Striving for Excellence on NSTX Run Assessment Meeting R. J. Hawryluk July 28, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SCO 3 Crewing Optimization As-Is Processes January 9, 2006
Advertisements

MRSEC Directors Meeting Focus on MRSEC Working Groups NSF, Thursday June 24, 2010 Sean Jones, Tom Rieker, and Charles Ying MRSEC Program Directors.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDAs website for reference purposes only. It.
MONTANA Department of Labor & Industry Employment Relations Division Occupational Safety & Health Bureau P.O. Box 1786 Miles City, Montana Fax:
Briefing to the Commission to Review the Effectiveness of the National Energy Laboratories (CRENEL) Joseph McBrearty, Deputy Director for Field Operations.
The National Association for Magnet and Theme-Based Schools Magnet Schools of America provides leadership for innovative instructional programs that promote.
PROMOTION OF ACADEMIC STAFF Professor Merlin Crossley Acting Deputy-Vice-Chancellor (Research)
DOE/NSF U.S. CMS Operations Program Review Closeout Report Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory March 10, 2015 Anadi Canepa, TRIUMF Anna Goussiou, University.
Aviation Security, Technology and Collaboration The Security Network February 25, 2009 Janelle Miller Director Aviation Security Alaska Airlines / Horizon.
Peer Assessment of 5-year Performance ARS National Program 301: Plant, Microbial and Insect Genetic Resources, Genomics and Genetic Improvement Summary.
Wellcome Trust/Australia/New Zealand International Collaborative Research Grants  Up to £12 million funding for Large grants to foster collaborative research.
Managing the Information Technology Resource Jerry N. Luftman
Introduction to Environmental Management Systems (EMS) Environmental Health & Safety Environmental Protection Program
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
Presented by: Eileen Harvey – Senior Human Resources Consultant June 2015 UCL Senior Promotions Academic, Research and Teaching Fellow Staff.
Senior Review Evaluations (1 of 5) Proposals due: 6 March 2015 Panel evaluations: Week of 22 April 2015 Performance factors to be evaluated will include.
Research Impact Alexandra Byrnes, Research Publication Officer Rio
Central management of training Program development Local implementation of programs Government orientations, policies and structures Components of the.
Product and Process Measures Drive Continuous Product Quality and Business Improvement Angelo G. Scangas, President Quality Support Group, Inc
Talent Management Director of Talent and Development –Amanda Andrus Specialist of Training and Orientation –Kelli Simkus Specialist of Performance Management.
Employee Recognition. C-TRAN EMPLOYEE APPRECIATION.
MISSION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES SOUTH FLORIDA REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY (SFRTA) MISSION, GOALS & OBJECTIVES.
Overview Fall  14 th year  Students receive up to $250,000 in college scholarships based on their research endeavors  14 national Intel semi-finalists,
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
IBHE Presentation 1 Performance Funding Discussion Topics Performance Funding Steering Committee Meeting September 28, 2011.
Preparing a Successful Graduate Student Award Application Karen Beattie, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Dept. of Medicine McMaster University
Frameworks Overall Facts and Presentations Hubbard High School Model Lakeview Career Readiness Certificates Grand Rapids Model.
LAA Judging Criteria & Process 2015
BUSINESS SENSITIVE 1 Achieving desired safety outcomes through cultural alignment Don McConnell Senior Vice-President and Chief Operating Officer Battelle.
OHRMD Recognition Award & DHS Supervisor Leadership, Education and Development Academy (LEAD) Presenter: Johnanna Weathers Presentation to: DHS Board Date:
© 2008 Autodesk Engineering Design with CAD Fusion FIRST training 2011.
Environmental Restoration Projects Methods for Safety Culture Realization November 30, 2007.
Presented by Linda Martin
Internal Assessment Group 4 Aims: “While the scientific method may take on a wide variety of forms, it is the emphasis on a practical approach through.
Quadrennial Review Retrospective performance review every 4 years Standardized to fairly evaluate Staff Scientists despite various roles Success judged.
Performance Assessment Assessment of Organizational Excellence NSF Advisory Committee for Business and Operations May 5-6, 2005.
Systems Studies Program Peer Review Meeting Albert L. Opdenaker III DOE Program Manager Holiday Inn Express Germantown, Maryland August 29, 2013.
Program Evaluation Update. Program Impact Campuses Served by TRC.
1 Metrics for the Office of Science HPC Centers Jonathan Carter User Services Group Lead NERSC User Group Meeting June 12, 2006.
W HAT IS M&E  Day-to-day follow up of activities during implementation to measure progress and identify deviations  Monitoring is the routine and systematic.
DOE Annual Review of SLAC HEP Research Program June 14-16, 2005 SLAC Charge to Committee Issues Procedures.
START global change SysTem for Analysis, Research & Training UNFCCC Expert Workshop on Monitoring and Evaluating Capacity Building in Developing Countries.
Risk Assessment. What is it? Careful assessment of what might cause harm to people Consideration of precautions (are they adequate?) Significance of hazard.
Light Source Reviews The BES Perspective July 23, 2002 Pedro A. Montano Materials Sciences and Engineering Basic Energy Sciences BASIC ENERGY SCIENCES.
U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Science 20 th Meeting of the IEA Large Tokamak ExCo, May th Meeting of the IEA Poloidal Divertor ExCo, May.
Advance Planning Briefing for Industry 10 October 2008 Mr. Chuck Comaty.
Supported by NSTX Team Meeting March 23, 2005 Columbia U Comp-X GA INEL JHU LANL LLNL Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL UC Davis UC Irvine.
Safety Groups Program HCHSA Safety Group February 21, 2005.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
LIGO-G M Organization and Budget Gary Sanders NSF Operations Review Caltech, February 26, 2001.
Selecting Evidence Based Practices Oregon’s initial attempts to derive a process Implementation Conversations 11/10.
Scientific Investigation Unit 3. Aim and purpose The aim of this unit is to enable learners to explore the protocols associated with scientific investigations.
Governors Introduction Part Three WELCOME Accountability.
A Division of the American Library Association Presentation copyright © 1999 American Association of School.
UNIT –V Presented By Senthil kumar.N. Today's Discussion Review of last class Organizational development & organizational effectiveness UNIT V O & B.
Goals of Upper Division Laboratory Experiences Experimentation –design and conduct experiments –analyze data –draw valid conclusions from data –identify.
FY10 Ops Preparations: Extended vessel bake (to 3 weeks) Additional Physics Operators Spare LITER probes/fill systems fabricated & new staff Run day status/plans.
Engineering Operations Outage Status: Tile cleaning is complete Tentatively planning on 2 LITER operation. Design Review upcoming Shielding of HHFW/in-vessel.
Alex Ezrakhovich Process Approach for an Integrated Management System Change driven.
1 The Five Year Plan review went well on all counts Review held June 30 - July 2 > 1.5 days of presentations by the Team Panel of nine (Hooper, Bravenec,
DETECTOR RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT Fred Borcherding 1.
LAA Judging Criteria & Process
Production Management System
Staff Recommendations for the 2016 Texas Higher Education Star Awards
MOSH Leading Practices Adoption System
Stan Whitcomb LSC meeting Livingston 21 March 2005
_____________________
LAA Judging Criteria & Process
FY2018 LABORATORY CALENDAR
Governor Induction Part 3
Presentation transcript:

Striving for Excellence on NSTX Run Assessment Meeting R. J. Hawryluk July 28, 2006

Total Recordable Case Rate 4 TRC Cases in FY05 FY05 Case Rate = 0.93 FY06 Goal < FY06 TRC Cases thru 7/27/06 FY06 Case Rate ~ 1.47 DART Case Rate 1 DART Case in FY05 FY05 Case Rate = 0.23 FY06 Goal < FY06 DART Case thru 7/27/06 FY06 Case Rate ~ 0.29 FY06 Goals FY05 Results Striving for Excellence: An Accident-Free Workplace is Possible

Safety is a Daily Responsibility  Continually improve our communication on safety issues and expectations  8:30 am meeting comments by Al  Hold Pre and Post-Job Briefings  Let us know what are the issues  Minimize workplace hazards and integration of safety considerations into work control systems  Use Job Hazard Analyses (JHA)  Attend and provide Training

Annual Laboratory Evaluation DOE evaluates PPPL each year  FY05 PPPL rated as “outstanding”  Congressional perception - everyone gets “outstanding” New process this year (FY06)  Revised criteria - more emphasis on world leading science  Compared against ten other science labs  Review at the Ray Orbach level  Mid-term facilities review in September  Input to Lab’s evaluation

Examples of FY’06 Scientific and Project Evaluation Criteria Recognition in community as world leading Number of invited talks, citations Output quantity of research -number of publications Awards (e.g. national recognition) Leadership positions (in community, academy panels, etc) Extent of collaborations Effectiveness and timeliness of meeting goals and milestones Availability, reliability, and efficiency of facilities -NSTX

What Do We Need to Do to Make NSTX the Facility of Choice for Research on Fusion? Program Coordination. –Scheduling, allocation of time, and performance/completion of Experimental Proposals (XPs). –Publishing the results of high impact experiments in a timely fashion. –How can we make an even greater impact on fusion and plasma science? Collaborations & Collaborator Support. –PPPL support of collaborator effort –How can we do better? Run Schedule. –Coordination of start up activities, run versus maintenance time, layout of the run day. Resource allocation to achieve world leading research within our financial constraints. –Run Staffing and Equipment/Spare Part needs. –Upgrades