Use of AMSR-E Land Parameter Modeling and Retrievals for SMAP Algorithm Development Steven Chan Eni Njoku Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting Telluride, Colorado.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Application of Remote Sensing: CE 6900 Tennessee Technological University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Course Instructor:
Advertisements

AMS’04, Seattle, WA. January 12, 2004Slide 1 HYDROS Radiometer and Radar Combined Soil Moisture Retrieval Using Kalman Filter Data Assimilation X. Zhan,
Extension and application of an AMSR global land parameter data record for ecosystem studies Jinyang Du, John S. Kimball, Lucas A. Jones, Youngwook Kim,
Aquarius Status Salinity Retrieval and Applications D. M. Le Vine NASA/GSFC, Greenbelt, MD E. P. Dinnat, G. Lagerloef, P. de Matthaeis, H. Kao, F.
AGU 2004 Fall Meeting, May 19, 2015Slide 1 Jointly Retrieving Surface Soil Moisture from Active and Passive Microwave Observations using Cubist Data-Mining.
Shenglei Zhang ﹡, Jiancheng Shi, Youjun Dou Xiaojun Yin, Liying Li, Chenzhou Liu ﹡ Experiments of satellite data simulation based on.
Sea water dielectric constant, temperature and remote sensing of Sea Surface Salinity E. P. Dinnat 1,2, D. M. Le Vine 1, J. Boutin 3, X. Yin 3, 1 Cryospheric.
Near Surface Soil Moisture Estimating using Satellite Data Researcher: Dleen Al- Shrafany Supervisors : Dr.Dawei Han Dr.Miguel Rico-Ramirez.
Potential Soil Moisture Retrieval from Aquarius Instrument Mississippi State University Geosystems Research Institute.
ATS 351 Lecture 8 Satellites
Aquarius/SAC-D Mission Mission Simulators - Gary Lagerloef 6 th Science Meeting; Seattle, WA, USA July 2010.
ICESat dH/dt Thinning Thickening ICESat key findings.
Soil Moisture Algorithm Results Oklahoma H Polarization Shown here are 1.4 GHz results obtained using an aircraft sensor and 19 GHz satellite data The.
Introduction Global soil moisture is one of the critical land surface initial conditions for numerical weather, climate, and hydrological predictions.
Single Column Experiments with a Microwave Radiative Transfer Model Henning Wilker, Meteorological Institute of the University of Bonn (MIUB) Gisela Seuffert,
Ifremer Planning of Cal/Val Activities during In orbit commisioning Phase N. Reul, J. Tenerelli, S. Brachet, F. Paul & F. Gaillard, ESL & GLOSCAL teams.
Role of Soil Moisture/Climate Networks in SMAP Validation T. J
Slide 1/32NOAA Soil Moisture/Soil Temperature Workshop, Oak Ridge, TN, 3-5 March, 2009 Value of Ground Network Observations in Development of Satellite.
Experiments with the microwave emissivity model concerning the brightness temperature observation error & SSM/I evaluation Henning Wilker, MIUB Matthias.
Multi-mission synergistic activities: A new era of integrated missions Christa Peters- Lidard Deputy Director, Hydrospheric and Biospheric Sciences, Goddard.
Princeton University Development of Improved Forward Models for Retrievals of Snow Properties Eric. F. Wood, Princeton University Dennis. P. Lettenmaier,
Aquarius Algorithm Workshop March 2007 College of Engineering Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences Chris Ruf Space Physics Research.
