The LITHOPROBE Experience:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cascadia Ken Creager, Steve Malone, Geoff Abers, Stephane Rondenay, Brad Hacker and Tim Melbourne Earth and Space Sciences University of Washington.
Advertisements

Prepared by Betsy Conklin for Dr. Isiorho
Understanding craton formation through their geochemical and geophysical characteristics A Preliminary Report CIDER 2012 Lithosphere Group Presenters:
Accretionary growth of Paleoproterozoic Fennoscandia: results from deep seismic experiments BABEL, FIRE and SVEKALAPKO Annakaisa Korja University of Helsinki.
The Earth’s Structure Seismology and the Earth’s Deep Interior The Earth’s Structure from Travel Times Spherically symmetric structure: PREM - Crustal.
Earth’s Interior and Geophysical Properties Chapter 17.
The Dynamic Crust Regents Earth Science. Seismic Waves and Earth’s Structure How can we tell that the outer core is liquid and the inner core is solid?
Earth’s Interior and Geophysical Properties Physical Geology 11/e, Chapter 17.
Lecture Outlines Physical Geology, 14/e Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. Plummer, Carlson &
Chapter 17 Earth’s interior. Earth’s interior structure Earth is composed of three shells; –Crust –Mantle –Core.
EARTH Unit 3. Earth's Origin Lesson 1 While it was still in the molten state, separation of elements occurred within the earth. light inert gasses like.
4. Formation and Deformation of the Continental Crust
EarthScope targets in the central Appalachians Eastern US continental margin preserves the signature of several cycles of supercontinent assembly and breakup.
Scientists divide the Earth
MT TA in region of cryptic accretion, cryptic rifting, potential superplumes and weak plumes in the cratonic core Adam Schultz in collaboration with Dhananjay.
Deep seismic reflection profiling of Archean cratons Arie J. van der Velden Frederick A. Cook Outline: - Locations of available profiles - Causes of reflectivity:
Geology of the Lithosphere 2. Evidence for the Structure of the Crust & Upper Mantle What is the lithosphere and what is the structure of the lithosphere?
LITHOPROBE GEOPHYSICS and GEOLOGY: An Essential Combination Illustrated by LITHOPROBE Interpretations Ron M. Clowes Earth, Ocean & Atmospheric Sciences.
Ch 21: Earth’s interior Probing Earth’s interior
Earth Systems Science Chapter 7 I.Structure of the Earth II.Plate Tectonics The solid part of the earth system includes processes, just like the atmosphere.
Earthscope Seminar: the summary Teresa Mae Lassak April 30 th, 2007.
GreatBreak: Grand Challenges in Geodynamics. Characteristics of a Desirable Geodynamic Model Ties together observational constraints on current state.
GG 450 April 15, 2008 Refraction Applications. While refraction is used for engineering studies such as depth to basement and depth to the water table,
Thermal structure of continental lithosphere from heat flow and seismic constraints: Implications for upper mantle composition and geodynamic models Claire.
(Chapter 10 in D & R) Geometry and Kinematics: Plates.
AN ORGANISATION FOR A NATIONAL EARTH SCIENCE INFRASTRUCTURE PROGRAM Capricorn Transect : Lithospheric Background B.L.N. Kennett Research School of Earth.
The Role of Active-Source Seismology in EarthScope Gary Fuis U.S. Geological Survey.
Earth Systems 3209 Unit: 1 Introduction to Earth Science – The Evolution of Planet Earth Reference: Chapters 1, 17 and Appendix A & B.
Faults and Earthquakes
Journey to the Center of the Earth
Integrated 2-D and 3-D Structural, Thermal, Rheological and Isostatic Modelling of Lithosphere Deformation: Application to Deep Intra- Continental Basins.
Understanding Earth Fifth Edition Chapter 14: EXPLORING EARTH’S INTERIOR Copyright © 2007 by W. H. Freeman and Company Grotzinger Jordan Press Siever.
Earth Structure.
Walter D. Mooney, Ph.D. US Geological Survey Menlo Park, California USA Lecture #10: Lithosphere of Young Mountain Belts IPRCC and SINOPROBE.
Earth's Internal Structure → Layers core mantle crust These are identified using seismic waves p-waves & s-waves.
David Foster - University of Florida Paul Mueller - University of Florida David Mogk - Montana State University David Foster - University of Florida Paul.
Reflection Seismic Data
5. Seismology William Wilcock OCEAN/ESS 410. A. Earthquake Seismology.
The Layers of the Earth!. Earth Layers The Earth is divided into three major zones that are defined by their compositions. *Core (Inner and Outer) *Mantle.
Chapter 32. Standards Earth Science Standards Dynamic Earth Processes : 3d, e, f Objectives: 1.Students will define key terms for chapter Students.
Section 1: Earth: A Unique Planet
Earthquakes and the Interior  Earthquakes are definitely a geologic hazard for people living in earthquake regions, but the seismic waves generated by.
THE EARTHS INTERIOR Seismic Wave Review 1.p-waves and s-waves 2.velocity = Distance / time 3.seismic waves travel at different speeds through different.
Other Tectonic Rifts: the Woodlark-D'Entrecasteaux Rift, Papua New Guinea Geoffrey Abers, Boston University Thanks to: A. Ferris (BU), S. Baldwin (Syracuse),
Earth’s Interior Bob Leighty GLG Physical Geology.
Chapter 12: Earth’s Interior
Gravity anomalies and flexure at the West Taiwan basin:
Layers of the EARTH. Earth’s Layered Structure Layers Defined by Composition 8.4 Earth’s Layered Structure  Earth’s interior consists of three major.
The Earth’s Interior. Most of what we know is from geophysics.
Thermal modelling of crustal stacking and exhumation during the Paleoproterozoic orogenic growth of the Fennosscandian Shield I.T. Kukkonen 1, A. Korja.
The Earth’s Interior. Write down the things that are in yellow Other terms in this PowerPoint are helpful but do not need to be included in your notes.
Walter D. Mooney, Ph.D. US Geological Survey Menlo Park, California USA Lecture #10: Geoelectrical Studies of Lithospheric Structure IPRCC.
Government - University – Industry A Triumvirate for Innovation & Growth.
1. Inner Core Outer Core Mantle Crust 2  The Earth's outermost surface is called the crust. The crust is typically about 25 miles thick beneath continents,
I. Layers Defined by Composition 8.4 Earth’s Layered Structure  A) Earth’s interior consists of 3 major zones (chemical composition).
Earth’s Layers G 103. General Information -Iron,Oxyge, Silicon, & Magnesium - Deepest drill 12 km -Radius of Earth 6371 km - How do we know about the.
A New View into Earth A Science and Facilities Program for study of the structure, dynamics and evolution of the North American continent.
Chapter 17: Earth’s interior (Part I ). Ch 17: Earth’s interior 1) How is it done? Why care?
Lecture Outlines Physical Geology, 12/e Plummer & Carlson Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.
Earthquakes A manifestation of rock deformation
August 25, 2017 SC. 912.E.6.1- Earth’s Layers
Goals (and conclusions)
CCFS-Macquarie University, University of WA, Geological Survey WA
Session 4: GOCE for Solid Earth
Carla Braitenberg Department of Mathematics and Geosciences
GeoTraverse In the Northern Rockies
Archean continental terranes commonly have deep keels, but the whole upper mantle of western North America shows very slow seismic velocities.
USArray and the Great Plains
Geophysics/Tectonics
Earth Systems: Interior of Earth
Presentation transcript:

The LITHOPROBE Experience: Active-source Seismology and Other Earth Science – An Essential Combination for Understanding Tectonic Evolution Ron Clowes University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC EarthScope Workshop, Bozeman, MT, Sept. 16-18/05

My main points are … For most geologists to participate meaningfully in the EarthScope program, multichannel reflection and refraction/wide-angle reflection seismology must be part of the scientific program The active-source seismology program must be directed at geological targets that have fundamental significance for understanding tectonic evolution The active-source seismology program must be coordinated with geological studies and Flexible Array

LITHOPROBE is … A national earth science research project To investigate the three-dimensional structure and evolution of Canada’s landmass and continental margins By probing the lithosphere, Earth’s relatively cold, strong, rigid outer shell which is typically 100 km or more thick

Why LITHOPROBE ? To gain a basic understanding of the continent on which we live, from which we derive resources and which generates natural hazards To obtain regional background information useful to mining and petroleum industries

How does LITHOPROBE work? Multidisciplinary Collaboration Partnerships Decentralized research

LITHOSPHERIC STRUCTURE GEOPHYSICS LITHOSPHERIC STRUCTURE & TECTONIC PROCESSES REGIONAL INFORMATION FOR INDUSTRY DETAILED STUDIES WITH INDUSTRY

How did LITHOPROBE select fundamental geological features? Call for integrated, multidisciplinary proposals from a New Transects Subcommittee Peer-review nationally and internationally Internal review by 3 disciplinary subcommittees [seismic, em, geology] and the senior Scientific Ctte Review of evaluations by New Transects Subctte Recommendation to Sci. Ctte. and LITHOPROBE Board of Directors

How does LITHOPROBE image internal structure? Seismic reflection – best resolution; crust and upper mantle structure Seismic refraction – medium resolution; P-wave velocity and composition of crust & upper mantle Teleseismic studies – lower resolution; S-wave velocity and structure from crust to transition zone Magnetotellurics – conductivity, fluids Magnetics & gravity – tie with geology and general structure

Seismic Reflection and Refraction

Seismic reflection acquisition Vibroseis trucks

Land seismic acquisition Vibroseis truck sources Contracted crew. Research staff are only there for quality control

wide-angle reflection Near-vertical reflection Refraction and wide-angle reflection Goals: image differences between rock types and subsurface structures: mapping the detailed “structural fabric” limited compositional information Goals: image the velocity structure also image major differences in rock types provide compositional and thermal constraints 6-12 km >500 km 0 km 40 km

wide-angle reflection Near-vertical reflection Refraction and wide-angle reflection impedance contrasts structural fabric velocity structure & large impedance contrasts compositional and thermal constraints Primary Goals Models imaging using deconvolution, stacking, and migration techniques inversion for simplest structure Resolution Upper crust 10 m < 0.5 km Moho 200 m < 2.5 km 1 km 3-20 km < 0.1 km/s 0.2 km/s 1.5-2 km 20-50 km 0.1 km/s 10-80 Hz 2–12 Hz INTRO TECHNIQUES RESULTS CONCLUSIONS

