SHINE 2006 - Zermatt Resort, Midway, UT July 31-August 4, 2006 Empirical Solar Wind Forecasting from the Chromosphere: Inclusion of a Potential Field Corona.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Numerical Simulations of Supergranulation and Solar Oscillations Åke Nordlund Niels Bohr Institute, Univ. of Copenhagen with Bob Stein (MSU) David Benson,
Advertisements

Estimating the magnetic energy in solar magnetic configurations Stéphane Régnier Reconnection seminar on Thursday 15 December 2005.
Coronal Responses to Explosive Events Adria C. Updike Smith College / Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics Amy Winebarger and Kathy Reeves, Center.
The Sun’s Dynamic Atmosphere Lecture 15. Guiding Questions 1.What is the temperature and density structure of the Sun’s atmosphere? Does the atmosphere.
Reviewing the Summer School Solar Labs Nicholas Gross.
1 Diagnostics of Solar Wind Processes Using the Total Perpendicular Pressure Lan Jian, C. T. Russell, and J. T. Gosling How does the magnetic structure.
East-West Asymmetry of the Yohkoh Soft X-ray Corona L.W. Acton 1, D.E. McKenzie 1, A. Takeda 1, B.T. Welsch 2,and H.S. Hudson 2,3 1 Montana State University,
The Sun Astronomy 311 Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 23.
Identifying and Modeling Coronal Holes Observed by SDO/AIA, STEREO /A and B Using HMI Synchronic Frames X. P. Zhao, J. T. Hoeksema, Y. Liu, P. H. Scherrer.
1 WSA Model and Forecasts Nick Arge Space Vehicles Directorate Air Force Research Laboratory.
CISM solar wind metrics M.J. Owens and the CISM Validation and Metrics Team Boston University, Boston MA Abstract. The Center for Space-Weather Modeling.
Why does the temperature of the Sun’s atmosphere increase with height? Evidence strongly suggests that magnetic waves carry energy into the chromosphere.
Study of magnetic helicity in solar active regions: For a better understanding of solar flares Sung-Hong Park Center for Solar-Terrestrial Research New.
Active Region Flux Transport Observational Techniques, Results, & Implications B. T. Welsch G. H. Fisher
Sung-Hong Park Space Weather Research Laboratory New Jersey Institute of Technology Study of Magnetic Helicity and Its Relationship with Solar Activities:
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
Magnetic configurations responsible for the coronal heating and the solar wind Hwanhee Lee 1, Tetsuya Magara 1 1 School of Space research, Kyung Hee University.
RT Modelling of CMEs Using WSA- ENLIL Cone Model
1 Hinode Monthly Highlights – Slow Solar Wind Sources Derived from recent publication from the Hinode/EIS team through the Naval Research Laboratory EIS.
The Solar Corona Steven R. Spangler Department of Physics and Astronomy University of Iowa.
Coronal Heating of an Active Region Observed by XRT on May 5, 2010 A Look at Quasi-static vs Alfven Wave Heating of Coronal Loops Amanda Persichetti Aad.
The Sun and the Heliosphere: some basic concepts…
Review of Lecture 4 Forms of the radiative transfer equation Conditions of radiative equilibrium Gray atmospheres –Eddington Approximation Limb darkening.
Proxies of the Entire Surface Distribution of the Photospheric Magnetic Field Xuepu Zhao NAOC, Oct. 18, 2011.
Abstract Although Parker was the first to describe the solar wind successfully at the time, his elegant theory still masks a number of fundamental problems.
Standard DEM: Consider a imaging instrument with M EUV filters (for the EUVI Fe bands M = 3). The measured intensity in one image pixel is given by DEM.
