LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Advertisements

Comparison of Reduced Tillage Cropping Systems for Onions Mulched No-Till vs. Cover Cropped Ridge Till.
Effects of Cover Crop Management on Corn Production Brian Jones Agronomy Extension Agent
Late Season Nitrogen Enhanced Wheat Protein as Affected by Late Season Moisture. B. D. Brown. University of Idaho Introduction High protein premiums and.
Responses of Sweet Cherry Productivity and Soil Quality to Alternate Groundcover and Irrigation Systems Xinhua Yin 1, Xiaolan Huang 1, and Lynn Long 2.
Determine seeding rate and hybrid effects on: Phenotypical and physiological plant measurements Canopy and leaf sensor measurements A goal in precision.
INTRODUCTION Figure 1: Seedling germination success by planting technique plus rainfall amount and date at the Poolesville location during fall BC.
Ethan Wyatt Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
Jacob P. Vossenkemper Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University.
Nitrogen Management for Enhanced Protein: Source and Timing of N Applications in Spring Wheat C.A. Grant 1, C.D. Rawluk 1, R.M. McKenzie 2, D.N. Flaten.
Yield, Protein, and Quality Response to Planting Date, Variety, and Late N. B.D. Brown. University of Idaho. Introduction Higher market prices for the.
Producing “New” Small Grain Crops in the Mid-Atlantic Wade Thomason.
Integrated Crop Pest Management Montana Small Grain Guide.
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is estimated to be 33% throughout the world, and can be lower in single, pre-plant applications compared with split nitrogen.
May 6, Drought tolerant Miller ComparisonsEfawLCB Grain Yield (bu/ac) Drought tolerant vs. Non-drought tolerant Monsanto vs. Pioneer
Fertilizing potatoes with biofuel byproducts Amber Moore, Ph.D University of Idaho Twin Falls Research and Extension Center.
Effect of Nitrogen Sources, Rates, and Application Time on Spring Wheat Yield and Grain Protein Olga S. Walsh, Western Triangle Agricultural Research Center,
Slow Release Nitrogen for Furrow Irrigated Wheat Brad Brown Extension Soil and Crop Management Specialist 2010 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference Shoshone,
Wheat Protein Enhancement with N Intervention: Why the Concern? B.D. Brown and N.W. Christensen.
Irrigation and Nitrogen Management Systems for Enhancing Hard Spring Wheat Protein J. Stark, E. Souza, B. Brown, and J. Windes University of Idaho.
Triticale For P Removal Brad Brown University of Idaho 2008 Idaho Nutrient Management Conference.
Effects of Late Nitrogen Application on Hard Spring Wheats Russ Karow 1, Ernie Marx 1, Doug Engle 2, Gary Hareland 3 and Jennifer Kling 1 1 Oregon State.
Chemical fertilizers as a component of INM in Tomato
May 15,  Rates – current industry recommendations  Soil and Foliar Applied ◦ Boron, Chlorine, Copper, Zinc ◦ Calcium – Foliar only  NDVI, Soil,
Wheat Production & Management Ed Twidwell Ed Twidwell LSU AgCenter LSU AgCenter School of Plant, Environmental & Soil Sciences School of Plant, Environmental.
The Nitrogen Requirement and Use Efficiency of Sweet Sorghum Produced in Central Oklahoma. D. Brian Arnall, Chad B. Godsey, Danielle Bellmer, Ray Huhnke.
Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Oklahoma State University Department of Plant and Soil Sciences Nitrogen Loss from Urea.
Comparison of Active Optical Sensors
1 CANOPY REFLECTANCE (HRWW AND HRSW) IN SOUTH DAKOTA ECONOMIC OPTIMUM NITROGEN RATE FOR HRSW IN SOUTH DAKOTA Nitrogen Use Efficiency Meeting Cheryl Reese*,
Receding water levels in Ogallala aquifer are threatening the sustainability of irrigated agriculture in the High Plains of Eastern New Mexico and West.
Wheat losses attributed to PM can reach 40% by affecting grain fill, root growth, and reducing test weights 1,2,3. At expected yield losses greater than.
The Effects of Topdressing Organic Nitrogen on Hard Red Winter Wheat - Year 2 Name: Erica Cummings Date: March 15, 2012 Title: Crops and Soils Technician.
Rate and Duration of Seed Component Accumulation in Water Stressed Soybeans José L. Rotundo & Mark Westgate Iowa State University, 1301 Agronomy Hall,
Nitrogen Use Efficiency Workshop Canopy Reflectance Signatures: Developing a Crop Need-Based Indicator for Sidedress Application of N Fertilizer to Canola.
Surface Cover and Biomass in No-tillage Cropping Systems as Affected by Crop Rotation, Winter Cover Crop, and Winter Weeds Forbes Walker 1, Nick Ryan 1,
Machungo C, Wanjogu R.K, Owilla, B , Njoka, J.J Anzwa, M.
