Outline Introduction Service Innovation The S-D Logic Perspective

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 3 E-Strategy.
Advertisements

HOW TO DEVELOP THE PROJECT IDEA Training unit 2.2 Definition of objectives in the action.
Towards Adaptive Web-Based Learning Systems Katerina Georgouli, MSc, PhD Associate Professor T.E.I. of Athens Dept. of Informatics Tempus.
Reframing Retail Strategy
IT Strategy Articles Brian Mennecke. Harrah’s Entertainment.
SANCHEZ, R., & MAHONEY, J. T. (1996). STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 17, PRESENTED BY CHRISTINA L. FRYE Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management.
Introduction to Social Analysis & Action (SAA)
Collaboration The Future Enterprise James S.Pickens
Introduction and Overview “the grid” – a proposed distributed computing infrastructure for advanced science and engineering. Purpose: grid concept is motivated.
2006/12/191 Using E-CRM for a unified view of the customer COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, April 2003, Vol.46 No.4 Shan L. Pan & Jae-Nam Lee Reporter: Shing-Jiun.
Managing and Performing Chapter One Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written.
Marketing Management Chapter 1.
Strategic Financial Decision-Making Framework
Online Communities Academic Publishing Perspective.
Competing for Advantage
Human capital management
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Guidance in Structuring a Communities of Practice.
Existing Frameworks: UNESCO Integration in stages The introduction and use of ICT in education proceeds in broad stages that may be conceived as a continuum.
Tsinghua University Service-Oriented Enterprise Coordination Prof. Dr. Yushun Fan Department of Automation, Tsinghua University,
DIVISION Landstingsdirektörens stab Coral Interreg Europe proposal Project proposal addresses objective 1.2 of the Interreg Europe Programme: Improve the.
Assistive Technology Clinical Outcomes Research Management System (AT-CORMS) Tool Utilizing the International Classification of Functioning (ICF) Cognitive.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
Delivering an Architecture for the Social Enterprise Alpesh Doshi, Fintricity Information Age Social&Mobile Business Conference Tuesday 31st January 2012.
The Leader and Global Systems: The Impact of an International Partnership Activity on the Redesign of the Doctoral Program in Leadership Studies at Gonzaga.
SYSE 802 John D. McGregor Module 8 Session 2 Platforms, Ecosystems, and Innovations.
Lecture 4 Transport Network and Flows. Mobility, Space and Place Transport is the vector by which movement and mobility is facilitated. It represents.
STRATEGY OF LIFELONG LEARNING AT THE UNIVERSITY OF NIS
© 2002 By Default! A Free sample background from Slide 1 “Creating Value in Your Business Ecosystem” and “Strategy for Small.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
The roots of innovation Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) Future and Emerging Technologies (FET) The roots of innovation Proactive initiative on:
STANDARDS COORDINATION COMMITTEE PLENARY BREAKOUT 18 SEPTEMBER 2014 Interoperability Requirements.
Competing For Advantage Part II – Strategic Analysis Chapter 4 – The Internal Organization: Resources, Capabilities, and Core Competencies.
MHC at its Best MHC at its Best.
DEVELOPMENt EDUCATION & The Primary classroom EXPLORED
Chapter 1 The Nature of Strategic Management
Conceptualizing value co-creation in health care delivery: the focal dyad perspective Professor Alan Wilson and Kofi Osei-Frimpong Service Management and.
Developing Competitive Advantage and Strategic Focus
MSOM conference, New York, 18th June 2012 Irene C.L. Ng
Competing For Advantage Chapter 4 – The Internal Organization: Resources, Capabilities, and Core Competencies.
Luca Carrubbo – Brno 2013 Building the service model, looking for its conceptual evolution.
Adaptive Processes: Linking Strategy with Execution.
Chapter © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Results and Recommendations From Hammer Siler George & Our Local Stakeholder Engagement Process. March 2004.
Working in Partnership
Enhancing service system design : An entity interaction pattern approach Author : Soe-Tsyr Daphne Yuan, Shiou-Tian Hsu Professor : Soe-Tsyr Daphne Yuan.
 Business Modeling in the Dynamic Digital Space An Ecosystem Approach - Omar A. El Sawy Francis Pereira.
Value Creating Service Systems: A Transdisciplinary Research Agenda Irene Ng.
Luca Carrubbo – Brno 2013 Promoting value proposition (potential value, effective value)
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Canada Inc. 00 Chapter 11 Alliances as Vehicles.
Foundations of Information Systems in Business
SM Sec.1 Dated 13/11/10 STRATEGY & STRUCTURE Group 3.
Responsive Innovation for Disaster Mitigation Gordon A. Gow University of Alberta.
Author : Lucas Pfisterer and Stefan Roth Professor : Soe-Tsyr Daphne Yuan Presenter : Po-Wei Chiang.
Value network analysis for complex service systems: Author : Juite Wang Jung-Yu Lai Li-Chun Hsiao Professor : Soe-Tsyr Daphne Yuan Presenter : Po-Wei Chiang.
1 MARKETING AND MARKETING MANAGEMENT Module 1. 2 Objectives Defining marketing and marketing management The scope of marketing Some fundamental marketing.
LECTURE 5 Nangwonvuma M/ Byansi D. Components, interfaces and integration Infrastructure, Middleware and Platforms Techniques – Data warehouses, extending.
Carmela Tuccillo Orlando Troisi Università degli Studi di Salerno
Is It Possible To Teach Service Science? © Leonard Walletzký PA181 – Service Systems, Modeling and Execution.
AUDIT STAFF TRAINING WORKSHOP 13 TH – 14 TH NOVEMBER 2014, HILTON HOTEL NAIROBI AUDIT PLANNING 1.
Chapter 1 Market-Oriented Perspectives Underlie Successful Corporate, Business, and Marketing Strategies.
SAM Baseline Review Engagement
Leveraging Disruptive Innovation: An S-D Logic Perspective
INTERNAL ENVIRONMENT ANALYSIS
Microsoft Services Cloud Productivity Solutions
Enabling Collaboration with IT
Internet Interconnection
NAE Global Challenge Scholars Program Annual Meeting on October 30.
The Organizational Context
MIS COURSE: CHAPTER 1 INFORMATION SYSTEM IN GLOBAL BUSINESS TODAY
Presentation transcript:

SERVICE INNOVATION: A SERVICE-DOMINANT LOGIC PERSPECTIVE Author: Robert F. Lusch 、Satish Nambisan Professor: Soe-Tsyr(Daphne) Yuan Presenter: Bryant Chen

Outline Introduction Service Innovation The S-D Logic Perspective A Broadened View of Service Innovation Service Ecosystems Service Platforms Cocreation of Value Discussion Conclusion

How enterprises view the nature and process of innovation? Introduction How enterprises view the nature and process of innovation?

Introduction Value/experience-centric focus A network-centric focus No longer are innovations developed from the confines of an organization A network-centric focus information-centric focus Value/experience-centric focus partners Intangible offerings Tangible goods customers in which the extent of information content is high—that is, an information-centric focus suppliers inventors

Introduction Not just the landscape but expanded the role of IT Digital enabled Digital revolution New UX Several of these innovations can be termed digital or digitally enabled, which involve new combinations of digital and physical components to create novel market offerings Facebook, YouTube , Twitter Apple, Amazon-Kindle

Introduction “Service innovation in the digital age” Need a broader conceptualization of service and framework Offering a broadened view of service innovation – SDL Examining its implication for the deployment of IT transcends the tangible–intangible divide and reflects the shifts to network-centric, information-centric, and experience-centric innovation foci the deployment of IT to facilitate both the creation and the delivery of innovative service offerings.

Introduction SDL Views what a firm as the exchange of service that occurs by one actor using its skills and capabilities for the benefit of another actor. Focus on the processes of serving G-D logic focuses on the separation and control of actors to optimize and manage tangible outcomes of economic processes S-D logic focuses on the processes of serving rather than on the output in the form of a product offering that is exchanged

Introduction Offer an integrated framework Draws on four meta-theoretical foundations of S-D logic : Incorporates three inter-related elements: Dual roles : operant , operand Actor-to-actor networks Resource liquefaction Resource density Resource integration Service platforms Service ecosystems Value cocreation

Service Innovation

Service Innovation Propose an overarching framework of innovation , one that is rooted in SDL and embraces and builds on many recent studies in this area. 應該還要放一些 p.158

The S-D Logic Perspective

The S-D Logic Perspective All actors in an exchange deploy skills and competences when making an offering of their service to one another. Value is the “comparative appreciation of reciprocal skills or services that are exchanged to obtain utility; value means ‘value in use’” reciprocal 相互的

The S-D Logic Perspective Reconceptualizing Service Reconceptualizing Resources Reconceptualizing Exchange Reconceptualizing Value Meta-Theoretical Foundations of S-D Logic

SDL:Reconceptualizing Service Service involves applying resources for the benefit of others or oneself. Use the singular term service to reflect the process Goods and service are not alternative forms of products. Goods are appliances that serve as alternatives to direct service provision. Service represents the general and universal case, the common denominator, of the exchange process.

