Towards a robust, generalizable non-linear regression gap filling algorithm (NLR_EM) Ankur R Desai – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Boulder,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why gap filling isn’t always easy Andrew Richardson University of New Hampshire Jena Gap Filling Workshop September 2006.
Advertisements

TEMPORAL VARIABILITY AND DRIVERS OF NET ECOSYSTEM PRODUCTION OF A TURKEY OAK (QUERCUS CERRIS L.) FOREST IN ITALY UNDER COPPICE MANAGEMENT Luca Belelli.
The impact of a declining water table on observed carbon fluxes at a northern temperate wetland Benjamin N. Sulman A nkur R. Desai * Department of Atmospheric.
Benefit of ASP, not generally being subjected to this:
Uncovering mechanisms of episodic methane sources observed by a very tall eddy covariance tower Ankur Desai, UW-Madison Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences.
Uncertainty in eddy covariance datasets Dario Papale, Markus Reichstein, Antje Moffat, Ankur Desai, many others..
Old-Growth Carbon Sequestration in the Sylvania Wilderness Ottawa National Forest, U.P. Michigan Ankur Desai Penn State, Meteorology January 2002.
Gap filling using a Bayesian-regularized neural network B.H. Braswell University of New Hampshire.
Cross-spectral analysis on Net Ecosystem Exchange: Dominant timescale and correlations among key ecosystem variables over the Ameriflux Harvard forest.
Raw data Hz HH data submitted for synthesis Flux calculation, raw data filtering Additional filtering for footprint or instrument malfunctioning.
Titel Gap Filling of CO 2 Fluxes of Frequently Cut Grassland Christof Ammann Agroscope ART Federal Research Station, Zürich Gap Filling Comparison Workshop,
Forrest G. Hall 1 Thomas Hilker 1 Compton J. Tucker 1 Nicholas C. Coops 2 T. Andrew Black 2 Caroline J. Nichol 3 Piers J. Sellers 1 1 NASA Goddard Space.
Spatial Processes and Land-atmosphere Flux Constraining regional ecosystem models with flux tower data assimilation Flux Measurements and Advanced Modeling,
The observed responses of ecosystem CO2 exchange to climate variation from diurnal to annual time scale in the northern America. C. Yi, K.J. Davis, The.
Interannual variability across sites: Bridging the gap between flux towers and flasks Goals Obtain a mechanistic understanding of tower-scale interannual.
Phenological responses of NEE in the subboreal Controls on IAV by autumn zero- crossing and soil thermal profile Dr. Desai.
Optimising ORCHIDEE simulations at tropical sites Hans Verbeeck LSM/FLUXNET meeting June 2008, Edinburgh LSCE, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de.
Paul R. Moorcroft David Medvigy, Stephen Wofsy, J. William Munger, M. Dietze Harvard University Developing a predictive science of the biosphere.
Unit of Biosystem Physics 1. O BJECTIVES To analyze impacts of grazing on carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) fluxes (F) exchanged by a meadow. 2. E XPERIMENTAL SITE.
An empirical model of stand GPP with LUE approach: analysis of eddy covariance data at several contrasting sites A. Mäkelä 1, M. Pulkkinen 1, P. Kolari.
Old & NotSoOld Examining Changes in Forest Ecosystem Carbon Exchange with Stand Age in the Upper Midwest US Ankur Desai, Ken Davis, Weiguo Wang Department.
The role of the Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study in the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan Ken Davis The Pennsylvania State University The 13 th ChEAS.
Multi-tower Synthesis Scaling of Regional Carbon Dioxide Flux Another fine mess of observed data, remote sensing and ecosystem model parameterization Ankur.
Enhanced Ecosystem Productivity in Cloudy or Aerosol-laden Conditions Xin Xi April 1, 2008.
Integrating Remote Sensing, Flux Measurements and Ecosystem Models Faith Ann Heinsch Numerical Terradynamic Simulation Group (NTSG) University of Montana.
A detailed look at the MOD16 ET algorithm Natalie Schultz Heat budget group meeting 7/11/13.
Three-dimensional flows and NEE: Results from the Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (ChEAS) Ken Davis, Weiguo Wang, Chuixiang Yi and others, The Pennsylvania.
1 Welcome to the Gap Filling Comparison Workshop September 18-20, 2006 Antje Moffat.
How Do Forests, Agriculture and Residential Neighborhoods Interact with Climate? Andrew Ouimette, Lucie Lepine, Mary Martin, Scott Ollinger Earth Systems.
Characterizing observational and model uncertainty Kusum Naithani Department of Geography The Pennsylvania State University ChEAS 2012 Workshop.
17 May 2007RSS Kent Local Group1 Quantifying uncertainty in the UK carbon flux Tony O’Hagan CTCD, Sheffield.
You have NEE Now what? Ankur Desai, U Wisconsin-Madison.
A FIRST LOOK AT THE MODIS 8-DAY PSN DATA FOR 2001 MODIS Science Team Mtg 19 December 2001 Steven W. Running NTSG, Univ. of Montana.
