Original Terms New Terms Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge Creating Evaluating Analyzing Applying Understanding Remembering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bloom's Taxonomy.
Advertisements

Bloom’s Questioning Stems Remembering Level (low)
Bloom's Taxonomy of Cognitive Development
SAIRA FARHAN (D.A.P.S O & A levels sea view). Key Objectives of Intel workshop.
Creating: can the student create new product or point of view?
BLOOMS TAXONOMY in the Classroom 10/1/11. What is Blooms Taxonomy? What is the revised Blooms Taxonomy? A look at the six Blooms Levels What level are.
Review 3 Documents In groups of 2-3, highlight things students must know and be able to do in the 21 st Century Select a speaker to share your items with.
Bloom's Revised Taxonomy Denise Tarlinton July 14, 2003.
Adapted by Susan Muir Created by:DeniseTarlinton.
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Levels of Thinking. What is Bloom’s Taxonomy?  A model for examining the different levels of educational activities students are asked.
Understanding Bloom’s Taxonomy
Presented by Dr. T. Kirshtein Today’s Objectives Review the Revised Bloom’s Matrix. Classify selected state standards according to the Revised Bloom’s.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Knowledge Comprehension Application Analysis
Educational Objectives Dr. Shama Mashhood Karachi Medical And Dental College.
Sample Questions Task-Based Activities Define each level shallow processing, simply recalling Demonstrate understanding Knowing when and why to apply.
COMMON ESSAY STYLE QUESTIONS Give a Quotation – Discuss Make an Assertion – Discuss Compare and Contrast Outline… Describe … Explain (with examples) …
Increasing Critical Thinking POWER VERBS with. Remembering Level.
Student Learning Outcomes
Writing Objectives Including Bloom’s Taxanomy. Three Primary Components of an Objective Condition –What they’re given Behavior –What they do Criteria.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
The City School O Levels Economics INSET 2010 The best teachers are those who equip students to THINK for themselves.
Bloom’s Taxonomy And we don’t mean Evan Bloom!. Have you ever wondered… How do we really learn information? What is the goal of learning? What do our.
Wilkes County Schools Tracee McManus & Nikki Patrick.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Revised Version. Bloom’s Taxonomy of Instructional Activities ( REVISED VERSION – PAGE 52) Create Evaluate Analyze Apply Understand Remember.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Blooms Taxonomy Margaret Gessler Werts Department of Language, Reading, and Exceptionalities.
A Decision-Making Tool.  Goal  Educational Objectives  Student Learning Outcomes  Performance Indicators or Criteria  Learning Activities or Strategies.
Does this learning goal focus on what the student will do? Objective: Conservation of energy A.Yes B.No C.Depends on context.
Assessment. Levels of Learning Bloom Argue Anderson and Krathwohl (2001)
BLOOM’S TAXONOMY Mrs. Eagen A, A. Bloom identified six levels within the cognitive domain, from the simple recall or recognition of facts,
1xx K K K Program Level Student Learning Outcomes K= Knowledge/Comprehension; A= Application / Analysis; S= Synthesis /Evaluation 1xx S K.
COMPREHENSION ANALYSIS EVALUATION APPLICATION SYNTHESIS KNOWLEDGE
Level 1 Tell List Describe Locate Write State Name What happened after? How many? Who was it that...? Describe what happened at...? Who spoke to...? Can.
If you want better answers, ask better questions.
Unit 5 Seminar D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
Teaching and Thinking According to Blooms Taxonomy human thinking can be broken down into six categories.
D ESCRIBING Y OUR L EARNING Unit 5 Seminar. Agenda Unit Objectives Bloom’s Taxonomy Learning Statements Questions.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Dr. Middlebrooks. Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Bloom’s Taxonomy OriginalRevised. Remembering The learner is able to recall, restate and remember learned information. –Recognizing –Listing –Describing.
Critical Thinking The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be ignited. (Plutarch)
Presented by Ms. Vayas At Bancroft MS March 25, 2008.
Educational Technology Mr. Galusha. What do you teach? “Churchill” and Module 2 Agenda Activators: ‘Disneyland’ Discussion: Changing Paradigms and 21.
A blueprint for learning derived from desired results A course to be run given the end point Planned activities, experiences, assignments for a specific.
Bloom’s Taxonomy Higher Order Skills Bloom's Original Taxonomy Anderson's Revised Taxonomy KnowledgeRemembering ComprehensionUnderstanding ApplicationApplying.
Workshop 2014 Cam Xuyen, October 14, 2014 Testing/ assessment/ evaluation BLOOM’S TAXONOMY.
The mind is not a vessel to be filled, but a fire to be ignited. welcome To Every body.
Knowledge ArrangeDefine Duplicate LabelList Memorize Name Order Recognize Relate Recall Repeat DescribeQuote.
Assessment.
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Presented by Kushal Roy, Asst Prof. ECE Dept HIT
Behavioral Objectives
Using Bloom’s Taxonomy
Assessment.
85. BLOOM’S TAXONOMY “Bloom’s Taxonomy is a guide to educational learning objectives. It is the primary focus of most traditional education.”
Teacher’s Name Date of Lesson Title of Lesson
Teacher’s Name Date of Lesson Title of Lesson
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان
مركز تطوير التدريس والتدريب الجامعي ورقة بعنوان إعداد
Teacher’s Name Date of Lesson Title of Lesson
H.O.T. Questions High Order Thinking Questions
Teacher’s Name Date of Lesson Title of Lesson
Knowledge Arrange Define Duplicate Label List
Assessments for “Remembering” Outcomes
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Teacher’s Name Date of Lesson Title of Lesson
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Teacher’s Name Date of Lesson Title of Lesson
Bloom’s Taxonomy.
Presentation transcript:

Original Terms New Terms Evaluation Synthesis Analysis Application Comprehension Knowledge Creating Evaluating Analyzing Applying Understanding Remembering (Based on Pohl, 2000, Learning to Think, Thinking to Learn, p. 8)

Changes in Terminology As depicted in the previous table, the names of six major categories were changed from noun to verb forms. The reasoning behind this is that the taxonomy reflects different forms of thinking and thinking is an active process. Verbs describe actions, not nouns, hence the change. The subcategories of the six major categories were also replaced by verbs and some subcategories were reorganized. Comprehension and synthesis were retitled to understanding and creating respectively, in order to better reflect the nature of the thinking defined in each category.

Remembering The learner is able to recall, restate and remember learned information. –Recognizing –Listing –Describing –Identifying –Retrieving –Naming –Locating –Finding Can you recall information?

Remembering cont’ List Memorize Relate Show Locate Distinguish Give example Reproduce Quote Repeat Label Recall Know Group Read Write Listen Group Choose Recite Review Record Match Select Underline Cite Sort Outline Recall or recognition of specific information Label List Workbook Reproduction Vocabulary Products include : Quiz Definition Fact Worksheet Test

“Remembering” stems What happened after...? How many...? What is...? Who was it that...? Name... Find the definition of… Describe what happened after… Who spoke to...? Which is true or false...? (Pohl, 2000)

Understanding The learner grasps the meaning of information by interpreting and translating what has been learned. –Interpreting –Exemplifying –Summarizing –Inferring –Paraphrasing –Classifying –Comparing –Explaining Can you explain ideas or concepts?

Understanding cont’ Restate Identify Discuss Retell Research Annotate Translate Give examples of Paraphrase Reorganize Associate Describe Report Recognize Review Observe Outline Account for Interpret Give main idea Estimate Define Understanding of given information Products include : Recitation Summary Collection Explanation Show and tell Example Quiz List Label Outline

“Understanding” stems Explain why… Write in your own words… How would you explain…? Write a brief outline... What do you think could have happened next...? Who do you think...? What was the main idea...? Clarify… Illustrate… (Pohl, 2000)

Applying The learner makes use of information in a context different from the one in which it was learned. –Implementing –Carrying out –Using –Executing Can you use the information in another familiar situation?

