SHS Science Department. What work does the team do? Protocols and Routines PLC Meetings (Contract time= 1 hour/month + additional teacher voluntary time.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stories Creek Elementary – Closing the Achievement Gap.
Advertisements

Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
 Standards Based Grading Discussion- February 3, 2014.
Balanced and Formative Assessment Systems Pat Roschewski, Director of Statewide Assessment Nebraska Department of Education
Curriculum & Instruction Webinar October 18, 2013.
The Blueprint Your SIP (School Improvement Plan) A living, breathing, document.
Getting CONNECT-ED in Montgomery Township Presentation of Learning Amy Wish Kari McGann JoAnn Zisa June 30, 2011.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Professional Learning Communities at Work
What We’re Learning Building & Improving an RTI System Seven Key Foundations RISS 2009.
COURSE PREVIEW Course Name Course Director: Course Coordinator:
Centennial High School School Wide Literacy Plan
Science Content Leadership Network July 17, 2014.
Summer Institutes 2013 Change Teacher Practice Change Student Outcomes.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
1. What is it we want our students to learn?
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Formative and Summative Assessments Secondary Language Arts PLC: Andrea Bergreen, Jo Lane Jennifer Doerner, RHS Susanne Cuatt, RHS.
Collaboration I nstruction Assessment 1st AnalysisReflection Intervention Assessment 2nd COMING FULL CIRCLE Mallard Creek and UNCC PDS Work Plan Outcomes.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
1 Common Core State Standards High School ELA Session Two: November 2, 5, 6, 7, 2013.
Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Tighten what we do! (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Designed by DuFour, DuFour and Eaker)
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Layers of Intentionality: Tasks, Assessments & Interventions Amanda Huddleston and Jennifer Edmondson-Neily Robert Thirsk High School.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Your Name Grading and Reporting on Student Learning What is it? A system of assessing and reporting that describes student progress in relation to standards.
Instructional Coaching Columbia High School February 17, 2011 JoAnn Moore, Facilitator 10 minutes.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
SciencePLUS (Promoting Learning & Understanding for Students) Network A Federally Funded Project through the Math-Science Partnership and the Kentucky.
Kyrene Instructional Minutes for Kindergarten – Fifth Grade (Updated April 2015)
Intellectual, Spiritual & Personal Growth Your Success is Our Greatest Achievement MADONNA UNIVERSITY Center for Personalized Instruction SUPPLEMENTAL.
Melrose High School MCAS Presentation October 22, 2013.
Planning PLCs with an Oregon DATA Project Approach.
Blended Learning Design: Revised Recommendation
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
Lesson Study Opening Activities (Movement Activity) Grouping Subgroup Article Sharing –Subgroup Reporting.
September 28, 2011 The Stories Behind the Data. John Sedgwick Junior High 98.8% of 8 th graders taking End of Course Exam 1 met standard 83.6% of 9 th.
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
MCAS 2007 Grade 10 ELA – Math – Science & Technology.
The PLC Team Learning Process Review Step One: Identify essential (key) learning standards that all students must learn in each content area during each.
Science Instructional Guide For High School Integrated Coordinated Science Biology and Chemistry Professional Development Module 1 Introduction to the.
P.R.I.D.E. School Professional Day :45 am- 3:30 pm.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Passport to Science MSP Science Program Indianapolis Public Schools.
Developing Common Course Syllabi November 20, 2010 Heather Sass, Education Consultant Preview.
TEACHER EVALUATION IMPLEMENTATION DAY: STUDENT GROWTH AND GOAL SETTING September 25, 2015 Shorewood High School 9/25/15 1.
Middle School Social Studies September 19, 2007 Department Meeting.
Olympia High School.  “The question confronting most schools and districts is not, ‘What do we need to know in order to improve?’ but rather, ‘Will we.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Question Introductory Biology course Does placing students with different learning skills into teams improve students’ knowledge of core content? Trudy.
PLC LEADERSHIP ACADEMY November 17/December 15/January 19 Jeremy Koselak Secondary RtI Coordinator.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning DeeDee Washington, Associate Superintendent of Academics Elementary.
LEARNING GOALS AND PERFORMANCE SCALES PLC FOCUS FOR BVS
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Professional Learning Communities Creating powerful and effective learning for teachers and students.
TASEL-M: Teachers Assisting Students to Excel in Learning Mathematics Collaborating using Standards and Strategies for Student Success.
ELA Grade 11/12 Cohort Common Core Transition Training SY March 7, 2014 Professional Development Center (PDC) Judy Henderson, Emily Jimenez, Elizabeth.
Instructional Review and School improvement
IMPLEMENTATION - JANUARY 2013
Jeff McCoy, Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology
Nottingham Curriculum Night
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Review and School improvement
Do nows & Exit Tickets.
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

SHS Science Department

What work does the team do? Protocols and Routines PLC Meetings (Contract time= 1 hour/month + additional teacher voluntary time = around 3 hours per month) Common learning targets and shared instructional methods Common course exams – Pretest – Unit Tests – Final Exams Exams given on the same day to all classes Common quizzes and formative checkpoints

What work does the team do? Goals Establish common language, strategies, and goals for students Create exams and quizzes that reflect the most recent standards (NGSS, CCSS) Compare student feedback to – Reflect on standards not met – Reflect on student misconceptions – Use data to inform instruction Proactive (and reactive) conversations centered around increasing Student Engagement

What data? Within a year and between years Course pretest and exams – Questions are given as a pretest Identify the level at which students enter the course – Given again after content is covered Did the students reach the target, if not what can we do to reteach and reassess – Given at the end to measure growth overall Retention of key concepts and skills

What differences/gains are you seeing?

EOC Biology

What makes the team work? Time for Collaborative Work – Two ACE days per month as a department – We often donate our teacher directed ACE time and other outside time to working as a team – The chemistry PLC meets for an hour each Monday after school, and for additional time to grade quizzes – The biology PLC meets for one additional meeting every 2 weeks for planning

What makes the team work? Treating each member as a contributor to a common goal All teachers are committed to team planning All teachers are committed to introducing new standards (NGSS, CCSS) We establish and stick to team norms Each individual in the PLC contributes expertise (lab design, organization, knowledge of standards)

What would help take teachers to the next level? Additional time for common planning would allow for: – Continued reflection and team conversations around what is best for students – Continued data collection and adjustment to instruction – Opportunity to create space for all members to show strengths Job embedded quality professional learning – Allowing the team to plan and implement instructional strategies as a group