No Euphemisms Required: BIRN on the Leading Edge of Community Ontology Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BioPortal Status and Plans September 2011 Ray Fergerson NCBO Project Director Stanford University 1.
Advertisements

DELOS Highlights COSTANTINO THANOS ITALIAN NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL.
Presentation at WebEx Meeting June 15,  Context  Challenge  Anticipated Outcomes  Framework  Timeline & Guidance  Comment and Questions.
The National Center for Biomedical Ontology Online Knowledge Resources for the Industrial Age Mark A. Musen Stanford University
Species-Neutral vs. Multi-Species Ontologies Barry Smith.
Data Integration & Ontology Working Group(s) Report and Deliverables.
THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR BIOMEDICAL ONTOLOGY Ontology-based Tools to Enhance Data Curation Trish Whetzel, PhD Outreach Coordinator December 9, 2010.
What is an ontology and Why should you care? Barry Smith with thanks to Jane Lomax, Gene Ontology Consortium 1.
Room for Lunch: Arlington Room Room for Evening Reception: Grand Prairie Room.
How to Organize the World of Ontologies Barry Smith 1.
Slides prepared for BIRN ONTOLOGY WORKSHOP (slimmed down version) Stanford Feb Barry Smith.
1 Beyond California Water Plan Update 2005 California Water and Environmental Modeling Forum Annual Meeting, March 3 rd, 2005.
Limning the CTS Ontology Landscape Barry Smith 1.
BIRN Ontologies Ontology Task Force. Topics Building the BIRNLex Structure of BIRNLex BIRN anatomy Next steps.
The BIRNLex: Principles and practices of community ontology development Maryann Martone.
Ontological realism as a strategy for integrating ontologies Ontology Summit February 7, 2013 Barry Smith 1.
Software Quality Assurance in Neuroinformatics H Jeremy Bockholt NITRC Grantee Meeting.
Using the Open Metadata Registry (openMDR) to create Data Sharing Interfaces October 14 th, 2010 David Ervin & Rakesh Dhaval, Center for IT Innovations.
Creating a community-based knowledge management framework for integrating neuroscience data via ontologies. A. Gupta 1, C. Bean 2, W. Bug 3, *C. Fennema-Notestine.
Crux flexible, structured data reporting for funding agencies.
National Centers for Biomedical Computing Software and Data Integration Working Group Peter Lyster (Chair) NCBC Workshop Wednesday December 16 (2005)
Atlas Interoperablity I & II: progress to date, requirements gathering Session I: 8:30 – 10am Session II: 10:15 – 12pm.
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith May 27, 2015.
Linking Tasks, Data, and Architecture Doug Nebert AR-09-01A May 2010.
Alan Ruttenberg PONS R&D Task force Alan Ruttenberg Science Commons.
Neuroscience Information Framework Ontologies: Nerve cells in Neurolex and NIFSTD Maryann Martone University of California, San Diego.
Ontologies for Neuroscience and Neurology The Neuroscience Information Framework Fahim Imam, Stephen Larson, Georgio Ascoli, Gordon Shepherd, Anita Bandrowski,
Component Based SW Development and Domain Engineering 1 Component Based Software Development and Domain Engineering.
W HAT IS I NTEROPERABILITY ? ( AND HOW DO WE MEASURE IT ?) INSPIRE Conference 2011 Edinburgh, UK.
Bob Jones Technical Director CERN - August 2003 EGEE is proposed as a project to be funded by the European Union under contract IST
Standardization Challenges Neuroimaging datasets: FBIRN Human Imaging Database You say potato, I say potahto: Ontological engineering applied within the.
RDA Data Foundation and Terminology (DFT) WG: Overview  Prepared for Collab Chairs Meeting, NIST, Nov 13-14, 2014  Gary Berg-Cross, Raphael Ritz, Peter.
10/24/09CK The Open Ontology Repository Initiative: Requirements and Research Challenges Ken Baclawski Todd Schneider.
The Biomedical Informatics Research Network Carl Kesselman BIRN Principal Investigator Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering Information Sciences.
INCF Digital Atlasing Infrastructure: An Overview.
Data Integration Progress. BIRN Data Integration Framework 2. Create conceptual links to a shared ontology 1. Create multimodal databases 3. Situate the.
2 3 where in the body ? where in the cell ?
Master headline RDFizing the EBI Gene Expression Atlas James Malone, Electra Tapanari
University of California, San Diego Ontology-based annotation of multiscale imaging data: Utilizing and building the Neuroscience Information Framework.
Computational Tools for Population Biology Tanya Berger-Wolf, Computer Science, UIC; Daniel Rubenstein, Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton; Jared.
You say potato, I say potahto: Ontological engineering applied within the Biomedical Informatics Research Network J. A. Turner1, C. Fennema-Notestine2,
Need for common standard upper ontology
N IF S TD : A C OMPREHENSIVE O NTOLOGY FOR N EUROSCIENCE Fahim IMAM 1, Stephen LARSON 1, Sridevi POLAVARAM 2, Georgio ASCOLI 2, Gordon SHEPHERD 3, Jeffery.
The Neuroscience information framework A User’s Guide.
Introduction to Biomedical Ontology for Imaging Informatics Barry Smith, PhD, FACMI University at Buffalo May 11, 2015.
2007 Mouse All Hands Meeting BIRN Ontology Day Jeff Grethe & Bill Bug (BIRN OTF) - March 7th, 2007.
INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE Quality Assurance Gabriel Zaquine - JRA2 Activity Manager - CS SI EGEE Final EU Review
2005 AHM Mouse BIRN. Goals Review progress on mouse BIRN milestones Update priorities and milestones for SFN, next spring, and next fall 2006 Clarify.
REQUIREMENTS GATHERING Moderators: M Miller Goals: To allow participants to provide feedback to the developers (BIRN-CC and test bed applications) of what.
Atlas Interoperablity I & II: progress to date, requirements gathering Session I: 8:30 – 10am Session II: 10:15 – 12pm.
Ontologies for the Semantic Web Prepared By: Tseliso Molukanele Rapelang Rabana Supervisor: Associate Professor Sonia Burman 20 July 2005.
Mouse BIRN: Ontologies Maryann Martone and Bill Bug 2005 All Hands Meeting Mouse BIRN: Ontologies Maryann Martone and Bill Bug.
Function BIRN The ability to find a subject who may have participated in multiple experiments and had multiple assessments done is a critical component.
Contributions to mouse BIRN tools and resources Maryann Martone and Mark Ellisman University of California, San Diego 2008.
Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology Barry Smith May 27, 2015.
2005 All Hands Meeting Data & Data Integration Working Group Summary.
BIRNLex and Associated Tools Maryann Martone, Bill Bug, Jeff Grethe 2007.
Semantic Media Wiki Open Terminology Development - Initial Steps - Frank Hartel, Ph.D. Associate Director, Enterprise Vocabulary Services National Cancer.
All Hands Meeting 2005 BIRN-CC: Building, Maintaining and Maturing a National Information Infrastructure to Enable and Advance Biomedical Research.
International Workshop 28 Jan – 2 Feb 2011 Phoenix, AZ, USA Modeling Standards Activity Team Model-based Systems Engineering (MBSE) Initiative Roger Burkhart.
EDM Council / Object Management Group Semantic Standards Workstream Definitions and Detailed Objectives May 04, 2011.
Financial Industry Business Ontology (FIBO) Monthly Status/review call Wednesday November 2 nd 2011.
Agenda Federated Enterprise Architecture Vision
University of California, San Diego
TRSS Terminology Registry Scoping Study
Databases, Ontologies and Text mining Session Introduction Part 2
Summit 2017 Breakout Group 2: Data Management (DM)
Ontology of biomedical investigations (OBI)
An ecosystem of contributions
OBI – Standard Semantic
Presentation transcript:

No Euphemisms Required: BIRN on the Leading Edge of Community Ontology Development

The Ontology Task Force: Cross Test Beds  Carol Bean (co-chair), NIH-NCRR  Maryann Martone (co-chair), BIRN CC  Amarnath Gupta, BIRN CC  Bill Bug, Mouse BIRN  Christine Fennema-Notestine, Morph BIRN  Jessica Turner, FBIRN Jeff Grethe, BIRN CC Daniel Rubin, NCBO David Kennedy, Morph BIRN Provide a dynamic knowledge infrastructure to support integration and analysis of BIRN federated data sets, one which is conducive to accepting novel data from researchers to include in this analysis Identify and assess existing ontologies and terminologies for summarizing, comparing, merging, and mining datasets. Relevant subject domains include clinical assessments, assays, demographics, cognitive task descriptions, neuroanatomy, imaging parameters/data provenance in general, and derived (fMRI) data Identify the resources needed to achieve the ontological objectives of individual test-beds and of the BIRN overall. May include finding other funding sources, making connections with industry and other consortia facing similar issues, and planning a strategy to acquire the necessary resources

Goals from Last Year Develop policies and procedures for utilizing and constructing ontologies in BIRN Posted on OTF Wiki Hold workshop for BIRN participants on using and extending ontologies Jan 2006 March 2006 (NCBO) Develop curation procedures and policies Cross test bed integration Neuroanatomy Animal model - human disease

