PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Readiness of Forward Muon Arms for W Detection Itaru Nakagawa For the PHENIX Muon Trigger Upgrade Collaboration 1.
Advertisements

J/  measurement with the PHENIX muon arms in d-Au interactions at √ s NN = 200 GeV David Silvermyr, LANL APS April Meeting Philadelphia, April 5-8, 2003.
Commissioning the PHENIX RPC Forward Trigger Upgrade Michael Daugherity Abilene Christian University for the PHENIX Collaboration.
Ultra Peripheral Collisions at RHIC Coherent Coupling Coherent Coupling to both nuclei: photon~Z 2, Pomeron~A 4/3 Small transverse momentum p t ~ 2h 
Heavy flavor production in sqrt(s NN )=200 GeV d+Au Collisions at PHENIX DNP 2013 Matthew Wysocki, Oak Ridge National Lab Newport News, Virginia, Oct 25,
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
Muon Tracker Overview The PHENIX Muon Arms detect vector mesons decaying into muon pairs, allow the study of the Drell-Yan process, and provide muon detection.
South Arm FEE Performance Prior to Au run, all FEMs installed and working. Currently, 157 of 168 FEMs read out useful data. = 93.5% operational FEM losses:
STAR Collaboration Meeting, Nantes, July2002 SVT Analysis/Status Update Jun Takahashi – University of Sao Paulo.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Tracking System in Run-2 Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab (for the PHENIX Collaboration) –Detector Commissioning –Detector.
APS Meeting April 5-8, 2003 at Philadelphia Chunhui Luo 1 Chunhui Luo Inclusive J/ψ Production at DØ.
W trigger upgrade simulation Kazuya Aoki Kyoto Univ. Muon Physics and Forward Upgrades Workshop Santa Fe, June 2004.
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
MuTr HV Optimization RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
PHENIX Status, 2/22/11 VTX commissioning on beam Local polarimeter in service 9.6% in blue, -16.6% Residual transverse component for longitudinal beam.
The Progress of PHENIX RPC Production in China Shouyang HU Xiaomei LI Shouyang HU Xiaomei LI Science and Technology on Nuclear Data Laboratory China Institute.
Jornadas LIP 2008 – Pedro Ramalhete. 17 m hadron absorber vertex region 8 MWPCs 4 trigger hodoscopes toroidal magnet dipole magnet hadron absorber targets.
Andrew Glenn 4/21/02 Commissioning and Performance of the. Muon Identifier Andrew Glenn (University of Tennessee), for the PHENIX collaboration April APS.
Run11 MuTrig-FEE Summary RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 1.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger 1.
Javier CastilloLHC Alignment Workshop - CERN - 05/09/ Alignment of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer Javier Castillo CEA/Saclay.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
NanoPHYS’12 – December 17-19, 2012 K. Nakano, S. Miyasaka, K. Nagai and S. Obata (Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology) Drift Chambers.
PHENIX Local Polarimeter PSTP 2007 at BNL September 11, 2007 Yuji Goto (RIKEN/RBRC)
QGP France sept 2010Sanjoy Pal Performances of the tracking Chambers of the ALICE MUON Spectrometer 1.
Takao Sakaguchi, BNL Run-11 PHENIX Run Coordinator PHENIX Run-11 Report Sakaguchi, RHIC retreat 1 RHIC retreat version.
The PHENIX Forward Silicon Vertex Tracker Eric J. Mannel IEEE NSS/MIC October 29, 2013.
Introduction to High Momentum Trigger in PHENIX Muon Arms RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa 中川格 1.
PHENIX Run8 Summary d+Au was fantastic! - x30 over Run3 baseline for future A+A new level of precision on intrinsic Cold Nuclear Matter physics now p+p.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
PHENIX Measurement of Parity-Violating Single Spin Asymmetry in W Production in p+p Collisions at 500 GeV Stephen Pate (for the PHENIX Collaboration) New.
