1 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Frank Padula.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Atmospheric Correction Algorithm for the GOCI Jae Hyun Ahn* Joo-Hyung Ryu* Young Jae Park* Yu-Hwan Ahn* Im Sang Oh** Korea Ocean Research & Development.
Advertisements

Evaluating Calibration of MODIS Thermal Emissive Bands Using Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer Measurements Yonghong Li a, Aisheng Wu a, Xiaoxiong.
Radiometric Corrections
Resolution.
Class 8: Radiometric Corrections
Radiometric and Geometric Errors
Atmospheric effect in the solar spectrum
NRL09/21/2004_Davis.1 GOES-R HES-CW Atmospheric Correction Curtiss O. Davis Code 7203 Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC 20375
Meteorological satellites – National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)-Polar Orbiting Environmental Satellite (POES) Orbital characteristics.
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
Hyperspectral Satellite Imaging Planning a Mission Victor Gardner University of Maryland 2007 AIAA Region 1 Mid-Atlantic Student Conference National Institute.
Aerial photography and satellite imagery as data input GEOG 4103, Feb 20th Adina Racoviteanu.
Rachel Klima (on behalf of the MASCS team) JHU/APL MASCS/VIRS Data Users’ Workshop LPSC 2014, The Woodlands, TX March 17,2014 MASCS Instrument & VIRS Calibration.
Spectral contrast enhancement
The Next Three Weeks In this sequence we will cover end-to-end data collection and analysis for a practical application. The overall objective is to develop.
Quick Review of Remote Sensing Basic Theory Paolo Antonelli CIMSS University of Wisconsin-Madison Benevento, June 2007.
Satellite Imagery and Remote Sensing NC Climate Fellows June 2012 DeeDee Whitaker SW Guilford High Earth/Environmental Science & Chemistry.
Image Restoration and Atmospheric Correction Lecture 3 Prepared by R. Lathrop 10/99 Revised 2/04.
The use of MOD09 product and in situ data in a reservoir Valério, A.M.; Kampel, M.; Stech, J.L. alineval, milton, stech COSPAR Training.
EARLINET and Satellites: Partners for Aerosol Observations Matthias Wiegner Universität München Meteorologisches Institut (Satellites: spaceborne passive.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Multispectral Remote Sensing of Benthic Environments Christopher Moses, Ph.D. Jacobs Technology.
ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION – HYPERSPECTRAL DATA Course: Special Topics in Remote Sensing & GIS Mirza Muhammad Waqar Contact:
Resolution Resolution. Landsat ETM+ image Learning Objectives Be able to name and define the four types of data resolution. Be able to calculate the.
刘瑶.  Introduction  Method  Experiment results  Summary & future work.
Remote Sensing. Vulnerability is the degree to which a system is susceptible to, or unable to cope with, adverse effects of climate change, including.
Electromagnetic Radiation Most remotely sensed data is derived from Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR). This includes: Visible light Infrared light (heat)
Satellite-derived Sea Surface Temperatures Corey Farley Remote Sensing May 8, 2002.
SATELLITE METEOROLOGY BASICS satellite orbits EM spectrum
Radiometric Correction and Image Enhancement Modifying digital numbers.
Clear sky Net Surface Radiative Fluxes over Rugged Terrain from Satellite Measurements Tianxing Wang Guangjian Yan
NOAA/NESDIS Cooperative Research Program Second Annual Science Symposium SATELLITE CALIBRATION & VALIDATION July Barry Gross (CCNY) Brian Cairns.
Satellite Imagery and Remote Sensing DeeDee Whitaker SW Guilford High EES & Chemistry
Remote Sensing of Evapotranspiration with MODIS
Chapter 8 Remote Sensing & GIS Integration. Basics EM spectrum: fig p. 268 reflected emitted detection film sensor atmospheric attenuation.
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
On the Use of Geostationary Satellites for Remote Sensing in the High Latitudes Yinghui Liu 1, Jeffrey R. Key 2, Xuanji Wang 1, Tim Schmit 2, and Jun Li.
Optical properties Satellite observation ? T,H 2 O… From dust microphysical properties to dust hyperspectral infrared remote sensing Clémence Pierangelo.
The Second TEMPO Science Team Meeting Physical Basis of the Near-UV Aerosol Algorithm Omar Torres NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Atmospheric Chemistry.
14 ARM Science Team Meeting, Albuquerque, NM, March 21-26, 2004 Canada Centre for Remote Sensing - Centre canadien de télédétection Geomatics Canada Natural.
A processing package for atmospheric correction of compact airborne spectrographic imager (casi) imagery over water including a novel sunglint correction.
A Method for Correcting for Telescope Spectral Transmission in the Geosynchronous Imaging Fourier Transform Spectrometer (GIFTS) John D. Elwell, Deron.
Radiative transfer in the thermal infrared and the surface source term
Objectives The Li-Sparse reciprocal kernel is based on the geometric optical modeling approach developed by Li and Strahler, in which the angular reflectance.
Satellites Storm “Since the early 1960s, virtually all areas of the atmospheric sciences have been revolutionized by the development and application of.
November 28, 2006 Derivation and Evaluation of Multi- Sensor SST Error Characteristics Gary Wick 1 and Sandra Castro 2 1 NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory.
Interactions of EMR with the Earth’s Surface
MODIS, AIRS, and Midlevel Cloud Phase Shaima Nasiri CIMSS/SSEC, UW-Madison Brian Kahn Jet Propulsion Laboratory MURI Hyperspectral Workshop 7-9 June, 2005.
Remote sensing of land surface temperature Lecture 8.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Dome C, MODIS/AVHRR TOA reflectance time series for (a) band 1, (b) band 2, (c)
Electro-optical systems Sensor Resolution
Radiance Simulation System for OSSE  Objectives  To evaluate the impact of observing system data under the context of numerical weather analysis and.
Satellite Imagery and Remote Sensing DeeDee Whitaker SW Guilford High EES & Chemistry
Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory thermal infrared data 1 Processing of TIMS data to emissivity spectra TIMS bands for this analysis 8.407,
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC.
Passive Microwave Remote Sensing
Electromagnetic Radiation
Remote sensing of snow in visible and near-infrared wavelengths
Temporal Classification and Change Detection
Retrieval of Land Surface Temperature from Remote Sensing Thermal Images Dr. Khalil Valizadeh Kamran University of Tabriz, Iran.
Radiometric Preprocessing: Atmospheric Correction
Seung-Hee Ham and B.J. Sohn Seoul National University, Korea
DATA PROCESSING & ANALYSIS
In the past thirty five years NOAA, with help from NASA, has established a remote sensing capability on polar and geostationary platforms that has proven.
Verifying the DCC methodology calibration transfer
Requirements Consolidation of the Near-Infrared Channel of the GMES-Sentinel-5 UVNS Instrument: FP, 25 April 2014, ESTEC Height-resolved aerosol R.Siddans.
Global Perspective, Local Commitment
Instrument Considerations
In the past thirty five years NOAA, with help from NASA, has established a remote sensing capability on polar and geostationary platforms that has proven.
Introduction and Basic Concepts
Satellite Wind Vectors from GOES Sounder Moisture Fields
Presentation transcript:

1 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Frank Padula

2 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory frankPadula update 1/2 Buoy DataBuoy Data »Yearly info on: » data availability » deployed instruments & sensor specs -temperature ± 1.0 C -wind Speed ± 1.0 m/s - 8min avg. // not an hourly avg. » sensor heights -Conversation with Rex Harvey from NDBC regarding sensor depth T water sensor depth T water -advised to use 0.6 m as sensor depth -Temp specs  situation dependent -Buoy itself, radiation reaching the sensor -who’s the manufacturer -buoy changes as a fcn of time

3 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory frankPadula update 2/2 ModtranModtran »Inputs  Dew points » prior to 1994 Td were only sampled to ~ 9km » Where T were sampled to ~ km » either case one has to use a modeled profile to fill in the void »What model? » Modtran - Mid Latitude Summer/Winter, 1976 Std. Atm., etc. » but what do these profiles look like, esp. compared to the real data data » Std. Modtran atm’s we currently have uses the moisture parameter RH. parameter RH. » Convert RH to Td RH = w/w s ≈ e/e s RH = w/w s ≈ e/e s

4 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory frankPadula 3/3

5 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Jake Ward

6 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Shape from Shading Introduction Azimuth/Elevation have tremendous impact on brightness temperature (i.e. largest sources of error) Want to lock down these two variables before optimizing other thermodynamic parameters, if possible (DEMs not good enough, but multi-temporal imaging helps!) Shape from Shading—Understanding how the shape of a 3D object may be recovered from shading in 2D image Most methods assume stereo or some sort of spatial difference imaging to create 3D model Need multi-temporal thermal IR imaging method –Trona WASP TIR resolution not good enough to rely on shadow geometry  new approach is needed!

