Idaho DHIA Field Supervisor Meeting Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA Manager, Quality Certification Services Inc.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Background Presenters Work done in preparation for WHS changes

Advertisements

2002 ADSA 2002 (GRW-1) (abstract 125) G.R. WIGGANS,* P.M. V AN RADEN, and J.C. PHILPOT Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,

Office of Purchasing and Contracts Procurement Outreach Training Level II - Module D State Finance Law; Ethics; OMB Guidelines.

ABSTRACT The objective of this research was to derive factors to predict daily milk yield when milk is sampled once per d for cows milked three times (3x)

Factors affecting milk ELISA scores of cows tested for Johne’s disease H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, and T. M. Byrem 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs.

2004 H.D. Norman, A.H. Sanders,* R.H. Miller, and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricutural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD.

HERD TESTING IN THE US AND THE ROLE OF QC– SIEVERT 2010 Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA/DHIA Services Manager, Quality Certification.

Bull selection based on QTL for specific environments Fabio Monteiro de Rezende Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE) - Brazil.

Investigating Herd Mastitis Problems Dave Wolfgang Bhushan Jayarao Ernest Hovingh Department of Veterinary & Biomedical Sciences Penn State University.

2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Projects.

2007 Jana L. Hutchison Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD , USA

Understanding the National Dairy Herd Improvement Program Uniform Operating Procedures (Code of Ethics & Uniform Data Collection Procedures) April 2014.

India Emerging Markets Conference, May 2009 (1) Leigh Walton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville,

Effects of complex vertebral malformation gene on production and reproduction M. T. Kuhn*, J. L. Hutchison, and C. P. Van Tassell Animal Improvement Programs.

2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*

Managing the business through data collection. What is data collection in a business? Data collection in a business is when a business manager collects.

G. R. Wiggans, Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD M. A. Faust ABS Global,

George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD National Association.

2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.

NAAB Dairy Trade Mission (1) A.H. Sanders 2002 Ashley H. Sanders AIPL on the Web Accessing Data and aipl.arsusda.gov Animal Improvement Programs.

 Breeding Heifers Mark Carson Reproductive Specialist, EastGen.

Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,

DAIRY PROFIT MONITOR AND ACTIVITY ANALYSIS PROJECTS Betsey Howland Cornell University PRO-DAIRY Program Department of Animal Science.

Calloway County Schools CONFIDENTIALITY TRAINING Protection of Personal Information School Year

Chapter 2: Breeds and Life Cycles of Livestock and Poultry Unit 2b: Dairy Life Cycle - history and general production of dairy cattle.

AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

Animal Welfare, Recording & Breeding Scheme For Suckler Herds.

2002 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD USDA Dairy Goat.

John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.

2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,

2007 Melvin Tooker Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA

2001 NAAB DSEC, April 2002 (1) Revision and Use of Termination Codes PAUL VANRADEN Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,

Effects of dam’s dry period length on calf M. T. Kuhn,* J. L. Hutchison, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research.

Accuracy of reported births and calving dates of dairy cattle in the United States Poster 1705 ADSA 2001, Indiannapolis H. D. Norman *,1, J. L. Edwards,

A.H. Sanders 2002 AIPL on the Web Accessing Data and aipl.arsusda.gov Ashley H. Sanders Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory.

2006 H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

Prediction of Service Sire Fertility M.T. Kuhn 1 *, J.L. Hutchison 1, and J.S. Clay 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agriculture Research Service,

Idaho DHIA Field Supervisor Meeting Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA Manager, Quality Certification Services Inc.

2005 George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Reproduction.

2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.

Feeding and Managing Dairy Cattle Part1. Objectives Analyze the production practices involved in the care of dairy calves from birth to weaning. Analyze.

1 Dairy Cattle Production (95314) Dr Jihad Abdallah Factors affecting milk composition.

H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.

Ruminant Restraint and Basic Physical Examination.

2003 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.