Evaluation of Foliar UAN and Timing on Wheat Grain Yield and Protein Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 371 Agricultural.
Experiments conducted by RICEMAPP
Small Grain Water Use Montana Small Grain Guide. Water - Nitrogen Relationship u Studies show that without adequate Nitrogen, wheat & barley yields increase.
Baking Quality Response to Late Season N with Variable Moisture During Grain Fill. K. O’Brien, B. Brown, and R. Gibson. University of Idaho Introduction.
Mandana Tayefe, Ebrahim Amiri, and Azin Nasrollah Zade
Optimizing Nitrogen and Irrigation Timing for Corn Fertigation Applications Using Remote Sensing Ray Asebedo, David Mengel, and Randall Nelson Kansas State.
Tolerance of Teff (Eragrostis tef) var. “Tiffany” to Several Selective Herbicides Brian Jones Agronomy Extension Agent September 2009.
Utilization of NAA as a Seed Treatment to Control Stem Number in Russet Burbank Andrew P. Robinson, North Dakota State University / University of Minnesota.
NITROGEN FERTIGATION OF SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATED BERMUDAGRASS M.A. Maurer* 1, J.A. Moken 2 and J.L. Young 1 1 Department of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin.
Influence of Selected Cultural Practices on the Expression of Iris Yellow Spot Virus in Onion Clinton C. Shock 1, Erik Feibert 1, Lamont Saunders 1, Lynn.
Figure 3. Concentration of NO3 N in soil water at 1.5 m depth. Evaluation of Best Management Practices on N Dynamics for a North China Plain C. Hu 1, J.A.
Introduction Higher market prices relative to the predominant soft white class has increased grower interest in the production of hard red spring wheat.
Chemical fertilizers as a component of INM in Tomato.
Highway 56 West Adams, MN Lynn Lagerstedt.
Durum and HRSW Best Management Practices A “Real-World” Perspective.
Dick Auld Calvin Trostle Plant & Soil Sciences Extension Agronomist
What did we learn in 2015: growth regulators and mid-season N applications on wheat yield, lodging and protein J Ransom, G Mehring, B Hansen, M Ostlie,
Locations Efaw Lake Carl Blackwell Haskell Years2005, 2006 Objectives: 1)To determine the minimum preplant N fertilizer needed to achieve maximum yield.
NFOA for Wheat and Corn. Yield Potential Definitions INSEYIn Season Estimated Yield = NDVI (Feekes 4 to 6)/days from planting to sensing (days.
Introduction Water quality concerns have led to adoption of Idaho regulations that require livestock producers to manage animal wastes as never before.
Influence of Late-Season Foliar Nitrogen Applications on Grain Protein in Winter Wheat C.W. Woolfolk, W.R. Raun, G.V. Johnson E.G. Krenzer, and W.E. Thomason.
AGSC 231 Principles of Agronomy Fertilization - I By S.K. Yau, revised April 2010.
Phosphorus Fertilization Reduced Hessian Fly Infestation of Spring Wheat S. E. Petrie and K. E. Rhinhart Columbia Basin Agricultural Research Center, Oregon.
Where do Enhanced Efficiency Nitrogen Fertilizers and Split N Applications Fit? Cynthia Grant and Alan Moulin AAFC - Brandon Research Centre Nicolas Tremblay.
Wood ash, the residue remaining from the combustion of bark, sawdust and yard waste for energy generation for forestry product operations, is an effective.
NDVI Active Sensors in Sugarbeet Production for In-Season and Whole Rotation Nitrogen Management.
Topsoil Depth at the Centralia Site
Wheat: Harvest and Review of Steps for Good Wheat Management
Dhurba Neupane1, Juan Solomon2 and Jay Davison3
and No-Tillage under Various Crop Rotations.
G. V. Johnson and W. R. Raun Dept. Plant & Soil Sciences
E.V. Lukina, K.W. Freeman,K.J. Wynn, W.E. Thomason, G.V. Johnson,
Lodging immediately after July 4, 2007 storm.
