S3: Calibration factors update Two weeks ago: L1 - Comparison with official factors found a problem: Investigating the discrepancy Gaby found an error.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Inferential Statistics and t - tests
Advertisements

The ISA for Physics What you need to revise.
Interfacing physical experiments and computer models Preliminary remarks Tony O’Hagan.
APS-DPP-2005-LeBlanc-1 Update on MPTS B.P. LeBlanc Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory NSTX Results Review July 26-27, 2006 Princeton, NJ.
FNAL Emittance Devices Flying Wires (FW) Sync Lite Ion Profile Monitors (IPM) aah,6/20/2000.
Statistical Techniques I EXST7005 Lets go Power and Types of Errors.
Locking improvements after the end of VSR1 Gabriele Vajente for the Locking Group 14 th ILIAS WG1 meeting Cascina – March 6 th 2008.
1 LIGO-G Z Penn State / LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2003 March 18 Calibration Testing Patrick Sutton, with Michael Landry, Gabriela Gonzalez,
CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
1 ILIAS WG1 meeting, Hannover, Alignment electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for.
Calculation of and. Wanted independent method to calculate calibration factors to use in search codes. XS, Jolien Creighton, Mike Landry.
LIGO-G D LIGO calibration during the S3 science run Michael Landry LIGO Hanford Observatory Justin Garofoli, Luca Matone, Hugh Radkins (LHO),
Power (Reading Packet Sect III) Mon, March 29 th.
Behavioural Science II Week 1, Semester 2, 2002
Hypothesis Testing: Type II Error and Power.
1 Psych 5500/6500 The t Test for a Single Group Mean (Part 5): Outliers Fall, 2008.
Loki Spectra Update Robert R. Howell University of Wyoming with help from Jani and Jason while on sabbatical at UA Fall 2005 and calibrated C10 images.
VELO ADC vs Charge Calibration Jianchun Wang April 16, 2008 This is an update to the presentation at April 11 st VELO Group Meeting. A new scan data of.
S3: Timescale for calibration factors At the frequency of the calibration line: Using this and going around the loop we obtain: Implemented in LAL/LALapps.
The one sample t-test November 14, From Z to t… In a Z test, you compare your sample to a known population, with a known mean and standard deviation.
Statistical Studies: Statistical Investigations
S4/S5 Calibration The Calibration team G Z.
EE345S Real-Time Digital Signal Processing Lab Fall 2006 Lecture 16 Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM) Receiver Prof. Brian L. Evans Dept. of Electrical.
APPLICATIONS OF DIFFERENTIATION 4. A polynomial behaves near infinity as its term of highest degree. The polynomial behaves like the polynomial Near infinity.
Calibration of LIGO data in the time domain X. Siemens, B. Allen, M. Hewitson, M. Landry.
Estimating and Constructing Confidence Intervals.
Section 8.4: Other Convergence Tests Practice HW from Stewart Textbook (not to hand in) p. 592 # 3-7, 12-17, odd, 33.
PSY2004 Research Methods PSY2005 Applied Research Methods Week Five.
Parameter studies of the e - cloud build up (update) C.Octavio Domínguez, Frank Zimmermann 28 th April e - cloud meeting.
‘Dude where's my muon?’ Trigger Efficiency of the Single Station. Edward Overton 1.
Functional Question Foundation (Number 8) For the week beginning ….
Feel the force I want to see how the front area of a car or the wind on the car effects how far it travels? How can I make a fair test? investigate the.
Chapter 21: More About Tests
Place Value – Objectives
6 Making Sense of Statistical Significance.
Beta and paper mills.
MODELING THE CALIBRATED RESPONSE OF THE ADVANCED LIGO DETECTORS Luke Burks 2013 LIGO Caltech SURF Mentors: Alan Weinstein, Jameson Rollins Final Presentation.
1 Commissioning meeting, Cascina, LA electronics noise budget ● Sources of electronic noise ● C7 electronic noise ● Electronic noise for optimized.
Statistical Techniques
Updating SEED Responses in PDCC After Calibration.
, Dan Peterson Apparent inconsistencies and other issues in the xBSM measurements of IBS Scans We have studied the pinhole and CodedAperture.
Chapter 8: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. Hypothesis Testing A hypothesis test is a statistical method that uses sample data to evaluate a hypothesis.
Update on Diffractive Dijets Hardeep Bansil University of Birmingham 12/07/2013.
EXCAVATORS. Excavator.dll : General Settings Contains:  Excavator Dimensions  System Override Values  Useful when a sensor fails  Sensor Adjustments.
Calibration/validation of the AS_Q_FAST channels Rick Savage - LHO Stefanos Giampanis – Univ. Rochester ( Daniel Sigg – LHO )
LIGO-G E S2 Data Quality Investigation John Zweizig Caltech/LIGO.
MODULATION AND MULTIPLEXING TECHNIQUES Each earth station will, in general, be transmitting and receiving many messages simultaneously to and from a satellite.
LIGO-G Z S5 calibration: time dependent coefficients  Myungkee Sung, Gabriela González, Mike Landry, Brian O’Reilly, Xavier Siemens,…
Recent Gain Changes C.Woody HBD Meeting March 23, 2010.
Nature’s Clock.  When sedimentary rock is deposited in layers it is deposited horizontally.  Scientists use this “Principle of Original Horizontality”
Calibration and the status of the photon calibrators Evan Goetz University of Michigan with Peter Kalmus (Columbia U.) & Rick Savage (LHO) 17 October 2006.
Purpose Design your own experimental procedures. Decide
Section Testing a Proportion
The Direct Method of Determining the Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities Appendix 14A.
Changes in Partnerships
S2/S3 calibration Gabriela González, Louisiana State University Plus
EMCal Recalibration Check
4.3 Technology What are the technological developments in elite sport?
EMCal Recalibration Check
Fundamentals of Data Representation
F-tests Testing hypotheses.
Problems with the Run4 Preliminary Phi->KK Analysis
Corona Linearization Patrick O’Donnell.
Formatting vs. Rounding
Chapter 7: Statistical Issues in Research planning and Evaluation
S3 Performance of the LIGO Interferometers as Measured by SenseMonitor
Andrew Heidinger JPSS Cloud Team Lead
1 Chapter 8: Introduction to Hypothesis Testing. 2 Hypothesis Testing The general goal of a hypothesis test is to rule out chance (sampling error) as.
Type I and Type II Errors
Purpose Design your own experimental procedures. Decide
Presentation transcript:

S3: Calibration factors update Two weeks ago: L1 - Comparison with official factors found a problem: Investigating the discrepancy Gaby found an error in the digital gain of the model for L1, which affects the sensing function gain also (C=H/(AD)). So digital filter was about 30% too high and sensing function was about 30% too small.

Now the factors computed both ways agree fairly well: Notice, however, that had we used the “wrong” alphas with the wrong sensing function we would have nevertheless obtained the correct updated sensing function. This is because the method measures the sensing function by taking ratios of the calibration line as seen in AS_Q to the line as seen in the excitation channel.

Bottom line: -The factors agree quite well between both methods when all the model functions are correct. - If they are not correct the new method can correct a certain class of errors (such as gains) in the reference functions by adjusting the values of the factors (demodulated alphas were about 30% lower). - Currently we are investigating the 5% discrepancy for S2 as well as a small discrepancy seen in the betas for L1/S3. - As far as time-scales for the factors we have decided for 2Hz for L1 and possibly 1Hz or larger for H1/H2.