Calibration of the MINOS Detectors Using Stopping Muons Jeff Hartnell University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory IoP Particle Physics 2004 Tuesday.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HARP Anselmo Cervera Villanueva University of Geneva (Switzerland) K2K Neutrino CH Meeting Neuchâtel, June 21-22, 2004.
Advertisements

MINOS sensitivity to dm2 and sin2 as a function of pots. MINOS sensitivity to theta13 as a function of pots Precision Neutrino Oscillation Physics with.
A long-baseline experiment with the IHEP neutrino beam Y. Efremenko detector Presented by.
Elisabeth Falk Harris University of Sussex On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration SNOW 2006, Stockholm, 2-6 May 2006 First MINOS Results from the NuMI Beam.
How to Build a Neutrino Oscillations Detector - Why MINOS is like it is! Alfons Weber March 2005.
An accelerator beam of muon neutrinos is manufactured at the Fermi Laboratory in Illinois, USA. The neutrino beam spectrum is sampled by two detectors:
Searching for Atmospheric Neutrino Oscillations at MINOS Andy Blake Cambridge University April 2004.
M. Kowalski Search for Neutrino-Induced Cascades in AMANDA II Marek Kowalski DESY-Zeuthen Workshop on Ultra High Energy Neutrino Telescopes Chiba,
First Observations of Separated Atmospheric  and  Events in the MINOS Detector. A. S. T. Blake* (for the MINOS collaboration) *Cavendish Laboratory,
The MINOS Experiment Andy Blake Cambridge University.
2015/6/23 1 How to Extrapolate a Neutrino Spectrum to a Far Detector Alfons Weber (Oxford/RAL) NF International Scoping Study, RAL 27 th April 2006.
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
1 CC analysis update New analysis of SK atm. data –Somewhat lower best-fit value of  m 2 –Implications for CC analysis – 5 year plan plots revisited Effect.
NuMI MINOS The MINOS Far Detector Cosmic Rays and their neutrinos are being collected now. How does this work, and of what use is this data? Alec Habig,
July 19, 2003 HEP03, Aachen P. Shanahan MINOS Collaboration 1 STATUS of the MINOS Experiment Argonne Athens Brookhaven Caltech Cambridge Campinas Dubna.
NEW RESULTS FROM MINOS Patricia Vahle, for the MINOS collaboration College of William and Mary.
CDF Joint Physics Group June 27, 2003 Rick FieldPage 1 PYTHIA Tune A versus Run 2 Data  Compare PYTHIA Tune A with Run 2 data on the “underlying event”.
1 Overview of the MINER A Experiment Vittorio Paolone(representing the MINER A Collaboration) University of Pittsburgh  Motivation  MINER A Detector.
Making a neutrino beam The neutrinos detected in the MINOS experiment are produced in the Neutrinos at the Main Injector (NuMI) beam line at Fermi National.
ICHEP04, August 18, Beijing G.F. Pearce, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory 1 The Minos Experiment G.F. Pearce Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Overview NUMI.
NuMI NuMI Overview NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) 14 March ‘02 NuMI / MINOS Overview.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Latest Results from The MINOS Experiment
1 735 km The MINOS Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiment Jeff Nelson William & Mary Fermilab Users’ Meeting June 6, 2007.
Current and Near Future Long Baseline Experiments Stéphane T’Jampens CEA Saclay DSM/DAPNIA/SPP.
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
Muon Identification in the MINOS Calibration Detector Anna Holin 05 December 2005 University College London.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
Latest Results from the MINOS Experiment Justin Evans, University College London for the MINOS Collaboration NOW th September 2008.
1 Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments Workshop – March 21, 2012 Workshop on Future Short-Baseline Neutrino Experiments March 21, 2012 Fermilab David.
The Status of MINOS Mike Kordosky University College London for the collaboration.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
1 Mike Kordosky – NuFact 06 - Aug 27, 2006 Neutrino Interactions in the MINOS Near Detector Mike Kordosky University College London on behalf of the MINOS.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
LHCf Report Takashi SAKO for the LHCf Collaboration 18-Dec-2009 CERN Main Auditorium.
Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.
Muon/Special Detector Studies Update St. Malo Muon ID - Single muons, single pion rejection. TESLA TDR (M. Piccolo) 2. Muon ID events:  ID efficiency,
HARP measurements of pion yield for neutrino experiments Issei Kato (Kyoto University) for the HARP collaboration Contents: 1.HARP experiment Physics motivations.
Detector possibilities: scintillator based detectors EUCARD 1 st Annual Meeting, RAL, 13 April 2010 Paul Soler.
E. W. Grashorn and A. Habig, UMD, for the MINOS Collaboration The Detectors of The Main Injector Neutrino Oscillation Search (MINOS) Experiment The MINOS.
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MiniBooNE MiniBooNE Motivation LSND Signal Interpreting the LSND Signal MiniBooNE Overview Experimental Setup Neutrino Events in the Detector The Oscillation.
D. Jason Koskinen UCL 1 st year presentation 6/2005 Temp Work and other MINOS projects.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
Muons at CalDet Introduction Track Finder Package ADC Corrections Drift Points Path Length Attenuation Strip-to-Strip Calibration Scintillator Response.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
D. Jason Koskinen IoP Nuclear and Particle Physics Divisional Conference 4/4/ MINOS Neutrino Flux Using NuMI Muon Monitors for calculating flux for.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
Measuring Oscillation Parameters Four different Hadron Production models  Four predicted Far  CC spectrum.
MINER A at the Triple Point: Three Phases at once Deborah Harris AEM August 31, 2009.
The Latest MINOS Results Xinjie Qiu Stanford University (for the MINOS Collaboration) International Symposium on Neutrino Physics and Beyond Sept
Neutrino Oscillation Results from MINOS Alexandre Sousa Oxford University (for the MINOS Collaboration) 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference - ICRC.
NEAR DETECTOR SPECTRA AND FAR NEAR RATIOS Amit Bashyal August 4, 2015 University of Texas at Arlington 1.
Status of the NO A Experiment Kirk Bays (Caltech) on behalf of the NO A collaboration Lake Louise Winter Institute Saturday, Feb 22, 2014.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
DEVELOPMENT OF THE POLYSTYRENE SCINTILLATOR TECHNOLOGY AND PARTICLE DETECTORS ON THEIR BASES VLADIMIR RYKALIN IHEP, PROTVINO INSTR-14, NOVOSIBIRSK, 24.
Minerva Test Beam 2 Status Geoff Savage for the Test Beam 2 Team March 23, /23/2015AEM - Minerva Test Beam 2 Status1.
DE/dx in ATLAS TILECAL Els Koffeman Atlas/Nikhef Sources: PDG DRDC (1995) report RD34 collaboration CERN-PPE
Ff Neutrino Time of Flight measurements (with MINOS) Phil Adamson 12 th September 2012.
New Results from MINOS Matthew Strait University of Minnesota for the MINOS collaboration Phenomenology 2010 Symposium 11 May 2010.
Measuring Nuclear Effects with MINERnA APS April Meeting 2011 G. Arturo Fiorentini Centro Brasileiro de Pesquisas Físicas On behalf of the MINERnA collaboration.
Neutral Current Interactions in MINOS Alexandre Sousa, University of Oxford for the MINOS Collaboration Neutrino Events in MINOS Neutrino interactions.
The MiniBooNE Little Muon Counter Detector
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
MINOS and Me D. Jason Koskinen
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
6. Preliminary Results from MINOS
Presentation transcript:

Calibration of the MINOS Detectors Using Stopping Muons Jeff Hartnell University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory IoP Particle Physics 2004 Tuesday 6 th April

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 Talk Outline The MINOS Experiment Near, Far and Calibration Detectors Calibrating the Calorimeter Stopping Muons: Our Standard Candle

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 MINOS Neutrino Physics Long-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment. Compare Near and Far neutrino energy spectra. Looking for  disappearance as a function of energy – “the dip”. Very important that we can accurately reconstruct the neutrino energy. Near Far Ratio: Far/Near

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 Calibration Targets Will hopefully have statistics for 10% measurement of  m 2. Have a target of 5% for the absolute energy calibration. Require that the relative calibration between detectors is 2%. Δm2Δm2

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 MINOS Detectors (x3) Common features:  Alternating steel- scintillator, magnetised, tracking calorimeters  WLS fibre-optic cables to extract the scintillator light Far Detector plane under construction

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 Near Detector Breaking News First Plane Installed: 31 st March 2004

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 Calibration Detector at CERN (CalDet) Small version of Near and Far detectors Exposed to , p, e,  beams GeV Hadronic & EM energy response Tune the MC

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 Neutrino Energy Reconstruction Need to accurately determine original neutrino energy to see “the dip”. E = E Had + E    Visible) E  = f(Range) & f(B-Curvature) E Had = f(Energy Dep.) μ μ hadrons 5 m μ hadrons μ 1.5 m

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 Calibrating the Calorimeter Problems: Scintillator output varies by up to 20% from strip to strip. Light output depends on particle type and particle energy. Solutions: Normalise using cosmic muons. Measure response with Calibration Detector in MEU/GeV. (MEU=Muon Energy Unit)

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 Why Stopping Muons? Need a calibration source of known energy - a “standard candle”. Don’t have a “PS” accelerator ½ mile underground to provide beams of particles The energy spectrum of cosmic muons (and hence energy deposition) is different for Near and Far detectors and not known accurately enough. Working backwards from the end of a stopping muon track you know its energy – Use to define a Muon Energy Unit (MEU). Stopping muons are the same at all 3 detectors!

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 Relativistic rise in ionisation ~10% Muons stop here Stopping Beam Muons in CalDet (at 1.8 GeV/c) Beam Direction Corrected ADCs Plane

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 Track Window Method Want a method that is inherently robust and not sensitive to reconstruction problems. Sum up the energy deposition in a window. Define a Muon Energy Unit (MEU) to be the average energy deposited in the window by a perpendicular muon in one detector plane. Window

Jeff Hartnell, IoP Particle Physics 2004 Conclusion The main physics measurement requires accurate reconstruction of the neutrino energy to 5%. Explained how MINOS has 3 detectors in very different environments. Need to set the absolute energy scale to be the same for each detector. No beam source of GeV particles for calibration underground so use stopping cosmic muons. Take a window on the stopping muon track to measure the detector response. Should enable us to meet our 2% relative calibration target and hence accurately measure  m 2.

The End!