Ontology Task Force Workshops Workshop in January 2006: Annotating BIRN data –Evaluated current state of terminologies (Bonfire) and tools for annotation Carol Bean arranged for OTF to attend workshop in March 2006 –National Center for Biomedical Ontologies (NCBO), NCBC, Mark Musen, P. I. Suzanna Lewis, Barry Smith, Michael Ashburner, Mark Musen, Daniel Rubin –Educated us on efforts underway at NCBO and vice versa –Provided their view on ontology “best practices” and what were examples of good ontologies –Evaluated BIRN’s current efforts

BIRNLex Major accomplishment: Version 1.0 of BIRNLexBIRNLex Grew out of BIRN Ontology Workshops –Meant to cover all domains of interest to BIRN: imaging, neuroanatomy, experimental techniques, behavior –Presented at this year’s SFN meeting; version 1.0 to be released very soon –Draft version posted on the web (see OTF Wiki) –Current domain areas: neuroanatomy, taxonomy, behavioral paradigms, mouse strain nomenclature MIND ontology –Next step: transition the BIRNLex into a fully structured ontology –“Multiscale investigation of neurological disease”

BIRNLex - General Principles OTF has adopted and refined best practices for ontology development being promoted by NCBO/OBO Foundry re-use existing community ontologies covering BIRN require domains - e.g. OBI, CARO, BFO, GO Cellular Component, NCBI taxonomy novel domains - behavioral paradigms, imaging protocols, etc. - submit to OBO Foundry or contribute to relevant community effort (e.g., imaging experiments and processing going into OBI) for all BIRNLex entities - must have Aristotelian definitions (genera & differentia) OTF and other BIRN members are holding regular curation sessions (Jyl Boline, Brett Peterson) heavy use of curatorial metadata to support automated evaluation/analysis/maintenance of ontology - match practice in field Use OWL and other supporting technologies enabling us to leverage variety of mature and emerging tools to support ontology curation, ontology-centric annotation, and ontology-driven semantic querying

Core domain: Neuroanatomy Evaluated the use of neuroanatomical terms within and across Mouse BIRN and Morph BIRN –Christine Fennema-Notestine, Maryann Martone, Jyl Boline, Allan MacKenzie-Graham Imported entities from Neuronames into BIRNLex (Bill) –Providing clear definitions for each anatomical entity –Defining a core neuroanatomy for BIRN that will cross test beds Will discuss findings and strategies at Wednesday’s session

BIRN is a valuable testbed Thanks largely to the efforts of Bill Bug, BIRN is now represented in many of the terminology and ontology efforts currently underway: –OBI –PATO (will be attending workshop in December) –Disease Ontology (meeting in November) –NIF –The Neurocommons Project (outgrowth of Science commons and W3C Semantic Web activity) We have assembled use cases for all of these groups; posted on OTF Wiki BIRN has already gone further than most groups in defining the ways in which these ontologies need to grow and adapt Complex domain (studies of CNS disease) providing attractive exemplar for community biomed. ontology projects

Community Biomedical Ontology Development (NCBO) BIRN Contributions BIRNLex is the best example of these emerging community best practices put into effect on a broad, complex domain - neuroscience at multiple time, spatial, and conceptual domains - in the critically important context of translational research still a lot more software development to be done making important progress in novel ontological domains - organism tax., neuroanatomy, microscopy & imaging methods, behavioral paradigms, etc. - remember - a terminology IS NOT an ontology providing a means by which other extremely valuable neuroinformatic knowledge resources can integrate more completely into the community of formal semantic biomed. frameworks - e.g., Brainmap.org, BAMS, NeuroNames, RadLex, etc.

BIRN is a valuable partner BrainMap –Close collaboration with Peter Fox’s group –Defining behavioral paradigms Jessica Turner, Angie Laird UK NeuroGrid and PsyGrid projects –Contacted OTF –Want to partner with BIRN on ontology development

Presenting BIRNLex Imaging Ontology workshop, March 2006 Society for Neurosciences meeting –Two posters on BIRNLex and Data Integration –Manuscripts are in preparation PATO workshop AMIA UK e-science Neuro/Psy Grid meeting

Resources for Ontology Work NIF: Neuroinformatics Framework –Maryann,Jeff, Amarnath, Bill Collaborating RO1 with NCBO to develop tools for annotation of multiscale imaging data and drive development of disease- model mapping (BIRN CC)

Summary of Activities of OTF (and friends) Developed BIRNLex –BIRN has gone farther than most of the neuroscience community in embracing standards for ontology construction utilized by other communities in the Life Sciences –Mouse BIRN is already using BIRNLex We have developed a set of ontology “best practices” and procedures for community ontology development –Next steps: tools for community contribution and utilization of BIRNLex Sessions on Wednesday will introduce the BIRNLex and provide overview of efforts on cross-test bed neuroanatomy