SDL:Reconceptualizing Resources Views resource as anything an actor can draw on for support. Operand resources an actor acts on to obtain support (i.e., they enable or facilitate) often tangible and static These things can be tangible or intangible; furthermore, they can be internal to actors and under their control or external to actors but capable of being drawn on for support. Operant resources act on other resources to produce effects they act or operate on other things rather than being operated on. often intangible and dynamic

SDL:Reconceptualizing Exchange Good-centered view the output (usually physical) from the performance of specialized activities is being exchanged. Service-centered view the performance of the specialized activities is being exchanged.

SDL:Reconceptualizing Value Value added describes the process of firms transforming matter to change its form, time, place, and possession. Value occurs when the offering is useful to the customer or beneficiary (value-in-use) Actors are constantly dropping and forming new connections  value experiencing is dynamic Firms, therefore, cannot deliver value; they can only offer a value proposition as an invitation to engage with the firm (and potentially other actors) for the cocreation of value

SDL:Meta-Theoretical Foundations of S-D Logic Actor-to-Actor Networks Resource Liquefaction Resource Density Resource Integration Aan : not in their dyadic roles as producers and consumers

SDL:Meta-Theoretical Foundations of S-D Logic Actor-to-Actor Networks More generic sense as actors in a system of other actors cocreating value through resource integration and service provision. All actors are resource integrators in a network of other actors . All actors are potential innovators or co- creators of value . Aan : not in their dyadic roles as producers and consumers

SDL:Meta-Theoretical Foundations of S-D Logic Resource Liquefaction The decoupling of information from its related physical form or device. For information to be useful, it must be shared with others. Aan : not in their dyadic roles as producers and consumers

SDL:Meta-Theoretical Foundations of S-D Logic Resource Density Maximum density occurs when the best combination of resources is mobilized for a particular situation. The need to mobilize contextually relevant knowledge (resource) in the most effective and efficient way. Aan : not in their dyadic roles as producers and consumers

SDL:Meta-Theoretical Foundations of S-D Logic Resource Integration Human actor integrate resources for two primary reasons : Any resource never be used in isolation but needs to be combined or bundled with other resources for usefulness or value. Innovation is the result of recombining or rebundling existing resources.  becomes a module Aan : not in their dyadic roles as producers and consumers

A Broadened View of Service Innovation

A Broadened View of Service Innovation Service innovation can then be considered the rebundling of diverse resources that create novel resources that are beneficial (i.e., value experiencing) to some actors in a given context .

A Broadened View of Service Innovation Such a conceptualization of service innovation offers several advantages, particularly in understanding the role of IT. Focuses on the value experienced by the beneficiary Incorporates the beneficiary (e.g., customer) as an active (and required) participant in the innovation process . Emphasizes access to the relevant bundle of resources at the location. We further delineate our broadened conceptualization of service innovation through a tripartite framework consisting service ecosystem, service platforms, and value cocreation.

Service Ecosystems

Service Ecosystems An ecosystem is a community of interacting entities - organizations and individuals (including customers) - that coevolve their capabilities and roles and depend on one another for their overall effectiveness and survival .

Service Ecosystems We define a service ecosystem as a relatively self-contained, self-adjusting system of mostly loosely coupled social and economic (resource-integrating) actors connected by shared institutional logics and mutual value creation through service exchange.

Service Ecosystems To explore the role of IT further, draw on the networks literature and consider three underlying aspects of a service ecosystem : Structural Flexibility and Structural Integrity Cognitive Distance and Shared Worldview Architecture of Participation

Structural Flexibility and Structural Integrity “loosely coupled” means that actors are relatively free to enter and exit and form collaborations or exchanges with other actors . Structural flexibility refers to the different ways of organizing actors to suit varied innovation opportunities in a network . Structural integrity refers to the nature of ties or relationships that hold the diverse actors together in a network .