1 THE RELATION BETWEEN CORONAL EIT WAVE AND MAGNETIC CONFIGURATION Speakers: Xin Chen
Solar Atmosphere A review based on paper: E. Avrett, et al. “Modeling the Chromosphere of a Sunspot and the Quiet Sun” and some others [Alexey V. Byalko]
Comparison of the 3D MHD Solar Wind Model Results with ACE Data 2007 SHINE Student Day Whistler, B. C., Canada C. O. Lee*, J. G. Luhmann, D. Odstrcil,
Using potential field extrapolations of active region magnetic fields, observed by SOHO/MDI, as a representation of a real active region, we apply hydrostatic.
The Magnetic Sun. What is the Sun? The Sun is a Star, but seen close-up. The Stars are other Suns but very far away.
Post Processing of ZEUS MHD Simulations of Young, Hot Stars Stephen V. St.Vincent and David H. Cohen Swarthmore College Department of Physics & Astronomy.
The Solar Wind.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Heliosphere: The Solar Wind March 01, 2012.
THE SUN. The Photosphere The Photosphere - The “visible” surface of the sun.  Thin layer of gas (less than 500km deep) from which we receive the majority.
By Elisha. » The Sun » The sun is the star in the centre of the solar system in which the earth orbits around and is about 149,600,000 km away from earth.
Nonlinear force-free coronal magnetic field extrapolation scheme for solar active regions Han He, Huaning Wang, Yihua Yan National Astronomical Observatories,
Advanced Solar Theory (MT5810) OUTLINE 1.Observational properties of the Sun 2.MHD equations (revision) 3.Induction equation - solutions when R m >1 4.Magnetic.
I. INTRODUCTION Gas Pressure Magnetic Tension Coronal loops are thin and bright structure of hot plasma emitting intense radiation in X-ray and EUV. (1)
SHINE Meeting Kona, HI July 11-15, 2005 Does the Chromosphere Have Heliospheric Impact? Scott W. McIntosh Department of Space.
The Sun The Sun imaged in white light by the SOHO spacecraft.
Mass loss and Alfvén waves in cool supergiant stars Aline A. Vidotto & Vera Jatenco-Pereira Universidade de São Paulo Instituto de Astronomia, Geofísica.
Using Realistic MHD Simulations for Modeling and Interpretation of Quiet Sun Observations with HMI/SDO I. Kitiashvili 1,2, S. Couvidat 2 1 NASA Ames Research.
Effective drift velocity and initiation times of interplanetary type-III radio bursts Dennis K. Haggerty and Edmond C. Roelof The Johns Hopkins University.
The Sun Youra Taroyan. Age 4.5 ×10 9 years Mean diameter 1.392×10 6 km, 109 × Earth Mass ×10 30 kg, 333,000 × Earth Volume 1.412×10 18 km 3, 1,300,000.
The Magnetic Sun. What is the Sun? The Sun is a Star, but seen close-up. The Stars are other Suns but very far away.
WG2 Sessions SHINE Workshop, July 30–August 3, K.D. Leka: “Promises and Reality of Analysis Using Magnetic Field Data” Gave update on present and.
Three-Dimensional Power Spectra of GONG++ High- Cadence Magnetograms F. Hill, J. Bolding, R. Clark, K. Donaldson-Hanna, J. Harvey, G. Petrie, C. Toner.
Modeling 3-D Solar Wind Structure Lecture 13. Why is a Heliospheric Model Needed? Space weather forecasts require us to know the solar wind that is interacting.
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Fall, 2009 Copyright © The Heliosphere: Solar Wind Oct. 08, 2009.
Universe Tenth Edition Chapter 16 Our Star, the Sun Roger Freedman Robert Geller William Kaufmann III.
Observations of the Thermal and Dynamic Evolution of a Solar Microflare J. W. Brosius (Catholic U. at NASA’s GSFC) G. D. Holman (NASA/GSFC)
Introduction to Space Weather Jie Zhang CSI 662 / PHYS 660 Spring, 2012 Copyright © The Sun: Magnetic Structure Feb. 16, 2012.