SMOS+ STORM Evolution Kick-off Meeting, 2 April 2014 SOLab work description Zabolotskikh E., Kudryavtsev V.
Retrieving Snowpack Properties From Land Surface Microwave Emissivities Based on Artificial Neural Network Techniques Narges Shahroudi William Rossow NOAA-CREST.
Calibration and Validation Studies for Aquarius Salinity Retrieval PI: Shannon Brown Co-Is: Shailen Desai and Anthony Scodary Jet Propulsion Laboratory,
A Combined Radar/Radiometer Retrieval for Precipitation IGARSS – Session 1.1 Vancouver, Canada 26 July, 2011 Christian Kummerow 1, S. Joseph Munchak 1,2.
The University of Mississippi Geoinformatics Center NASA MRC RPC – 11 July 2007 Greg Easson, Ph.D. Robert Holt, Ph.D. A. K. M. Azad Hossain University.
SCIENCE PROCESSING OVERVIEW David Le Vine Aquarius Deputy PI 07 July 2009.
APPLICATIONS OF THE INTEGRAL EQUATION MODEL IN MICROWAVE REMOTE SENSING OF LAND SURFACE PARAMETERS In Honor of Prof. Adrian K. Fung Kun-Shan Chen National.
L-band Microwave Emission of the Biosphere (L-MEB)
A. Montuori 1, M. Portabella 2, S. Guimbard 2, C. Gabarrò 2, M. Migliaccio 1 1 Dipartimento per le Tecnologie (DiT), University of Naples Parthenope, Italy.
William Crosson, Ashutosh Limaye, Charles Laymon National Space Science and Technology Center Huntsville, Alabama, USA Soil Moisture Retrievals Using C-
PASSIVE MICROWAVE TECHNIQUES FOR HYDROLOGICAL APPLICATIONS by : P. Ferrazzoli Tor Vergata University Roma, Italy
IGARSS 2011, Jul. 26, Vancouver 1 Improving Land Surface Energy and Water Fluxes Simulation over the Tibetan Plateau with Using a Land Data Assimilation.
Level 2 Algorithm. Definition of Product Levels LevelDescription Level 1 1A Reconstructed unprocessed instrument data 1B Geolocated, calibrated sensor.
Soil moisture estimates over Niger from satellite sensors (T. Pellarin, M. Zribi)
Update status of soil moisture algorithm Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting, July 14-16, Telluride, CO H.Fujii (JAXA/EORC) and T.Koike(UT)
An Intercalibrated Microwave Radiance Product for Use in Rainfall Estimation Level 1C Christian Kummerow, Wes Berg, G. Elsaesser Dept. of Atmospheric Science.
Space Reflecto, November 4 th -5 th 2013, Plouzané Characterization of scattered celestial signals in SMOS observations over the Ocean J. Gourrion 1, J.
WATER VAPOR RETRIEVAL OVER CLOUD COVER AREA ON LAND Dabin Ji, Jiancheng Shi, Shenglei Zhang Institute for Remote Sensing Applications Chinese Academy of.
2011 IEEE International Geoscience And Remote Sensing Symposium IGARSS’11  July 24-29, 2011  Vancouver, C ANADA A synergy between SMOS & AQUARIUS: resampling.
Sea Surface Salinity from Space Simulation of Aquarius brightness temperature, Tb, at spacecraft during one orbit Top Panel –Ground track (red) –Outer.
Land Surface Modeling Studies in Support of AQUA AMSR-E Validation PI: Eric F. Wood, Princeton University Project Goal: To provide modeling support to.
MULTI-FREQUENCY, MULTI-POLARIZATION AND ANGULAR MEASUREMENTS OF BARE SOIL, SNOW AND WATER ICE MICROWAVE REFLECTION AND EMISSION BY C-, Ku-, AND Ka-BAND,
NPOESS Conical Scanning Microwave Imager/ Sounder (CMIS) Overview
