Doc.: IEEE 802.11-13/0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: 2013-07-3 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /1355r2 11ah Submission Date: Authors: Nov 2012 James Wang, MediaTek Slide 1.
Advertisements

PS-Poll TXOP Using RTS/CTS Protection
Discussion on OFDMA in HEW
Dynamic Sensitivity Control V2
Doc.: IEEE /0871r0 Submission Jul 2013 Timo Koskela, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Discussion on Potential Techniques for HEW Date:
Comp 361, Spring 20056:Basic Wireless 1 Chapter 6: Basic Wireless (last updated 02/05/05) r A quick intro to CDMA r Basic
Submission doc.: IEEE /1225r1 Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax Date: Slide 1Huawei Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0091r0 January 2015 Woojin Ahn, Yonsei Univ.Slide 1 UL-OFDMA procedure in IEEE ax Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1431r1 Submission September 2014 Issues on UL-OFDMA Transmission Date: Authors: Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0861r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury Impact of CCA adaptation on spatial reuse in dense residential scenario Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1420r1Nov 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Impact of Preamble Error on MAC System Performance Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1187r1Sep 2014 Submission Po-Kai Huang (Intel) Slide 1 The Effect of Preamble Error Model on MAC Simulator Date: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Discussion on OFDMA in IEEE ax
Direction Finding Positioning for
Submission doc.: IEEE /1208r1 September 2014 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 MAC considerations on ax OFDMA Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1454r0 November 2014 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide ax Power Save Discussion Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /1303r5 Submission November 2010 Jarkko Kneckt (Nokia)Slide 1 Overlapping BSS Co-Existence Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0107 Jan 2014 SubmissionYonggang Fang et. al. (ZTE) HEW Evaluation Metrics Date: Slide 1 Authors: NameAffiliationAddress .
Doc.: IEEE /1126r0 Submission September 2012 Krishna Sayana, SamsungSlide 1 Wi-Fi for Hotspot Deployments and Cellular Offload Date:
Doc.: IEEE /492r02 Submission Orange Labs Date: Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz May 2010 Authors:
September 2013 doc.: IEEE 11-13/1105r0 Submission Meng Yang (CATR) Discussion on Access Mechanism for HEW Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /1153r0 Submission September 2013 Laurent Cariou (Orange)Slide 1 Simulation scenario proposal Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 On Future Enhancements to Technology Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1179r0 September 2014 Gwangzeen Ko, ETRISlide 1 Considerations for Partial Band Interference between WLAN Systems Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0831r0 Submission July 2010 Yusuke Asai (NTT)Slide 1 Frame Sequence of Interference Management Using Beamforming Technique in OBSS.
Doc.: IEEE /1081r0 SubmissionSayantan Choudhury HEW Simulation Methodology Date: Sep 16, 2013 Authors: Slide 1.
doc.: IEEE /0496r2 Submission A Flexible Beam Training Protocol for 60GHz mm-Wave Communication (TGad) Date: Authors: NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Doc.: IEEE /0648r0 Submission May 2014 Chinghwa Yu et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0065r0 Submission January 2014 William Carney, SONYSlide 1 Comments on Draft HEW PAR Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0637r0 Submission May 2014 James Wang et. al., MediaTekSlide 1 Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0523r0 Submission April 2014 Imad Jamil (Orange)Slide 1 MAC simulation results for Dynamic sensitivity control (DSC - CCA adaptation)
Doc.: IEEE r0 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 CCA Revisit May 2015 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Doc.: IEEE /0840r1 Submission AP Assisted Medium Synchronization Date: Authors: September 2012 Minyoung Park, Intel Corp.Slide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /0720r1 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Presenter: Spatial Sharing Mechanism in aj (60GHz) July 2013 Francois Chin.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1395r2 Simultaneous Transmission Technologies for HEW Date: November 2013 Koichi Ishihara, NTTSlide 1.
Doc.: IEEE /1110r0 Amin Jafarian, Newracom 1 September 2015 BSS-TXOP NameAffiliationsAddressPhone Amin
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-13/1398r0 Nov 2013 Akira Yamada, NTT DOCOMO, Inc.Slide 1 Requirements for HEW Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE / Submission September 2010 James Wang, MediatekSlide 1 Wide Band OBSS Friendly PSMP Date: 2010, September 13 Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /1081r3 September, 2015 Jing Ma, NICTSlide 1 Further consideration on receive behavior based on the cascading structure.
Doc.: IEEE /0081r0 Submission Title –Author List Date: Authors: January 2013 Name, Company.Slide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /1289r2 Michelle Gong, IntelSlide 1 RTS/CTS Operation for Wider Bandwidth Date: Authors: Nov
Doc.: IEEE /0542r0 SubmissionSimone Merlin, QualcommSlide 1 HEW Scenarios and Goals Date: Authors: May 2013.
Discussion on ax functional requirements
Doc.: IEEE /xxxx SubmissionSlide 1 Summary and Discussions of Proposals on Potential PHY Technologies in HEW Date: Authors: Jianhan.
Doc.: IEEE /0805-r1 SubmissionSlide 1 On Definition of Dense Networks and Performance Metric Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek.
Doc.: IEEE /0805-r0 SubmissionSlide 1 On Definition of Dense Networks and Performance Metric Date: Authors: Jianhan Liu, etc. Mediatek.
Doc.: IEEE /1086r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Date: Authors: Improved Virtual Carrier Sensing Mechanism for 45GHz Sep ZTE Corp.
Distributed-Queue Access for Wireless Ad Hoc Networks Authors: V. Baiamonte, C. Casetti, C.-F. Chiasserini Dipartimento di Elettronica, Politecnico di.
Resolutions to Static RTS CTS Comments
Doc.: IEEE /0212r3 Submission Feb 2016 TG ax Enterprise Scenario, Color and DSC Date: Authors: Graham Smith, SR TechnologiesSlide 1.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r1 January 2016 Jinsoo Ahn, Yonsei UniversitySlide 1 NAV cancellation issues on MU protection Date: Authors:
DL-OFDMA Procedure in IEEE ax
Secondary Channel CCA of HE STA
Possible Approaches for HEW
Performance Evaluation of OBSS Densification
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
120MHz channelization solution
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 September 2010
Overlapping BSS Co-Existence
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Increased Network Throughput with Channel Width Related CCA and Rules
RTS&CTS Exchange in wideband transmission
Considerations on CCA for OBSS Opearation in ax
Channelization for China’s Spectrum
Reserving STA Date: Authors: January 2011 January 2011
HEW Beamforming Enhancements
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 May 2010
Proposed basis for PAR discussion
Utilizing Unused Resources by Allowing Simultaneous Transmissions
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission July 2013 James Wang (MediaTek)Slide 1 HEW Beamforming Enhancements Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Background “Area throughput/Average Throughput per STA” is a new metric in HEW for dense deployment scenarios 1 Performance enhancement for cell edge has also been highlighted as a key issue in dense deployment 2 Current CSMA baseline channel access protocol is based on the omni-directional transmission There are some ambiguities related to beamformed transmission under different scenarios This contribution presents some possible performance beamforming enhancements for HEW 2016/1/25 Slide 2 James Wang (MediaTek)