7 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory 180° 0° 90° 270° TC=0.5 HC=0.5 SGP=0 T=4.0 EA=1.0 SA=0.88 TE= °= 11.2°, 12.3°, 21.2° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° 45°= 11.2°, 26.3°, 21.2° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° 45°= 11.2°, 29.5°, 28.1° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° 45°= 11.2°, 15.2°, 33.9° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° Therm Gives Us… We care more about pixels with larger surface normal deviation (elevation) angles Getting azimuth incorrect on flat pixels is not so bad

8 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory 180° 0° 90° 270° 45°= 11.2°, 12.3°, 21.2° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° 45°= 11.2°, 26.3°, 21.2° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° 45°= 11.2°, 29.5°, 28.1° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° 45°= 11.2°, 15.2°, 33.9° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° Azimuth/Elevation 11 AM Temp < 20.2° 11 AM Temp > 20.2°

9 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory 180° 0° 90° 270° 45°= 11.2°, 12.3°, 21.2° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° 45°= 11.2°, 26.3°, 21.2° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° 45°= 11.2°, 29.5°, 28.1° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° 45°= 11.2°, 15.2°, 33.9° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° Azimuth/Elevation 5 PM Temp ↓ 5 PM Temp ↑ 5 PM Temp ↑ 5 PM Temp ↓

10 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory 180° 0° 90° 270° 45°= 11.2°, 29.5°, 28.1° 35°= XX°, 28.4°, XX° 25°= XX°, 27.4°, XX° 15°= XX°, 26.3°, XX° 5°= XX°, 24.9°, XX° 0°= 11.0°, 24.2°, 24.8° Azimuth/Elevation Choose most ‘meaningful’ time per quadrant to base threshold 90°/270° – 5 PM 0°/180°– 11 AM

Broadband Phase Diversity Brian Daniel August 8, 2007 Update

12 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory What I’ve been up to Now that I understand the theory of chromatic incoherent imaging, I’m writing it down. Proposal currently at 30 (good) pages –Was at 20 (crappy) pages Studying Broadband Phase Diversity

13 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Broadband definitions and assumptions

14 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Broadband phase diversity

15 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Broadband phase diversity Where:

16 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Reflections Whole thing is based on Gray-world assumption Broadband PD infeasible without Gray-world assumption Broadband PSF is not too hard –Wavelength sampling still a possible issue Finding appropriate gradient constant might be a little tricky Optimization seems as complex as monochromatic case –Good, because I haven’t figured that out yet

Marvin Boonmee Land surface temperature and emissivity retrieval from thermal infrared hyperspectral imagery

18 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

19 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

20 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Black Tarp

21 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Gray Tarp

22 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Therm target

23 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

24 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

25 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

26 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

27 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

28 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

29 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

30 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

31 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

32 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

33 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

34 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory

LDCM Aaron Gerace

36 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory First attempt at atmosphere Idea is to find dark pixel in the scene and compare to Modtran-derived upwelled radiances to determine atmosphere

37 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory First attempt at atmosphere Use just NIR to determine atmosphere

Landsat Calibration Cliff Anderson

39 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory MODIS Imagery Good bandBad Band?

40 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory MODIS Imagery Other issues –Overlap btwn two scenes Will use continuous ones, not separate passes –How to process? Take averages of the calibration region for each band –Match MODIS bands to L5 and L7 spectral response curves Repeated pixels

41 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory MODIS Solar ZenithSolar Azimuth Sensor Zenith Sensor Azimuth

42 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Ward BRDF

43 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Jason Hamel

44 Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory Video clip of spectral space