Marbury v. Madison 1803 Established judicial review (based upon Article III in Constitution and Judiciary Act of 1789) Executive branch employees cannot.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supreme Court Cases You Need to Know
Advertisements

Landmark Supreme Court Cases Marbury v Madison Description (Key Question) –Who has the power to decide what is Constitutional? Decision –Established.
Supreme Court Case Review. Marbury v Madison What was an influence this case had on the power of the Federal Government?
Supreme Court Decisions
 1803  DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional.
Important Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803)  John Marshall used the case to establish Judicial Review which allows the court to declare.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 12 Civics – Mr. Blough.
Unit 4 Citizenship Individuals can demonstrate national identity by fulfilling duties and responsibilities.
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES
8 Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Jeopardy!!! 1st Amendment At School Equal Protection Rights of the Accused Potpourri \
The Rights of Individuals Analyze court cases that demonstrate how the U.S. constitution and the bill of rights protect the rights of individuals.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison, 1803 Midnight Appointments – Court Appointments by John Adams Established the power of Judicial Review.
Jeopardy The Bill of Rights Landmark Cases First Amendment Random Name That Case Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500.
Court Cases dealing with Individual Rights (Bill of Rights) J. Worley Civics.
2.05 Starter Why were the Civil War amendments so important? Explain the 14 th amendment in your own words. Which amendment was repealed (done away with)?
Issue: Equality Issue: Civil Liberties Issue: Rights of the Accused Issue: The Judicial Branch
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) A United States Supreme Court case in which the Court formed the basis for the exercise of judicial.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: Mr. Blough Academic Civics.
Important Supreme Court Decisions. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Established the Supreme Court’s right of judicial review (the right to determine the constitutionality.
SUPREME COURT CASES CASES EVERY POLITICAL SCIENCE STUDENT NEEDS TO KNOW.
U.S. Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison 1803 Established judicial review— allowing for the court to rule on whether or not a law is allowed by the.
 1803  DECISION  Established the concept of Judicial Review: the Supreme court has the final authority to find acts of government unconstitutional.
SUPREME COURT CASES. Marbury v Madison This case establishes the Supreme Court's power of judicial review. Constitutional basis: supremacy clause What.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Question – Does the Supreme Court have the authority to declare laws passed by Congress unconstitutional?
Landmark Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison  1803  Article III – Judicial Powers  Establishment of Judicial Review – the power of the Supreme.
Key Supreme Court Cases. Cases on Federalism Marbury v. Madison (1803): judicial review, strong S.C. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819): court has implied powers,
Important Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v. Madison Does the Judiciary Act of 1789 allow Marbury to take his case directly to the Supreme Court? Does the.
Look over all the cases in the powerpoint and select only one of the cases. Open the Supreme Court Cases Reading file on Edmodo and read about the case.
The Supreme Court! Supreme Court ► ► Highest court in the land ► Final interpretation of Constitution ► Judges appointed by _________ with ________ approval!
SUPREME COURT CASES Other Cases Civil Rights (1) Student Rights Civil Rights (2) th, 5 th, 6 th Amendments Federal Government.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases: American History. Marbury v. Madison Essentials: Essentials: Established JUDICIAL REVIEW Established JUDICIAL REVIEW 1803.
Supreme Court Cases. Marbury vs Madison Established Judicial review-which says the Supreme Court decided what’s constitutional or not It gave them Judicial.
Bell Ringer!!! You have 10 minutes to complete any questions and summary portions of yesterday’s Cornell Notes. You have 10 minutes to complete any questions.
4.04: Creation and Defense of Individual Rights Supreme Court Cases.
Supreme Court ► ► Highest court in the land ► Final interpretation of Constitution ► Judges appointed by _________ with ________ approval! ► “Equal Justice.
Objective: To examine the importance of the Supreme Court case of Brown v. Board of Education.
Supreme Court Cases. Marbury v Madison Issue: Should the Constitution be very strictly interpreted or is there room for interpretation? If there.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Landmark Supreme Court Decisions
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
Supreme Court Cases You Need to Know
The Judicial Branch of Government
The Warren Court 1953 – 1969 Chief Justice Earl Warren
Landmark Supreme court cases
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
Landmark Supreme Court cases
AP Gov Review: Unit #6 in 10 minutes
3.12 landmark supreme court cases
Supreme Court Cases.
Important Supreme Court Cases
Liberalism vs. Conservatism
Gov Review Video #50: Important Supreme Court Cases To Know
Landmark Supreme Court Cases:
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES:
Supreme Court Cases.
Landmark Supreme Court Cases
LANDMARK SUPREME COURT CASES
10 Court Cases in American History
GOVERNMENT UNIT 5 REVIEW.
Top 15 Supreme Court Cases
Review! Review! Review! What is federalism?
Historic Supreme Court Cases
Landmark Supreme court cases
Key Supreme Court Cases
Constitutional Rights: Protections and Limitations
Presentation transcript:

Marbury v. Madison 1803 Established judicial review (based upon Article III in Constitution and Judiciary Act of 1789) Executive branch employees cannot go against congressional acts