Tectonic Ages Archean Proterozoic 4Ga Phanerozoic 3Ga 2Ga 1Ga 0Ga

Trans-Canada Crustal Cross-Section 80 km 1:1 6000 km 2:1

Tectonic Ages Archean Proterozoic 4Ga Phanerozoic 3Ga 2Ga 1Ga 0Ga

Paleoproterozoic Trans-Hudson Orogen in Saskatchewan and Manitoba

Ashton et al., CJES, v. 42, 2005

Mylonites from Pelican Thrust Zone Strain gradient around tectonic inclusion of granodiorite-tonalite Sheath fold defined by attenuated mafic dyke in mylonite Δ-winged porphyroclasts in mylonitic granodiorite-tonalite – Shows dextral shear component Δ-winged porphyroclasts in mylonitic pelitic migmatite – Shows low-angle reverse shear Ashton et al., CJES, v. 42, 2005

Concordia diagrams: the need for dating structures and rocks Ashton et al., CJES, v. 42, 2005

Ashton et al., CJES, v. 42, 2005

L10 L9

Line 10 Line 9 east

Lines 9 and 10 Extensive Crustal Reflectivity Limited mantle reflectivity

Lines 9 and 10 PT PT PT Paleoprot Sask Paleoprot Archean Archean

LS2b L9

Line 9 PT PT Sask Paleoproterozoic Archean Hajnal et al., CJES, v. 42, 2005

Line S2b Sask PT Paleoproterozoic Archean Hajnal et al., CJES, v. 42, 2005

C C` C C` Hajnal et al., CJES, v. 42, 2005

Archean Slave craton and Paleoproterozoic Wopmay Orogen in Northwest Territories

Corridor 1, west half: migrated reflection section and interpretation Fort Simpson Terrane upper crust (upthrust) Fort Simpson lower crust (delaminated) Cook et al., Tectonics, v. 18, 1999

Corridor 1, east half: migrated reflection section and interpretation 5 10 Time (s) 15 20 25 30 15 Hottah lower crust Slave lower crust 30 Approx Depth (km) 50 Hottah mantle (Archean &/or Proterozoic) Archean Mantle 70 Deformed mantle Proterozoic (?) 90 110 Cook et al., Tectonics, v. 18, 1999

Van der Velden & Cook, CJES, v. 38, 2002

Van der Velden & Cook, CJES, v. 38, 2002 km 20 40

Van der Velden & Cook, CJES, v. 38, 2002

RESULTS Strong crustal reflectivity; related to surface geology Strong mantle reflections . to depths of ~100 km . lateral continuity for 100s of km Crustal delamination during continental collision Deformation within the lithospheric mantle Possibly some Proterozoic mantle beneath Archean Slave craton

1100 1101 Yellowknife array 1112 1113

Offset distance (km) Offset distance (km)

Offset distance (km)

H3 J H1 K

SNORCLE Line 11, Northwest Territories 1111 1101 H1 H2 J 1113 1100 P-Velocity (km/s)

RESULTS WA reflections correlate with NVI reflections WA reflection at 180 km depth probably corresponds to base of lithosphere Support for model of delamination, subduction and Proterozoic mantle below Archean Slave craton

Integration of seismic reflection and teleseismic results Bostock, JGR, v. 103, 1998

Slave craton teleseismic study Straub et al., CGU-AGU, Montreal, 2004

RESULTS Impulse responses show mantle stratigraphy Teleseismic images correspond to interpretations of MCS and R/WAR data Support for assembly of proto-Slave craton by processes of shallow subduction; and for subduction of Proterozoic lithosphere below Archean Slave

RESULTS Impulse responses show mantle stratigraphy Teleseismic images correspond to interpretations of MCS and R/WAR data Support for assembly of proto-Slave craton by processes of shallow subduction; and for subduction of Proterozoic lithosphere below Archean Slave Low velocity anomaly at ~350 km depth centered to the south of the Lac de Gras kimberlite field

My primary points, now demonstrated, are … For most geologists to participate meaningfully in the EarthScope program, multichannel reflection and refraction/wide-angle reflection seismology must be part of the scientific program The active-source seismology program must be directed at geological targets that have fundamental significance for understanding tectonic evolution The active-source seismology program must be coordinated with geological studies and Flexible Array

Summary In order: To maximize the scientific and infrastructure investment in EarthScope To involve the geological and geochemical community in a meaningful way To develop a true 4-D understanding of lithospheric development Focused studies within EarthScope should include active-source seismology integrated with all other Solid Earth Science studies

Thank you!