Improving Results-Based Management in Grants to States: Transitioning to Virtual Collaboration Training Presentation by Matthew Birnbaum, PhD., IMLS Evaluation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SE Name SE Title Blackboard Training: Approaches and Opportunities.
Advertisements

Performance Measurement: Not just for breakfast anymore Performance Measurement and the Strategic Plan Senior Corps Virtual Conference August 2012.
Floridas Outcome-Based Evaluation Program Technical Session LSTA Coordinators Annual Conference November 16-17, 2000.
Lessons Learned: How to Survive the Development of Outcome Measures Cherie McCraw, M.L.S., Library Consultant, Division of Library and Information Services.
Improving Results-Based Management in Grants to States: Transitioning to Virtual Collaboration Training Presentation by Matthew Birnbaum, PhD., IMLS Evaluation.
Presentation at The Conference for Family Literacy Louisville, Kentucky By Apter & O’Connor Associates April 2013 Evaluating Our Coalition: Are We Making.
1 Rhode Island School Counselor Evaluation Jean Greco, Patricia Nailor and Karl Squier RISCA Spring Conference Rhode Island Convention Center April 11,
AB 86: Adult Education Consortia Planning Regional Comprehensive Plan Objectives 1, 2, & 4 Webinar Series
LSTA Grants to States Conference Philadelphia, PA March 2012 LSTA Conference Measuring Success and the New SPR.
RACE TO EXCELLENCE This presentation provides guidance and tools for participation in the 2011 Race.
Spring Depository Library Council March 31, 2008 U.S. Government Printing Office FDsys Update.
1 Money Follows the Person Working Group August 26, 2011.
Welcome to Project CHARACTER*. Created by: Jim Carroll Joe Montecalvo.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
1 EEC Board Policy and Research Committee October 2, 2013 State Advisory Council (SAC) Sustainability for Early Childhood Systems Building.
Pilot – Professional Mentoring Program The American Association of Blacks in Energy.
Sara Kim, PhD, Director, Associate Professor Instructional Design and Technology Unit, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine Katherine Wigan, BS, MBA, Senior.
RHP 12 Learning Collaborative.  RHP 12 Learning Collaborative Summary ◦ Cohort Updates ◦ Upcoming DSRIP in Action  Waiver Updates.
WHAT IS “CLASS”? A BRIEF ORIENTATION TO THE CLASS METHODOLOGY.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
August 11, 2014 Opportunities for Technical Assistance through ASTHO.
REVIEW OF CMS “INITIAL APPROVAL” OF RHP PLAN AND FOLLOW-UP REQUIREMENTS May 8, 2013 REGION 10.
1 Community-Based Care Readiness Assessment and Peer Review Team Procedures Overview Guide Department of Children and Families And Florida Mental Health.
Cathy Burack and Alan Melchior The Center for Youth and Communities The Heller School for Social Policy and Management, Brandeis University Your Program.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Sept. 5, 2012 Kevin T. Gallagher and Linda C. Gundersen September 5, 2012 CDI Science.
Crossing Methodological Borders to Develop and Implement an Approach for Determining the Value of Energy Efficiency R&D Programs Presented at the American.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
Katie A. Learning Collaborative For Audio, please call: Participant code: Please mute your phone Building Child Welfare and Mental.
Ted Price, Ph.D. West Virginia University Workshop Facilitator September 16, 2010.
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
1 Archdiocese of New York Academic Initiatives.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Overview NIATx-SI Business Practices for the Future Learning Collaborative Fee-for-Service Cohort II Informational Call Jeanne Pulvermacher, Project Director.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
WERT Intercollege Dissemination Activities Prepared by Intercollege EU Office 4 th SCM – Cyprus 26 &
Continuing the work of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Presented by: Jeff Stauffer WebJunction Service Manager Date: 3 February 2005.
Overview of Indiana’s Alternate Assessment October 2014 Karen Stein, IDOE.
April 10, A year of mentoring required to move from the initial to the professional license: Initial teaching Initial school specialist Initial.
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
Improving Secondary Transition Services Through an Electronic Learning Community: An Online “Connect and Learn” Professional Development Model in Idaho.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
RetuRN to Care R2C & TCAB ARMC Nursing Retreat Annelle Beall & James Shrum August 28, 2008.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
LSTA Grant Workshop Jennifer Peacock, Administrative Services Bureau Director David Collins, Grant Programs Director Mississippi Library Commission September.
Innovative Case Study Strand Hunter Moorman Education and Training Policy Division Workshop of National Coordinators July 5, 2006.
September 8, 2015 Update Housing Committee September 8, 2015 Neighborhood Revitalization Plan for Dallas.
August 20, 2008 Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) CTSA Evaluation Approach Institute for Clinical & Translational Research (ICTR)
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Introduction to the Pennsylvania Kindergarten Entry Inventory.
Greta Smith, P.E. Associate Program Director, Project Delivery AASHTO Subcommittee on Design June 5, 2013.
Middle Fork Project Relicensing Process Plan April 25, 2006.
U.S. Department of Agriculture eGovernment Program Smart Choice Pre-Select Phase Transition September 2002.
Yvonne Abel, Abt Associates Inc. November 2010, San Antonio, TX Enhancing the Quality of Evaluation Through Collaboration Among Funders, Programs, and.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Plans for Phase III of Transition Age Youth Initiative.
Transition Age Youth Initiative: Promoting Resiliency and Recovery Oriented Practices! Dennis Bach, Program Director Lauren Cohen, Youth Coordinator.
Critical Program Movement: Integration of STD Prevention with Other Programs Kevin Fenton, MD, PhD, FFPH Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis,
Performance Measurement and PM-OTOOL Presented at the Abandoned Infants Assistance Grantee Kick-Off Meeting Washington, DC December 4, 2008 icfi.com ©
SHAPE your School Mental Health System!
Making Technical Cooperation work for capacity building
TN: TEACH AACTE Grant TN TEACH: The TN EPP Assistive and Collaborative Help Network.
SNA Strategic Plan #SNAleadership.
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)
Phase 4 Milestones.
Equitable Services Under ESSA
2018 – 2019 Child Well-Being Community Investment Process
Strategy
FY19 SoM Process Excellence Poster Celebration
Team Based Care Kick off Webinar
Making Technical Cooperation work for capacity building
Presentation transcript:

Improving Results-Based Management in Grants to States: Transitioning to Virtual Collaboration Training Presentation by Matthew Birnbaum, PhD., IMLS Evaluation Officer May 2011

Overview of Presentation What are we going to be doing? Why are we doing this? Who is responsible for what? How are we going to do this? When are we doing this? Where are we headed? 2

What Are We Going to Be Doing? We are focusing for the rest of the spring and summer on the first phase of reform – - logic mapping. We are going to create a series of “logic maps”. –The maps will describe what types of results we can expect to accomplish over different time intervals. –There will be one logic map for each of six priorities in the new IMLS legislation. These logic maps will be transformed into a formal master document for guiding subsequent efforts at reforming results- based management protocols in the Grants to States program over the next five years. 3

Why are We Doing This? 1.The public needs effective library services to improve their quality of life. 2.Results-based management (RBM) improves our ability to tell more compelling stories about the the benefits that the public receives from effective library services. 3.RBM provides a way to better demonstrate accountability to policy makers by better informing them on results benefitting the public from effective library services. 4.RBM helps libraries improve effectiveness in setting and implementing policies and programs through continued learning and adapting from results discovered about services offered to the public. 4

Who is Responsible for What? The State Library Administrative Agency partners are primarily responsible for producing the content. IMLS staff are primarily responsible for facilitating the process. Additional experts may be brought in at different points to increase the quality and usefulness of the effort through peer reviews. 5

How Are We Going to Do This? We unfortunately can no longer afford to meet face-to-face as we did in March at the Baltimore conference. We will instead move to using the power of information and telecommunications technologies in collaborating virtually through: –Webinars –The “Measuring Success” wiki 6

Measuring Success Wiki The Measuring Success Wiki will be the principal mode of interaction for developing the results-based management plan. This wiki is organized to enable working groups to develop logic maps, objectives and metrics for addressing each of the priorities virtually during the planning process. The Wiki is intended to be an ongoing virtual community for encouraging the sharing of knowledge between IMLS and SLAAs and among the SLAAs themselves. See: For more questions about this wiki, contact Kim Okahara at 7

When Are We Going to Be Doing This? Phase I (Logic Mapping/Planning) – March 2011 – October 2011: Process begun at the LSTA Conference in Baltimore on March 14. Bi-monthly webinars for each working group from May through July to develop initial logic maps. August webinars for each working group to review translation of logic map into planning document End of September interaction (TBD) to finalize planning document. The six working groups end. Wiki will be up and active throughout this entire period. Subsequent, Overlapping Phases: Phase 2 – Piloting (August 2011 – September 2012) Phase 3 – Transition to Full-Scale RBM (March 2012-March 2013) 8

Timeline for Logic Mapping and and RBM Planning Document May-June: “Concept Mapping” (aka “Backward Logic Mapping”) –Priorities  Opportunities/Obstacles  Contributing Factors  Strategies –Refining what was initiated at Baltimore conference in Baltimore June- July: “Results Chains” (aka “Forward Logic Mapping”) –Strategies/Actions  Initial Results  Opportunity Captures/Threat Reductions  Long-Term Results  Priority Results July - August: Milestones (aka “Targets”) and Metrics (Statistical and Qualitative) August-September: RBM Planning Document 9

Where Are We Headed? Powerpoint slides from presentations in March, April and today are available at: s went out on May X announcing the schedules for the webinars for individuals who volunteered to participate in one of the working groups around the six priorities. More information about the Measuring Success wiki will be sent out by on May Y. Training on using the Measuring Success wiki will happen on ZZZ. The first webinars will happen on WWW. We will return to refining and completing the logic maps that were begun at the March conference. 10