Chief Justice John Marshall William Marbury

Plessy v. Ferguson 1896 SC upheld a 1890 Louisiana law which provided for separate railroad cars for blacks and whites. Plessy was the one who was discriminated against. Ferguson was the judge who upheld the LA law. Significance: legitimized segregation

Brown v. Board of Education 1954 The Court ( in a unanimous decision) declared state laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students unconstitutional. Overturned Plessy. Oliver Brown, a parent in Little Rock, was the plaintiff. Sig.: States cannot make and enforce “Jim Crow” laws

Engel v. Vitale 1962 Opening school with a prayer violates the establishment clause of the First Amendment Engel-one of parents who protested the school board approved prayer; Vitale-school board president

McCulloch v. Maryland 1819 Backed up the national government’s power to use the elastic clause to make laws; also the Supremacy Clause holds that the states cannot make laws that “punish” the national government Maryland’s displeasure with a national bank

Tinker v. Des Moines 1969 Defended students’ First Amendment rights in schools Students wore black armbands to protest Vietnam War Established the “Tinker Test:” If a student’s “speech” significantly disrupts school and inhibits learning, then it is NOT protected

Mapp v. Ohio 1961 Incorporation of Fourth Amendment to apply to state law (unreasonable search and seizure) Exclusionary Rule Mapp-woman who refused to allow police to enter home without warrant—she was suspected of having bombs, they came in anyway and found obscene material..arrested her and she was found guilty Conviction overturned

Roe v. Wade 1973 Right to privacy extended to include a woman’s right to have an abortion until viability (9th Amendment) Roe-alias of Jane McCorvey who lied to doctor about need for abortion (said was raped); Wade-District Attorney for TX

Texas v. Johnson 1989 Gregory Johnson served a year in prison for burning an American flag in protest. Sig.: The SC upheld the lower appeals court decision that declared flag burning as a legitimate freedom of expression as guaranteed in the First Amendment.

Gideon v. Wainwright 1963 Incorporation of 6th amendment to states States are required to provide legal counsel in criminal cases if one cannot afford an attorney Wainwright-Sec. of FL dept of corrections. Gideon-accused of burglary, lost trial when had to defend self—5 yrs in jail-appealed to SC

University of California v. Bakke 1978 Ruled it is unconstitutional for universities to have a requisite # of students based solely on race with a different admissions procedure Violates 14th- Equal Protection Schools CAN consider race as a “plus” factor, but cannot set aside seats, which inherently also makes race a “negative factor” Bakke-white applicant to med school

Baker v. Carr 1962 Redistricting (a state reserved power) is actually justiciable-is there “standing”-the ability to bring it to a court; allowing the SC to check the powers of state govts. Baker-Repub. Who lived in Memphis who felt the districts were drawn unfairly, violated 14th amendment. Carr-sec of state for TN

Katz v. US 1967 Charles Katz used a pay phone to conduct illegal gambling. He was caught by FBI & convicted. Sig.: The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Katz, claiming that a conversation is protected from unreasonable search and seizure (4th amendment)

Miranda v. Arizona 1966 A suspect’s responses to police interrogation is admissible in court only if he has been informed of his right to an attorney (5th ). Ernesto Miranda arrested on charges of kidnapping and rape—he confessed & was convicted—ACLU took his case to SC SC ordered conviction overturned; retrial; guilty again

Reynolds v. US 1878 A member of LDS challenged anti-polygamy laws, claiming a violation of 1st Amendment freedom of religion. The Court ruled unanimously that a law banning polygamy was constitutional, and did not infringe upon individuals’ First Amendment right to free exercise of religion.

Korematsu v. US 1944 In WWII, Japanese-Americans were forced to relocate to internment camps for the duration of the war. Korematsu-violated the executive order. Sig.: The SC sided with the national government and upheld Korematsu’s arrest because they said the need for national protection outweighed an individual’s rights.

Lemon v. Kurtzman 1971 States cannot give funding to church-sponsored schools…such actions violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment Lemon-PA teacher that claimed the actions of the state violated separation of church and state; Kurtzman-superintendent of schools in PA Established the “Lemon Test”

Bush v. Gore 2000 In the 2000 presidential election, there was a controversy surrounding the re-counting of ballots. The Court ruled in favor of Bush stating that the method recount violated the 14th amendment’s equal protection clause.

Schenck v. US 1919 A man was convicted for circulating pamphlets urging resistance to the draft Established the "clear and present danger" test to determine when a state could constitutionally limit an individual's free speech rights under the First Amendment.

Bethel School District v. Fraser 1986 Matthew Fraser was suspended from school for making a speech full of sexual double entendres at a school assembly. Sig.: The Supreme Court held that his suspension did not violate the First Amendment bc the 1st amendment doesn’t cover vulgar speech

Morse v. Frederick 2007 The First Amendment does not protect student speech (at school sponsored event) that can be viewed as promoting illegal activities “Bong Hits 4 Jesus”