Experiment #601 Long-term Top-Dress N Trial Stillwater, OK
Presentation transcript:

LATE SEASON N APPLICATIONS FOR IRRIGATED HARD RED WHEAT PROTEIN ENHANCEMENT. S.E. Petrie*, Oregon State Univ, B.D. Brown, Univ. of Idaho. Introduction The higher market prices and the premiums associated with high protein hard red wheat (winter and spring) have sparked considerable grower interest in these market classes of wheat. Unfortunately, we do not have the management tools to consistently produce hard red wheat with acceptable protein levels. The use of high pre-plant N application rates increases the likelihood of acceptable protein levels but also increases the potential for unacceptable N losses due to leaching and may increase lodging. Mid-season and late season N applications in sprinkler irrigation systems have been used to increase grain protein levels but N applications in surface irrigation systems (flood, furrow, etc.) are problematic. Non-uniform water application due to differences in infiltration rates, tailwater runoff and system inefficiencies all contribute to non-uniform N applications and subsequent differences in N availability and grain yield and protein responses. The objectives of this work were to (1) determine the most effective N application rate for mid-season applications, (2) compare foliar and soil applications, (3) compare foliar urea and solution 32, (4) and the time of application (tillering, jointing, heading, flowering). Materials and Methods A series of field trials were conducted between 1985 and 1996 at the Southwest Idaho Research and Extension Center near Parma, ID examining the effects of N rate, source, method of application and stage of wheat development on hard red winter and spring wheat grain yield and protein. The tillage, planting, variety, crop management, fertilizer (except N), weed control and irrigation practices varied between years but was typical for recommended Best Management Practices for the area. Winter wheat was furrow irrigated and spring wheat was sprinkler irrigated. The trials were seeded using a double disk drill with 7 inch row spacing and the plots were harvested using a small plot combine. The treatments in all trials were arranged in a randomized block design with four or five replications. Grain samples were cleaned, weighed and test weights determined. Leaf injury, when measured, was estimated by visual observation. Grain protein was determined using NIR at the University of Idaho Aberdeen Wheat Quality Lab. Abstract Nitrogen fertilizer is frequently applied late in the growing season to enhance hard red wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) protein to avoid low protein discounts. Both furrow and sprinkler irrigation are used for hard wheat production but N management options are limited when using furrow irrigation. Several furrow or sprinkler irrigated studies ( ) were conducted in southwestern Idaho to evaluate late season N manage-ment practices for increasing wheat protein. Treatments evaluated included N rates (0-67 kg/ha), sources (urea, uran), timing (tillering, jointing, heading, flowering), and application methods (foliar, soil). Late season N generally increased protein but the protein increase was not affected by N sources or application methods when soil applied N was adequately incorporated with subsequent moisture. The protein response to late N was limited if protein in untreated wheat was already high. Urea was less phytotoxic than uran as a foliar N source. N applied at tillering or jointing was less effective at increasing protein than heading or flowering growth stage applications. Late season N did not consistently increase hard red wheat protein to market-acceptable levels if the previously applied N was inadequate for maximizing yield N Rate (kg/ha) Leaf Injury (%) Urea UAN Sol'n Figure 1. Furrow irrigated winter wheat leaf injury from boot stage applied foliar urea and UAN at different N rates. Preplant N was 224 kg ha-1. Parma, Leaf injury varied among years and was worse in 1985 than the other two years. Leaf injury was significantly related to yield reduction in individual years but not when all years were combined (data not shown). Figure 2. Hard red spring wheat flag leaf injury from boot stage applied urea or UAN as affected by N rate and solution pH. Parma, Summary N applications made later in the growing season tend to increase grain protein. Late season N applications did not consistently increase grain protein to market acceptable levels if the previously applied N was not sufficient to maximize yield. There were no yield or protein differences between foliar and dry N if the topdressed N was incorporated by irrigation following application. Foliar applications of urea caused less leaf injury than UAN solution Slightly acidic spray solutions caused less leaf injury Figure 4. Hard red winter wheat protein as affected by N rate and foliar N source and year. Parma, Results Timing---Hard red winter wheat yielded higher and had higher protein when N was spring topdressed rather than preplant incorporated. Late season applied N generally increased winter wheat protein and the protein increase with late N depended on the timing of N previously applied. Late season N also increased spring wheat protein from low protein values and the protein increase was generally linear with N rate. The protein increase from late N was limited if protein otherwise exceeded 14%. The protein increase with N tended to be greater the closer the application was made to flowering. N Sources--Late season urea and UAN N sources did not generally differ in their effectiveness in increasing protein in three years of testing. UAN caused more leaf burn than urea solutions. Appreciable leaf burn was associated with significant yield reductions in some years. Solution pH--Solutions with higher pH generally caused more leaf burn than solutions closer to pH 7. Soil vs Foliar Late N--Soil and foliar applied late N did not differ in two years of testing in their effectiveness for enhancing protein provided there was no leaf burn from foliar applied UAN and topdressed N was sufficiently incorporated with subsequent sprinkler irrigation. Figure 3. Hard red spring wheat protein as affected by urea and UAN solutions and equivalent dry N sources and N rates. Dry N sources were incorporated with sprinkler irrigation. Foliar N sources were applied the day after the sprinkler wetting. Parma, Table 1. Irrigated hard red winter wheat yield and protein response to late season N as affected by fall and spring applied N. Table values are three year means % --kg/ha kg/ha TotalHeadingSpringFall ProteinYieldN Application Rate and Time