__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep. 17 2003 ELASTIC SCATTERING IN D0 EXPERIMENT Carlos Avila Universidad de Los Andes Bogota,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NDVCS measurement with BoNuS RTPC M. Osipenko December 2, 2009, CLAS12 Central Detector Collaboration meeting.
Advertisements

Stereo Spectrum of UHECR Showers at the HiRes Detector  The Measurement Technique  Event Reconstruction  Monte Carlo Simulation  Aperture Determination.
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
Cosmic Rays with the LEP detectors Charles Timmermans University of Nijmegen.
LHCb PatVeloTT Performance Adam Webber. Why Upgrade?  Currently we de-focus the beams o LHCb Luminosity ~ 2x10 32 cm -2 s -1 o ~ 1 interaction per bunch.
June 6 th, 2011 N. Cartiglia 1 “Measurement of the pp inelastic cross section using pile-up events with the CMS detector” How to use pile-up.
Manchester Dec Dynamic Alignment of Roman Pots Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University The Future of Forward Physics at the LHC Manchester,
The Design of MINER  A Howard Budd University of Rochester August, 2004.
Machine induced background in ALFA The ALFA detector elastic scattering and luminosity background generation, rejection and subtraction impact on luminosity.
June 2003 M.Mulders - Fermilab 1 Diffractive results from DØ and prospects for Run II Martijn Mulders Fermilab for the DØ collaboration (with special thanks.
The forward detectors of CDF and D0 K. Goulianos EDS 2009, June 29-July 3 1 The forward Detectors of CDF and D0 Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University.
Elastic Scattering at s=1.96 TeV Using the DØ Forward Proton Detector
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
Measurements of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T on Deuteron and Nuclei in the Nucleon Resonance Region Ya Li January 31, 2009 Jlab E02-109/E (Jan05)
Preliminary Study of CC-Inclusive Events in the P0D using Global Reconstruction Rajarshi Das (w/ Walter Toki) Nu-Mu Prelim. Meeting Dec 2010 CSU.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
A Study of Mapping for g2p instead of Reconstruction? Jixie Zhang Nov 27, 2012.
Jorge Barreto Low_x Prague1 Status of Diffractive Physics at DØ Run II Jorge Barreto Instituto de Física - UFRJ Rio de Janeiro – RJ - Brazil Outline.
Prompt J/  and b ➝ J/  X production in pp collisions at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay & CERN, 7 Dec 2010 For the LHCb Collaboration KRUGER 2010 Workshop.
4 th International Workshop on VHMP, Alushta 2 June 2003 Carmine Elvezio Pagliarone A j u m p i n t o t h e F u t u r e !
May 12, 2009Włodek Guryn1 Physic Program with Tagged Forward Protons at STAR Single Diffraction Dissociation (inclusive SDD cross section, leading  0.
Lishep06 Gilvan Alves1 Overview of Diffraction from DØ Gilvan Alves Lafex/Brazil  Introduction  DØ RunI x RunII  Special Runs  Outlook.
AFP Introduction September 10th 2014 M. Bruschi, INFN Bologna (Italy) 1.
1 PID & FPD Software Gilvan Alves (Lafex/CBPF) Q4Q4 D S Q2Q2 Q2Q2 Q3Q3 Q3Q3 Q4Q4 S A 1Q A1SA1S A 2Q A 2S P 1Q P 2S P 1S P 2Q p p Z(m) A D1 Detector Roman.
Elastic Scattering and Diffraction at DØ Tamsin Edwards for the DØ collaboration 14 th - 18 th April, 2004 XII International Workshop on Deep Inelastic.
Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status Jorge Barreto IF – UFRJ/CBPF D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p.
Small_X / 09/17 – 09/20Jorge Barreto – UFRJ The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status Jorge Barreto UFRJ/CBPF - Brazil D1 TDC D2 TDC pbar p.
LISHEP Rio de Janeiro1 Factorization in diffraction Alice Valkárová Charles University, Prague On behalf of H1 and ZEUS collaborations.
Why study Diffractive W Boson?. Data Samples Z boson sample: Start with Run1b Z ee candidate sample Central and forward electron W boson sample: Start.
Low Luminosity Opportunities Andrew Brandt, U. Texas at Arlington DØ ADM November 18, 2005 “easy” “really hard”
Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.