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Cell-Edge Performance May 2013 Slide 3 James Wang (Mediatek ) Improved cell edge performance with TX or RX beamforming, more graceful degradation in dense deployment

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Beamforming for Cell Edge Performance Enhancement Beamforming is an effective way to enhance cell edge performance –Higher phy rate can be achieved (versus non- beamformed) –Reduced interference to OBSS (beamformed transmission) –Reduced interference from OBSS interference (beamformed reception) –Reduced delay spread When more energy is delivered to the targeted receiver through TX beamforming, the less interference toward others. RX beamforming mitigates the interference level. Higher number of antennas results in less interference. –Potential to increase spatial reuse (higher area throughput) 2016/1/25 Slide 4 James Wang (MediaTek)

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Scenario : Station at the cell edge STA1 at the cell edge of BSS1 typically suffers from –Difficulty with channel access (CCA busy) due to OBSS interference –Higher packet collision rate from OBSS hidden nodes –STA1 becomes interference to OBSS Goal: How to use beamforming to improve STA1 situation while reducing interference to OBSS (STA2 and AP2). Specifically, we want to explore the possibility of spatial reuse to improve network capacity 2016/1/25 AP1 STA1 STA2 AP2 BSS1 STA3 Slide 5 James Wang (MediaTek)

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Spatially Reciprocal Transmission Define spatial reciprocity as a device capable of transmitting and receiving with same antenna pattern, via implicit or explicit calibration or other means. Spatially reciprocal devices provides the following benefits : –A spatially reciprocal device can use its channel knowledge derived the received signal use it in its transmission –It reduces the overhead of the over-the-air (explicit or implicit) calibration. Note that some vendors are shipping pre-calibrated devices already. 2016/1/25 AP1 STA1 STA2 AP2 BSS1 STA3 Slide 6 James Wang (MediaTek)

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Condition 1 - Spatially Orthogonal Condition Supposed OBSS STA2 and AP2 are communicating and STA1 wishes to transmit to AP1 at the same time. To avoid STA1 interfering with OBSS STAs (STA2 and AP2), STA1 should satisfy spatially orthogonal (SO) condition before it transmits (allowing it to reset NAV) –SO condition: STA1 does not receive AP2 and STA2 signal under beamformed condition during an observation duration * Note if STA1’s CCA is idle, the STA1 is allowed to transmit. 2016/1/25 AP1 STA1 STA2 AP2 BSS1 STA3 Slide 7 James Wang (MediaTek) SO condition

