Understanding Your LI Reports October 16, 2015 October 2015 Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Samantha Sniegowski.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing an NCATE/IRA Program Report
Advertisements

Copyright © 2010 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Washington 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation February 2011.
Copyright © 2010 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Washington 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation – April Update.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Oregon 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation Neil Naftzger.
1 Improving School Leadership - Guidelines for Country Background Reports - Education and Training Policy Division Directorate of Education.
Individualized Learning Plans A Study to Identify and Promote Promising Practices.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: SDP Toolkit August 16, 2012.
Copyright © The Center for Educational Effectiveness, All Rights Reserved. EES Staff v9.0 Comparison 1 EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS SURVEY v9.0-
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Afterschool Youth Outcomes Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Leadership Institute Neil Naftzger.
Copyright © 2007 Learning Point Associates. All rights reserved. TM Introduction to PPICS for Washington 21st CCLC Grantees Michael Hutson Research Associate.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Oregon 21st CCLC Leading Indicators Breakout Session Neil Naftzger and Deborah Moroney.
DO NOW Using the post-its at your table please give examples of what family and community engagement looks like in each of the past 3 decades and at present.
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
1 Faculty Leadership Development Programs at Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., Director, AdvanceVT.
Oregon Reading First: Statewide Mentor Coach Meeting February 18, 2005 © 2005 by the Oregon Reading First Center Center on Teaching and Learning.
Copyright © 2012 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Administration of the Youth Skills and Beliefs Survey American Institutes for Research.
Teen Mentoring Toolkit Permission to adapt as needed
Insert Title Here Aboriginal Engagement & Employment Project: An Overview.
TIMELESS LEARNING POLICY & PRACTICE. JD HOYE President National Academy Foundation.
TITLEIIA(3) IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM 1.
Cohort 8 Grant Closeout Procedures HEIDI SCHULTZ DEBRA APPLETON.
Copyright © 2007 Learning Point Associates. All rights reserved. TM Overview of the Oregon Attendees Module Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher To hear.
Union Elementary School “Soaring Above and Beyond”
8.Implications for Analysis: School Survey, Student Assessment, and Transcript Data.
Using Multiple Measure to Evaluate Principals Hillsborough County Public Schools.
Designated County Partner Grassroots Grant Application.
Welcome! Please join us via teleconference: Phone: Code:
Quality Indicators for Secondary Transition (QuIST) – Webinar #5 April 21, 2010 Presented by: Center for Change in Transition Services Cinda Johnson, Wendy.
Copyright © 2012 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Oregon 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation Mariel Sparr.
Community Assessment Training 2- Community Assessment Training 2-1.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Oregon 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation Neil Naftzger.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
CASP 101 Sample Presentation See TRAIN Edition for Facilitator’s Guide For more information: summerstartsinseptember.com.
Jamestown Community College The Path to NACEP Accreditation.
LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2.
Step 4 Presenter: Updated 6/21/2013. Training Overview Introduction Walk Through Step 4 Scheduled FET Trainings & Completion Dates for FET Step(s) Question(s)
Supporting Work Based Learners Transitioning from training to facilitating learning Ann Minton, Work Force Development Fellow.
Family Resource and Youth Services Centers: Action Component Plan.
Professional Development Opportunities for the New Math Standards.
EVAL Self Assessment (Adapted from LaConner School Improvement Presentation) Your Name Your District Your Date.
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
Single Plan for Student Achievement
*6=Mute *7=Unmute David P. Weikart Center for Youth Program Quality · OSPI Box Set Ordering Please dial-in: Phone Number: Access Code:
Iowa 21 st CCLC Local Evaluations Support for Local Evaluators.
Understanding the Goal Pages Presented by: Robert Oye Lorraine Torres Title I Coordinators ESC South.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Center for Change In Transition Services improving post-school outcomes for students with disabilities in Washington state Seattle University OSPI State.
Agent Performance Review. Goals of a Performance Review Provide opportunity for self-assessment Increase job satisfaction and understanding Recognize.
Performance Accountability System. PAS Overview Performance Accountability System (PAS) was developed by the Technical College System of Georgia (TCSG)
Appendix 3: The Standard Report From the Church Vitality Survey This Standard Report is produced for each church or church group that completes the Church.
Welcome Reporting: Individual Student Report (ISR), Student Roster Report, and District Summary of Schools Report.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar Neil Naftzger and Samantha.
Washington 21 st CCLC Evaluation February 2016 Copyright © 2016 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved Data Collection Activities.
Using Cost-Effective Processes to Develop Large-Scale Data-Driven Continuous Improvement Systems for Local Programs Laurie A. Van Egeren, Jamie Wu, Michigan.
21 st CCLC APR System Webinar Tanya Morin Gary Sumnicht Alison Wineberg April 25 and 26, 2016.
Leading Indicators: Evaluation for Site-Level Improvement and System- Level Planning Samantha Sugar Research Associate/Analyst David P. Weikart Center.
School Improvement Updates Accreditation (AdvancED) Process ASSIST Portfolio for Schools May 2016 Office of Service Quality Veda Hudge, Director Donna.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
College Readiness Night
Understanding Your LI Reports October 19, 2016
Continuous Quality Improvement Process
Washington 21st CCLC Data Collection Webinar Samantha Sniegowski
Sterling Examiner Preparation
Statewide Afterschool Evaluation— What Do the Data Tell Us
Statewide Afterschool Evaluation— What Do the Data Tell Us
Sterling Examiner Preparation
Presentation transcript:

Understanding Your LI Reports October 16, 2015 October 2015 Copyright © 2015 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Samantha Sniegowski Researcher AIR

 To familiarize you with Leading Indicator report  To answer questions  To prepare you for the Advanced Planning with Data trainings October 26 – Webinar training for Cohorts 9 & 10 October 29 – Live training for Cohort 11 Goals for the Webinar 2

 Part of overall evaluation of 21 st CCLC in WA  Intended to support continuous improvement  Not intended to support compliance monitoring  Summarizes performance on best practices  Allows programs to compare performance to state  Promotes discussion Overview of LI Reports 3

 Information submitted by you into PPICS  Site coordinator survey  Staff survey  PQA Form A and B data  Youth survey data  Program attendance data  OSPI data warehouse (not yet available) **All data is from previous school year Where Do the Data Come From? 4

 User interface Project director and local evaluators have access – Site coordinator access Can view summary or full report or both  5 major sections Center Profile Organizational Practices Instructional Practices Partnerships Practices Youth Outcomes Understanding your report 5

User interface 6

7

8

9

10 Select project/grant Select centerSelect report typeSelect domainsHit submit to generate report

 Basic characteristics  Recruitment  Attendance  Activity provision  Number of partners  Site Coordinator characteristics  Staff characteristics Center Profile 11

Center Profile 12

 1.1 – Continuous Improvement Program Climate Internal Communication, Staff Survey Internal Communication, Site Coordinator Survey  1.2 – Leadership and Management Leadership and management (Form B PQA) Organizational Practices 13

 2.1 – Instructional Quality (Content) Intentionality in Program Design, Site Coordinator Survey Intentionality in Program Design, Staff Survey  2.2 – Instructional Quality (Process) Point of Service Quality (PQA Form A) Youth Centered Policies and Practices (PQA Form B) Instructional Practices 14

 3.1 – Family Engagement Family Communication  3.2 – School Context Data Use, Staff Survey Data Use, Site Coordinator Survey Linkages to the School Day, Staff Survey Linkages to the School Day, Site Coordinator Survey  3.3 – Community Context Family and Community – Form B PQA Partnership Practices 15

Sample Indicator 16 Indicator Name Explanation of indicator Scale score for state and center for all sub indicators Click for more info. No data indicates survey not completed

Sample Indicator 17 Summary of all items by response category Item by item responses

Sample Indicator 18 Celebrate Strengths Identify areas for improvement

PQA Form A Data 19 Two types of data

 4.1 – Youth Program Experiences Skills and Beliefs  4.2 – Reading and Mathematics Performance (Grades 4–8)  4.3 – School Day Attendance (Grades 6–12)  4.4 – School Day Disciplinary Incidents (Grades 1–12)  4.5 – Percentage of Credits Earned (Grades 10–12) Youth Outcomes 20

Youth Outcomes – Youth Program Experiences Skills and Beliefs

 Examine graphs and tables to understand overall report and what it includes  Compare how your center is doing relative to the state average.  Celebrate your strengths!  What can you work on?  Identify two areas for improvement in preparation for Advanced Planning with Data workshop. How to Review Report 22

Questions? questions to: or Samantha Sniegowski