Diffractive W/Z Bosons Andrew Brandt UTA Run I Diffractive W/Z Boson Production Recap Run II Preliminary Search for Diffractive Z Bosons (Courtesy of Tamsin.
Charmonium Production in 920 GeV Proton-Nucleus Interactions Presented by Wolfgang Gradl for the HERA-B
Andrew Brandt FPD Rio Workshop Mar Forward Proton Detector Overview Andrew Brandt University of Texas at Arlington.
Luminosity Monitoring Issues  ZDC  what’s the advantage?  problems  BBC  can they do it? A. Drees QCD critical point workshop, Mar
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
Comments on systematics of corrected MB distributions Karel Safarik (presented by A. Morsch) Meeting of the Minimum Bias and Underlying Event WG CERN,
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
FPD STATUS Carlos Avila Uniandes/UTA 1. FPD overview 2. Roman pot and detector status 3. FPD readout integration status 4. Software status 5. Stand-alone.
1 Constraining ME Flux Using ν + e Elastic Scattering Wenting Tan Hampton University Jaewon Park University of Rochester.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
FPD Status and Data Quality Andrew Brandt UTA Q4 D S Q3S A1A2 P 1 UP p p Z(m) D1 Detector Bellows Roman Pot P 2 OUT Q2 P 1 DN P 2 IN D2.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Status of the TOTEM Experiment and Latest Results
Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.
Diffraction at DØ Andrew Brandt University of Texas at Arlington E   Run IRun II Low-x Workshop June 6, 2003 Nafplion, Greece.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.
David Silvermyr Lund University for the PHENIX Collaboration Early global event results using the PHENIX Pad Chambers at RHIC.
Moriond QCD March 24, 2003Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D01 b-production cross-section at the TeVatron Eric Kajfasz, CPPM/D0 for the CDF and D0 collaborations.
Run 2 Jets at the Tevatron Iain Bertram Lancaster University/DØ Experiment PIC2003  Inclusive Cross Section  Dijet Mass  Structure.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
A New Upper Limit for the Tau-Neutrino Magnetic Moment Reinhard Schwienhorst      ee ee
Hadron production in C+C at 2 A GeV measured by the HADES spectrometer Nov02 gen3 analysis and results for spline tracks (shown in Dubna) changes - removing.
1 Exotic States 2005 E.C. Aschenauer The search for Pentaquarks at on behalf of the HERMES Collaboration E.C. Aschenauer DESY.
Study of the Differential Luminosity Spectrum Measurement using Bhabha Events in 350GeV WANG Sicheng 王 思丞 Supervisor: André Sailer.
Quarkonia production with the HERA-B experiment J. Spengler, MPI Heidelberg.
Open and Hidden Beauty Production in 920 GeV p-N interactions Presented by Mauro Villa for the Hera-B collaboration 2002/3 data taking:
QWG Sept 20-22, Jundong Huang Indiana University 1 DØ Quarkonium Production at DØ Jundong Huang Indiana University Quarkonium Workshop FermiLab September.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Hit Reconstruction for the Luminosity Monitor March 3 rd 2009 | T. Randriamalala, J. Ritman and T. Stockmanns.
An FPD quadrupole castle Elastic Scattering and High Mass Exclusive Dijets at DØ (  s=1.96 TeV) Andrew Brandt University of Texas, Arlington on behalf.
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
Results of dN/dt Elastic
FPD Status and Data Quality Andrew Brandt
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
VEPP-2000 plans for the study of the nucleon form factors
Quarkonium production in ALICE
NKS2 Meeting with Bydzovsky NKS2 Experiment / Analysis Status
The D0 Forward Proton Detector (FPD) Status
Installation, Commissioning and Startup of ATLAS & CMS Experiments
Presentation transcript:

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep ELASTIC SCATTERING IN D0 EXPERIMENT Carlos Avila Universidad de Los Andes Bogota, Colombia

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep FPD has opened the opportunity to study elastic scattering in the D0 experiment. We show in this talk: The analysis of elastic triggers taken during FPD commissioning. Prospects for increasing the t range that can be covered by FPD.

