Lucas Schill Brent Grover Ed Schilla Advisor: Danny Miller

Overview  Comparison of Nagios, Shinken, and Icinga Performance comparison of common features Usability Scalability Extra feature testing for usability Scoring procedures

Goals  Provide an in-depth analysis of the software.  Complete the project this semester.

Setbacks  Power Outages  Hardware  Support

Network design

Where we are now  Configuring the three programs for our environment  Familiarizing ourselves with each software  Working with Nagios, and Icinga to have a support contact  Contacting possible sponsors Dell Hardware companies

Nagios

Nagios(continued)

Icinga

Icinga(continued)

Shinken  Designed as a Nagios drop in replacement that provides many of the features Nagios lacks by default  Written in Python  Open source  Very modular

Shinken So Far  Custom built installer Installs all dependencies, configures the system, and can install additional plug-ins.  Configuration Complex, Nagios with Shinken mixed in Skonf WebUI

Accomplishments  12 clients 4 for each product  3 servers – RHEL DELL 2650s Software Suites Installed  Integrated WDS/PXE  Website

Budget Starting Funds$ Second Semester Funds$ Spent Funds($27.54) Remaining Funds$ Spend Funds Detailed Rail Clips($27.54) Planned Spending 2x Atom Servers($52.14) 4x SCSI Hard Drives($40.00) Planned Remaining Funds$480.32

Where we are headed  Upgrade hardware Atom Servers Servers and clients ○ Virtualized clients if possible  Finish configuring Customization of network monitoring systems Remote network  Research and write scripts to run checks

Questions?