO4: Input Ox. NH4SO4 ? Prog. SS Prog. Dust SO4, NH4SO4 w/ Chemistry Prog. 4/7 mode Internally Mixed MicrophysicsPresent w/ Mods 2 moment 4 class EmissionsBC, OC Tami Bond, SO2 (Smith, Streets), Oxidants (From POET precursors), BB (Randerson + arbitrary scale)

Chemistry model in CCSM MOZART4 Incorporated into CCSM –CAM and MOZART routines checked against each other Chemical Mechanism –MZ4 mechanism in place. –Simple input of fixed chemical oxidants –Query functions so chemical mechanism easy to change. Additions to mechanism for SOA formation (Heald) Dry deposition –Wesley deposition in place (MZ4) Wesley deposition input into CLM Updated scheme using information from CLM (LAI, stomatal resistance) Photolysis –Fast TUV in place Update to Prather Fast-J Use of sophisticated cloud overlap (Neu) Consistency between CAM and CHEM in treatment of aerosols Combined radiation/aerosol calculation

Chemistry in CCSM continued Emissions –MEGAN emissions algorithm for isoprene/monoterpene in CLM Update for other biogenic emissions Interactive injection height for biomass burning emissions –Lightning based on Price and Rind Update based on work of Barth Washout (gas) –Giorgi and Chameides (both large-scale and convective) Update to more physically based scheme with realistic cloud overlap Include explicit washout within convective scheme Washout (aerosol) –Updated to Rasch scheme Impact and nucleation scavenging (Ghan, in development)

Chemistry model in CCSM continued Aerosols –MOZART4 bulk aerosol scheme w/ NH4NO3 –Interactive Sea-salt and Dust (Mahowald) –Aerosol-Radiation coupling –Ability to use sulfate scheme with input oxidants Coupling to cloud microphysics (Gettleman, …) Internally mixed 4 or 7 mode scheme (Ghan, Liu) More sophisticated schemes Upper Boundary Conditions –Stratospheric concentrations specified –Synoz Extension of domain to stratosphere/mesosphere

Chemistry model in CCSM continued Online/Offline capability –Aerosol-Radiation coupling –Extension of offline model to WACCM Evolution of lower part of model from analyzed winds Evolution of upper part of model dynamically computed dynamically Data assimilation capabilities –Ensemble Kalman Filter Meteorological/Chemical data assimilation Coupling to CLM/Ocean models –Nitrogen coupling to the C cycle –Biomass burning algorithm DMS and other ocean emissions CH4 emissions Ozone/Acid rain and the biosphere Downscaling and coupling with WRF-chem

Stage 1 (end of 2006) -Assemble the latest physical and biogeochemistry components -Include a simple form of the indirect effects of aerosols -Begin coupled control runs Stage 2: (end of 2007) -Finalization of the new physical and biogeochemical components for CCSM 4. (in development branch and accepted by SSC) Stage 3 (2008) - Test, finalize, and thoroughly understand the CCSM 4 run in fully coupled mode. CCSM with Chemistry:

CCSM4 -Configuration to be determined: New physics –Convection –Boundary Layer Carbon Cycle Indirect Effect Chemistry? (CCWG input) Aerosols? (CCWG input) CCSM4 (Impacts) Same as above? CSSM4 – Chemistry (CCWG) -TBD

CCSM4 -Configuration to be determined: New physics –Convection –Boundary Layer Carbon Cycle Indirect Effect Chemistry? (CCWG input) Aerosols? (CCWG input) CCSM4 (Impacts) Same as above? CSSM4 – Chemistry (CCWG) -TBD

Deliverables 1)Atmospheric composition for AR5 (including aerosols, O3…regional) - prescribed or modeled within CCSM4 2) Fully coupled chemistry-climate simulations (what must be coupled) 3) Air quality projections (21 st century….) - HTAP 4) Quantify model errors (hindcasts, forecasts, assimilation) 5) Scenario evaluation and correction

CCSM4 -Configuration to be determined: New physics –Convection –Boundary Layer Carbon Cycle Indirect Effect Chemistry? (CCWG input) Aerosols? (CCWG input) CCSM4 (Impacts) Same as above? CSSM4 – Chemistry (CCWG) -TBD

Deliverables 1)Atmospheric composition for AR5 (including aerosols, O3…regional) - prescribed or modeled within CCSM4 2) Fully coupled chemistry-climate simulations (what must be coupled) 3) Air quality projections (21 st century….) - HTAP 4) Quantify model errors (hindcasts, forecasts, assimilation) 5) Scenario evaluation and correction

Priorities for Development -Aerosol-Cloud microphysics -Fast-j with/without cloud overlap -Wet-deposition with/without cloud overlap -Cloud overlap -Dry Deposition coupling CLM --Ozone interaction with the biosphere -Biosphere emissions (methane etc) -New lightning -Aerosol package -Fast chemistry -Interactive middle atmosphere (and how much)

Stratosphere Inclusion Solar Forcing – historical runs Volcanic Forcing – historical runs Ozone Forcing – 21 st century Fingerprints of climate change in a stratosphere/troposphere model Dynamical coupling between Troposphere and stratosphere Changes and sensitivity of coupled state