Spatial Model-Data Comparison Project Conclusions Forward models are very different and do not agree on timing or spatial distribution of C sources/sinks.
Satellite data, ecosystem models and site data: contributions of the IGBP flux network to carbon cycle science David Schimel, Galina Churkina, Eva Falge,
Impacts of leaf phenology and water table on interannual variability of carbon fluxes in subboreal uplands and wetlands Implications for regional fluxes.
ChEAS workshop. August, 2002 Department of Meteorology, Penn State University Eddy-covariance flux measurements: Outline for the day Morning ChEAS sites.
Interannual Variability in the ChEAS Mesonet ChEAS XI, 12 August 2008 UNDERC-East, Land O Lakes, WI Ankur Desai Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences, University.
Variations in Continental Terrestrial Primary Production, Evapotranspiration and Disturbance Faith Ann Heinsch, Maosheng Zhao, Qiaozhen Mu, David Mildrexler,
ChEAS meeting. June, 2003Department of Meteorology, Penn State University Introduction Welcome, logistics. A brief history of the ChEAS. Scope of the ChEAS.
How Do Forests, Agriculture and Residential Neighborhoods Interact with Climate? Andrew Ouimette, Lucie Lepine, Mary Martin, Scott Ollinger Earth Systems.
Landscape-level (Eddy Covariance) Measurement of CO 2 and Other Fluxes Measuring Components of Solar Radiation Close-up of Eddy Covariance Flux Sensors.
Biases in land surface models Yingping Wang CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research.
Recursive Calibration of Ecosystem Models Using Sequential Data Assimilation Mingshi Chen¹, Shuguang Liu¹, Larry L. Tieszen², and David Y. Hollinger 3.
Spatial Processes and Land-atmosphere Flux Constraining ecosystem models with regional flux tower data assimilation Flux Measurements and Advanced Modeling,
Model-Data Synthesis of CO 2 Fluxes at Niwot Ridge, Colorado Bill Sacks, Dave Schimel NCAR Climate & Global Dynamics Division Russ Monson CU Boulder Rob.
Edinburgh, June 2008Markus Reichstein Critical issues when using flux data for reducing Land Surfcace Model uncertainties – towards full uncertainty accounting?
Chronosequence of soil respiration in ChEAS sites (sub-topic of spatial upscaling of carbon measurement) Jim Tang Department of Forest Resources University.
Uncertainty in eddy covariance data and its relevance to gap filling David HollingerAndrew Richardson USDA Forest ServiceUniversity of New Hampshire Durham,
A challenge to the flux-tower upscaling hypothesis? A multi-tower comparison from the Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study K.J. Davis 1, D.R. Ricciuto.
Using AmeriFlux Observations in the NACP Site-level Interim Synthesis Kevin Schaefer NACP Site Synthesis Team Flux Tower PIs Modeling Teams.
Merging CO 2 flux and mixing ratio observations at synoptic, seasonal and interannual scales Kenneth J. Davis, Chuixiang Yi, Martha P. Butler, Michael.
Success and Failure of Implementing Data-driven Upscaling Using Flux Networks and Remote Sensing Jingfeng Xiao Complex Systems Research Center, University.
Gap Filling Comparison Workshop, September 18-20, 2006, Jena, Germany Corinna Rebmann Olaf Kolle Max-Planck-Institute for Biogeochemistry Jena, Germany.
Influence of Land Cover Heterogeneity, Land-Use Change and Management on the Regional Carbon Cycle in the Upper Midwest USA Ankur R Desai, Kenneth J Davis:
Spatial Coherence of NEE Response of Different Ecosystems to the Same Climate Anomaly Martha Butler 1, Ken Davis 1, Peter Bakwin 2, David Hollinger 3,
It's been ten years, where's my flux capacitor? Past and future for the flux tower mesonet Ankur Desai Associate Professor Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences.
Results from the Reflex experiment Mathew Williams, Andrew Fox and the Reflex team.
Validation of ASTER and MODIS surface temperature and vegetation products with surface flux applications Principle Investigators Tom Gower, Univ. of Wisconsin.
Marc Kennedy, Tony O’Hagan, Clive Anderson,
Figure 10. Improvement in landscape resolution that the new 250-meter MODIS (Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer) measurement of gross primary.
Comparison of GPP from Terra-MODIS and AmeriFlux Network Towers
Old and Not-So-Old Research Progress/Plans for Ankur Desai Penn State University, Department of Meteorology Cheas 2003 Meeting, Woodruff, WI, 29 June –
MODIS Validation and Real-Time Modeling
Lake Superior Region Carbon Cycle
Atmospheric Tracers and the Great Lakes
Jianmin Zhang1, Timothy J. Griffis1 and John M. Baker2
Coherence of parameters governing NEE variability in eastern U. S
Spatial Processes and Land-atmosphere Flux
Regional Carbon Fluxes in WI:
Presentation transcript:

Towards a robust, generalizable non-linear regression gap filling algorithm (NLR_EM) Ankur R Desai – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Boulder, Colorado, USA University of Wisconsin, Atmospheric & Oceanic Sciences, Madison, Wisconsin, USA Pennsylvania State University, Meteorology, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA Bruce D Cook – University of Minnesota, Forest Resources St. Paul, Minnesota, USA Kenneth J Davis – Pennsylvania State University, Meteorology University Park, Pennsylvania, USA Gap Filling Workshop 18 Sept 2006 Max-Planck BGC, Jena, Germany

Goals Simple, fast, general GPP/RE and gap-filling estimation for eddy flux NEE Simple, fast, general GPP/RE and gap-filling estimation for eddy flux NEE Theoretically meaningful parameters Theoretically meaningful parameters Statistically valid regression Statistically valid regression Flexible moving window regression Flexible moving window regression Temperature / PAR forcing only Temperature / PAR forcing only Used at ChEAS Ameriflux sites Used at ChEAS Ameriflux sites Code written in IDL, available to all Code written in IDL, available to all

Primary references Desai, A. R., P. Bolstad, B. D. Cook, K. J. Davis, and E. V. Carey, 2005: Comparing net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide between an old-growth and mature forest in the upper Midwest, USA. Agric.For.Meteorol., 128, (doi: /j.agrformet ). Desai, A. R., P. Bolstad, B. D. Cook, K. J. Davis, and E. V. Carey, 2005: Comparing net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide between an old-growth and mature forest in the upper Midwest, USA. Agric.For.Meteorol., 128, (doi: /j.agrformet ). Cook, B. D., K. J. Davis, W. Wang, A. R. Desai, B. W. Berger, R. M. Teclaw, J. M. Martin, P. Bolstad, P. Bakwin, C. Yi, and W. Heilman, 2004: Carbon exchange and venting anomalies in an upland deciduous forest in northern Wisconsin, USA. Agric.For.Meteorol., 126, (doi: /j.agrformet ). Cook, B. D., K. J. Davis, W. Wang, A. R. Desai, B. W. Berger, R. M. Teclaw, J. M. Martin, P. Bolstad, P. Bakwin, C. Yi, and W. Heilman, 2004: Carbon exchange and venting anomalies in an upland deciduous forest in northern Wisconsin, USA. Agric.For.Meteorol., 126, (doi: /j.agrformet ). Eyring, H., 1935: The activated complex in chemical reactions. J.Chem.Phys., 3, Eyring, H., 1935: The activated complex in chemical reactions. J.Chem.Phys., 3,

Sites that use NLR_EM Sites that use it: Sylvania Old-growth, Lost Creek wetland, WLEF 447-m tall tower (3 levels), Willow Creek upland. Others only site-to-site comp. Sites that use it: Sylvania Old-growth, Lost Creek wetland, WLEF 447-m tall tower (3 levels), Willow Creek upland. Others only site-to-site comp.

