Accountability Update Ty

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Advertisements

Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Miami ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Accountability 2013 and Beyond! Tori Shauna Ty
Data Analysis State Accountability. Data Analysis (What) Needs Assessment (Why ) Improvement Plan (How) Implement and Monitor.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
Accountability Updates Testing & Evaluation Department May 21, 2014 Mission High School MISSION CISD DEIC MEETING.
Review of Performance Index Framework and Accountability Ratings RICHARDSON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT To serve and prepare all students for their global.
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Texas State Accountability 2013 and Beyond Current T.E.A. Framework as of March 22, 2013 Austin Independent School District Bill Caritj, Chief Performance.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
Action Items For Accountability 2015 URGENT and INTENSE.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
2014 Accountability Commissioner’s Decisions – April 4, 2014.
STAAR & Accountability 2012 End of Course AYP Grades 3-8 Performance Standards State Accountability.
LINKING ACCOUNTABILITY AND INSTRUCTION Ty Duncan ESC 17 Coordinator of Accountability and #esc17
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
2015 Accountability Commissioner’s Final Decisions KIM GILSON SENIOR CONSULTANT, DATA AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGION 10 ESC
Accountability Update Professional Service Provider Update and Network Meeting April 1,
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
Accountability to Responsibility in a STAAR World! TEPSA Summer Conference 2014 Ty Duncan, ESC 17 on Twitter.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness 3 rd Grade Parent Information Night.
Parent Meeting February STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness Emphasis on college and career readiness standards Began school.
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Overview Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
Instructional Leaders Advisory Tuesday, April 8, 2014 Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
Timmerman Public Hearing September 16, :00-7:00.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
Timmerman Public Hearing February 4, :00-4:00.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
Accountability: Current Issues Friday, April Region 4 ESC Accountability Update Richard Blair Sr. Education Specialist Federal/State Accountability.
Accountability Update District Testing Coordinator Advisory Committee Meeting March 20,
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Accountability to Responsibility in a STAAR World! Shauna Lane, ESC Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator
Accountability 2014!! Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Shauna Lane, ESC 17 Ty.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
Lazbuddie ISD Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR)
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Draft...proposals may change1 Proposed Changes to the Texas Accountability System Adapted from “Accountability System for 2006 and Beyond- Standard Procedures”
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
Accountability 2013 Interpreting Your 2013 Accountability Report It’s Like Learning To Read All Over Again Ervin Knezek John Fessenden.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
July 11, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Michael Murphy State and Federal Accountability.
2016 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Department of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting February 25, 2016.
Adequate Yearly Progress [Our School District]
Accountability Update
2013 Texas Accountability System
State and Federal Accountability Overview
2014 State Accountability Ratings
Presentation transcript:

Accountability Update Ty

2013 Statewide Results 2 Districts (Including Charter Operators)  Of the 1,228 districts in the state, 1,136 (92.5%) achieved a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating.  A total of 80 (6.5%) districts were rated Improvement Required and 12 (1%) were labeled as Not Rated.

2013 Statewide Results 3 Campuses  Of the 8,555 campuses in the state, 7,206 (84.2%) achieved a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating.  778 (9.1%) were labeled Improvement Required.  571 (6.7%) were labeled as Not Rated.

2013 Statewide Results 4 Distinction Designations  Only campuses that received a Met Standard rating are eligible for Distinction Designations in Districts, charter operators, and AEA campuses are not eligible to receive Distinction Designations.  Of the 8,555 campuses, 1,991 (23.3%) campuses received a distinction for achieving the Top 25% in Student Progress.  2,323 (27.2%) received a distinction for reading/ELA and 1,906 (22.3%) received a distinction for mathematics.  In total, 3,599 (42.1%) received one or more Distinction Designations.  759 (8.9%) received Distinction Designations in all three categories.

2013 Statewide Results 5 System Safeguards  Of the 55 performance indicators (five subject areas x 11 student groups) evaluated in the system safeguards, 52 (94.5%) indicators achieved the performance target of 50%.  All 22 of the participation indicators (two subject areas x 11 student groups) achieved the participation target of 95%.  Of the 11 student groups, 9 (81.8%) achieved the graduation rate of 78% for the four-year rate, achieved 83% for the five-year rate, or demonstrated sufficient improvement to achieve the goal of 90%.  The state did not exceed the federal limit of 1% on STAAR Alternate or the 2% limit on STAAR Modified results.

Phase-in Level - Met Satisfactory SubjectPhase 1Phase 2 Final Reading Grade 350%65% 75% Grade 455%66% 77% Grade 557%67% 78% Grade 656%67% 77% Grade 754%66% 76% Grade 854%65% 75% Math Grade 359%72% 83% Grade 460%73% 81% Grade 554%66% 78% Grade 642%58% 71% Grade 743%56% 67% Grade 839%52% 63% Science Grade 559%70% 80% Grade 852%63% 72% Social Studies Grade 850%62% 73% Writing Grade 452%61% 68% Grade 756%64% 72%

Phase-in Level - Met Satisfactory SubjectPhase 1Phase 2 Final Reading English I Reading 54%61%66% English II Reading 54%59%63% English I Writing 63%68%71% English II Writing 68%73%76% Math Algebra I37%50%63% Science Biology 37%48% 61% Social Studies U.S. History 41%53%65%

Pressing Issues!! Ensuring students who are Level III stay Level III Ensuring students who are approaching Level III get there. Identifying students who did not meet the growth target last year and ensuring they are receiving immediate intervention.