Ashley H. Sanders and H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

Cow Herd Performance Testing. Introduction Help evaluate economically important traits Calving ease Birth weight Weaning weight Calving interval Calf.

H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

2006 GEORGE R. WIGGANS Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, Maryland ,

George R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Considering.

Chapter 14: Labor Requirements and Scheduling © 2005 Thomson Delmar Learning. All rights reserved.

Genetics – Trait Selection An S 426 Fall Genetics – Trait Selection Has led to development of Economically Relevant Traits (ERT) and Indicator Trait.

CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

By: Lisa Vorce. Recipient Dams – Multi-breed Analysis Holding tank Prepaid Credits Donor Dams Facebook page Photo Upload/Classified Ads New Website.

H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT

Cattle Breeding in Ireland.

Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations

Calibration of Portable Scales

Selection and Judging of Beef Cattle

USDA Dairy Goat Genetic Evaluation Program

Introducing CDCB Health Evaluations

Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity

A National Sire Fertility Index

Provider, Supervision & QC Codes

Access and Use of Data Field Service Advisory Committee Meeting

Where AIPL Fits In Agricultural Research Service (ARS) is the main research arm of USDA (8,000 employees with 2,000 scientists at >100 locations) Beltsville.

Field Service Update Field Service Advisory Committee March 5, 2019

Abstr. M4 Merit of obtaining genetic evaluations of milk yield for each parity on Holstein bulls H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* R.L. Powell, and P.M. VanRaden.

Genetic Evaluation of Milking Speed for Brown Swiss Dairy Cattle

How to understand and use dairy goat performance data

Presentation transcript:

Idaho DHIA Field Supervisor Meeting Steven J. Sievert Technical Director, National DHIA Manager, Quality Certification Services Inc.

The Code of Ethics provides guidelines for appropriate conduct in the production, collection, and distribution of DHI information for all persons involved with these records.

1. Impairing the reliability of information 2. Not cooperating fully or interfering with data collection procedures. 3. Providing inaccurate information or withholding information. 4. Engaging in management practices with the intent of misrepresenting the performance of animals or herd.

Practices include:  Movement of animals between herds  Influencing relative performance of herdmates  Selective use of management practices.  Permitting collection of data and/or samples by a person with financial interest  Incomplete release of production data or DHI information

The purpose of uniform collection procedures is to ensure accuracy and ultimately make producers more profitable. Data is provided for:  Making management decisions.  Educational Programs and Research.  Genetic Evaluations of Cows and Bulls.  Promotion of sale animals.

1. Collection of Milk Weights and samples. 2. Use of Standard Equipment. 3. Recording Programs and Plans. 4. Records calculated w/Test Interval Method.

5. Test all cows in the herd. 6. Identified with permanent number registration number for Genetic Evaluation. 7. Bulk tank measurements must be reported.

8. Fresh Cows---Cows fresh four or more days beginning the evening milking of the fourth day after calving. (morning of the fifth day for AP records) 9. Dry Cows---The dry date is the 1 st calendar day the cow is not milked. 10. Leaving herd---last calendar day cow was in the herd.

11. Cows entering herd---calendar day following the last day of credits in former herd. 12. Sick Cows---actual production recorded and coded as abnormal. Cows record will be adjusted accordingly. BEWARE OF TAKING SAMPLE AND INSURE MILK DOES NOT ENTER INTO TANK.

13. Code aborted cows---if carried calf less than 152 days record will continue. 14. Cows calving without going dry---record ends on day prior to calving, new lactation on calving date. 15. Prepartum milk is not counted. 16. Transfers between field service providers within 15 days 17. Transfers between DRPC within 48 hours

1. Open Disclosure  Unrestricted access to herd records 2. Limited Disclosure  Access to Industry Partners  AIPL  National DHIA  Local DHIA  NAAB  PDCA 3. No Disclosure

1. Affect the publication of records. 2. Do not stop the flow of data to AIPL or Industry Partners. 3. Religious objections may be stated using privacy code and appropriate release code.

Questions?