Algorithm highlights 1 parameter set per day for ER and GPP 1 parameter set per day for ER and GPP day moving window: size increases until 200 good half-hourly points – all user definable day moving window: size increases until 200 good half-hourly points – all user definable One-tailed t-test for parameter fit One-tailed t-test for parameter fit if confidence < 0.90, replace ER/GPP with daily mean ER/GPP over window if confidence < 0.90, replace ER/GPP with daily mean ER/GPP over window mostly occurs in winter mostly occurs in winter Monte-Carlo random gap generator to compute sensitivity of filling to gaps - reported for sites Monte-Carlo random gap generator to compute sensitivity of filling to gaps - reported for sites

Respiration Use nighttime u*-screened NEE and 5 cm soil temperature (can use air temp instead) Use nighttime u*-screened NEE and 5 cm soil temperature (can use air temp instead) Regress against Eyring equation: Regress against Eyring equation: similar to Arrhenius but more accurate description of reaction activation energies by including entropy similar to Arrhenius but more accurate description of reaction activation energies by including entropy For regression, total carbon content not needed For regression, total carbon content not needed

Respiration Gibbs free energy: Gibbs free energy: Regress with linear form of equation: Regress with linear form of equation:

Example of ΔG++ From Cook et al (2004) From Cook et al (2004)

GPP Simple 2 or 3 parameter equation: Simple 2 or 3 parameter equation: Can relate b1/b2 to Amax and quantum yield Can relate b1/b2 to Amax and quantum yield b3 can be included as an intercept b3 can be included as an intercept T-test failure replaces b1 with mean GPP T-test failure replaces b1 with mean GPP Levenberg-Marquardt non-linear regression Levenberg-Marquardt non-linear regression

Example of b1/b2 From Cook et al (2004) From Cook et al (2004)

Error estimation Simple Monte Carlo estimate of error induced by gap-filling Simple Monte Carlo estimate of error induced by gap-filling 100 sets of random artificial gaps of lengths 30 minutes – 5 days 100 sets of random artificial gaps of lengths 30 minutes – 5 days Error reported as standard deviation and range of NEE across 100 sets (e.g., Desai et al., 2005; Desai et al., in press, Ag. For Met.) Error reported as standard deviation and range of NEE across 100 sets (e.g., Desai et al., 2005; Desai et al., in press, Ag. For Met.)

Other notes Can use filled or non-filled met data Can use filled or non-filled met data ChEAS filled met relies on cluster of met sites ChEAS filled met relies on cluster of met sites Without filled met data, mean diurnal values and interpolation used to fill either met or flux Without filled met data, mean diurnal values and interpolation used to fill either met or flux Can use other ER/GPP equations Can use other ER/GPP equations Day/night determined by sunrise/set at lat/lon and by a low PAR criterion Day/night determined by sunrise/set at lat/lon and by a low PAR criterion Algorithm has been used across Ameriflux in a Modis GPP – flux tower evaluation project Algorithm has been used across Ameriflux in a Modis GPP – flux tower evaluation project Filling NEE = ER - GPP Filling NEE = ER - GPP

Next steps Harder to use well in non-temperate sites Harder to use well in non-temperate sites Exploration of phenologically controlled windows Exploration of phenologically controlled windows Not good for moisture-limited sites Not good for moisture-limited sites Cross-site Gibbs free energy comparisons require total carbon content, but has promising use for examining ER parameter spatial var. Cross-site Gibbs free energy comparisons require total carbon content, but has promising use for examining ER parameter spatial var. Interested in understanding model bias in gap filling and exploring energy activation across sites used in this study Interested in understanding model bias in gap filling and exploring energy activation across sites used in this study

Advertisement GPP/ER intercomparison GPP/ER intercomparison Tuesday, 13:00 Tuesday, 13:00 Most gap-filling methods can produce GPP/ER Most gap-filling methods can produce GPP/ER How variable are they? How variable are they? Across methods / sites Across methods / sites Due to gaps in NEE Due to gaps in NEE Can we infer ecosystem parameters? Can we infer ecosystem parameters? I have most of these data, but not all I have most of these data, but not all Send them in to me Send them in to me or else or else