Applying cont’ Translate Manipulate Exhibit Illustrate Calculate Interpret Make Practice Apply Operate Interview Paint Change Compute Sequence Show Solve Collect Demonstrate Dramatise Construct Use Adapt Draw Using strategies, concepts, principles and theories in new situations Products include : Photograph Illustration Simulation Sculpture Demonstration Presentation Interview Performance Diary Journal

“Applying” stems Explain another instance where… Group by characteristics such as… Which factors would you change if…? What questions would you ask of…? From the information given, develop a set of instructions about… (Pohl, 2000)

Analyzing The learner breaks learned information into its parts to best understand that information. –Comparing –Organizing –Deconstructing –Attributing –Outlining –Finding –Structuring –Integrating Can you break information into parts to explore understandings and relationships?

Analyzing cont’ Distinguish Question Appraise Experiment Inspect Examine Probe Separate Inquire Arrange Investigate Sift Research Calculate Criticize Compare Contrast Survey Detect Group Order Sequence Test Debate Analyze Diagram Relate Dissect Categorize Discriminate Breaking information down into its component elements Products include : Graph Spreadsheet Checklist Chart Outline Survey Database Mobile Abstract Report

“Analyzing” stems Which events could not have happened? If...happened, what might the ending have been? How is...similar to...? What do you see as other possible outcomes? Why did...changes occur? Explain what must have happened when... What are some or the problems of...? Distinguish between... What were some of the motives behind..? What was the turning point? What was the problem with...? (Pohl, 2000)

Evaluating The learner makes decisions based on in-depth reflection, criticism and assessment. –Checking –Hypothesizing –Critiquing –Experimenting –Judging –Testing –Detecting –Monitoring Can you justify a decision or course of action?

Evaluating cont’ Judge Rate Validate Predict Assess Score Revise Infer Determine Tell why Compare Evaluate Defend Select Measure Choose Conclude Deduce Debate Justify Recommend Discriminate Appraise Value Probe Argue Decide Criticise Rank Reject Judging the value of ideas, materials and methods by developing and applying standards and criteria. Products include : Debate Panel Report Evaluation Investigation Verdict Conclusion Persuasive speech

“Evaluating” stems Judge the value of... What do you think about...? Defend your position about... Do you think...is a good or bad thing? How would you have handled...? What changes to… would you recommend? Do you believe...? How would you feel if...? How effective are...? What are the consequences...? What influence will....have on our lives? What are the pros and cons of....? Why is....of value? What are the alternatives? Who will gain & who will loose? (Pohl, 2000)

Creating The learner creates new ideas and information using what has been previously learned. –Designing –Constructing –Planning –Producing –Inventing –Devising –Making Can you generate new products, ideas, or ways of viewing things?

Creating cont’ Compose Assemble Organise Invent Compile Forecast Devise Propose Construct Plan Prepare Develop Originate Imagine Generate Formulate Improve Act Predict Produce Blend Set up Devise Concoct Compile Putting together ideas or elements to develop a original idea or engage in creative thinking. Products include : Film Story Project Plan New game Song Newspaper Media product Advertisement Painting

“Creating” stems Design a...to... Devise a possible solution to... If you had access to all resources, how would you deal with...? Devise your own way to... What would happen if...? How many ways can you...? Create new and unusual uses for... Develop a proposal which would... (Pohl, 2000)

CREATE PRODUCE MAKE CONNECTIONS GENERALIZE INFER QUESTI ON

Each student clearly understands exactly what it takes to earn an A or a B. Teachers’ questions align to the complexity of learning expected by the standards. Assignments are sequenced so that students turn in drafts of work as part of the total assignment grade. All students are expected to re-do work before the final draft is completed. Providing Feedback Students are provided with extensive and specific feedback. Teachers and peers review and provide feedback on work. Parents are involved in checking and responding to student work. Working Toward Mastery for All Students Instruction is differentiated to challenge students working at all levels of cognitive demand. Adequate time and additional instruction is provided (without penalty) for students to re-do work/re- take assessments until standards are met. A system of interventions is in place that is triggered when a student falls below a C. Extra help is structured to meet specific student needs. Students receive information on when, where and how extra help can be obtained and what the student must do to get it.