1 Hot Topics at the Interface of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Possible Antitrust Concerns Arising from Patent Pools ABA International Law.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOS Interop II Sophia Antipolis, September 20 and 21, 2005 IPRs and standards: some issues Richard Owens Director, Copyright E-Commerce Division Philippe.
Advertisements

IP MISUSE and ANTITRUST LAW Eugene L. Chang January 9, 2009.
Negotiating Technology License Agreements Tamara Nanayakkara.
1 © 2005 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Session Number Presentation_ID Cisco Public Standard-Setting, Competition Law and the Ex Ante Debate.
Slide 0 Refusals To License IP Jonathan I. Gleklen Partner Arnold & Porter The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent.
University of Toronto Patent Colloquium:. Illustration of Sequential Innovation Processes Application 1 Application 2 Application 4 Application 5 Application.
Licensee Rights in Case of Licensor Bankruptcy Hiroki Saito MAX Law Offices
Fosterswift.com PROTECTING AGAINST THE UNKNOWN : How to Successfully Review IT Contracts to Increase Your Rights and Avoid Potential Liability Samuel Frederick.
1 S.Tronchon Legal Considerations when drafting a standard.
National Judicial Academy National Conference for Newly Elevated High Court Justices January, 2015 Bhopal, India Samuel Weinstein Attorney Legal.
US Antitrust Limitations on Patent Licensing Bruce D. Sunstein Bromberg & Sunstein LLP Boston © 2008 Bromberg & Sunstein LLP.
Dr. Andrew S. Joskow Senior Vice President March 28, 2007 Department of Justice/ Federal Trade Commission Hearings on Single-Firm Conduct: Remedies in.
National symposium on Competition law: Evolution and Transition, 2012 Competition Policy for IP Issues Pradeep S Mehta Secretary General, CUTS International.
1 Technology Transfer Seminar Series Patent Licensing : A Pathway to Commercialization Karen Hersey Senior Counsel for Intellectual Property, MIT. Ret.
Joost Haans Antitrust Section Corp. Legal 22 May 2009 Resale Price Maintenance - Time for change? -
France: A Country on the Move Protecting your Intellectual Property Internationally.
ESSENTIAL STANDARD 2.00 Understand the nature of business. 1.
1 Chapter 17 Licensing Copyright © Nelson Australia Pty Ltd 2003.
1 Is there a conflict between competition law and intellectual property rights? Edward Whitehorn Head, Competition Affairs Branch Carrie Tang Assistant.
IP for Scientists Universities Allied for Essential Medicines (UAEM) UC Berkeley.
DOJ/FTC Hearings on Market DefinitionWashington, D.C. March 7, 2007 Technology Markets Richard Gilbert Professor of Economics University of California.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
H I R S C H & P A R T N E R S A v o c a t S o l i c i t o r R e c h t s a n w a l t Pharmaceutical settlement agreements and competition law A litigation.
1 Anti-trust issues in standardisation bodies Nicholas Banasevic DG Competition, European Commission (Speaking in a personal capacity - the views expressed.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
© 2008 Innovate Legal Services Limited The Expansion Phase – Acquiring Products and Technologies From Others Garry Mills Head of Trade Marks and Brands.
© 2008 Innovate Legal Services Limited Overview of presentation 1. Introduction 2. The block exemptions 3. The Technology Transfer Block Exemption (TTBER)
UNCTAD/CD-TFT 1 Intellectual Property Rights and National Development Goals – Ensuring Innovation in Russia St. Petersburg/Moscow Study Tour 2008 Christoph.
Government Funded Inventions Mark L. Rohrbaugh, Ph.D., J.D. Acting Director Office of Technology Transfer National Institutes of Health.
Custom Software Development Intellectual Property and Other Key Issues © 2006 Jeffrey W. Nelson and Iowa Department of Justice (Attach G)
© Suzanne Scotchmer 2007 from Innovation and Incentives Licensing Some Terms: Exclusive Exclusive licensing versus exclusive dealing Royalties versus Fixed.
All Rights Reserved. GTRC. Atlanta, Georgia Georgia Tech Integrated Program for Startups Inventing the Future 2012 Technology Commercialization:
Cost and benefits of patents: increasing patent use through licensing Paola Giuri LEM - Laboratory of Economics and Management Sant’Anna School of Advanced.
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
Intellectual Property and Antitrust Antitrust Basics Lesson III: Intellectual Property November 8, 2006 Sean P. Gates Federal Trade Commission.
The Basics of Intellectual Property Law Understanding IP by A. David Spevack, Office of Naval Research.
26/28/04/2014 – IP for Innovation HG Dynamic Use of Industrial Property for Innovation Growth, Competitiveness and Market Access Heinz Goddar Boehmert.
PATENT POOL & its CONCERNS PATENT POOL & its CONCERNS Manmohan A Amonkar 20 July 2010.
Law Antitrust - Instructor: Dwight Drake Patent Pooling What is patent pooling? When is patent pooling anticompetitive? Can others be excluded from.
Constantine & Partners 1 Constantine Cannon 1 C C An Overview of the Antitrust/IP Intersect By Jeffrey I. Shinder Partner, Constantine Cannon New York.
1 WIPO-KIPO-KIPA IP Panorama Business School, October 6 to 10, 2008 IP Strategies in Standards Setting Tomoko Miyamoto Senior Counsellor, Patent Law Section.
Biotechnology / Life Sciences Ensuring Access Christina Sampogna July 2005 CASRIP – University of Washington, Seattle *Views expressed are those of the.
Moscow, Russia, 10 September 2012 HSE Intellectual Property Policy Aliya Ermakova, Head of IP Department, Innovation and Enterprise Office, HSE
ABA China Inside and Out September , Beijing The interface between competition law and intellectual property Nicholas Banasevic, DG Competition,
View from the U.S. The Swing of the Pendulum in the Antitrust Focus to IPR Licensing in the SDO Context Lauren S. Albert AXINN, VELTROP & HARKRIDER LLP.
Willard K. Tom ABA Section of International Law Spring Meeting April 17, 2009 Compulsory Licensing: An Antitrust Lawyer’s Perspective.
1 The EC Competition Policy on Patent Pools. Has the Commission Struck the Right Balance? Paul Lugard Head of Antitrust Royal Philips ElectronicsABA Brown.
Patent Pools – Issues of Dominance and Royalty Setting Marleen Van Kerckhove ABA Brown Bag Presentation March 20 th, 2007.
Exercise of IP rights as an abusive behaviour under EU antitrust law Christian Vollrath European Commission DG Competition 1.
Review of the Transfer of Technology Block Exemption Regulation (TTBE) 2001 Report shortcomings of the TTBE new generation of regulations more economic.
Sangmin Song, Director, Anti-Monopoly Div., KFTC MRFTA & IP Rights 1.
Patent settlements for medicines -- status under EU and US antitrust law -- Luc Gyselen, Partner Arnold & Porter LLP Brussels Symposium on the Interface.
The Definition of the Relevant Market Lecturer: Professor Huang Yong Law School of UIBE UIBECLC Dalian, China,June 11, 2010.
Identification of Monopoly Agreement involving Intellectual Property Rights Wang Xianlin, KoGuan Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Dalian, June.
Dialogue on Competition Policy and Intellectual Property *
EU Competition Rules for Technology Transfer Agreements
Understand the nature of business.
The new technology transfer regime More evolution than revolution
“Revisiting Abuse of Dominance & IPRs: Emerging Jurisprudence of the Indian Competition Law” “Plenary 2: A comparative perspective to IPR and Competition:
Guidelines for IEEE-SA Meetings
The Global Marketplace
The Global Marketplace
The new technology transfer regime
US Antitrust Limitations on Patent Licensing
Max Riegel, Nokia (TG Chair)
Standards and competition law Michael Adam DG Competition, European Commission (speaking in a personal capacity - the views expressed are not necessarily.
The Global Marketplace
Gil Ohana Cisco Systems Legal Department
A Primer for Nonlawyers on Intellectual Property
Understand the nature of business.
Presentation transcript:

1 Hot Topics at the Interface of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Possible Antitrust Concerns Arising from Patent Pools ABA International Law Section Fall Meeting September 26, 2008 Frances Marshall* Special Counsel for Intellectual Property Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice *Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Department of Justice

2 Procompetitive Benefits of Pools Integrate complementary technologies Integrate complementary technologies Reduce transaction costs Reduce transaction costs Clear patent blocking positions Clear patent blocking positions Avoid costly infringement litigation Avoid costly infringement litigation Promote dissemination of technology Promote dissemination of technology

3 Potential Anticompetitive Harms of Pools Reduction of horizontal price competition between licensors Reduction of horizontal price competition between licensors  Leads to rise in prices of products and services that utilize the pooled patents Foreclosure of innovation by discouraging research and development Foreclosure of innovation by discouraging research and development

4 Limiting the Risk of Horizontal Price Competition in a Pool Limit pools to complementary patents Limit pools to complementary patents  Exclude substitute patents  “Essentiality” test Use independent review process to select pool patents Use independent review process to select pool patents Limit access to CBI Limit access to CBI

5 Limiting the Risk of Harming Innovation Incentives in a Pool Keep invalid patents out of the pool Keep invalid patents out of the pool Licensors grant non-exclusive licenses to pool Licensors grant non-exclusive licenses to pool  Retain right to license individually Limit scope of grantbacks Limit scope of grantbacks Provide clear understanding of pool contents Provide clear understanding of pool contents  Non-exclusive  Essential patents License available to all interested licensees License available to all interested licensees

6 Antitrust Guidance on Patent Pools United States United States  1995 Antitrust-IP Licensing Guidelines  Patent pool business review letters  MPEG-2 (1997); 3C DVD (1998); 6C DVD (1999); RIFD (2008) (?)  IP2 Report, ch. 3 EC EC  2005 Technology Guidelines ¶¶ Japan Japan  2005 Standards and Pooling Guidelines

7 Hot Topics at the Interface of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Possible Antitrust Concerns Arising from Patent Pools ABA International Law Section Fall Meeting September 26, 2008 Frances Marshall* Special Counsel for Intellectual Property Antitrust Division U.S. Department of Justice *Views expressed are not necessarily those of the Department of Justice