Program Review Training Workshop August 2013

DUE DATES TO Karen Marler ▪ Respiratory Therapy ( ) ▪ Psychology ( ) ▪ Sociology ( ) ▪ Philosophy ( ) ▪ ESL/World Languages ( ) ▪ Communications ( ) ▪ HPF/Dance ( ) Dates indicated allow for two weeks of review with the Deans Office prior to presentation at Academic Council

New and improved template

“Paws” point Q&A

Course Reviews ▪ Begin these as soon as possible. ▪ Set your course review completion for October 1. ▪ Taxonomy Summary forms are to be used.

“Paws” point Q&A

Our Experiences with the new Program Review process… Why required? Lessons learned from those who have gone before you.

Balanced Scorecard

Study Data, pre-populated by IR/Deans Office/HR/Business Office Program Review Metrics: ▪ Course Success ▪ Awards Conferred ▪ Student Satisfaction ▪ Student Engagement ▪ Graduate Satisfaction ▪ Percent of Seats Filled ▪ HQV Instructor Participation ▪ ADO Reporting ▪ Enrollment – Billing Contact Hours ▪ Enrollment – Unduplicated Headcount ▪ BCH Taught by FT Faculty ▪ Cost per BCH ▪ Faculty with HLC Min Degree Requirement

Discover, Analyze, Act, Inspire

“Paws” point Q&A

The Process 1 Program Review Training Workshop 2 Create Discipline Team & Update Course Reviews 3 Create Discipline timeline with milestone checkpoints 4 Review/Study Balanced Scorecard and Environmental Scan Data 5 Plug-in Discipline/Program Data, Analyze, & Draft Review Sections

The Process 6 Hold Stakeholder Input Groups 7 Present Interim Program Review Report with draft of action plans for Deans review and conversation 8 Select Action Projects 9 Present Executive Summary and Action Plans to Academic Council. See samples in the toolbox on the Program Review web pagetoolboxProgram Review 10 Your Executive Summary & Actions Plans are then shared with Leadership Council.

Another View of the Academic Program Review Process…

Timelines for disciplines whose reviews are due in January and February 2013 August: P rogram/Discipline Review Training Workshop ▪ Create Discipline Team Leader and Team members ▪ Create Timeline September: Complete Course Reviews ▪ Plug in Data; Analyze Data ▪ Conduct Focus Groups (current students, graduates/employers) ▪ Hold Cross Curricular Focus Groups to assess other discipline needs/concerns October and November: ▪ Design Action Plans ▪ Share Progress Milestone checkpoints with Deans January: ▪ Finalize Review ▪ Present full Review to Executive Dean, Dean, team members and other relevant parties ▪ Checkpoints with Deans January – February: ▪ Present Executive Summary and Action Plans to Academic Council Reconvene: Sept. 27, pm JW 201 Receive Data Back, Delve into Data Analysis Oct. 25, Noon JW 201 Touching Base, Q & A

Timelines for disciplines whose reviews are due in March and April 2013 August/September:  Create Program Review Team  Design Specific Discipline timelines September/October: Complete Course Reviews/ Data Analysis October/November:  Conduct Stakeholder Focus Groups: Students, Grads, Employers, Advisory Councils  Meet with Other Disciplines for Co-Curricular needs/concerns December:  Plug in Data  Initial Meeting with Executive Deans—Questions/Concerns/ Milestone Checklist January and February:  Design Action Plans  Complete all aspects of the Program Review March and April  Finalize Review  Present full Review to Executive Dean, Dean, team members and other relevant parties  checkpoints with Deans; D  Present Executive Summary and Action Plans to Academic Council Reconvene: Sept. 27, pm JW 201 Receive Data Back, Delve into Data Analysis Nov. 15, Noon JW 201 Touching Base, Q & A

“Paws” point Q&A

Your input is invaluable! Guinea Pigs Unite! A Team Approach….

End of Year Celebration!!