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep ELASTIC TRIGGER: 31 runs taken with detectors located at 9 from beam. ( = beam width): P1D=17.05mm, P2D=13.80mm A1U=12.57mm, A2U=9.11mm Total of 1.3 million triggered events DAQ used for FPD commissioning: Nim logic and camac readout. LM COUNTERS  2.5<  <4.4 VC COUNTERS  5.2<  <5.9

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep DAQ USED FOR FPD COMMISIONING Temporary DAQ used while FPD was integrating to D0 DAQ. Capability for reading out one Spectrometer.

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep HIT COORDINATE RECONSTRUCTION: We can reconstruct coordinates using the UV, UX, VX intersections of fiber segments. Comparison of coordinates obtained by different intersections is useful to determine the spatial resolution of the detector.

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep Events were rejected if there was a fiber plane with multiple hits. 2. We required 3 reconstructed fiber segments per detector. 3.Required that reconstructed coordinates from UX and UV planes agreed within 2 standard deviations (Fiducial cut). 4.Rejected events that were out of our MC expected elastic acceptance region (Acceptance cut). CUT# EVENTS AFTER CUT No cut1,308,734 Fiber multip. cut29,285 Segments cut26,428 Fiducial cut21,287 Acceptance cut17,724 SELECTION OF ELASTIC EVENT CANDIDATES:

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep FIBER MULTIPLICITY CUTS Majority of events recorded have multiple hits in our detectors. Particle showers seem to be produced in the separators located between P1 and P2.

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep EVENTS THAT SURVIVED ALL CUTS D0 Preliminary

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep SPATIAL RESOLUTION Determined from the difference between coordinates obtained from UV segment and coordinates obtained from UX segment. D0 Preliminary

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep  ACCEPTANCE CORRECTIONS  covered by the PD spectrometer. We also determine the error in acceptance due to error in detector position. D0 Preliminary

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep t distribution (uncorrected) D0 Preliminary

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep |t| slices in each detector P1D P2D

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep |t| range covered with the data shown here

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep Can the FPD do studies of elastic events in the forward region? FPD could give some light about the discrepancy between E710/E811 and CDF measurements of total cross section:

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep MC for elastic events can tell the FPD running conditions to reach lower |t| values: In the forward region we simulate: Add Tevatron lattice and include beam emittance in the simulation.

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep A possible measurement of the Total cross section? With beam injection lattice:

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep Uncertainty on the measurement of  _TOT due to extrapolation to t=0 (50000 elastic events): Position|t|_rangeSlope  _T(mb) 88 0.05<|t|< ± 9 0.12<|t|< ±  0.16<|t|< ±  0.20<|t|< ± This error is only due to error in extrapolation. Still need to include error in the measurement of N inelastic

__________________________________ C. Avila, small x workshop, Sep CONCLUSIONS Proton Antiproton elastic events have been very useful to test the performance of FPD detector. Analysis of elastic events recorded with the FPD in the range 0.9<|t|<1.7, during commissioning, is in a mature stage. It has proven difficult because we have fiber information from only one spectrometer. After Dec elastic triggers will have fiber information from full FPD system. FPD will be able to reach up to a |t| value of 4.5. FPD detector rates have a large contribution from particle showers most likely produced in the electrostatic separators. Working with beam divisions on this issue. FPD has a chance to make a new measurement of the Total cross section but requires special low luminosity store running with beam injection lattice. Only need a few hours of running to collect enough statistics.