The Crucible logical fallacy project

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MULTIPLE CHOICE The Crucible.
Advertisements

Straw Man Allison & Summer.
Straw Man Fallacy By: Will And Courtney.
Responding to Text Dependent Questions
The Crucible $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 Characters?
Kenzie Garrett Amber Jewell
Katilyn Wyatt and DeAnna Mabe. Definition Using a biased, suspicious, or incredible source to defend a conclusion. X is true because Y says so. Therefore,
By Madison Kerley and Rachel Haynes.  Presenting the argument in such a way that makes the argument look ridiculous, usually by misrepresenting the argument.
Fallacy Appeal to Ridicule (Appeal to Mockery/ The Horse Laugh) Anna Houchens Tiffany Tolsma.
Red Herring Matt Zuccari Ashley Steenbergen. The man tries to divert the conversation to something that is completely irrelevant but more supportive of.
An appeal to ignorance is an argument for or against a proposition on the basis of a lack of evidence against or for it. If there is positive evidence.
The Crucible Test Review
Crucible Reverse Jeopardy Characters Literary Terms Plot Events SettingQuoteSignificance
Who’s Who in The Crucible Written by Arthur Miller.
Jeopardy Review Game. Characters Identifying Key Events Notable Quotable Characters Fact or Fiction
The Crucible Bellringer #7 8/22/12
$100$200$100$300$100$200 $400 $200$200$400 $100 $400 $100$400 $500 $200$500 $300$500$300$300$500$300$400 $500.
The Crucible Act III.
Logical Fallacy Brett Willis Kaylee Britt. Appeal to Ridicule Definition: a fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an “argument”.
Nov 21 – Jr American Lit You will need: The Crucible - Act I Agenda:
Appeal To Ignorance Fallacy By: Cole Mutter & Ashley Hart.
Poisoning the Well Fallacy
Appeal to Ridicule Emma Doyle, Kelly Moss and Jake Beakes.
Argument From Authority/ False Authority
Argument from authority
Straw Man Logical Fallacy
By: Sammi Jo Johnson and Melissa Shirley
The Crucible Act III March 15, 2011.
Jeopardy Vocab Quotes Characters Plot Misc. Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Final Jeopardy.
Focus Questions The Crucible: Act I.
Begging the Question/Circular Reasoning
The Crucible Bellringer #17 9/5/13 1. What does Giles accuse Mr. Putnam of in the beginning of Act III? 2. When Danforth gives John Proctor the offer to.
By: Haley Ford Appeal To Ignorance.
CRUCIBLE STUDY GUIDE. 1/ How does the story open? 2/ Why is Reverend Parris worried only about himself and not his daughter? 3/ Why is Tituba worried.
Parris slave daughter niece Tituba Betty Abigail John Proctor Had an affair Thomas and Ann Putnam daughter Ruth Conjured spirits in the forest Dislike.
Characters MotifsMotivesVocabEvents.
APPEAL TO RIDICULE By: Whitney Miles.
Appeal to Ridicule Mattie Bruton Hannah Weedman. Definition of Fallacy AKA: Appeal to Mockery, The Horse Laugh. Appeal to Ridicule is a fallacy in which.
Post Hoc Billy Estes. Post Hoc Explained Event A happened immediately prior to event B. Therefore, A caused B. Post Hoc occurs when a faulty assumption.
The Crucible Act I. Reverend Parris’ House Spring His daughter, Betty, is lying on the bed and is not moving.
Ad Hominem Brandon Sneed and Tesia Bailey AP English III L. Hughes- 7 th Period.
The Crucible By Arthur Miller. Preview/Foundation Setting: 1692 in Salem, Massachusetts Point of View: third-person omniscient and first-person Historical.
Ad Populum/ Appeal to Popularity/ Bandwagon Krystal Sims & Makayla Glass.
Appeal to Ridicule By: Dakota Hunt. Definition Ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an argument, or it presents the opponent's argument.
The Crucible Bo and Maggie Straw Man Fallacy. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than It actually is and claims that the real.
Crucible Jeopardy Characters Literary Terms Plot Events Setting McCarthy Trials/Kazan and Miller
Appeal to Ridicule ASHLEY STEPHENS. Appeal to Ridicule is…  A fallacy in which ridicule or mockery is substituted for evidence in an “argument.”
By: McKinley King Zoe Brownfield. Argument from Authority/ False Authority  Asks audiences to agree with the assertion of a writer based simply on his.
By: Kennedy Logsdon. Definition of Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to Ignorance is the assumption of a conclusion or fact based primarily on lack of ridicule.
The red scare Quotes Important Characters Plot and setting Mystery bag
ACT BY ACT Summaries. SUMMARY- ACT 1 Setting: home of Rev Parris. Parris is praying over Betty who is in a coma. Abigail enters. Susanna says the Doc.
CharactersCourtAccusationsQuotesMisc
Arguments from Authority/False Authority Kelsay Manion & Sean Belding Example: In some cases, the expertise may be just for show -"I'm not a doctor, but.
The Crucible Jeopardy. 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt Characters.
English III Unit 1 Test Review Puritans/ Early Am. Why the Puritans escaped England What Puritans thought about those who were corrupted Collective benefit.
Straw Man GRAYSON HYATT. A straw man fallacy misrepresents a position to make it weaker than it actually is and claims that the real position has been.
The Crucible List of Characters. Francis Nurse Head of the Nurse family; Respected man in town. Tried to stop the trials by aiding John Proctor.
The Crucible Acts I & II Review Women of Salem Say what? Act I Act IIMen of Salem
The Crucible Act III. Martha Corey is on trial It is clear they don’t believe Martha is not a witch – they think everyone accused is guilty Giles disrupts.
GOOD VS EVIL STUDENTS WILL UNDERSTAND HOW TO EXPLAIN THE NATURE OF GOOD AND EVIL IN ‘THE CRUCIBLE’
Ad Hominem LUCAS ENGLAND & ZACH ZACCARI A.P. LANGUAGE ROSEMARIE GRICE 7 TH PERIOD.
In this fallacy it is argued that a statement is correct because the statement is made by a person or source that is commonly regarded as authoritative.
Act III Comprehension Questions
The Crucible Acts I & II Review
Appeal to Ridicule By:Cassidy Patriarca.
Appeal to Ignorance Justus, John, Nick.
Appeal to Ignorance Paige Davis.
TOD and discussion questions
Makayle Botts and Kaitlin Graves
Appeal to Ignorance By: Amber Cline.
Presentation transcript:

The Crucible logical fallacy project By: Kaleigh Gumm

Appeal to Ignorance Appeal to ignorance is when someone uses the lack of someone's knowledge or information on a subject as proof that their conclusion is accurate.

Universal Example So why is this an example of Appeal to ignorance? The cartoon depicts a news reporter pointing at the evidence that home schooling is bad. Since there is no evidence to counter act his claim that home schoolers are hiding something his claim must be true. So in other words he is using the lack of evince as proof for his claim.

Another Universal example What makes this an example of appeal to ignorance? The cartoon depicts two men arguing over a point. One man claims that its safer to drive airplanes on the ground than to fly them. While another says that there is no proof that its safer to drive airplanes on the ground therefore, it much be safer.

Example from The Crucible Why is this an example of appeal to ignorance? Mrs. Putnam believes that her children were murdered by Rebecca nurse her midwife to all of them because there is no evidence that indicates that they ere not murdered. Mrs. Putnam: “… I have laid seven babies baptized in the Earth and now this year my Ruth, my only… Send her to your Tituba.”

Another example from The Crucible Why is this an example of Appeal to ignorance? John proctor is making fun of the ridiculous accusations against Mrs. Proctor when she was questioned about having a poppet in her house. He is saying that a five legged dragon lives in his house. Since no one has ever seen it then it has to be true. John Proctor: “There might also be a dragon with five legs in my house, but no one has ever seen it.”

Another example from The crucible Danforth: “You deny every scrap and title of this?” Abigail: “If I must answer that, sir, I will leave and I will not come back again.” Hale: “She does not deny it, Mr. Danforth, she does not deny it!” (Act III page 103) How is this an example? Hale believe that Abigail is guilty because she does not deny her innocence. Since there is no evidence that proves that she Is innocent she is guilty.

Citations/ sources Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. London: Penguin Classics, 2003 Hanks, Dr. Craig. "Appeal to Ignorance." Texas State University. Department of Philosophy. Web. 14 march.2015. Bluedorn, Nathaniel. "Newspaper Logic: Akron Beacon Journal Attack on Homeschooling." Fallacy Detective. Mary Jo Tate. Cartoon, 10 Oct. 2004. Web. 16 march.2015. Bennett, Bo. “Argument from Ignorance”. Logically Fallacious. Achieboy Holding, LLC, 2013. web. 13 march.2015.