The Advance CV Workgroup The Advance CV Workgroup November 17, 2014

2 Review Ideas discussed Mock ups Section by Section Analysis Agenda

3 Review Develop an updated CV format that allows faculty greater flexibility to represent the full range of their academic accomplishments Provide feedback and guidance on functionality for uploading/editing the CV Determine and maintain a standard CV format to provide efficiency for faculty reviewers Represent your constituencies during the revision process Advocate for the CV Module we develop

4 Allow user to add a text field at the end of each section for additional information Allow Reviewers to sort Packet CV entries –Save sort option; apply it to that reviewer’s CVs Allow users to create/save multiple versions (like the NIH Biosketch) In the Packet/Review CV, do not display empty section headers Enable export of a Packet/Review CV Ideas discussed

5 Change section header roll-overs to –Add an example to the roll-over text Import process: –Provide a list of possible issues to the user –Do not fill in End Date if there is no end date Update the rules related to the review CV so Service Centers can help faculty understand how to organize their CV Additional ideas: –Add a “sticky button” for filtering the Review CV –Restrict import after first review Ideas discussed

6 Mock ups – sort review CV

7

8 Mock ups – multiple CVs Additional CVs Create New CV

9 Mock ups – multiple CVs Additional CVs PNAS 2014

Mock ups – multiple CVs Additional CVs Create New CV PNAS 2014 Genentech

11 Mock ups – info roll-over

12 Mock ups – info roll-over

13 Mock ups – sticky filter

14 Mock ups – sticky filter

15 The CV Redesign Process Section by Section analysis –The content perspective Does the structure of this section allow the user to tell their story? –Ideas: sub-sections, new sections, etc. –The functionality perspective Is this section easy to use, modify, export? –Ideas: sort options, moving things around, filters, etc. Is it easy to create a CV for different purposes? –The academic review perspective Can a reviewer easily find what’s needed to evaluate academic accomplishments? –Ideas: Required vs Optional sections; “Do you need this?” “Does this help you evaluate the academic accomplishments?”

16 Section by Section Analysis DEMO

17 The Advance CV Other topics that need to be discussed: –Rich Text fields Rich Text enables bold, underline, italics, formatting tricks like bullets, indents, hanging indents, etc. Opens “paste” process to introduce unwanted code Can we “strip” rich text when pasting, forcing the user to add formatting using the rich text tool? –Sharing your data Default is NOT to share data – user can enable sharing Do we want system-defined access to some data? –“Granularity” of fields Original design considered sorting and reporting Do we need more granularity?