Trinity Collaborative Recreation Assessment and Forest Contractor and Workforce Assessment
Recreation Assessment - Purpose and Contents An assessment articulating the current conditions of represented interests, as well as related challenges, and potential opportunities for recreation developments in Trinity County. A set of surveys of a representative sample of local recreation interest groups, recreation related businesses, and relevant agency interests. A set of recommendations for recreation subgroup that help identify potential strategies for long-term relationship-building and capacity and development.
Recreation - Methods The study and methods were developed by a subgroup comprised of collaborative members. The study consisted of a set of interviews of key sectors related to the recreation industry including nonprofits, agencies, interest groups, and businesses. The data was gathered and analyzed by the Watershed Center staff. Recommendations were informed by insights of the Collaborative group that developed throughout the life of project, and through interview questions designed to provide direction to the collaborative group.
Recreation - Findings & Recommendations Trinity County faces universal economic, infrastructure, and business challenges that need to be considered in project development. Planning should be informed by sector specific considerations. Key actors, interest groups, and businesses face unique challenges to growth. A working knowledge of the challenges and conditions for these groups is essential to effective project development. The assessment produced a suite of recommendations for the Recreation Subgroup, including specific projects and strategies to improve the capacity of the group.
Recreation – Moving Forward Currently the Recreation Group has a limited participation or capacity, though some projects are proceeding There are not always agency representatives, stakeholders, and corresponding projects that support collective activities among stakeholders – perhaps narrower opportunities Now is a good time for the larger collaborative group to determine how that would like to address recreation interests
Contractors and Workforce Assessment - Methods Developed Workforce Assessment protocol and survey with input from SMART Center and Superior California Economic Development District Built off of 2004 assessment Design based upon outside examples/expert advice Developed local contractors list Primarily Trinity County w/ some from neighboring communities Survey mailed to 50 contractors Follow-up phone interviews with key contractors
Contractors and Workforce - Results 15 initial respondents 5 follow up interviews All respondents desire to work in the woods Average age of 58 Average crew size – 6 Repeatedly heard that it is hard for contractors to hire and keep skilled workers
Contractors and Workforce - Results 9 contractors had been a primary contractor on a federal contract Many contractors not qualified to contract with federal government at all Only a couple of the younger contractors may try to continue the family businesses Limited equipment and crew capacity throughout the county – especially for mechanical thinning and biomass Contractors do not have an incentive to purchase/upgrade equipment due to lack of opportunity Bottom Line – The contractors felt that the most significant barrier to federal contracting in the region is the “Lack of federal contracts”
Contractors and Workforce - Recommendations Develop contracts that match and potentially help to grow the local capacity Bring contractors together to discuss their capacity and needs related to timber sale, stewardship, service, and firewood contracts Use specific projects as opportunities Could include a collaborative workgroup? Continue to train local workforce Tighten connections to private sector needs and opportunity as possible – SMART center, RCD, WRTC Continue to track forest contractors and the workforce over time