Problem Solving: Cognitive processes aimed at achieving a specific goal (a solution to a problem) Early Research: Wolfgang Kohler (Gestalt Psychologist)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Advanced Educational Psychology --mgmsantos. Misconceptions: 1. That nothing needs to be done for students with a high intelligence because they will.
Advertisements

“If we can really understand the problem, the answer will come out of it, because the answer is not separate from the problem.” Jiddu Krishnamurti Indian.
Problem Solving. Outline Well vs. ill-defined problems Heuristics for problem solving –Hill climbing –Means-Ends analysis –Working Backwards representation.
Problem Solving What is a problem? How do we go about solving problems? How can we be better problem-solvers?
Problem Solving. Well-defined problems –Much studied in AI –Requires search –Domain general heuristics for solving problems What about ill-defined problems?
Computer Simulation (1). 8 A (8) Initial State 44 Goal State B (5) C (3) A (8) B (5) C (3) Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 5 Step 6 Step 7.
1 Problem Solving and Creativity. 2 Problem solving - definition Directed thinking towards a goal solution – the task is to choose the best process that.
Analogical Reasoning. Types of reasoning Content free reasoning: –Deductive reasoning Reasoning by similarity –Inductive reasoning –Analogical reasoning:
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 8 – Problem Solving May 21, 2003.
Means-end analysis Reducing differences between current state and goal state Stop when difference is 0 (no difference) Subgoals Intermediate goals – not.
Problem Solving Shortcuts through the Problem Space.
Problem Solving. Well-defined problems –Much studied in AI –Requires search –Domain general heuristics for solving problems What about ill-defined problems?
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 8 – Problem Solving.
Area of psychology that refers broadly to mental processes or thinking
Problem Solving.
Problem Solving & Creativity Dr. Claudia J. Stanny EXP 4507 Memory & Cognition Spring 2009.
Analogical Problem Solving. How good are we at finding relevant prior experience?
* Problem solving: active efforts to discover what must be done to achieve a goal that is not readily attainable.
What is Problem Solving?
Problem-Solving October 29, The Problem with problem-solving research “In field research, there is often too much [complexity] to allow for definitive.
Kimberley Clow Problem Solving Kimberley Clow
Constructivism Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos. Outline Overview of Constructivism Two Types of Constructivism Learning according to Constructivism Constructivist.
Problem-Solving and Reasoning
1 Problem Solving: How Do We Do Think Things Out? EDIT 600 Fall 2010 Instructor: Elise Christopher.
MODULE 23 COGNITION/THINKING. THINKING Thinking is a cognitive process in which the brain uses information from the senses, emotions, and memory to create.
Problem solving Using background knowledge Analogical problem solving and access Case-based reasoning.
Research on Human Learning: Understanding and Applications Jose Mestre Department of Physics University of Massachusetts Amherst, MA
Cognitive Psychology: Thinking, Intelligence, and Language
Human Cognitive Processes: psyc 345 Ch. 11: Problem Solving Takashi Yamauchi © Takashi Yamauchi (Dept. of Psychology, Texas A&M University)
Outline »Problem solving ◊The Gestaltist approach –Stages of thinking »Analogy ◊Multiconstraint theory »Problem Solving Basics ◊Characteristics of problem.
Transfer to Learning EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos, PhD.
WHS AP Psychology Unit 6: Cognition Essential Task 6-2: Identify problem-solving techniques (algorithms and heuristics) as well as factors that influence.
Analogical Learning and Problem Solving
Lecture 13 – Problem Solving 1 Two points for this lecture: 1.Role of problem solving in history of cognition. 2. Cognitive theories of the problem, the.
Problem-Solving Water Jugs Problem You are given two jugs, a 4-gallon jug & a 3-gallon jug. Neither has any measuring marks on it. There is a pump that.
Problem Solving 1. The “problem” -well versus ill defined 2. Measurement -RT, error patterns, verbal protocols 3. History of problem solving.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334
EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos
How People Learn: A Scientist’s Perspective Jose Mestre Departments of Physics and Educational Psychology University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign.
C Pearson Allyn & Bacon Problem Solving Chapter 11.
Thinking part III Problem Solving. Solve this maze at your leisure. Start at phil’s house. At first, you can only make right turns through the maze. Each.
Transfer to Learning EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
Phenomena in Problem Solving Insight Problems Functional Fixedness Using external representations.
How People Learn: A Scientist’s Perspective Jose Mestre Departments of Physics and Educational Psychology University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign.
1 HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON P SYCHOLOGY PRINCIPLES IN PRACTICE 1 Chapter 8 THINKING AND LANGUAGE Section 1: What Is Thinking?What Is Thinking? Section.
An Eyetracking Analysis of the Effect of Prior Comparison on Analogical Mapping Catherine A. Clement, Eastern Kentucky University Carrie Harris, Tara Weatherholt,
Psychology - Warm Up April 10, 2012 Senior Exit Projects - Metacognition If you have not chosen your senior exit topic, please choose chose one for this.
PROBLEM SOLVING. ALGORITHM Specific procedure that when used properly will always lead to the solution Ex: recipes, math formulas S P L O Y O C H Y G.
Intelligence and Creativity
Problem Solving PERTEMUAN Early research on problem- solving A cat placed in a box with a trapdoor was not observed to show behaviour approximating.
Four points for this lecture Role of problem solving in history of cognition. Theories about problem Theories about solver’s knowledge Theories about process.
Thought & Problem Solving Tell a partner: What are you thinking about?
Thinking and Language Notes 10-1 (obj.1-3). 1.) Thinking ****Thinking, or cognition, refers to a process that involves knowing, understanding, remembering,
The Cuban Missile Crisis
Art of the Day Presentation Colby Hester Honors English 1-2 Period 3 Ms. Tanaka 18 th April, 2014.
Curriculum Integration Why and How? Jeff Froyd Texas A&M University
Incubation Effects - Why Do They Occur? Then: Analogical Reasoning Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 5/25/2016: Lecture 09-3.
Cognitive Processes PSY 334
Thinking and Reasoning LO 8
Cognitive Processes PSY 334
Reasoning deduction, induction, abduction Problem solving
Unit 6: Cognition WHS AP Psychology
Cognitive Processes: Thinking and Problem Solving
But They Said They Knew This!
EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos, PhD
Cognition mental activities associated with thinking, reasoning, knowing, remembering, and communicating.
Unit 7: Cognition AP Psychology
Unit 7: Cognition AP Psychology
EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos, PhD
Cognitive Processes PSY 334
Presentation transcript:

Problem Solving: Cognitive processes aimed at achieving a specific goal (a solution to a problem) Early Research: Wolfgang Kohler (Gestalt Psychologist) work with chimpanzees on Tenerife Island. Insight learning: the “sudden” realization of a knowledge. Fit nicely with Gestalt idea of perceiving whole meaningful pattern or form.

Duncker (1945) “make a lamp” problem Functional fixedness: tendency to think about objects only in term of the conventional uses

Luchin’s (1942) water jar problem: mental or negative set effects Set effect: inappropriately using a previously successful approach when an another approach would be better.

Return to insight learning Insight as release from irrelevant modes of thinking that inhibit problem solving (“getting over” set or functional fixedness effects) EEG shows a spike in alpha and gamma brain waves prior to insight solution Frontal lobe and anterior cingulate gyrus activity associated with insight solution not non-insight solution

Analogy and problem solving Gick and Holyoak (1980) Radiation Problem Suppose you are a doctor faced with a patient who has a malignant tumor in his stomach. It is impossible to operate on the patient, but unless the tumor is destroyed the patient will die. There is a kind of ray that can be used to destroy the tumor. If the rays reach it all at once at a sufficiently high intensity, the tumor will be destroyed. Unfortunately, at this intensity the healthy tissue the rays pass through on the way to the tumor will also be destroyed. At lower intensities the rays are harmless to healthy tissue, but they will not affect the tumor, either. What type of procedure might be used to destroy the tumor with the rays and at the same time avoid destroying the healthy tissue? When give this problem cold, less than 10% were able to solve it.

Analogy and problem solving Gick and Holyoak (1980) Military Problem A small country was ruled from a strong fortress by a dictator. The fortress was situated in the middle of the country, surrounded by farms and villages. Many roads led to the fortress through the countryside. A rebel general vowed to capture the fortress. The general knew that an attack by his entire army would capture the fortress. He gathered his army at the head of one of the roads, ready to launch a full-scale direct attack. However, the general then learned that the dictator had planted mines on each of the roads. The mines were set so that small bodies of men could pass over them safely, since the dictator needed to move his troops and workers to and from the fortress. However, any large force would detonate the mines. Not only would this blow up the road, but it would also destroy many neighboring villages. It therefore seemed impossible to capture the fortress. The general, however, devised a simple plan. He positioned a small detachments of soldiers at the head of different roads and on his order they march along different roads to the fortress and arrived at the same time, thereby overthrowing the dictator.

Analogy and problem solving Gick and Holyoak (1980) Analogy was not obvious: only 20% solved the radiation problem when first given the military problem. However, this went up to over 90% when subjects were told that the military problem would be applicable to solving the radiation problem.

When are analogies more likely to work? Holyoak and Thagard (1997) multi-constraint theory of problem solving Analogies more effective when: Similarities in content: elements of one event or experience bear resemblance to elements in another (note: military and radiation have little surface similarity which may explain low rate of problem solving in no-hint condition) Parallel structures: elements in one event or experience can be “mapped” onto elements in the other. (e.g. dictator=tumor; troops=rays; different routes=dividing rays, etc.) Similar purposes: goals/purposes of events are similar (e.g. curing a dangerous problem, dictator/tumor)

Analogy and the brain When doing analogical mapping: left prefrontal and inferior parietal, plus medial frontal active When doing insight learning: right frontal

Means-End Analysis General problem solving heuristic strategy. Includes: Initial state: conditions as they exist currently (with problem) Goal state: conditions as they exist with problem solve Problem space: the “territory” that must be traversed to move from initial to goal states Operators: legal “moves” that can be made to navigate through problem space Subgoals: states in problem space that represent progress toward goal state.

Problem space Tower of Hanoi (3 disks fairly simple). Getting largest one on bottom of last pole might be subgoal. More practical example: clearing snow from drive way. Legal moves and subgoals shown

GPS (General Problem Solver) Early attempt at creating AI Problem-solving computer system using means-end analysis Operated using production systems: directional instructions in the form of if-then statements if no stores are open to buy snow-removal equipment then call for snow removal. If no friend available to help with removal then call professionals, etc. Production systems constrained by legal operator “rules” Ex: can’t call if phone lines down. Can’t contract professionals if no money, etc. Limitation of GPS: often got stuck on subgoals. If solving overall problem required making a move that “moved” away from subgoal, GPS got stuck, called stuck at local maximum