Cognitive Distance and Shared Worldview As more content is digitized, it becomes easier for actors to share information quickly and gain advantage through better IT-based sense-and-respond strategies. A critical challenge for an ecosystem to achieve such capabilities is the cognitive distance among the actors. Adopt a shared worldview - actors can interpret resource integration opportunities coherently and come together quickly to exchange or integrate resources.

Architecture of Participation Provides a road map for the different actors to come together and engage in service exchange. Two key aspects: Involves the implementation of transparent rules of exchange to facilitate the coordination of actor contributions and their interactions. The participants will realize value from the exchange (or be “rewarded” for their contributions).

Service Platforms

Service Platforms As a modular structure that comprises tangible and intangible components (resources) and facilitates the interaction of actors and resources (or resource bundles) Primary benefit is to leverage resource liquefaction and enhance resource density.

Service Platforms Modular Architecture and Resource Density Protocols (Rules) of Exchange

Modular Architecture and Resource Density Actors in the ecosystem must gain access to a suitable combination of resources . A layered–modular structure enhances the level of resource density more than an integrated structure. A bundled set of specialized knowledge and skills appearing that easily interface with variable product forms and types. As the number of layers as well as the degree of modularity in each layer increases, the opportunity for innovative resource combinations expands,

Modular Architecture and Resource Density A higher degree of modularity enables better coordination of service exchange and creates more opportunities for value cocreation. A higher degree of granularity allows a diverse set of actors to participate in such service exchange. As the number of layers as well as the degree of modularity in each layer increases, the opportunity for innovative resource combinations expands,

Protocols (Rules) of Exchange If the rules of engagement are clearly specified and the ability to interface is more open, the service platform will support a greater degree of resource integration and serve as a venue for more viable systems solutions.

Cocreation of Value

Cocreation of Value All firms undertake the dual roles of service offerer (making offers of resources or service to other actors) and service beneficiary (they themselves are beneficiaries of other firms that supply them with service or resources).

Cocreation of Value Actor (User or Beneficiary) Roles in Resource Integration Support for Value Cocreation

Actor (User or Beneficiary) Roles in Resource Integration Five roles for customers in value cocreation : resource, coproducer, buyer, user, and product S-D logic identifies three broad roles depending on the nature of service exchange and the type of resource integration achieved: ideator, designer, and intermediary.

Actor (User or Beneficiary) Roles in Resource Integration Ideator : reflects the capability of beneficiaries of service offerings (i.e., customers) to bring knowledge about their needs and unique work context to the firm and then to integrate that with knowledge about how they use existing market offerings to envision new services.

Actor (User or Beneficiary) Roles in Resource Integration Designer : reflects the capability of beneficiaries of service offerings to mix and match existing knowledge components or resources to configure (or develop) new services. Intermediary : reflects the capability of beneficiaries to cross- pollinate knowledge across multiple ecosystems and to serve as intermediaries in service innovation.

Actor (User or Beneficiary) Roles in Resource Integration The value an actor creates or cocreates may not be directly related to the usage of the related offering. It may pertain to the broader context in which such a role is enacted.

Support for Value Cocreation Although the service ecosystem (by providing an organizing structure for the actors) and service platforms (by providing an organizing structure for the resources) contribute to this, the nature of the roles implies three additional areas of support.

Support for Value Cocreation Facilitating Interactions among Actors Adapting Internal Processes Transparency of Activities

Support for Value Cocreation Facilitating Interactions among Actors The easier it is for actors to access platforms and resources therein, the richer the opportunity for resource integration The more diverse the communication channels, the richer are the opportunities for knowledge integration and service exchange.

Support for Value Cocreation Adapting Internal Processes Actors may also need to adapt their existing (or adopt new) business processes to embrace diverse other actors as part of the service ecosystem. Involve establishing new organizational roles to connect the customer with the internal actors.

Support for Value Cocreation Transparency of Activities IT can be important in enhancing transparency in value cocreation activities, indicating issues for further study.

Discussion

Discussion Dual roles Framework implication: Highlights the need to further explicate the key characteristics of the three elements of service innovation described here . Involves the need for companies to adopt a holistic focus and consider all three components and their interconnections.

Conclusion

Conclusion Our conceptualization helps identify and integrate the salient themes and concepts that assume considerable importance in service innovation, and specifically, in digital service innovation. Reveals important gaps in our understanding of service innovation (for example, on the emerging role of IT as an operant resource) and the potential for S-D logic to inform on those issues.

THANK YOU