Global coronal seismology and EIT waves Istvan Ballai SP 2 RC, University of Sheffield, UK.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
Estimation of acoustic travel-time systematic variations due to observational height difference across the solar disk. Shukur Kholikov 1 and Aleksander.
Lecture 12 The Importance of Accurate Solar Wind Measurements
Heliosphere: Solar Wind
Xuepu Zhao Oct. 19, 2011 The Base of the Heliosphere: The Outer (Inner) Boundary Conditions of Coronal (Heliospheric) models.
GOAL: To understand the physics of active region decay, and the Quiet Sun network APPROACH: Use physics-based numerical models to simulate the dynamic.
D. Odstrcil1,2, V.J. Pizzo2, C.N. Arge3, B.V.Jackson4, P.P. Hick4
MDI Level 1.8 Magnetograms
Carrington Rotation 2106 – Close-up of AR Mr 2106 Bt 2106
Magnetic Topology of the 29 October 2003 X10 Flare
Exploring Large-scale Coronal Magnetic Field Over Extended Longitudes With EUVI EUVI B EIT EUVI A 23-Mar UT Nariaki Nitta, Marc DeRosa, Jean-Pierre.
How does the solar atmosphere connect to the inner heliosphere?
Lecture 5 The Formation and Evolution of CIRS
ESS 261 Topics in magnetospheric physics Space weather forecast models ____ the prediction of solar wind speed April 23, 2008.
Introduction to Space Weather
Presentation transcript:

SHINE Zermatt Resort, Midway, UT July 31-August 4, 2006 Empirical Solar Wind Forecasting from the Chromosphere: Inclusion of a Potential Field Corona R.J. Leamon, 1 S.W. McIntosh 2 1 ADNET Systems, Inc. at NASA GSFC, Greenbelt MD; 2 Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO INTRODUCTION The measured separation in height of the TRACE 1600Å and 1700Å UV band pass filters correlates very strongly with solar wind velocity and inversely with the ratio of ionic oxygen (O 7+ /O 6+ ) densities measured at 1 AU. These correlations suggest that the structure of the solar wind is rooted deeper in the outer solar atmosphere than previously considered. We show here that the value of plasma beta extrapolated from the photosphere up into the chromosphere correlates with TRACE UV band pass separation and thus to in situ solar wind velocity and composition. Initial results of a model developed to so predict interplanetary solar wind conditions, using SOHO/MDI magnetograms with 96 minute cadence as input has recently been submitted to ApJL. The model provides a near continuous range of solar wind speeds and composition quantities from the structure of the chromosphere, and shows good correlation with observations over approximately one solar rotation. At SHINE we discuss the implications and results from including a PFSS model of the corona to trace the sub-terrestrial field line to the photosphere. 5 – Potential Field Source Surface (deRosa & Schrijver’s SSW contributions) extrapolations. The above 4 panels are stills from a QuickTime movie that covers the whole 36-day interval from the “old” disk center results (Fig. 4). The PFSS data are reduced daily. For each MDI magnetogram (441), 33 field lines are traced back to the sun; one at the sub-solar point, and 32 around an ellipse one-third the size used for the disk center ellipse calculations (i.e., 5º  2.5º). Sometimes, the whole ellipse maps to a small region of the photosphere, other times it maps to all over the map! Sometimes the sub-solar point on the source surface is connected to the sub-solar point on the photosphere, other times the footpoint is as much as 35º away from disk center. 6 – (Below Right) Results in the same format as Fig. 4, but using the PFSS footprint mask. First notice the dynamic range increases. The cross-correlation coefficients are now for O 7+ /O 6+ (at +19.6h), and (at +24h) for V SW. Notice the variation in error bar size – small when the whole ellipse maps back to one point in an active region (thus the slowest wind), and large (for the crazy 4th panel, above). 