The Emergent Structure of Semantic Knowledge

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)
Advertisements

Summer 2011 Tuesday, 8/ No supposition seems to me more natural than that there is no process in the brain correlated with associating or with.
Distributed Representation, Connection-Based Learning, and Memory Psychology 209 February 1, 2013.
Tuomas Sandholm Carnegie Mellon University Computer Science Department
PDP: Motivation, basic approach. Cognitive psychology or “How the Mind Works”
Does the Brain Use Symbols or Distributed Representations? James L. McClelland Department of Psychology and Center for Mind, Brain, and Computation Stanford.
Emergence in Cognitive Science: Semantic Cognition Jay McClelland Stanford University.
Emergence of Semantic Structure from Experience Jay McClelland Stanford University.
What is Cognitive Science? … is the interdisciplinary study of mind and intelligence, embracing philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, neuroscience,
Connectionist models. Connectionist Models Motivated by Brain rather than Mind –A large number of very simple processing elements –A large number of weighted.
Un Supervised Learning & Self Organizing Maps Learning From Examples
COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE
False Memory Phenomena James Raftery Psy/Orf 322 Spring 2004.
Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA). Introduction to LSA Learning Model Uses Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to simulate human learning of word and passage.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 2 – Perception.
Neural Networks. Background - Neural Networks can be : Biological - Biological models Artificial - Artificial models - Desire to produce artificial systems.
Cooperation of Complementary Learning Systems in Memory Review and Update on the Complementary Learning Systems Framework James L. McClelland Psychology.
Crosscutting Concepts and Disciplinary Core Ideas February24, 2012 Heidi Schweingruber Deputy Director, Board on Science Education, NRC/NAS.
Development and Disintegration of Conceptual Knowledge: A Parallel-Distributed Processing Approach Jay McClelland Department of Psychology and Center for.
Using Backprop to Understand Apects of Cognitive Development PDP Class Feb 8, 2010.
Representation, Development and Disintegration of Conceptual Knowledge: A Parallel-Distributed Processing Approach James L. McClelland Department of Psychology.
Emergence of Semantic Structure from Experience Jay McClelland Stanford University.
Presentation on Neural Networks.. Basics Of Neural Networks Neural networks refers to a connectionist model that simulates the biophysical information.
James L. McClelland Stanford University
Artificial Neural Nets and AI Connectionism Sub symbolic reasoning.
Conceptual Hierarchies Arise from the Dynamics of Learning and Processing: Insights from a Flat Attractor Network Christopher M. O’ConnorKen McRaeGeorge.
Integrating New Findings into the Complementary Learning Systems Theory of Memory Jay McClelland, Stanford University.
The PDP Approach to Understanding the Mind and Brain Jay McClelland Stanford University January 21, 2014.
Disintegration of Conceptual Knowledge In Semantic Dementia James L. McClelland Department of Psychology and Center for Mind, Brain, and Computation Stanford.
Awakening from the Cartesian Dream: The PDP Approach to Understanding the Mind and Brain Jay McClelland Stanford University February 7, 2013.
Contrasting Approaches To Semantic Knowledge Representation and Inference Psychology 209 February 15, 2013.
Emergence of Semantic Knowledge from Experience Jay McClelland Stanford University.
Methodology of Simulations n CS/PY 399 Lecture Presentation # 19 n February 21, 2001 n Mount Union College.
The Influence of Feature Type, Feature Structure and Psycholinguistic Parameters on the Naming Performance of Semantic Dementia and Alzheimer’s Patients.
CSC321: Neural Networks Lecture 6: Learning to model relationships and word sequences Geoffrey Hinton.
Development, Disintegration, and Neural Basis of Semantic Cognition: A Parallel-Distributed Processing Approach James L. McClelland Department of Psychology.
Emergence of Semantic Structure from Experience Jay McClelland Stanford University.
Similarity and Attribution Contrasting Approaches To Semantic Knowledge Representation and Inference Jay McClelland Stanford University.
Rapid integration of new schema- consistent information in the Complementary Learning Systems Theory Jay McClelland, Stanford University.
Semantic Cognition: A Parallel Distributed Processing Approach James L. McClelland Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition and Departments of Psychology.
The PDP Approach to Understanding the Mind and Brain Jay McClelland Stanford University January 21, 2014.
James L. McClelland Stanford University
The Origins of Knowledge Debate How do people gain knowledge about the world around them? Are we born with some fundamental knowledge about concepts like.
Origins of Cognitive Abilities Jay McClelland Stanford University.
Emergent Semantics: Meaning and Metaphor Jay McClelland Department of Psychology and Center for Mind, Brain, and Computation Stanford University.
Biological and cognitive plausibility in connectionist networks for language modelling Maja Anđel Department for German Studies University of Zagreb.
The Emergentist Approach To Language As Embodied in Connectionist Networks James L. McClelland Stanford University.
Semantic Knowledge: Its Nature, its Development, and its Neural Basis James L. McClelland Department of Psychology and Center for Mind, Brain, and Computation.
Organization and Emergence of Semantic Knowledge: A Parallel-Distributed Processing Approach James L. McClelland Department of Psychology and Center for.
Development and Disintegration of Conceptual Knowledge: A Parallel-Distributed Processing Approach James L. McClelland Department of Psychology and Center.
Chapter 9 Knowledge. Some Questions to Consider Why is it difficult to decide if a particular object belongs to a particular category, such as “chair,”
Psychology 209 – Winter 2017 January 31, 2017
What is cognitive psychology?
Learning linguistic structure with simple and more complex recurrent neural networks Psychology February 2, 2017.
CSC2535: Computation in Neural Networks Lecture 11 Extracting coherent properties by maximizing mutual information across space or time Geoffrey Hinton.
Psychology 209 – Winter 2017 Feb 28, 2017
Development and Disintegration of Conceptual Knowledge: A Parallel-Distributed Processing Approach James L. McClelland Department of Psychology and Center.
James L. McClelland SS 100, May 31, 2011
Does the Brain Use Symbols or Distributed Representations?
Dynamic Routing Using Inter Capsule Routing Protocol Between Capsules
Memory and Learning: Their Nature and Organization in the Brain
Emergence of Semantic Structure from Experience
Emergence of Semantics from Experience
Learning linguistic structure with simple and more complex recurrent neural networks Psychology February 8, 2018.
network of simple neuron-like computing elements
Learning linguistic structure with simple recurrent neural networks
A connectionist model in action
CLS, Rapid Schema Consistent Learning, and Similarity-weighted Interleaved learning Psychology 209 Feb 26, 2019.
The Network Approach: Mind as a Web
Presentation transcript:

The Emergent Structure of Semantic Knowledge Jay McClelland Department of Psychology and Center for Mind, Brain, and Computation Stanford University

The Parallel Distributed Processing Approach to Semantic Cognition Representation is a pattern of activation distributed over neurons within and across brain areas. Bidirectional propagation of activation underlies the ability to bring these representations to mind from given inputs. The knowledge underlying propagation of activation is in the connections. Experience affects our knowledge representations through a gradual connection adjustment process language

Distributed Representations: and Overlapping Patterns for Related Concepts dog goat hammer dog goat hammer

Kiani et al, J Neurophysiol 97: 4296–4309, 2007.

Emergence of Meaning and Metaphor Learned distributed representations that capture important aspects of meaning emerge through a gradual learning process in simple connectionist networks Metaphor arises naturally as a byproduct of learning information in homologous domains in models of this type

Emergence of Meaning: Differentiation, Reorganization, and Context-Sensitivity

The Rumelhart Model

The Training Data: All propositions true of items at the bottom level of the tree, e.g.: Robin can {grow, move, fly}

Target output for ‘robin can’ input

Forward Propagation of Activation aj ai wij neti=Sajwij wki

Back Propagation of Error (d) aj wij ai di ~ Sdkwki wki dk ~ (tk-ak) Error-correcting learning: At the output layer: Dwki = edkai At the prior layer: Dwij = edjaj …

Early Later Later Still E x p e r i e n c e

What Drives Progressive Differentiation? Waves of differentiation reflect coherent covariation of properties across items. Patterns of coherent covariation are reflected in the principal components of the property covariance matrix. Figure shows attribute loadings on the first three principal components: 1. Plants vs. animals 2. Birds vs. fish 3. Trees vs. flowers Same color = features covary in component Diff color = anti-covarying features

Sensitivity to Coherence Requires Convergence A A A

Conceptual Reorganization (Carey, 1985) Carey demonstrated that young children ‘discover’ the unity of plants and animals as living things with many shared properties only around the age of 10. She suggested that the coalescence of the concept of living thing depends on learning about diverse aspects of plants and animals including Nature of life sustaining processes What it means to be dead vs. alive Reproductive properties Can reorganization occur in a connectionist net?

Conceptual Reorganization in the Model Suppose superficial appearance information, which is not coherent with much else, is always available… And there is a pattern of coherent covariation across information that is contingently available in different contexts. The model forms initial representations based on superficial appearances. Later, it discovers the shared structure that cuts across the different contexts, reorganizing its representations.

Organization of Conceptual Knowledge Early and Late in Development

Overall Structure Extracted by a Structured Statistical Model

Sensitivity to Context Context-general representation Context-sensitive representation

Relation-specific representations IS Representations (top) reflect idiosyncratic appearance properties. HAS representations are similar to the context-general representations (middle). Can representations collapse differences between plants, since there is little that plants can do. The fish are all the same, because there’s no difference in what they can do.

Ongoing Work Can the representations learned in the distributed connectionist model capture different patterns of generalization of different kinds of properties? Simulations already show context-specific patterns of property generalization. We are currently collecting detailed data from a new data set to explore the sufficiency of the model to explain experimental data on context specific patterns of generalization.

Generalization of different property types At different points in training, the network is taught one of: Maple can queem Maple is queem Maple has queem Only weights from hidden to output are allowed to change. Network is then tested to see how strongly ‘queem’ is activated then same relation is paired with other items. queem

Generalization to other concepts after training with can, has, or is queem

Ongoing Work Can the representations learned in the distributed connectionist model capture different patterns of generalization of different kinds of properties? Our simulations already show context-specific patterns of property generalization. We are currently conducting new experiments to gather experimental data on context specific patterns of generalization that we will use to test an extended version of the model trained with a much larger training set.

Metaphor in Connectionist Models of Semantics By metaphor I mean: the application of a relation learned in one domain to a novel situation in another

Hinton’s Family Tree Network Person 1 Relation Person 2 Training data: Colin’s Father is James … Alfonso’s Father is Marco …

English Tree Recovered Italian Tree Recovered

Understanding Via Metaphor in the Family Trees Network Marco’s father is Pierro. Who is James’s father?

Future Work: Metaphors We Live By In Hinton’s model, neither domain is the base – each influences the other equally But research suggests that some domains serve as a base that influences other domains Lakoff – physical structure as a base for the structure of an intellectual argument Boroditsky – space as a base for time In connectionist networks, primacy and frequency both influence performance This allows the models to simulate how early and pervasive experience may allow one domain to serve as the base for others experienced later or less frequently Influences can still run in both directions, but to different extents

Emergence of Meaning and Metaphor Learned distributed representations that capture important aspects of meaning emerge through a gradual learning process in simple connectionist networks Metaphor arises naturally as a byproduct of learning information in homologous domains in models of this type