Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order to higher- order, and interactive effects (Silvia et al., 2009) November 24,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Uwe Wolfradt and Jean E. Pretz, European Journal of Personality (2001)
Advertisements

Altruism as a Characteristic of Individuals Who Intend to Adopt Heather Buford Hanover College.
Conceptual Issues Personality Stability Personality Change Personality Coherence.
Self-Discrepancies on the Big Five Personality Factors METHOD “In each kind of self, material, social, and spiritual, men distinguish between the immediate.
11-3 Maudsley Personality Inventory Questions 1-6 measure Neuroticism (emotional stability/instability) – Answering “Yes” to most indicates more emotionally.
Margarida Pedroso de Lima Isabel Albuquerque Marcela matos FPCE, University of Coimbra, Portugal ATEE – 30 August, Budapest,
Personality and Life Satisfaction: A Facet-Level Analysis Ulrich Schimmack Shigehiro Oishi R. Michael Furr David C. Funder.
1]Knoll, N., Burkert, S., & Schwartzer, R. (2006). Reciprocal support provision: Personality as a moderator? European Journal of Personality, 20,
Refining the Relationship Between Personality and Subjective Well-Being Steel, P., Schmidt, J., & Shultz, J. (2008)
Michael Draper Annamarie Elmer Hanover College
Physical Activity and the Self EPHE 348. Structure of the Self Self is a complex multidimensional issue We are both descriptive and evaluative.
Introduction Method  Evaluation of ability to provide social support yielded scores with good internal consistency reliability.  There was moderate agreement.
Subjective QOL of people with Arthritis RoseAnne Misajon Robert A. Cummins.
Correlation Research Examines relationships between two or more variables.
EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE (EI) Presented by Derrick Lottes.
CHAPTER 12 Leadership Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology by Ronald E. Riggio.
Evaluation After presenting the results, I asked students to rate the classroom activity according to whether it (1) was enjoyable to them, (2) was helpful.
Negative Urgency, Distress Tolerance and Problematic Alcohol Use Abstract Purpose: This study aimed to explore the relations among Negative Urgency, Distress.
Human Resources Training and Individual Development Personality Theories and Assessment March 3, 2004.
BACKGROUND Evolutionary Personality Psychology is the study of individual differences in evolved systems for social behavior. The most familiar and best.
Environmentalism and Personality Simon Cohen Jeff Edgar Chris Latham-Warde Sanni Kujala.
By: Robert Ashton and Michael Roberts Presenter: Sara Aliabadi September, 25.
From personality to politics. Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt, Brian A. Nosek (2009)
Trait Resilience and Distress Among Family Caregivers of Children with Severe Disabilities Receiving Pulmonary Services Courtney Francis 1, Ryan T. Blucker.
FACETS Can Understanding Facets of Personality lead to a Better Understanding of Behaviour.
Self Competence and Depressive Symptoms in Ethnic Minority Students: The Role of Ethnic Identity and School Belonging Praveena Gummadam and Laura D. Pittman.
Theories of Personality Eysenck’s Biologically Based Factor Theory
The Evolution of Personality Victoria Thomas Psyc 3906.
The Effect of Social Comparison & Personality Grace White, B.S. & Jerry Suls, Ph. D.
Personality Trait Change in Adulthood Brent W. Roberts Daniel Mroczek.
The Trait Perspective. Trait A characteristic of behavior or a disposition to feel and act as assessed by self-reported inventories or peer reports.
Gender differences in symptom reporting: the influence of psychological traits. Laura Goodwin Dr Stephen Fairclough Liverpool John Moores University BACKGROUND.
Theories of Personality Eysenck, McCrae and Costa
INTRODUCTION HYPOTHESES MEASURES RESULTS Correspondence to: at the 27 th Association for Psychological Science Conference,
Copyright ©2006 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved Personality.
Approaches to Learning and the Acquisition of General Knowledge By Adrian Furnham, Andrew Christopher, Jeanette Garwood, and G. Neil Martin Personality.
The Motive Perspective
Reporter-Adviser: Supporter, helper, tolerant; A collector of information; Dislikes being rushed; Knowledgeable; Flexible Creator-Innovator : Imaginative;
Presented at the 16 th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology Long Beach, CA February, 2015 Background Personality, time-of-day.
Leadership and Personality Chris Moran and Maurice Joseph.
Personality notes 15-5 Objectives (14-19). A.) The Trait Perspective 1.) An individual’s unique constellation of durable dispositions and consistent ways.
Camila Alaasam, Kelsey Wilson, Caitlin Grinsell, & Dr. Laurie Hunter Department of Psychology Importance of the Research and Research Question Methodology.
Latent Curve Modeling to Understand Achievement Emotions Gavin Brown Quant-DARE Methods Showcase Feb 22, 2016.
Introduction Results: Mediational Analyses Results: Zero-Order Correlations Method Presented at the 15 th Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality.
Romantic Partners Promotion of Autonomy and Relatedness in Adolescence as a Predictor of Young Adult Emotion Regulation. Elenda T. Hessel, Emily L. Loeb,
Measures Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: Prostate (FACT-P). The FACT-P (Cella et al., 1993; Esper et al., 1997) is a widely-used self-report measure(e.g.,
Department of Psychology, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
1University of Oklahoma 2Shaker Consulting
Mindfulness and Creativity
Theoretical Background
University of Mount Union
Personality notes 15-5 Objectives (14-19)
Midwest Nice, Southern Hospitality, and Coastal Cool
Religious, Cognitive, & Personality Predictors of Intelligence
Reliability & Validity
Trait Perspective Unit 1 - Personality.
Beliefs In Free Will/Determinism and Creativity
A Preliminary Study of Music Experience, Creativity and Personality
Adolescent Personality Development
My, But We are Impressive
ABSTRACT PROCEDURE CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES
Rachel L. Turner, Cara C. Campos, Douglas E. Colman, Tera D. Letzring
Measuring Athlete Coachability
Personality What Makes you “YOU”?.
CHAPTER 13 Leadership Introduction to Industrial/Organizational Psychology by Ronald E. Riggio.
Personality An individual’s characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling, and acting.
Kristin E. Gross & David E. Szwedo James Madison University
Personality Dispositions Over Time: Stability, Change, and Coherence
Personality and interpersonal communication
Personality An individual’s characteristic pattern of thinking, feeling, and acting.
Presentation transcript:

Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: exploring lower-order to higher- order, and interactive effects (Silvia et al., 2009) November 24, 2009

Personality and Creativity ‘What are creative people like?’ Big Five Factors ▫Openness is the best predictor  Other factors often show negative (e.g. Conscientiousness) or positive (e.g. extraversion) correlations (not consistently enough)

The Huge Two (Silvia et al., 2008) Plasticity: Openness to experience + Extraversion ▫tendency to ‘explore and engage flexibly with novelty, in both behaviour and cognition’ (DeYoung, 2006, p.1138) Stability: Conscientiousness + agreeableness + emotional stability ▫tendency to ‘maintain a stability and avoid disruption in emotional, social and motivational domains’ (p.1138)

Huge Two Predictions Concerned with impulsivity, behavioural variability and control ▫High stability:  lower in externalising behaviours (DeYoung, Peterson, Séguin & Tremblay, 2008)  higher in conformity (DeYoung, Peterson, and Higgins, 2002)  higher in morningness (DeYoung, Hasher, Djikic, Criger & Peterson, 2007)  lower in divergent thinking (Silvia et al., 2008).

▫High plasticity:  higher externalising behaviour (DeYoung et al. 2008)  lower in conformity (DeYoung et al., 2002)  lower in morningness (DeYoung et al., 2007)  higher in divergent thinking (Silvia et al., 2008).

The Huge Two and Creativity Feist (1998) meta-analysis: ▫Creative people have high levels of plasticity traits and low levels of stability traits ▫Different combinations of plasticity and stability levels? Lack of study on interaction of latent predictors ▫Difficult to measure ▫LMS (Latent Moderated Structural) equation has fared well in simulation

Participants 189 General Psychology Students ▫University of North Carolina ▫(150 women, 39 men) Predominantly Caucasian and African-American

Procedure Participant groups of 2-10 Three divergent thinking tasks Questionnaire assessing demographics and individual differences ▫Everyday creative activities ▫Creative Achievement ▫Creative Self-Reports

Scales to measure the Big Five Four Scales ▫60-item Five Factor Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1992) ▫50-item scale from International Personality Item Pool ▫Two 10-item scales (Gosling, Rentfrow & Swann, 2003; Rammstedt & John, 2007) ▫Response in 1-5 format

Divergent Thinking Create uses for a ‘brick’, ‘knife’, and ‘box’ ▫circle the two most creative Scores ▫ fluency (the number of responses) ▫creativity (the quality of responses)  as scored by four raters independently scoring each response on a scale of 1-5)

Everyday Creativity 28-item Creative Behaviour Inventory (CBI; Dollinger, 2007) “How often do you…” ▫ write a short story, ▫design and make a costume “Never did this”, “Did this once or twice”, “3-5 times”, “more than five times” Course or academic requirements did not count

Creative Achievement Creative Achievement Questionnaire (CAQ) 10-domain self-report scale (Carson et al., 2005)

Creative Self-Reports 9-item Creativity Scale for Different Domains 9CSDD; Kaufman & Baer, 2004) ▫“How creative are you?” ▫“How creative in the area of interpersonal communication?” Responses on a 1-5 scale Three domains: math-science factor, empathy- interpersonal factor, hands-on creativity factor ▫Plus a global self-concept question e.g. ‘how creative would you say you are in general?’ ▫Analysed as a multivariate model with four outcomes

Results – Model Specification The two components of divergent thinking were modeled using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), with three indicators each. The Big Five and Huge Two were also modeled with CFA. Model fit was fairly weak due to a cross-loading of extraversion with agreeableness.

Overall Results (No interaction effect of Stability with Plasticity was found)

Discussion Openness is the only factor of the Big Five to have a strong effect on creativity. Stability and Plasticity influence creativity, but they do not interact in doing so. Going below the factor level is necessary for future research.