1 – Results from McIntosh & Leamon [2005]: The areas in red in the top "time difference" image show a shallow, dense chromosphere beneath an area with slow, dense solar wind outflow; the areas in blue in the bottom image show a deep, less dense chromosphere below a "coronal hole" with fast, tenuous solar wind outflow. Separation of the formation heights of 1600Å and 1700Å TRACE filters correlates strongly with solar wind speed and inversely with the ratio of oxygen composition. One smooth curve can fit through the observations of Active Regions, Quiet Sun and Coronal Holes. The two filled symbols are for the two EIT/ TRACE images, above. Best-fit Power laws ( A  z B + C ): V SW : A = 1.49 (± 0.19)  B = 4.56 ± 0.33 (1) C = 333 ± 12 O 7+ /O 6+ : A = 1.22 (± 0.11)  B = ± 0.23 (2) C = ± – 2-D histogram showing the correspondence of oscillation travel time and the plasma  at 450 km above the photosphere for the suite of 13 TRACE observations (below left). TT = log 10 (  + 5  10 3 ) The nature of the TRACE UV observations does not lend itself to a predictive tool: each of the 13 solar observations below left is the result of a 1–3 hour time TRACE sequence of interleaved 1600Å and 1700Å images, which then require careful co- alignment to sub-pixel accuracy and removal of the effects of solar rotation. Fortunately, there is the striking relationship between the observed travel times and the plasma  at the mean formation height of the TRACE 1600Å passband. So, we extrapolate a co-aligned line-of-sight magnetogram from MDI to 450 km, and compute the magnetic pressure. By imposing a simple model gas pressure (e.g., VAL3C), we can compute  in the chromospheric region of the TRACE passbands. Using this relationship, we can generate a synthetic full-disk TT map from the extrapolated MDI magnetogram  and then use Eq. (1) to generate a map of predicted wind speed or other in situ quantities. Since the source region of Earth-directed solar wind parcels can be only a fraction of the whole solar disk, we average the predicted wind speed over a ``source window.'' The size of the source window is set somewhat arbitrarily as an ellipse with semi-major axes 0.25  R sun (~15º by 7.5º) at disk center. 4 – Results. Left panels are for ballistic propagation, right panels use Parker’s solar wind model. The blue crosses are for a refined model with an empirically reduced delay, resulting in zero lag for the cross-correlation between model and data. With ballistic propagation, the correlation coefficients are 0.30 for V SW and 0.41 for oxygen, both at a lag of 28.8h. The Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients are comparable: 0.27 and With the Parker model, the cross-correlation coefficients increase to 0.32 and 0.47, and the Spearman coefficients increase significantly to 0.46 and It is perhaps interesting to note that the correlations for O 7+ /O 6+ are consistently higher than for V SW, despite the fact that we use the same V SW to predict the arrival time of the hot oxygen. TTV SW 3 – Derived wind speed and composition maps, and a context EIT image, showing the active regions and coronal holes. In all 3 panels, the white dashed circle has radius ~600 , beyond which the accuracy of the line-of-sight approx for MDI magnetograms degrades significantly. We present two different two empirical solar wind condition “forward-modeling” scenarios. First, we shall consider a simple ballistic propagation model, shifting the predictions derived from MDI observations from the time of MDI observations by the constant velocity travel time (147 million km divided by predicted V SW ). Then, we will adopt a more sophisticated model based on the original solar wind model of Parker [1958] where the accelerating solar wind can be expressed as solutions of We use the method of Cranmer [2004], invoking Lambert's W function, to solve Parker’s equation exactly, with various coronal temperatures as input. We convert these velocity profiles into a look-up table for the time taken for a parcel of plasma to flow from the sun to 1 AU, given the predicted V SW at 1 AU. CONCLUSIONS Including a PFSS model of the corona to track the source of Earth-directed wind improves the correlation and agreement with in situ V SW and O 7+ /O 6+ data, but at the expense (at this point in time) of time lags. We have not yet considered the length of the coronal field lines (i.e., the twisted path from photosphere to Source Surface)… See you next year!