Design Features of a Boresighted GPM Core Radiometer Christopher S. Ruf Dept. of Atmospheric, Oceanic & Space Sciences University of Michigan, Ann Arbor,
CCAR / University of Colorado 1 Airborne GPS Bistatic Radar in CLPX Dallas Masters University of Colorado, Boulder Valery Zavorotny NOAA ETL Stephen Katzberg.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Soil Moisture Active and.
Improved Aquarius Salinity Retrievals using Auxiliary Products from the CONAE Microwave Radiometer (MWR) W. Linwood Jones Central Florida Remote Sensing.
IGARSS 2011, Jul. 27, Vancouver 1 Monitoring Vegetation Water Content by Using Optical Vegetation Index and Microwave Vegetation Index: Field Experiment.
Locally Optimized Precipitation Detection over Land Grant Petty Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences University of Wisconsin - Madison.
Faraday Rotation David Le Vine Aquarius Algorithm Workshop March 9-11, 2010.
Challenges and Strategies for Combined Active/Passive Precipitation Retrievals S. Joseph Munchak 1, W. S. Olson 1,2, M. Grecu 1,3 1: NASA Goddard Space.
国家 863 计划微波遥感技术实验室 The National Microwave Remote Sensing Laboratory 11/15/2007 Preparation for Vicarious Calibration of SMOS using Takelimgan Sand Desert.
Recent Improvements and Ecological Applications of the UMT AMSR Land Parameter Record Jinyang Du, Lucas A. Jones, and John S. Kimball Numerical Terradynamic.
The Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) Mission: Retrieval Characterisation and Error Analysis H. Bösch 1, B. Connor 2, B. Sen 1, G. C. Toon 1 1 Jet Propulsion.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Evaluation of the SMAP.
Basis of GV for Japan’s Hydro-Meteorological Process Modelling Research GPM Workshop Sep. 27 to 30, Taipei, Taiwan Toshio Koike, Tobias Graf, Mirza Cyrus.
A step toward operational use of AMSR-E horizontal polarized radiance in JMA global data assimilation system Masahiro Kazumori Numerical Prediction Division.
Recent SeaWiFS view of the forest fires over Alaska Gene Feldman, NASA GSFC, Laboratory for Hydrospheric Processes, Office for Global Carbon Studies
A New Ocean Suite Algorithm for AMSR2 David I. Duncan September 16 th, 2015 AMSR Science Team Meeting Huntsville, AL.
Sarah Abelen and Florian Seitz Earth Oriented Space Science and Technology (ESPACE) IAPG, TUM Geodätische Woche 2010 Contributions of different water storage.
References: 1)Ganguly, S., Samanta, A., Schull, M. A., Shabanov, N. V., Milesi, C., Nemani, R. R., Knyazikhin, Y., and Myneni, R. B., Generating vegetation.
Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.
CGMS-43-NOAA-WP-25 Coordination Group for Meteorological Satellites - CGMS NOAA Use of Soil Moisture Products Presented to CGMS-43 Working Group 2 session,
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing
Intercalibration of AMSR2 and PMW radiometers Takashi Maeda(JAXA/EORC), Arata Okuyama (JMA), Kazufumi Kobayashi (RESTEC), Mieko Seki (RESTEC), Keiji Imaoka.
SOLab work description
NPOESS Airborne Sounder Testbed (NAST)
Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Satellite
Presentation transcript:

Use of AMSR-E Land Parameter Modeling and Retrievals for SMAP Algorithm Development Steven Chan Eni Njoku Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting Telluride, Colorado July 14-16, 2008

The SMAP Algorithm Development Testbed Purposes:  An L-band mission simulator (simulated TB’s to be as realistic as possible)  Modules capable of testing multiple algorithms subject to the same inputs Features:  Realistic orbital and instrument sampling  Global and continental scales  Annual cycle(s) Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008  An end-to-end Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) for SMAP

The SMAP Algorithm Development Testbed Anticipated Benefits:  Investigate relative strengths/weaknesses of different retrieval algorithms  Impacts of pursuing different science/instrument/mission trades  Impacts of ancillary data uncertainties Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008  Realistic orbital and instrument sampling

Major Testbed Components Excerpted from SMAP Algorithm Development Testbed for MCR in Jun 2008  Land surface model (LSM) input  Forward microwave models (i.e. radiometer and radar) Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008  Environmental effects (e.g. Faraday rotation, galactic radiation)  Instrument effects (e.g. instrument precision, calibration errors)  Inverse models (e.g. radiometer, radar, and combined radar-radiometer)  Error analysis  Orbital and instrument sampling

Testbed Flowchart Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008 LSM Input Parameters Surface Temp Soil Texture Vegetation ‘Truth’ Soil Moisture Orbital/ Instrument Sampling Forward Models (radiometer/radar) Environmental Effects Instrument Effects TB,σ° Inverse Models (radiometer/radar) Retrieved Soil Moisture ● ● ●● ● ● Error Analysis

Orbital and Instrument Sampling Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008 Altitude = 670km Sampling Period = 42ms Antenna = 6m Incidence = 40° SMAP Ground Tracks

Orbital and Instrument Sampling (Radiometer) Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008 SMAP Instrument Sampling (boresight and antenna beam pattern)

Major Testbed Components Excerpted from SMAP Algorithm Development Testbed for MCR in Jun 2008  Land surface model (LSM) input  Forward microwave models (i.e. radiometer and radar) Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008  Environmental effects (e.g. Faraday rotation, galactic radiation)  Instrument effects (e.g. instrument precision, calibration errors)  Inverse models (e.g. radiometer, radar, and combined radar-radiometer)  Error analysis  Orbital and instrument sampling

Land Surface Model Input Parameters Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008 Current scheme: Use geophysical data fields from GLDAS Soil Moisture Surface Temperature Sand Fraction Vegetation Water Content Soil Temperature Clay Fraction

Advantages Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008  Antenna sampling not well addressed: cell size (above) >> SMAP footprint  Simulated TB’s may have QC issues due to unrealistic inputs  Inputs may introduce unreal spatial and temporal correlations  Convenience: one-stop portal of geophysical input data fields  Fields are consistent with the underlying land model that generates them Potential Limitations

Major Testbed Components Excerpted from SMAP Algorithm Development Testbed for MCR in Jun 2008  Land surface model (LSM) input  Forward microwave models (i.e. radiometer and radar) Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008  Environmental effects (e.g. Faraday rotation, galactic radiation)  Instrument effects (e.g. instrument precision, calibration errors)  Inverse models (e.g. radiometer, radar, and combined radar-radiometer)  Error analysis  Orbital and instrument sampling

First Step Towards More Realistic Inputs/Outputs Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008 Proposed scheme: Use AMSR-E data fields ( ) to first optimize forward model and then extend its frequency dependence to L-band frequency AMSR-E Soil Moisture Forward Model at 6.9 GHz Forward Model at 10.7 GHz Forward Model at 18.7 GHz Simulated TB’s at 6.9 GHz Simulated TB’s at 10.7 GHz Simulated TB’s at 18.7 GHz AMSR-E TB’s at 6.9 GHz AMSR-E TB’s at 10.7 GHz AMSR-E TB’s at 18.7 GHz Optimal Model Parameters at 6.9 GHz Optimal Model Parameters at 10.7 GHz Optimal Model Parameters at 18.7 GHz

First Step Towards More Realistic Inputs/Outputs Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008 Frequency (GHz) Model Parameter (e.g. ω)  Use AMSR-E soil moisture and AMSR-E TB’s to determine optimal model parameters at a given frequency  Repeat the above procedure for other frequencies  Explore frequency dependence of optimal model parameters and extend (extrapolate) their values to L-band frequency Radiative Transfer Forward Model Ts: surface temperature, r’s: Fresnel reflectivities, τ: vegetation opacity ω: single-scattering albedo, h: surface roughness, Q: polarization mixing ratio

Simulated L-band TB (1 Day) Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008

Simulated L-band TB (2 Days) Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008

Simulated L-band TB (3 Days) Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008

Summary Steven K. Chan  Joint AMSR Science Team Meeting  Telluride, Colorado  Jul 14-16, 2008  SMAP Testbed as an end-to-end mission simulator  Simulated L-band observations to be as realistic as possible  AMSR-E data fields could be used to optimize forward model and extend its frequency dependence to L-band frequency, thus assisting the SMAP Testbed to generate realistic L-band observations