Performance of the PHENIX Muon Identifier Introduction Calibration with cosmic rays Performance in Au+Au collisions Summary Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
Muon Tracker Responsibilities This Year South arm commissioning through this year’s run Analysis Software oversight and development North Arm station 2.
Diffractive W/Z Bosons Andrew Brandt UTA Run I Diffractive W/Z Boson Production Recap Run II Preliminary Search for Diffractive Z Bosons (Courtesy of Tamsin.
Muon detection in NA60  Experiment setup and operation principle  Coping with background R.Shahoyan, IST (Lisbon)
1/27/2016 R.Seidl: status of simulation1 W muon analysis in PHENIX Status of the background understanding, signal, smearing and asymmetries R.Seidl (RBRC)
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
10/2/2002MJL - MuTr DC Report Muon Tracking Status South North.
The Detector Performance Study for the Barrel Section of the ATLAS Semiconductor Tracker (SCT) with Cosmic Rays Yoshikazu Nagai (Univ. of Tsukuba) For.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
Performance of PHENIX High Momentum Muon Trigger.
P+p J/  results from PHENIX Run-2 Hiroki Sato, Kyoto University for the PHENIX collaboration RBRC Workshop “ Current and Future Directions at RHIC ” BNL,
PHENIX results on J/  production in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at  S NN =200 GeV Hugo Pereira Da Costa CEA Saclay, for the PHENIX collaboration Quark.
Performance and Early Results from the Muon Tracking System of Rusty Towell of Abilene Christian University for the PHENIX collaboration First Joint Meeting.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with the PHENIX experiment at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - State University of New York at Stony Brook for the PHENIX.
Overview of PHENIX Muon Tracker Data Analysis PHENIX Muon Tracker Muon Tracker Software Muon Tracker Database Muon Event Display Performance Muon Reconstruction.
Station-4 MuID System: Status Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab 1/7/091E906 Collaboration Meeting.
P.F.Ermolov SVD-2 status and experimental program VHMP 16 April 2005 SVD-2 status and experimental program 1.SVD history 2.SVD-2 setup 3.Experiment characteristics.
Reduction of Background in Observation of W Decay Using the Forward Vertex (FVTX) detector at PHENIX Abraham Meles New Mexico State University APS April.
Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.
Muon Arm Physics Program Past, Present + Future Patrick L. McGaughey Los Alamos National Laboratory Santa Fe June 17, 2003.
Jamaica 11 Jan.8, 2009 Muon Trigger Upgrade at PHENIX RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa RIKEN/RBRC Itaru Nakagawa.
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
Study of polarized sea quark distributions in polarized pp collisions at sqrt(s)=500GeV with PHENIX Oct. 10, 2008 Tsutomu Mibe (KEK) for the PHENIX collaboration.
The CDF Upgrade - Incandela -CERN - January 26, 2001 slide 1 96 wire planes –(8 superlayers) –50% are 3 o stereo –Uniform drift (0.88 cm cell) –30,240.
PHENIX J/  Measurements at  s = 200A GeV Wei Xie UC. RiverSide For PHENIX Collaboration.
RPC production and performance Chong Kim Korea university RHIC spin workshop, Seoul National Univ.
08-Sep-00PHENIX Upgrades PHENIX has a phased strategy to q Complete the current detector q Enhance its capabilities q Extend its physics reach.
Quark Matter 2002, July 18-24, Nantes, France Dimuon Production from Au-Au Collisions at Ming Xiong Liu Los Alamos National Laboratory (for the PHENIX.
Fall DNP Meeting,  meson production in Au-Au and d-Au collision at \ /s NN = 200 GeV Dipali Pal Vanderbilt University (for the PHENIX collaboration)
First data from TOTEM experiment at LHC
The LHC collider in Geneva
STAR Detector Event selection and triggers Corrections to data
Presentation transcript:

PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002 Nantes, France July 2002

PHENIX MUON ARMS South muon identifier (MuID) 5 gaps per arm filled with planes of transversely oriented Iarocci tubes South muon tracker (MuTR) 3 octagonal stations of cathode strip chambers per arm North muon arm being commissioned this summer

MUON IDENTIFIER Small panel Large panel The South Muon Identifier

MUON TRACKER Installing a station 2 octant into the south magnet Winding anode wires for a station 3 octant Station 3 octants already installed Station 2 octant under construction

Cathode strips 1 cm pitch Gap 3, ° STRUCTURE OF A STATION momentum kick Internal alignment <25 microns Gap 2, +6.0° Gap 1, ° Anode wire direction Cathode plane Anode plane Cross Section of Station 1 98 mm 6 cathode planes

NOISE PERFORMANCE Station 1  = ADC Station 2  = ADC Station 3  = ADC Noise goal = 2 ADC counts (indicated by ) The average noise per channel is already at this level. Further improvement anticipated for next year. Cathode strip charge for MIP peak ~200 ADC counts preamp 64 cell AMU ADC cathode

TRACKER CHAMBER ALIGNMENT Optical alignment system has 7 sets of straightness monitors per octant. Can correct for changes in alignment due to temperature or magnetic field. Straight tracks from p+p field off data are used to accurately align chambers. Projection errors at station 3 (for a typical half-octant) for p+p field-off data. Precisely centered at zero. Note projection error includes extrapolation over ~2 m and does not directly indicate intrinsic chamber resolution. (See next page.)

Performance of Production Chambers Composite chamber plus projection error of 131 microns is consistent with 100 micron specification for this production chamber octant. Residuals for track stub projections within station 1 after installation using p+p field-off data are better than 100 microns. Resolution goal: 100 microns work in progress! cm work in progress 100  m Station 1 Track Stub Residuals cm Station 2 Octant Test Resolution

CHANNEL-BY-CHANNEL EFFICIENCIES Identifier road projecting to struck strips in tracker for cosmic ray event interation point small muon identifier panels strips in stations 3, 2, 1. Cosmic ray tracks are used to measure the efficiency of each pair of muon identifier tubes. The distribution is broadened due to insufficient statistics.

ACTIVE MUON TRACKER CHANNELS Visualization of active regions of three tracking stations. Dead regions are due to problems with HV and front end modules during run. Majority of problems corrected for next run. Station 3 Station 1 Station 2 Interaction point

COLLISIONS! Muon Tracker Multiplicity vs. Beam-Beam counter total charge (a measure of multiplicity) Au+Au data Tracker occupancy increases with multiplicity as expected. PHENIX sampled 24  b -1 of Au+Au data and 150 nb -1 of p+p data in Run 2 (2001-2).

DIMUON CANDIDATE Interaction point 3 stations of muon tracker 2 muon candidates penetrate muon identifier panels Dimuon candidate from p+p collision (rotated for clarity with beam line running vertically)

OCCUPANCY Hits/event Muon Identifier gap Occupancy as a function of depth in identifier Occupancy observed in muon identifier for data agrees closely with expectations from simulation gap-by-gap. Occupancy generally decreases with depth in the identifier. The small increase for last gap is due to secondaries striking material in the square hole and is consistent with expectations from simulation.

MUON IDENTIFIER LEVEL-1 TRIGGER l NIM Logic LVL-1 Trigger used during  LVL-1 rejection is not required for Au+Au until RHIC significantly exceeds design luminosity.  LVL-1 rejection is required for lighter species, notably p+p  Used for stand-alone cosmic ray (diagnostic) trigger  4 gaps in trigger, each with 2 orientations. Trigger required hits in 6 out of 8 gap/orientations per quadrant. Use gaps 0,2,3,4. One MLU per quadrant.

MUON LEVEL-2 TRIGGER l Available LVL-2 requirements:  minimum polar angle of muon(s) (12° or 15°)  opening angle between two muons  centrality of event (measured by PHENIX)  For Run 3: match to station 3 of the muon tracker  For Run 3: require minimum invariant mass of dimuon pair! l Efficient for muons from the vertex, good rejection of hadrons Measured rejection factors

TRIGGER RATE (Hz) collimate beam mis-steer collimator out TIME dump yellow blue target in yellow target in collimate blue BACKGROUND STUDIES After  * = 1 m achieved, significant non-collision background observed. Studied problem with help from RHIC during p+p running by mis-steering beam and seeing panel currents remain high. Rates very sensitive to beam scrape. Collimation helps tremendously. RHIC expects to further investigate and improve this situation.

OUTLOOK l The south muon arm performed well during its first (2001-2) run and is producing physics results. l See related posters by D.-J. Kim, J. Newby, M. Liu, and H. Sato. l For more information see l The north muon arm will be commissioned this summer and fall.