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Condition 1- Spatially Orthogonal Condition STA1 decides the beamforming weight for SO detection based on its knowledge of channel to AP1 and the OBSS interference (STA2&AP2) situations. STA1’s is only interested in communicate to AP1. STA1 can establish SO condition via –beamforming toward AP1 to suppress interference, or –using active nulling toward interference source (STA2/AP2) 2016/1/25 AP1 STA1 STA2 AP2 BSS1 STA3 Slide 8 James Wang (MediaTek) SO condition

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Condition 2 – Use RTS/CTS to start a SO Frame Exchange STA1 should start the frame exchange with RTS/CTS with AP1 to avoid AP1 from interfering with AP2 or STA2 Note that the intended recipient of RTS (AP1) will not transmit CTS if its NAV≠0*. AP1 would not cause interference to OBSS STAs (AP2 and STA2). * REVmb: CTS procedure: If the NAV at the STA receiving the RTS indicates the medium is not idle, that STA shall not respond to the RTS frame. 2016/1/25 AP1 STA1 STA2 AP2 BSS1 STA3 Slide 9 James Wang (MediaTek) RTS CTS

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Spatial Reuse of Wireless Medium A spatially reciprocal (SR) HEW device should be allowed to gain access to the channel when SO condition is satisfied, with beamforming weights determined by the HEW device based on its channel knowledge Under this SO condition, the HEW device can start a SO frame exchange by employing the beamformed (preamble & payload) transmission and reception for the TXOP starting with a RTS/CTS Note that under this condition, the spatial re- use of the wireless medium can be achieved. 2016/1/25 AP1 STA1 STA3 AP3 BSS1 STA2 AP STA TXOP Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration WM Access (SO Detection) WM Access (SO Detection) Slide 10 James Wang (MediaTek) RTS CTS

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Beamformed Transmission Issues PPDU-based Beamforming: Switching between a omni- preamble to a beamformed-transmission after omni- preamble is also hard for OBSS receiver to predict the channel conditions 2016/1/25 Beamformed Time AP STA Omni-preamble Slide 11 James Wang (MediaTek)

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission TXOP-based Beamformed Frame Exchange When an AP is engaged in a frame exchange with a selected STA, it should inform all STAs within the BSS defer properly. This requires some omni- directional transmission. TXOP-based beamformed frame exchange: A proposed solution is to employ the omni-beam transmission at the beginning of an TXOP to set up protection duration (NAV) and then to switch to the beamformed (both preamble and payload) transmission and reception for the remainder of the TXOP duration Desirable to have minimum omni-beam duration and then beamformed transmission thru the TXOP  minimum interference to OBSS James Wang (MediaTek) Slide 12 AP STA Omni-Beam Duration NAV TXOP Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration WM Access WM Access More Interference to OBSS Reduced Interference to OBSS

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission TXOP-based Beamformed and SO Frame Exchange During a TXOP-based beamformed frame exchange (AP1 & STA2), an OBSS device (STA3 or AP3) should be allowed to start a frame exchange starting with a RTS/CTS if the SO condition is satisfied  spatial reuse cab be achieved AP1 can have more antennas for beamforming resulting in less interference TXOP-based beamformed FX enable simple STAs to spatially re-use the medium (only need to detect SO condition either with or without beamforming) July 2013 James Wang(MediaTek)Slide 13 AP1 STA1 STA3 AP3 BSS1 STA2 An OBSS STA can start a SO frame exchange (RTS/CTS) upon detecting the SO condition

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Combined SR beamformed and TXOP-based Beamformed FXs Note that the beamformed FX (by STA) and the TXOP-based beamformed FX (by AP) can be combined in an TXOP 2016/1/25 AP STA Omni-Beam Duration NAV TXOP Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration WM Access WM Access Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration AP uses TXOP-based Beamformed FX STA uses SR Beamformed FX AP STA Omni-Beam Duration NAV TXOP Bemaformed Transmission and Reception Duration WM Access WM Access Beamformed Transmission and Reception Duration AP uses TXOP-based Beamformed FX STA uses SR beamformed FX RTS CTS Slide 14 James Wang (MediaTek)

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission Summary Discuss potential beamforming enhancement ideas with the following benefits: –increase likelihood of channel access under dense deployment condition –reduce interference to OBSS –reduce collision during reception –increase likelihood of spatial re-use in dense deployment scenario, leading to higher network throughput The proposed beamforming enhancement is suitable for HEW, because –there is no control of the WLNA deployment scenario due to unlicensed spectrum –no BSS-BSS coordination is required –distributed algorithm accommodates mobile APs/devices and changing channel conditions 2016/1/25 Slide 15 James Wang (MediaTek)

doc.: IEEE /0877r0 Submission References Ref 1: Usage models and requirements for IEEE High Efficiency WLAN study group (HEW SG) – Liaison with WFA, Laurent Cariou, Orange Ref 2: WNG Carrier-oriented WiFi for cellular offload, Laurent Cariou, Orange 2016/1/25 Slide 16 James Wang (MediaTek)