Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ing%20for%20Success.pdf Information from NIH: Louis V. De Paolo NICHD Roger G. Sorensen.
Advertisements

Writing a Fellowship Part 1. My Fellowship History In my third year as a post-doc fellow I received a Leukemia and Lymphoma fellowship for senior fellows.
FLINDERS INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Peer Support Grant Writing Workshop Why Apply for Funding? Developing your Research Ideas Gerry Redmond.
Creating Your Competitive Proposal Projects, Grants, Fellowships...
How your NIH grant application is evaluated and scored Larry Gerace, Ph.D. June 1, 2011.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Robert Elliott, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
NIH Writing Your Specifics Aims CHIP Grant Workshop 2014 Amy Gorin, Ph.D. Listen Up! This is a critical section of your application.
INSTITUTE OF BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES WRITING GRANT PROPOSALS Thursday, April 10, 2014 Randy Draper, Office of the Vice Chancellor for Research Room 125, IBS.
Grant Writing: Specific Aims and Study Design Zuo-Feng Zhang, MD, PhD EPIDEMIOLOGY
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS Grant Writing for Success Michael A Sesma, Ph.D., NIGMS/NIH Roger G Sorensen, Ph.D., NIDA/NIH.
How Your Application Is Reviewed Vonda Smith, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer (SRO)
Cheryl Anne Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute on Drug Abuse Roger G. Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010 NIH Regional Seminars, Portland.
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 4
Getting Funded: How to write a good grant
How to Improve your Grant Proposal Assessment, revisions, etc. Thomas S. Buchanan.
Effective proposal writing Session I. Potential funding sources Government agencies (e.g. European Union Framework Program, U.S. National Science Foundation,
Grant Writing for Success
Nancy L Desmond, Ph.D. Division of Neuroscience & Basic Behavioral Science Key Things to Know about Research Project Grants (R01)
THE NIH REVIEW PROCESS David Armstrong, Ph.D.
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Grant Writing for Success Harold I. Perl, Ph.D. NIDA Michael A. Sesma, Ph.D. NIMH with inspiration from Coelho, Sorensen, Frascella & Levitin.
Writing Successful Research Grant Proposals
Grant-Writing Boot Camp © 2015 A.G. Williams Grant-Writing Boot Camp TWO DAY TWO.
Michael A. Sesma, Ph.D.; NIMH What Is A Strong Grant Application? What Is A Strong Grant Application? Simple steps to a successful grant application Michael.
A Roadmap to Success Writing an Effective Research Grant Proposal Bob Miller, PhD Regents Professor Oklahoma State University 2011 Bob Miller, PhD Regents.
COMPONENTS OF A GOOD GRANT PROPOSAL Philip T. LoVerde.
CSR Peer Review of NIH HIV/AIDS Grant Applications NIH Grantsmanship Workshop Diana Finzi, Ph.D. Chief, Pathogenesis and Basic Research Program Division.
Helping Your Mentees Develop a Competitive K Award Application (K01, K07, K08, K23, K25, K99) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Dept. of Epidemiology and Biostatistics.
AHRQ 2011 Annual Conference: Insights from the AHRQ Peer Review Process Training Grant Review Perspective Denise G. Tate Ph.D., Professor, Chair HCRT Study.
Presubmission Proposal Reviews at the College of Nursing (CON) Nancy T. Artinian, PhD, RN, FAAN Associate Dean for Research and Professor.
NIH Peer Review Process – Grant Renewal
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH CHALLENGE GRANT APPLICATIONS Dan Hoyt Survey, Statistics, and Psychometrics(SSP) Core Facility March 11, 2009.
 NSF Merit Review Criteria Intellectual Merit Broader Impacts  Additional Considerations Integration of Research & Education Broadening Participation.
Cecelia McNamara Spitznas, Ph.D. National Institute on Drug Abuse Roger G. Sorensen, Ph.D., MPA National Institute on Drug Abuse 2010 NIH Regional Seminars,
12/11/2009 Writing a NIH Grant Application Ellen Puré, PhD, Professor and Associate Vice President of Academic Affairs, Wistar Institute Mitchell Schnall.
Tips on Fellowship Writing A Reviewer’s Perspective Wendy Havran.
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS Grant Writing for Success LeShawndra N. Price, Ph.D., NIMH, NIH Henry Khachaturian, Ph.D., OEP/NIH.
Working with the NIHR Research Design Service to maximize successful grant applications Dr. Steven Blackburn NIHR Research Design Service West Midlands.
Key Elements in Applying for a Clinical Research Grant Niloofar Afari, PhD Associate Professor University of CA, San Diego Director of Clinical Affairs.
Career Development Awards (K series) and Research Project Grants (R series) Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University.
 It ALWAYS Takes Longer Than You Think: Managing Grant Proposal Timelines Howard Goldstein and colleagues CBCS Research Forum October 20, 2015.
How is a grant reviewed? Prepared by Professor Bob Bortolussi, Dalhousie University
Restructured NIH Applications One Year Later:
An Insider’s Look at a Study Section Meeting: Perspectives from CSR Monica Basco, Ph.D. Scientific Review Officer Coordinator, Early Career Reviewer Program.
Insider Guide to Peer Review for Applicants Dr. Valerie Durrant Acting Director CSR Division of Neuroscience, Development and Aging.
Short and Sweet: Selling Your Science in 12 Pages ASBMR Grant Writing Workshop Friday, 15 October 2010 Toronto, ON Jane E. Aubin, Ph.D. Dept of Molecular.
R01? R03? R21? How to choose the right funding mechanism Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
Grantsmanship: The Art and Science of Getting Funded Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. Senior Advisor, Molecular Endocrinology National Institute of Diabetes and.
Research Strategy: Approach Frank Sellke, MD Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery Brown Medical School Providence RI AATS Grant Course 2011.
Office of Extramural Programs GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS Rebekah S. Rasooly, Ph.D. NIDDK/NIH.
NIH R03 Program Review Ning Jackie Zhang, MD, PhD, MPH College of Health and Public Affairs 04/17/2013.
Reviewers Expectations Peter Donkor. Outline Definitions The review process Common mistakes to avoid Conclusion.
Grant Writing for Success
Applying for funding: Tips fom the trenches
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
NSF/NIH Review Processes University of Southern Mississippi
Research and Grant Writing
Grant Writing Information Session
Grant Writing Workshop Specific Aims
Grant Writing for Success
Rick McGee, PhD and Bill Lowe, MD Faculty Affairs and NUCATS
FLINDERS INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Peer Support Grant Writing Workshop Why Apply for Funding? Developing your Research Ideas Gerry Redmond.
Dr. Lani (Chi Chi) Zimmerman, UNMC Dr. Bill Mahoney, IS&T
CRC Grant writing basics
How to Succeed with NIH: September 28, 2018
UAMS Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Thomas Mitchell, MA, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics
GRANT WRITING FOR SUCCESS
Presentation transcript:

Ronald Margolis, Ph.D. National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases Amanda Boyce, Ph.D. National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases Alan Willard, Ph.D. National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Stroke NIH Regional Seminars, Phoenix INTRODUCTION TO Grant Writing for Success

“Anatomy” of Grant Process Program Staff Funding Opportunity Announcement Announcement Grant Application (R01, R03, R21, K01, K08, etc.) Grant Application (R01, R03, R21, K01, K08, etc.) NationalAdvisoryCouncilNationalAdvisoryCouncil Program Staff Program Staff $ RevisionRevision ResearcherIdeaInstitutionResearcherIdeaInstitution CSRReferral and Review CSRReferral Collaborators

Grant Writing for Success Writing the Application:  Start early  Seek advice from colleagues  Start with a good idea  Talk to your NIH Program Official(s)  Use the NIH webpage (  Remember review criteria  Follow instructions carefully

What Determines Which Grants Are Funded?  Scientific merit  Program considerations  Availability of funds

Components of a Successful Grant Application  Strong Idea  Strong Science  Strong Application

Principles of Success  Understand the peer review process  Understand the agency mission –Every one is different!  Secure collaborators (mentors) to complement your expertise and experience –Don’t compete … collaborate!  Learn and practice the skills of writing applications for grant funds

NIH RePORTer

Pre-Submission Planning Timeline call NIH

Remember … Before you start  Talk to Program Staff  Read instructions for application form  Know your audience  Propose research about which you are passionate and totally committed to doing

Good Idea  Does it address an important problem?  Will scientific knowledge be advanced?  Does it build upon or expand current knowledge?  Is it feasible … –to implement? –to investigate?

Good Grantsmanship  Grant writing is a learned skill –Writing grant applications, standard operating protocols and manuals of procedures that get approved are learned skills –Writing manuscripts that get published in peer reviewed journals is a learned skill  Grantsmanship is a full time job –Learn about the grant application process

Good Grantsmanship  Collaborate with other investigators –Fill gaps in your expertise and training –Add critical skills to your team  “Team Science” can be powerful

Good Grantsmanship  Show your draft application to a colleague  Show your draft application to a colleague who does not already know what you intend to do  Show your draft application to a colleague who is not your best friend

Good Grantsmanship  Your draft reviewers need to understand –What you intend to do –Why you believe it is important to do –Exactly how you are going to do it  If they don’t get it, you must revise your application  Leave enough time to make revisions

Align with Review Criteria 1) Overall Impact (Address on Specific Aims page) 2) The 5 core review criteria: –Significance –Investigator –Innovation –Approach –Environment otice-files/NOT-OD html

Good Presentation 1) OVERALL IMPACT The likelihood for the project to exert a sustained, powerful influence on the research field(s) involved: –in consideration of the following five core review criteria, and –additional review criteria (as applicable for the project proposed)

Alignment of Application Format with-- 2) Scored Review Criteria

Good Presentation  Be realistic … not overly ambitious  Discuss potential problem areas  Discuss possible solutions –Explain rationale for your decisions  Be explicit  Reviewers cannot read your mind … Don’t assume they know what you intend

Other Review Considerations  Human subjects  Animal care and use  Select agents  Model organism sharing plan  Data sharing plan

 Strong significance to an important problem in public health: IMPACT is high — High degree of novelty and innovation  Strong track record by a well qualified applicant  Clear rationale  Relevant and supportive preliminary data  Clear and focused approach that provides unambiguous results  Careful attention to details — Fonts, clarity of data, error bars, spelling, etc Hallmarks of an Outstanding Grant Application