Understanding lack of validity: Bias

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bias Lecture notes Sam Bracebridge.
Advertisements

Bias Update: S. Bracebridge Sources: T. Grein, M. Valenciano, A. Bosman EPIET Introductory Course, 2011 Lazareto, Menorca, Spain.
Assessing Validity of Association
Principles of Epidemiology Lecture 10 Dona Schneider, PhD, MPH, FACE
SLIDE 1 Confounding and Bias Aya Goto Nguyen Quang Vinh.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
1 Case-Control Study Design Two groups are selected, one of people with the disease (cases), and the other of people with the same general characteristics.
Bias, Confounding and the Role of Chance
Bias in Clinical Research: Measurement Bias
BIAS AND CONFOUNDING Nigel Paneth. HYPOTHESIS FORMULATION AND ERRORS IN RESEARCH All analytic studies must begin with a clearly formulated hypothesis.
Chance, bias and confounding
Mother and Child Health: Research Methods
Bias Thanks to T. Grein.
Rita Popat, PhD Clinical Assistant Professor Division of Epidemiology Stanford University School of Medicine August 7, 2007 Rapid appraisal of the literature:
BIAS. ExplanationAssessment Strategy Random variabilityEstimation of precision (95% confidence interval), and testing (p) ConfoundingExperimental design;
SOME ADDITIONAL POINTS ON MEASUREMENT ERROR IN EPIDEMIOLOGY Sholom May 28, 2011 Supplement to Prof. Carroll’s talk II.
Intermediate methods in observational epidemiology 2008 Instructor: Moyses Szklo Bias.
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Bias and errors in epidemiologic studies Manish Chaudhary BPH( IOM) MPH(BPKIHS)
Cohort Studies Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH Professor of Medicine Associate Chief of Staff, Research Minneapolis VA Medical Center.
Validity and Reliability Dr. Voranuch Wangsuphachart Dept. of Social & Environmental Medicine Faculty of Tropical Medicine Mahodil University 420/6 Rajvithi.
 Be familiar with the types of research study designs  Be aware of the advantages, disadvantages, and uses of the various research design types  Recognize.
Lecture 8 Objective 20. Describe the elements of design of observational studies: case reports/series.
Research Techniques Made Simple: Databases for Clinical Research Katrina Abuabara, MD MA David Margolis, MD PhD University of Pennsylvania.
Evidence-Based Medicine 4 More Knowledge and Skills for Critical Reading Karen E. Schetzina, MD, MPH.
Study Design. Study Designs Descriptive Studies Record events, observations or activities,documentaries No comparison group or intervention Describe.
Epidemiology The Basics Only… Adapted with permission from a class presentation developed by Dr. Charles Lynch – University of Iowa, Iowa City.
CHP400: Community Health Program- lI Research Methodology STUDY DESIGNS Observational / Analytical Studies Case Control Studies Present: Disease Past:
Design and Analysis of Clinical Study 8. Cross-sectional Study Dr. Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia.
دکتر خلیلی 1. Lucid the way to “ Research” And Follow an “ Evidence Based Medicine”
Study design P.Olliaro Nov04. Study designs: observational vs. experimental studies What happened?  Case-control study What’s happening?  Cross-sectional.
Observation Bias (Information Bias) Biased measure of association due to incorrect categorization. DiseasedNot Diseased Exposed Not Exposed The Correct.
Bias Defined as any systematic error in a study that results in an incorrect estimate of association between exposure and risk of disease. To err is human.
Section 1-4 Collecting Sample Data. DEFINITIONS Observational Study: observing and measuring specific characteristics without attempting to modify the.
Mother and Child Health: Research Methods G.J.Ebrahim Editor Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Oxford University Press.
Mother and Child Health: Research Methods G.J.Ebrahim Editor Journal of Tropical Pediatrics, Oxford University Press.
Landmark Trials: Recommendations for Interpretation and Presentation Julianna Burzynski, PharmD, BCOP, BCPS Heme/Onc Clinical Pharmacy Specialist 11/29/07.
Potential Errors In Epidemiologic Studies Bias Dr. Sherine Shawky III.
Case-control study Chihaya Koriyama August 17 (Lecture 1)
Design and Analysis of Clinical Study 2. Bias and Confounders Dr. Tuan V. Nguyen Garvan Institute of Medical Research Sydney, Australia.
A short introduction to epidemiology Chapter 10: Interpretation Neil Pearce Centre for Public Health Research Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Case Control Study Dr. Ashry Gad Mohamed MB, ChB, MPH, Dr.P.H. Prof. Of Epidemiology.
Causal relationships, bias, and research designs Professor Anthony DiGirolamo.
Unit 2 – Public Health Epidemiology Chapter 4 – Epidemiology: The Basic Science of Public Health.
Instructor Resource Chapter 11 Copyright © Scott B. Patten, Permission granted for classroom use with Epidemiology for Canadian Students: Principles,
System error Biases in epidemiological studies FETP India.
Overview of Study Designs. Study Designs Experimental Randomized Controlled Trial Group Randomized Trial Observational Descriptive Analytical Cross-sectional.
Case-Control Study Duanping Liao, MD, Ph.D
Ch 15 Bias, Confounding, and Interaction
Case-Control Studies Abdualziz BinSaeed. Case-Control Studies Type of analytic study Unit of observation and analysis: Individual (not group)
Design of Clinical Research Studies ASAP Session by: Robert McCarter, ScD Dir. Biostatistics and Informatics, CNMC
Instructor Resource Chapter 12 Copyright © Scott B. Patten, 2015.
مقدمه ‌ اي بر خطا. براي خطاي منظم و انواع سوگرايي تعريف ‌ هاي مناسب ارايه دهد. خطاي تصادفي، ‌ خطاي منظم، سوگرايي و مطالعه معتبر را با يكديگر مقايسه كند.
1 Causation in epidemiology, confounding and bias Imre Janszky Faculty of Medicine NTNU.
1 Study Design Imre Janszky Faculty of Medicine, ISM NTNU.
Purpose of Epi Studies Discover factors associated with diseases, physical conditions and behaviors Identify the causal factors Show the efficacy of intervening.
Collecting Sample Data Chapter 1 Section 4 Part 2.
Journal Club Curriculum-Study designs. Objectives  Distinguish between the main types of research designs  Randomized control trials  Cohort studies.
BIAS AND CONFOUNDING Nigel Paneth.
Present: Disease Past: Exposure
Epidemiological Methods
BIAS AND CONFOUNDING
Lecture 2: Bias Jeffrey E. Korte, PhD
Dr Seyyed Alireza Moravveji Community Medicine Specialist
ERRORS, CONFOUNDING, and INTERACTION
Evaluating the Role of Bias
Critical Appraisal วิจารณญาณ
The objective of this lecture is to know the role of random error (chance) in factor-outcome relation and the types of systematic errors (Bias)
Presentation transcript:

Understanding lack of validity: Bias

Objectives To define and discuss the concept of bias To define and discuss selection bias and information bias. To discuss exposure and outcome identification bias To discuss the results of information bias Combine selection/information bias: detection bias, incidence-prevalence bias, temporal bias

Bias - Definition Is defined as the result of a systematic error in the design or conduct of a study Results from: Flaws in the method of selection of study participants Procedures for gathering relevant exposure and/or disease information

Bias - definition Bias exists when, on the average, the results of an infinite number of studies differs from the true results Most biases related to study design and procedures can be classified into: Selection bias Information bias

Information bias A systematic tendency for individuals selected for inclusion in the study to be erroneously placed in different exposure/outcome categories (misclassification) Examples: recall bias – ability to recall past exposure is dependent on case-control status.

Selection bias Systematic error in the ascertainment of study subjects Berksonian bias – when this bias occurs in case-control studies of hospitalized patients.

Recall bias When recall of past exposure error differs between cases and controls Methods to prevent recall bias Review of other documentation (eg. pharmacy or hospital charts) Using proxy respondents (spouse, parent, etc) Using biological markers

Interviewer bias When the disease status is not masked and the interviewer differentially ascertains exposure status Methods to reduce this error: sub-study interviews, masking of case-control status, standardization in how you ask the question

Outcome identification bias May occur in both case-control and cohort Usually due to an imperfect definition of the outcome or errors in the data collection stage. Observer bias Respondent bias

Results of information bias Non-differential misclassificaton (systematic) Differential (non-systematic)

Effect of misclassification of a confounding variable Results in an imperfect adjustment due to residual confounding Can lead to spurious conclusions

The association of IV drug use with CD4 cell counts

Medical surveillance bias Can be selection or information bias This bias is most likely to occur when the exposure is a medical condition or therapy that leads to frequent/detailed checkups (eg:diabetes, OCP)

Cross-sectional bias Incidence-prevalence bias – results from the inclusion of prevalent cases into the study (important when duration of disease is differential) Temporal bias – don’t know which came first exposure or disease

Lead time bias The time by which a diagnosis can be advanced by screening Occurs when estimating survival time

Publication bias Assumption that published papers should be unbiased and represent an unbiased sample of the theoretical “population” of unbiased studies Papers with statistically significant results are more likely to be published