Doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January. 2004 David Johnston, IntelSlide 1 IEEE 802 Handoff ECSG L2 Triggers David Johnston

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 2004 doc.: _L2_Upper_Layer_Interaction_r1 Samsung AIT Interaction between L2 and Upper Layers in IEEE Xiaoyu Liu
Advertisements

1 IEEE Media Independent Handoff Overview of services and scenarios for 3GPP2 Stefano M. Faccin Liaison officer to 3GPP2.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Initial Proposal on IEEE Down Selection Process Date Submitted: October 12,
Submission doc.: IEEE /1167r0 August 2011 Hiroki Nakano, Trans New Technology, Inc.Slide 1 Upper Layer Data IE Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /243r0 Submission March 2002 James Kempf, DoCoMo LabsSlide and IP James Kempf Seamoby WG Co-chair DoCoMo Labs USA
Doc.: IEEE /481r3 Submission May 2004 Lily Yang, Steve Shellhammer, IntelSlide 1 Thoughts on AP Functional Descriptions L. Lily Yang Steve Shellhammer.
Doc.: Handoff_WNG_Presentation r3 Submission July David Johnston, IntelSlide Handoff Presentation to WNG David Johnston.
Omniran TG 1 Cooperation for OmniRAN P802.1CF Max Riegel, NSN (Chair OmniRAN TG)
Doc.: 802_Handoff_EC_Opening_Plenary_Report r2 Submission November David Johnston, IntelSlide Handoff ECSG EC Opening Plenary Report David.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/0938r1 August 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 Service mapping between the ISS and Date: Authors:
Netext issues Julien Laganier, IETF-80. Logical Interface (I) #1: Replication of ND multicast messages across physical interfaces – What is in the source.
Doc.: _IETF_DNA_r1 Submission March David Johnston, IntelSlide L2 Services for Handover Optimization David Johnston
Omniran IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
Reference Models and Standards. Reference Models (1) A reference model is the formal name for a protocol suite – a collection of protocols and layer definitions.
xx IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Proposed Presentation for 3GPP Date Submitted: July,
Doc.: IEEE /124r0 Submission January 2003 Byoung-Jo “J” KimSlide 1 RRM Requirements for Public WLAN Service Provider Byoung-Jo “J” Kim AT&T Labs-Research.
Doc.: IEEE /0981r1 TGs Reference Architecture Considerations September 6, 2004 Tricci So & W. Steven Conner.Slide 1 TGs ESS Mesh System Reference.
Doc.: _IETF_DNA_r1 Submission March David Johnston, IntelSlide L2 Services for Handover Optimization David Johnston
DCN: March 7, 2005 IETF 62 - Minneapolis, MN Media Independent Handover Services and Interoperability Ajay Rajkumar Chair, IEEE
Standard for a Convergent Digital Home Network for Heterogeneous Technologies Zhimeng Du 12/5/2013.
Doc.: 802_Handoff_Linksec_Presentation Submission May David Johnston, IntelSlide Handoff LinkSec Handoff Issues? David Johnston
Doc.: Linksec CipherSuites Submission August David Johnston, IntelSlide 1 LinkSec CipherSuites? David Johnston
Doc.: 802_Handoff_Joint_Handoff_16e_Session Submission July David Johnston, IntelSlide Handoff ECSG Overview for Joint 16e/Handoff David Johnston.
Doc.: 802_Handoff_WMAN_Presentation Submission July David Johnston, IntelSlide Handoff A Technical Preview David Johnston
Doc.: 802_Handoff_SEC_Closing_Report Submission July David Johnston, IntelSlide Handoff ECSG SEC Closing Report David Johnston
Doc.: _Handoff_EC_Closing_Report Submission July David Johnston, IntelSlide Handoff ECSG EC Closing Report David Johnston.
Doc.: 802_Handoff_Architecture_Elements_r2 Submission May David Johnston, IntelSlide 1 Architectural Elements of an 802 Handoff Solution David Johnston.
RRM Architecture Considerations
Doc.: IEEE /1019r0 Submission September 2004 Soohong Daniel Park & Jaehwan Lee Access Router Identifier (ARID) for supporting L3 mobility Soohong.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Analysis on Identifiers Date Submitted: January 9, 2006 Presented.
MIPSHOP – November, 2005 Event Services and Command Services for Media Independent Handover Presentation prepared by: Srini Sreemanthula Presented by:
Requirements For Handover Information Services MIPSHOP – IETF #65 Srinivas Sreemanthula (Ed.)
Omniran IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
IEEE P Handoff Submission March 2004 Soohong Daniel Park, Samsung Electronics. Awareness of the handover to be distinguished from a L2 or L3 Soohong.
Omniran CF00 1 VLANs in relation to P802.1CF NRM Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNokia Networks
1 Enhanced Mobility Support for Roaming Users: Extending the IEEE Information Service WWIC 2010 Luleå, June 1-3, 2010 Karl Andersson*, Andrea G.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: draft_invariants Title: Invariants in Proposed Drafts Date Submitted:
Doc.: 802_Handoff_Work_Package_Discussion_r1 Submission September David Johnston, IntelSlide 1 IEEE 802 Handoff ECSG Work Package Discussion David.
September 2002 doc.: IEEE /568r0 David Skellern, Cisco SystemsSlide 1Submission RRM Architectural Framework David Skellern Wireless Networking.
August 2, 2005 IETF 63 – Paris, France Media Independent Handover Services and Interoperability Ajay Rajkumar Chair, IEEE WG.
Slide 1 2/22/2016 Policy-Based Management With SNMP SNMPCONF Working Group - Interim Meeting May 2000 Jon Saperia.
Omniran CF00 1 IEEE OmniRAN TG Athens NRM Conclusions Max Riegel, Nokia Networks (OmniRAN TG Chair)
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/ ak May 2013 Norman Finn, Cisco SystemsSlide 1 P802.1Qbz + P802.11ak Proposed Division of Work Date: Authors:
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: XXXX Title: Panasonic’s MIH Proposal (Details) Date Submitted: January, 09,
1 Purpose of Checklist Identify major components of contribution: To assist the working group in categorizing proposals To help authors in the harmonization.
Omniran IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Coexistence architecture of Notice: This document has been prepared.
MIH Proposal Submission Submission Jan 2005 Prasad Govindarajan, Varaha SystemsSlide 1 IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: Varaha Submission.
Trend of Mobility Management Yen-Wen Chen Ref: 1.Draft IEEE Standard for Local and Metropolitan Area Networks: Media Independent Handover Services 2.Transport.
Virtual Local Area Networks In Security By Mark Reed.
Doc.: 802_Handoff_Linksec_Presentation Submission May David Johnston, IntelSlide Handoff LinkSec Handoff Issues? David Johnston
IEEE 802 OmniRAN EC SG July 2013 Conclusion
draft-corujo-ps-common-interfaces-lmm-00
Proposal for IEEE solution
Media Independent Handover Services and Interoperability
Maryna Komarova (ENST)
Awareness of the handover to be distinguished from a L2 or L3
Listen to Probe Request from other STAs
IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Abstract
May 2004 doc.: IEEE /629r1 May 2004 The Nature of an ESS
MAC State Convergence Function
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
802 Handoff ECSG Nov-03 Opening Plenary Report
The Need for an AP Functional Description
Media Independent Coexistence
Media Independent Coexistence
Media Independent Coexistence
MAC Service Updates for NGV
What is an ESS? Date: Authors: July 2009
Presentation transcript:

doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January David Johnston, IntelSlide 1 IEEE 802 Handoff ECSG L2 Triggers David Johnston

doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January David Johnston, IntelSlide 2 ‘Fast Handoff for Mobile IP and Link Layer Triggers’. Gang Wu & Alper Yegin. –Recommends Formal definition of 802 L2 triggers and associated APIs Align definitions between IETF and IEEE ‘Architectural Elements of an 802 Handoff Solution’, David Johnston –Recommends L2 Triggers Flexibility/Extensibility in trigger definition ‘draft-satish-l2-mobilereq-01.txt’, Satish Jamadagni –Ties L2 triggers to handover decision stages Background..

doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January David Johnston, IntelSlide 3 Link_up(which link) Link_down(which_link, why) Link_going_up(which link, when) Link_going_down(which link, when) Domain_crossing(old subnet, new subnet) Etc. Potential Trigger Types

doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January David Johnston, IntelSlide 4 Trigger Trajectories - Local MAC PHY LLC IPOther LLC Upper Layer attaches to LSAP of LLC May register interest in particular triggers from a trigger source Triggers may therefore have multiple destinations Triggers may originate from PHY, or MAC

doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January David Johnston, IntelSlide 5 Trigger Trajectories – Link Traversing MAC PHY LLC IPOther LLC Trigger sent down the stack to appear at remote end of link Requires a transport Security Implicationsb Applies to AP-STA, SS-BS situations Upper layer needs a reason to use these triggers Could originate from upper layer MAC PHY LLC IPOther

doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January David Johnston, IntelSlide 6 Triggers should have well defined semantics Implementations or standards defined behavior (e.g. in dot11 or dot16) map semantics of trigger to internal events E.G. –“Link_up” = Full MSDU transport established Trigger Semantics

doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January David Johnston, IntelSlide 7 MIBs –Wrong application, not station management, SNMP access not required, doesn’t fit with link traversing triggers Programmatic API? –Goes beyond the 802 spec implementation domain boundary Triggers look similar in type to incoming asynchronous data arrival –Causes indication upwards through MAC SAP –Are annotated events, not states –Recommend adding MAC SAP trigger primitives Upper layer trigger interface

doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January David Johnston, IntelSlide 8 Must support trigger registration –Register interest in a trigger –Declare supported trigger capabilities Still do through MAC SAP? Or use MIBs? –Link traversing triggers suggest MAC SAP approach Upper layer trigger interface

doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January David Johnston, IntelSlide 9 Generic: –Type –Remote, Local? –Source (UL, MAC, PHY) –Registered Recipients (LSAP id list) Specific –Reason Codes –Time Estimates –Other? Trigger Parameters

doc.: L2_Triggers_dj_r1 Submission January David Johnston, IntelSlide 10 Triggers are pointless unless upper layer handover algorithms are deployed that understand them We should kickstart the process by drawing up strawman trigger specification –Trigger Semantics –MAC SAP Primitives Iterate and refine with trigger consuming bodies such as IETF Arrive at base trigger suite that will be used/useable Standardize them! IETF/3GPP/other